Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,197

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story
LYIN AYN RYAN

Anderson, CA

#163028 Oct 14, 2012
Winston Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
AK, NorCal Native sums up my feelings quite nicely, but if I may elaborate.
The comparison to skin color is valid as there was a time when whites didn't want to serve along side blacks and this was SOP. It wasn't rational (sadly it is a feeling that persists in some/many individuals). Likewise there are those in the military that don't want to serve with homosexuals. These feelings are based upon irrational thoughts. One of the yammering idiots in here brings up rape. I can just see that one in an open barrack. I wouldn't think that the percentages would change in the service as compared to the general population. That means, depending upon what you believe, 2 to 10% of the military is gay. This ought to be a fairly constant rate all the way down to a single barrack. Soooo, 2% are going to launch an assault on 98% in an open barrack. I seriously have my doubts about any sort of assault going in that direction. OTOH, it isn't unreasonable to think that a gay man might get the shxt beat out of him under those same numbers.
All that said, it is a hurdle that needs jumping. Eventually we'll get there, but it'll probably involve a few bloody noses.
is rape not an issue in the miltary?? there are way more men...

not in the barracks(so much), but out on training missions??

I remember the descrpition of a girl friend who went through basic(for the navy) in about 02'......she described it as all the guys in the plattoon wanting to have sex with just 4 girls.

the girls had to work extra hard to pass basic, while fending off advances, daily, by their male comrades.

rape is indeed a big problem...

dont you remember the air force acedemy scandal??? why that was only a few years ago.

It has been over a year, since president Obama finally BOWED to political pressure and scrapped DADT.

I havent heard of any bloody noses......

have you??
i figure any real altercations would be highly publicized by right wing journals...
peace
Winston Smith

Falls Church, VA

#163029 Oct 14, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>

Your blissful and deliberate ignorance is putting the US at risk and makes you a traitor.
Christonabike! More hallucinations rising from the far right crack house. Again, there is not too far of a stretch to compare these "concerns" with the fears that existed during the birth of this nation regarding blacks in the military. Try some rationality on for a change.
LYIN AYN RYAN

Anderson, CA

#163030 Oct 14, 2012
Winston Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
You assume someone is a woman based upon a name that they adopt for a topix forum? Some folks actually put a little thought into their handles when they choose them. I'm surprised you haven't got a grasp of the guy's forum name as of yet. I'll give you a hint. Google is your friend and the search terms you want are Ayn Rand and Paul Ryan. The irony in Ryan's affections for Rand's philosophy is hilarious. He's had a turn of thought recently. I suppose it took him a while to get a grasp of Rand's religious belief.
So, instead of using your noggin in order to figure out why he'd use the name he chose you made an assumption. That's dumb.
he flipped on ayn, when his pollsters told him he had NO chance of becoming VP with that kind of baggage in tow.

rand was SUPER anti-religious??

like goldwater..

the right has its assorted odd cases.

some of them have become folk heros...

some are kinda heros to the middle left, like bill buckley....

only because bill would scoff at the current NEW, NEW, FAR, FAR right republican philosophy....
Winston Smith

Falls Church, VA

#163031 Oct 14, 2012
Olive wrote:
Has it occurred to every gay, lesbian, transsexual who advocate for same sex marriage - you wouldn't even had existed if your Dad mated with a man or your Mom mated with a woman. Until the day humans defy God by creating mankind with 2 sperms or 2 ovums, do same sex marriage and u can adopt another straight family's child, but mind you - this will be the beginning of a dwindling human count in the next thousand millennia. Our founding fathers sure didn't have this type of marriage in mind when they wrote the Constitution. Right federal judge?
Thank you for the grade school level biology review sprinkled with religious BS. I'll give you a statement of fact to chew on. A portion of the population is gay. BFD!
LYIN AYN RYAN

Anderson, CA

#163032 Oct 14, 2012
Olive wrote:
Has it occurred to every gay, lesbian, transsexual who advocate for same sex marriage - you wouldn't even had existed if your Dad mated with a man or your Mom mated with a woman. Until the day humans defy God by creating mankind with 2 sperms or 2 ovums, do same sex marriage and u can adopt another straight family's child, but mind you - this will be the beginning of a dwindling human count in the next thousand millennia. Our founding fathers sure didn't have this type of marriage in mind when they wrote the Constitution. Right federal judge?
it had occured to them....

but they found their adversion to opposite sex relationships overwhelming any need to conform to such silly norms...

we have way too many babies on the planet already....

that is why we on the left, also support birth control, and a womens right to choose.........lets take care of the rights of the living , before we start giving personhodd rights to zygots.
Winston Smith

