Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201891 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#154961 Aug 15, 2012
Bruno wrote:
<quoted text>Why would you make such a comment?? even if you were butch you are still kind of cute from what I can tell.
thank you.

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#154962 Aug 15, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>BS

Your real hair color is blonde, isn't it?

Smile.
no but I have had blonde, pink, black, and brown hair.
Hey Koch Zucker

Pasadena, CA

#154963 Aug 15, 2012
FYI: your number is based on registrants. Mine is based on actual voters.

The resultant product of a matched voters to voters or natched registrants to registrants would be less than the 0.06 %.

MATH! It's fun!!!

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#154964 Aug 15, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>^^^Most same sex marriage supporters post profanity. That's proof of intellectual bankruptcy.

.

Hey Brian wrote, "You know damn well that state had marriage equality prior to the passage of Prop 8. Gawd! You're tedious."

No, California had an outlaw mayor in San Francisco who, unilaterally issued same sex couples marriage licenses. There was no law passed to permit same sex marriage in California. On August 12, citing the mayor's lack of authority to bypass state law, the Supreme Court of California ruled that the marriages were void.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriag...

If I'm wrong, cite the California state law that allows same sex marriage, tell us when it was passed and signed by the governor.

We can go over this again, if you like. Patience is a virtue.
the other side post profanity also ( even though I have not) but I have been called a few not nice things if you look back at some replies to me without provocation and asked very inappropriate questions.
Reality

Madison, WI

#154965 Aug 15, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I sense a measure of honesty, but still a lot of stretching. I would attribute a lot of your reasons to experimenting and discovering for yourself, and not butch lesbians. I think the closest you came to answering is "that is who they are". I agree, but it still does not explain why. Especially in relation to evolutions dictates.
How does a persons attire or mannerisms affect a marriage. If two people wear a suit at their wedding does it make it anyless valid than a person in a tux and another in a dress? I wore a Kilt and my wife wore a dress is my marriage anyless valid than yours?

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#154966 Aug 15, 2012
LeaderOfThePack2 wrote:
<quoted text>I bet you really enjoy bitch slapping, don't you? You are still pissed women won the right to vote!
sorry I accidentally replied on your thread instead of the original one that asked about the butch thing.

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#154967 Aug 15, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>So why does a butch lesbian dress and act like a man to attract another lesbian? The ones I've talked to unanimously say "thats who I am".

And how does that relate to evolution? Our sexuality is rooted in evolutionary purpose, defined over millions of years. This makes no sense on so many levels!
Ok I will answer your question differently....
Some woman like to dress comfortably and short hair is so much less of a hassle.
Some woman dress and act like men becuase they feel that is who they are... some transition and become men and some are content with just the appearance.
Some woman go for the "butch" girls for different reasons. When I was younger I dated butch girls that looked more like guys because I lived in smaller town and when she looked more boy then girl we didnt get stared at and we could be out in public in peace. But no matter how boy she looked she didnt have the extra equipment. And even though the outside appearance looked one way when we were alone at home that is all that mattered not what others saw.

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#154968 Aug 15, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>So why does a butch lesbian dress and act like a man to attract another lesbian? The ones I've talked to unanimously say "thats who I am".

And how does that relate to evolution? Our sexuality is rooted in evolutionary purpose, defined over millions of years. This makes no sense on so many levels!
Ok I will answer your question differently....
Some woman like to dress comfortably and short hair is so much less of a hassle.
Some woman dress and act like men becuase they feel that is who they are... some transition and become men and some are content with just the appearance.
Some woman go for the "butch" girls for different reasons. When I was younger I dated butch girls that looked more like guys because I lived in smaller town and when she looked more boy then girl we didnt get stared at and we could be out in public in peace. But no matter how boy she looked she didnt have the extra equipment. And even though the outside appearance looked one way when we were alone at home that is all that mattered what others saw.

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#154969 Aug 15, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>I sense a measure of honesty, but still a lot of stretching. I would attribute a lot of your reasons to experimenting and discovering for yourself, and not butch lesbians. I think the closest you came to answering is "that is who they are". I agree, but it still does not explain why. Especially in relation to evolutions dictates.
I can not answer who they are because I don't know. I love being a woman and do not want what a man has except it would be great to go to the bathroom outside anywhere.

