Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments
148,841 - 148,860 of 200,565 Comments Last updated 10 hrs ago
Dan C

Roseville, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169914
Dec 4, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
I know what I said you fucking twit, it is you whom is having trouble with your own position. That must be why you are so angry..
"No one cares if polygamists get married dumbshit. For one their numbers are so small they're almost non-existant."
Like you say, their numbers are so small who gives a sh$$ about them.
Poor Dan, such a bigot.
I have no reason to be angry.

I'm not gay.

I instead give you facts and you in turn play games.

You're fast approaching the point of being too worthless and stupid to respond to.
Dan C

Roseville, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169915
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Our founders HATED democracy you MORON!!! That's why they created a REPUBLIC!!!!
Get a clue.
Based on the principles set forth by democratic means.

I don't think you're up to arguing the Constitution given you cannot even identify the elements of a bsaic civil right let alone know how many Amendments there are or how they were formed.
Dan C

Roseville, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169916
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Nice side-step jackass. If you don't want to discuss secession perhaps you shouldn't bring up the civil war.
By the way genius....I never brought up the Civil War.

This thread is about gays marrying MORON....LOL!!!!

You are the DUMBEST Mo-Fo yet!

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169917
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
You never mentioned 'secession'.
You advised of 'succession' dumbfuck.
Your post #169895;
"So you do not believe in the right of succession?
---Go to school, you ignorant moron before entering any more posts....really.
Because as it is you're just being stupid.
Our founders did."
If you would like me to point out all of your typo's I would be more than happy to Dan- but since your posts are so consistently full of sh$$ I figured I would focus on that.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169918
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
There are more than ten Amendments to the Constitution. And freedoms are duly argued in regards to harm they may cause.
You sir are a complete fool.
You are the fool. The first 10 Amendment are the ONLY Amendments that the "founders" drafted and Ratified as a collective.

I am sorry that you have a reading comprehension problem.

And again, where did the founders mention "harm" when they mentioned inalienable right's?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169919
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
I have no reason to be angry.
I'm not gay.
I will let people stew on that statement for a bit.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169920
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
You're fast approaching the point of being too worthless and stupid to respond to.
You reached that point years ago, yet here we are.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169921
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
Based on the principles set forth by democratic means.
I don't think you're up to arguing the Constitution given you cannot even identify the elements of a bsaic civil right let alone know how many Amendments there are or how they were formed.
So yo are still claiming what the founders gave us was a "Democracy"?

And you are the one saying I am clueless..

You are in dire need of a history lesson my friend.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169922
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
By the way genius....I never brought up the Civil War.
This thread is about gays marrying MORON....LOL!!!!
You are the DUMBEST Mo-Fo yet!
Poor Dan.

Doesn't realize that when he rants on about- Lincoln, Slavery, the southern states, and the 13th Amendment- that he is discussing the Civil War.
Dan C

Roseville, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169923
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
You are the fool. The first 10 Amendment are the ONLY Amendments that the "founders" drafted and Ratified as a collective.
I am sorry that you have a reading comprehension problem.
And again, where did the founders mention "harm" when they mentioned inalienable right's?
The point behind the Amendments dealt with the fact they were set in motion my foolish friend.

There were never intended to stop at ten and our country was intended to live past the deaths of our Founding Fathers by them.

Rights are determined in part by harm. If they are proven to cause harm then they in turn are rejected.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169924
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
Based on the principles set forth by democratic means.
I don't think you're up to arguing the Constitution given you cannot even identify the elements of a bsaic civil right let alone know how many Amendments there are or how they were formed.
Your right Dan- I cannot identify the elements of a BSAIC civil right.

Perhaps you could explain it to me?
Dan C

Roseville, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169925
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
So yo are still claiming what the founders gave us was a "Democracy"?
And you are the one saying I am clueless..
You are in dire need of a history lesson my friend.
Really.

There are many rebublic formats of government of which some are not wholly based on the democratic format.

Please...you tire me with your stupidity.
Dan C

Roseville, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169926
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Poor Dan.
Doesn't realize that when he rants on about- Lincoln, Slavery, the southern states, and the 13th Amendment- that he is discussing the Civil War.
Weak.

They also had horse carriages back then. Are we to claim I brought them up as well???

Your game playing really makes me think you haven't been able to hold a job longer than 3 months in your life. No shit.
Dan C

Roseville, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169927
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Your right Dan- I cannot identify the elements of a BSAIC civil right.
Perhaps you could explain it to me?
Already did a long time ago.

Your mind is like an open drain.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169928
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
The point behind the Amendments dealt with the fact they were set in motion my foolish friend.
The point is, you have no point.
Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
There were never intended to stop at ten and our country was intended to live past the deaths of our Founding Fathers by them.
Who said it wasn't Dan? You are the one who said you liked "Facts" the FACT is the founders as a collective only played a part in the first 10 Amendment's. Well, at least you like the facts YOU make up.
Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
Rights are determined in part by harm. If they are proven to cause harm then they in turn are rejected.
Source? Oh, that's right- DAN.

Just because you repeat something over and over doesn't make it so. The founders believed in UNALIENABLE RIGHT's- look up the meaning. No mention of harm.

Hell these days EVERYTHING can be found to cause harm- even CO2. Does that mean we no longer have the "RIGHT" to breath?
Dan C

Roseville, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169929
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
I will let people stew on that statement for a bit.
How so?

I'm the one who's not gay who is backing the idea homosexuals should marry nationwide.

You in turn have no realistic belief in the same and instead choose to muddy the waters on the debate that ensued from it.

People reading this can clearly see you're into games when it comes to debate Ace.
Ralphie

Santa Cruz, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169930
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
I have no reason to be angry.
I'm not gay.
I instead give you facts and you in turn play games.
You're fast approaching the point of being too worthless and stupid to respond to.
He tends to do that.

Must be another TeaTard.
Ralphie

Santa Cruz, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169931
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

7

6

6

Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
Already did a long time ago.
Your mind is like an open drain.
Where is WasteWater when we need him. ROTFLMAO
Dan C

Roseville, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169932
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
If you would like me to point out all of your typo's I would be more than happy to Dan- but since your posts are so consistently full of sh$$ I figured I would focus on that.
So your wording of 'succession' was actually to mean 'secede'.

Interesting.

Hardly a typo but maybe when you head to the store and ask them where the apples are and you meant oranges it was their fault for the misunderstanding as well.

You're an idiot.
Dan C

Roseville, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169933
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
You reached that point years ago, yet here we are.
Yeah I did.

You are too stupid to respond to so it's mt bad for doing so.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••

Redwood City News Video

•••
•••

Redwood City Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Redwood City People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Redwood City News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Redwood City
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••