Falls Church, VA

#163033 Oct 14, 2012
LYIN AYN RYAN wrote:
<quoted text>
is rape not an issue in the miltary?? there are way more men...
not in the barracks(so much), but out on training missions??
I remember the descrpition of a girl friend who went through basic(for the navy) in about 02'......she described it as all the guys in the plattoon wanting to have sex with just 4 girls.
the girls had to work extra hard to pass basic, while fending off advances, daily, by their male comrades.
rape is indeed a big problem...
dont you remember the air force acedemy scandal??? why that was only a few years ago.
It has been over a year, since president Obama finally BOWED to political pressure and scrapped DADT.
I havent heard of any bloody noses......
have you??
i figure any real altercations would be highly publicized by right wing journals...
peace
I am aware that rapes occur in the military. The presence of homosexuals (in the light of day) has no bearing on that. Which is my point in a round about fashion. By bloody noses I'm speaking figuratively about the reactions that will occur when you mix openly gay soldiers with homophobes. There will be unhappiness, just as there was when blacks gained access to front line roles in the military (and then lost them, regained them, lost them...).
Winston Smith

Falls Church, VA

#163034 Oct 14, 2012
LYIN AYN RYAN wrote:
<quoted text>
it had occured to them....
but they found their adversion to opposite sex relationships overwhelming any need to conform to such silly norms...
we have way too many babies on the planet already....
that is why we on the left, also support birth control, and a womens right to choose.........lets take care of the rights of the living , before we start giving personhodd rights to zygots.
I say we give personhood to gametes. And vigorously prosecute, as mass murderers, anyone that masturbates..
LYIN AYN RYAN

Anderson, CA

#163036 Oct 14, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>But you like joe Biden and Hillary Clinton, they both voted for the Iraq war. Here are some more YEA votes: Baucus (MT) Bayh (IN) Biden (DE) Breaux (LA)Cantwell (WA) Carnahan (MO) Carper (DE) Cleland (GA) Clinton (NY) Daschle (SD) Dodd (CT) Dorgan (ND) Edwards (NC) Feinstein (CA) Harkin (IA) Hollings (SC) Johnson (SD) Kerry (MA) Kohl (WI) Landrieu (LA) Lieberman (CT) Lincoln (AR) Miller (GA) Nelson (FL) Nelson (NE) Reid (NV) Rockefeller (WV) Schumer (NY) Torricelli (NJ)
Obama doesn't bother with his intelligence briefings. If he had, he might have noticed that 48 hours before the attack there were credible reports of an attack, according to news stories.
The Marines on guard were unarmed -- another Obama administration policy, so as not to offend the barbarians who want to murder as many Jews and Americans as they can.
The Libyan guards entrusted to protect our diplomats apparently were in on the plot, and ran when the shooting started.
It was also clear that the barbarians knew the location of a safe house for our diplomats.
All of it was timed for Sept. 11.
The cover story was supposed outrage over some goofy movie. That just doesn't fit the facts.
The mobs burned and looted the building, taking secret documents that may expose Libyans who have helped America, and other vital information, to our enemies.
Afterward, a confused Obama, trying to bluster his way through, said Egypt was not our ally, which his own State Department had to "clarify." They are.
This Keystone Kops performance would be funny if it were not for the lives lost.
good come back riccaro....

I like howe your learning to become a better debator by sticking with me.
I too was disgusted at how much support there was in the democratic party for the war vote. shame on them.

That is why I supported Obama over clinton in 08'

it is pathetic!! every election I voted in from 88' to 04, had either a bush or a clinton on the ticket......

that was another reason why barack edge clinton out, our party didnt want a modern dynasty....like yours had.

lets just say that didnt turn out to well for the republican party!

like where was poppy and dubya come convention time.?

it is a huge advantage that the democrats have now.....

bill clinton.

on Iraq??? it was a needless fabricated war that left 100000 dead.

I dont think al gore would have gone in....

you see where all that patriotic bluster went!!

80% of americans now want afghnaistan to end.

quick mission to kill wanted terrorists..... good!!

long protracted quagmire to get oil feilds???...... bad.

ryan chose war last week.

ill stick with the party and candidate that is willing to negociate.

with regards to war and foriegn policy??

I felt like the adults took back over on 1/20/09.

it used to be republicans would rescue democratic presidents from unwanted wars???
now it appears to be the opposite!!
the republicans started two wars that the democrats are now ending!!

good!!

it is about time!

ps: mabey you can explain further some of romneys positions on afghanistan and IRan......all Ive been hearing about is Libya??