“well, really...”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#154971 Aug 15, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Because everything I said was simply the truth, all you have is to assert lies on who I am.
Anything that can be destroyed by the truth should be.
Smile.
"The truth" in your limited World view...not the truth to many others. Asserting lies on who you are? Look buster I have no idea who you are except for what you post here. You have attacked me multiple times, my children and my love for my children (which you know nothing of). I would never attack your family or your wife - I have nothing but the utmost respect, admiration and sympathy for them. You on the other hand deserve no respect, you have done nothing to earn it. You reap what you sow!
Dude

New Castle, DE

#154972 Aug 15, 2012
Bruno wrote:
<quoted text>
SSM will only lead to a more unothodox ways of of life among a normal society. The next step to the gay lifestyles will be to teaching it in public shools.
How would you know if these things would come about? Gay marriage has been present in some states and countries already, and I haven't seen anything manifest. Also, even if these things came about, why would they be bad because they're "unorthodox"? Furthermore, why shouldn't teens know about gay people? Is it because you fear they will be taught the facts, instead of being indoctrinated to believe in lies?
Bruno

Redondo Beach, CA

#154973 Aug 15, 2012
Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
How would you know if these things would come about? Gay marriage has been present in some states and countries already, and I haven't seen anything manifest. Also, even if these things came about, why would they be bad because they're "unorthodox"? Furthermore, why shouldn't teens know about gay people? Is it because you fear they will be taught the facts, instead of being indoctrinated to believe in lies?
I understand you want to keep the cult growing by brain washing teens that are on the fence. I just don't think you should use the public school sysltem to do it.
Bruno

Redondo Beach, CA

#154974 Aug 15, 2012
Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
How would you know if these things would come about? Gay marriage has been present in some states and countries already, and I haven't seen anything manifest. Also, even if these things came about, why would they be bad because they're "unorthodox"? Furthermore, why shouldn't teens know about gay people? Is it because you fear they will be taught the facts, instead of being indoctrinated to believe in lies?
What are the facts about gay people? what lies would you be refering to????

“WAY TO GO”

Since: Mar 11

IRELAND

#154975 Aug 15, 2012
Bruno wrote:
<quoted text>what lies would you be refering to????
Gee Bruno.......so MANY lies have been posted about Gays and Lesbians it would be hard to list them all......but Prof Marvel hits on many of them every day.....just for starters!!!
Local

Hidden Valley Lake, CA

#154977 Aug 15, 2012
Hey Koch Zucker wrote:
<quoted text>
289 + 161 = 450
Divide by 2008 Hennipin voters: 722777
Equals a 0.06% problem that you're spending how-much on?
do ya want to talk about Florida Bush v Gore again?
A few votes can make a big difference, especially in local races.
Now multiply those numbers nationwide.

Now, go find your mommy.
Buzz off.