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#163037 Oct 14, 2012
Winston Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
You assume someone is a woman based upon a name that they adopt for a topix forum? Some folks actually put a little thought into their handles when they choose them. I'm surprised you haven't got a grasp of the guy's forum name as of yet. I'll give you a hint. Google is your friend and the search terms you want are Ayn Rand and Paul Ryan. The irony in Ryan's affections for Rand's philosophy is hilarious. He's had a turn of thought recently. I suppose it took him a while to get a grasp of Rand's religious belief.
So, instead of using your noggin in order to figure out why he'd use the name he chose you made an assumption. That's dumb.
Like I said toots, silly me thought you were a girl since you gave yourself a girl's name. The rest of your nonsense is way off topic.

I see a girl's name I assume you're a girl. You see I have sympathy for Americans tortured and killed abroad you assume I'm a right winger voting for Romney/Ryan. Who is dumber?
LYIN AYN RYAN

Anderson, CA

#163039 Oct 14, 2012
Winston Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
I say we give personhood to gametes. And vigorously prosecute, as mass murderers, anyone that masturbates..
that reminds me of......monty python

every sperm is sacred!!
LYIN AYN RYAN

Anderson, CA

#163041 Oct 14, 2012
Winston Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
I am aware that rapes occur in the military. The presence of homosexuals (in the light of day) has no bearing on that. Which is my point in a round about fashion. By bloody noses I'm speaking figuratively about the reactions that will occur when you mix openly gay soldiers with homophobes. There will be unhappiness, just as there was when blacks gained access to front line roles in the military (and then lost them, regained them, lost them...).
I just have not heard of any incidents like that in 13 months??

have you?

I think the troops are doing well with it so far....

it is just like civilian life....if you dont have something nice to say??? dont say anything(not you)

you get what I mean??
LYIN AYN RYAN

Anderson, CA

#163043 Oct 14, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
Guess who ?
bigot!
LYIN AYN RYAN

Anderson, CA

#163045 Oct 14, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Like I said toots, silly me thought you were a girl since you gave yourself a girl's name. The rest of your nonsense is way off topic.
I see a girl's name I assume you're a girl. You see I have sympathy for Americans tortured and killed abroad you assume I'm a right winger voting for Romney/Ryan. Who is dumber?
dont get the posters mixed up mikey.

winston and I have differeing veiws.

I know you made a mistake right??

no one could mistake "winston" for girl.

so how about those veiws on the rest of the REAL hot spots?? like afghanistan?
let us know where you stand.....

the bengazi thing is just getting old, and it sounds alot like a pre-programmed talking point. so typically republican!!
RiccardoFire

Sacramento, CA

#163046 Oct 14, 2012
LYIN AYN RYAN wrote:
<quoted text>
good come back riccaro....
I like howe your learning to become a better debator by sticking with me.
I too was disgusted at how much support there was in the democratic party for the war vote. shame on them.
That is why I supported Obama over clinton in 08'
it is pathetic!! every election I voted in from 88' to 04, had either a bush or a clinton on the ticket......
that was another reason why barack edge clinton out, our party didnt want a modern dynasty....like yours had.
lets just say that didnt turn out to well for the republican party!
like where was poppy and dubya come convention time.?
it is a huge advantage that the democrats have now.....
bill clinton.
on Iraq??? it was a needless fabricated war that left 100000 dead.
I dont think al gore would have gone in....
you see where all that patriotic bluster went!!
80% of americans now want afghnaistan to end.
quick mission to kill wanted terrorists..... good!!
long protracted quagmire to get oil feilds???...... bad.
ryan chose war last week.
ill stick with the party and candidate that is willing to negociate.
with regards to war and foriegn policy??
I felt like the adults took back over on 1/20/09.
it used to be republicans would rescue democratic presidents from unwanted wars???
now it appears to be the opposite!!
the republicans started two wars that the democrats are now ending!!
good!!
it is about time!
ps: mabey you can explain further some of romneys positions on afghanistan and IRan......all Ive been hearing about is Libya??
But all you do is blame bush, my point was it wasn't just bush and now look at the position Hillary is in, she is a war monger. Obama's Senate voting record on Iraq is quite similar to that of Hillary Clinton. Both senators waited until May 2007 before they finally voted to cut off funds for the war, on the grounds that the administration had not agreed to a firm timetable for withdrawal. They both voted against a June 2006 amendment proposed by John Kerry (D-Mass.) for the redeployment of U.S. troops. Once the war started Obama voted to cut military.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#163048 Oct 14, 2012
LYIN AYN RYAN wrote:
<quoted text>
good come back riccaro....
I like howe your learning to become a better debator by sticking with me.
I too was disgusted at how much support there was in the democratic party for the war vote. shame on them.
That is why I supported Obama over clinton in 08'
it is pathetic!! every election I voted in from 88' to 04, had either a bush or a clinton on the ticket......
that was another reason why barack edge clinton out, our party didnt want a modern dynasty....like yours had.
lets just say that didnt turn out to well for the republican party!
like where was poppy and dubya come convention time.?
it is a huge advantage that the democrats have now.....
bill clinton.
on Iraq??? it was a needless fabricated war that left 100000 dead.
I dont think al gore would have gone in....
you see where all that patriotic bluster went!!
80% of americans now want afghnaistan to end.
quick mission to kill wanted terrorists..... good!!
long protracted quagmire to get oil feilds???...... bad.
ryan chose war last week.
ill stick with the party and candidate that is willing to negociate.
with regards to war and foriegn policy??
I felt like the adults took back over on 1/20/09.
it used to be republicans would rescue democratic presidents from unwanted wars???
now it appears to be the opposite!!
the republicans started two wars that the democrats are now ending!!
good!!
it is about time!
ps: mabey you can explain further some of romneys positions on afghanistan and IRan......all Ive been hearing about is Libya??
No one is obligated to explain Romney's positions on a thread about marriage you dopey jackass. And no one cares about your simplistic opinions. There are plenty of threads for that. Or maybe you were laughed out of them?

Learn to spell, learn grammar, punctuation and how to construct a sentence. It won't make your stupid opinions any smarter but at least your posts will be legible and coherent.
Winston Smith

Falls Church, VA

#163049 Oct 14, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Like I said toots, silly me thought you were a girl since you gave yourself a girl's name. The rest of your nonsense is way off topic.
I see a girl's name I assume you're a girl. You see I have sympathy for Americans tortured and killed abroad you assume I'm a right winger voting for Romney/Ryan. Who is dumber?
Where have I assumed anything about your political orientation or who you support? What is clear is you're not one to think things through. Otherwise you wouldn't make assumptions. The topic, or subtopic as it applied to the dialogue about another persons board name was the origination of the name. You assumed, foolishly, it was because he was a woman. If you just excercised a few brain cells and looked into it you wouldn't have looked so dumb.

Having sympathy for torture victims doesn't impart any knowledge about one's political belief (apart from that of the torturer himself).

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#163050 Oct 14, 2012
LYIN AYN RYAN wrote:
<quoted text>
dont get the posters mixed up mikey.
winston and I have differeing veiws.
I know you made a mistake right??
no one could mistake "winston" for girl.
so how about those veiws on the rest of the REAL hot spots?? like afghanistan?
let us know where you stand.....
the bengazi thing is just getting old, and it sounds alot like a pre-programmed talking point. so typically republican!!
He speaks for you, I treat him accordingly toots. You're interchangeable.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#163051 Oct 14, 2012
LYIN AYN RYAN wrote:
<quoted text>
dont get the posters mixed up mikey.
winston and I have differeing veiws.
I know you made a mistake right??
no one could mistake "winston" for girl.
so how about those veiws on the rest of the REAL hot spots?? like afghanistan?
let us know where you stand.....
the bengazi thing is just getting old, and it sounds alot like a pre-programmed talking point. so typically republican!!
Benghazi will never get old to the people who lost loved ones. Their pain will last a very long time. Maybe someday you'll understand that the hard way. Hope not for your sake. But if it happens you'll get angry when someone trivializes it just to get elected won't you?

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#163052 Oct 14, 2012
Winston Smith wrote:
<quoted text>

Having sympathy for torture victims doesn't impart any knowledge about one's political belief (apart from that of the torturer himself).
My point exactly you dope.
Winston Smith

United States

#163053 Oct 14, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
He speaks for you, I treat him accordingly toots. You're interchangeable.
You're quite funny toots. I was simply trying to show you the light by pointing out what you should have done instead of making an idiotic assumption. I don't speak for anyone but myself.

Try to get an impulse across a synapse occasionally.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Redwood City Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
My Teen Verbally Abuses Me (Feb '09) 12 hr sidbad 110
Elite prep schools seek disadvantaged kids Oct 27 Jerry Boggs 1
Almost a Decade of History That Still Thrives T... Oct 27 pattyg0266 1
La Victoria's Orange Sauce (Jan '06) Oct 26 AmandaElise 129
Worth a Look Oct 24 WE JUST DONT CARE 12
From Tower of Power - The Mic Gillette Band Oct 3 IGotSoul 1
Catalytic Converter Theft. Toyota Truck/SUV own... (May '07) Sep '14 Jesie 950

Redwood City News Video

Redwood City Dating
Find my Match

Redwood City People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Redwood City News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Redwood City

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]