Our Country needs to have a voter photo I.D. requirement.
Dude

New Castle, DE

#154978 Aug 15, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
First, homosexuality is a public health menace which means the government should not endorse it in any way, size, shape, or form.
Saying that it is okay to deny people rights, simply because they're more susceptible to certain diseases, is probably one of the worst things you have ever typed minus all the nasty porn titles you search for. Black people are way more vulnerable to HIV than whites, so I guess Loving v Virginia was a mistake? The true danger is not homosexuality. The danger is ignorance about the dangers of unsafe sex, which is something fundamentalist Christians are responsible for spreading. We can see that in Africa. Sex education and condom use=less AIDS. Abstinence teachings and lectures about how sex is demonic= rampant infections and skyrocketing cases of AIDS. Also, lesbians have the lowest in STD rates. Women are also naturally hardier than men in the infection dept. I guess by your retarded standards, the only people fit to marry are lesbians.
Prof Marvel wrote:
Second, as we see in Massachusetts, same sex marriage promotes the normalization of homosexuality which manifests itself with transvestite school teachers and homosexuality affirming curriculum.
Homosexuality is normal, you dope. Also, there's nothing wrong with a man who dresses like a woman, because there is nothing shameful about being a woman. Gender stereotypes are retarded. We have women that dress in suits and jeans all of the time. Also, I don't have a problem with schools teaching about homosexuality. Ignorance about homosexuality is how dopes like you can manifest your deceit without being immediately shot down, so the less of that the better.
Prof Marvel wrote:
Third, it promotes NAMBLA-like initiatives like Gay-Straight Alliance Clubs in our schools.
There is no science that shows a link between homosexuality and pedophilia. Also, gays and straights getting together and in order to get rid of pre-conceived notions about each other is a great thing.
Prof Marvel wrote:
Fifth, it has a ripple-effect throughout society -- the military, Boy Scouts, etc.
As society changes, so do its institutions. Banning gays from the military was retarded, and I say that as someone who isn’t the biggest fan of our activities in the Middle East and North Africa.
Prof Marvel wrote:
Six, it promotes fascism and intolerance against those who don't endorse same sex marriage -- Chik-fil-A.
Gays have been murdered, raped, beaten, and ostracized for many years by the same kinds of people that now try to force their morals on them via adoption, housing, and marriage laws. Also, Chick-fil-A funds groups that make BS papers in order to spread an anti-gay bias. I feel that the leadership of that company should be able to express its views, and stay in business, but that doesn't mean people should be forced like what it does.
Prof Marvel wrote:
Seven, it removes the barriers in place preventing men who wear penis suits and erect penis hats from adopting kids.
The gay men that adopt children go through mountains of paperwork and rigorous amounts of background checks in order to evaluate whether or not they're fit to be parents. Many of them take these kids in without the thousands of legal benefits of marriage. All a fertile, heterosexual couple needs to do is pop a condom. Is it clear to you now why there are millions of kids in the system? Sure, let's deny the largest group of adopters from taking kids out of a sh*tty situation their heterosexual birth parents created. You see why I think you're a c*nt? Just because you look too much like a Furby to snag a man, and form a family, doesn’t give you the right to rob kids of a chance of escaping hell and being loved and valued. Hope back under your bridge, because I’m not paying the toll to cross into your dopey mindset.
Dude

New Castle, DE

#154979 Aug 15, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
First, homosexuality is a public health menace which means the government should not endorse it in any way, size, shape, or form.
Saying that it is okay to deny people rights, simply because they're more susceptible to certain diseases, is probably one of the worst things you have ever typed minus all the nasty porn titles you search for. Black people are way more vulnerable to HIV than whites, so I guess Loving v Virginia was a mistake? The true danger is not homosexuality. The danger is ignorance about the dangers of unsafe sex, which is something fundamentalist Christians are responsible for spreading. We can see that in Africa. Sex education and condom use=less AIDS. Abstinence teachings and lectures about how sex is demonic= rampant infections and skyrocketing cases of AIDS. Also, lesbians have the lowest in STD rates. Women are also naturally hardier than men in the infection dept. I guess by your retarded standards, the only people fit to marry are lesbians.
Prof Marvel wrote:
Second, as we see in Massachusetts, same sex marriage promotes the normalization of homosexuality which manifests itself with transvestite school teachers and homosexuality affirming curriculum.
Homosexuality is normal, you dope. Also, there's nothing wrong with a man who dresses like a woman, because there is nothing shameful about being a woman. Gender stereotypes are retarded. We have women that dress in suits and jeans all of the time. Also, I don't have a problem with schools teaching about homosexuality. Ignorance about homosexuality is how dopes like you can manifest your deceit without being immediately shot down, so the less of that the better.
Prof Marvel wrote:
Third, it promotes NAMBLA-like initiatives like Gay-Straight Alliance Clubs in our schools.
There is no science that shows a link between homosexuality and pedophilia. Also, gays and straights getting together and in order to get rid of pre-conceived notions about each other is a great thing.
Prof Marvel wrote:
Fifth, it has a ripple-effect throughout society -- the military, Boy Scouts, etc.
As society changes, so do its institutions. Banning gays from the military was retarded, and I say that as someone who isn’t the biggest fan of our activities in the Middle East and North Africa.
Prof Marvel wrote:
Six, it promotes fascism and intolerance against those who don't endorse same sex marriage -- Chik-fil-A.
Gays have been murdered, raped, beaten, and ostracized for many years by the same kinds of people that now try to force their morals on them via adoption, housing, and marriage laws. Also, Chick-fil-A funds groups that make BS papers in order to spread an anti-gay bias. I feel that the leadership of that company should be able to express its views, and stay in business, but that doesn't mean people should be forced like what it does.
Prof Marvel wrote:
Seven, it removes the barriers in place preventing men who wear penis suits and erect penis hats from adopting kids.
The gay men that adopt children go through mountains of paperwork and rigorous amounts of background checks in order to evaluate whether or not they're fit to be parents. Many of them take these kids in without the thousands of legal benefits of marriage. All a fertile, heterosexual couple needs to do is pop a condom. Is it clear to you now why there are millions of kids in the system? Sure, let's deny the largest group of adopters from taking kids out of a sh*tty situation their heterosexual birth parents created. You see why I think you're a c*nt? Just because you look too much like a Furby to snag a man, and form a family, doesn’t give you the right to rob kids of a chance of escaping hell and being loved and valued. Hop back under your bridge, because I’m not crossing into crazy land like you did years ago.
Dude

New Castle, DE

#154980 Aug 15, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
Eight, it promotes a hornet's nest of junk science, superstition, and outright lies -- "Born this Way!" ..."Sexual orientation can't be changed"... "Homosexuals can't be pedophiles!" etc.
So since every, credible, scientific body disagrees with you, their findings are "junk"? B*tch please.
Prof Marvel wrote:
Nine, it demonizes the Pope, Billy Graham, and all other religions and religious leaders who don't endorse same sex marriage.
It is on record that the current pope protected pedophile priests, and the rest of those leaders are snake oil salesmen that profit off the fear, hope, and ignorance of their respective flocks. Also, organized religion is a joke and has no bearing on this matter. A lot or religions and branches of religions are fine with gays, and this is a secular republic. Not a theocracy.
Prof Marvel wrote:
Ten, it promotes hedonism, atheism with sex cultism.
Total rubbish. Many hedonists are heterosexual, and many Christians are gay. Also, it would do this nation good if atheism spread. Then, we'd have a solid portion of the public that based their beliefs on facts instead of fiction.
Toothpicks

La Puente, CA

#154981 Aug 15, 2012
Whats the matter with all the wood you keep eating with them toothpicks?
Bill Of Rights

Tempe, AZ

#154985 Aug 15, 2012
thisGuy wrote:
<quoted text>
Great, More PC Bullshit from the thought police
Yeah that dude you mentioned on that lame youtube video is as queer as a $3 bill. Did you know you're the second person on this thread to openly admit to me your queer parents made you queer? LOL. The proof is the pudding, you queers recruit.
Yeah apparently, your primitive mind doesn't seem to understand the importance of the nuclear family. You, your queer parents, their parents, & their parent's parents would never even exist if it weren't for the nuclear family. Children need need both a mother & a father. Hell, even the animals have that figured out. The nuclear family is important for survival.
And you queers think your kids aren't gonna notice their missing a father or mother? HA! Good luck raising your kid/s within an imbalance environment of power, morals, & co-existence. Good luck, I say./sarcasm
The queer & single-parent family isn't a nuclear family & will NEVER be "equal" to the nuclear family. NEVER. When a child has both a mother & father, there is balance. It's the father's job to teach the child how to be firm, strong, & assertion, while it's the mother's job to teach the child sensitivity, careness, & apathy. In a queer environment, the child doesn't have a father or a mother. In a male queer environment, there is no mom. In a lesbian environment, there is no dad. And single-parent environment are just as bad. Why else do you think so many people around the world disapprove of children being raised by queers & why so many disapprove of divorce? You queers have no idea how your affecting your kids, & they're the ones who suffer.
So very sorry you ignorant human POS but not gay! LOL,Now what stupid? LOL,And sorry again but NO gay parents and sorry but I never admitted to being gay but if I were gay I'd be the first to tell you as there is nothing wrong with being gay you frigging dumb ass! Now lets talk about you ya self-hating in the closet so far trying to convince yourself that you're not gay that you come off as this laughable lying idiot who tells one laughable idiotic lie after another thinking we will let them pass as fact when every post you've written is a load of lying B.S.! So again,NO, gays do not recruit children you moron,you can't turn someone gay,they either are or not! So how about you STFU quit lying and get back under your rock you lying slimy cock roach! Glad I could help!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Redwood City Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Facebook to shut down the entire website Fri Palo Alto 2
Google likely to buy Instagram from Facebook Feb 23 Local 1
My Teen Verbally Abuses Me (Feb '09) Feb 22 Outofoptions 137
News Tiburon's Guaymas restaurant sold, but concept ... (Sep '08) Feb 9 burrrrpo 16
Local Entrepreneur Launching a Business Feb 7 hemington10 1
Review: Senior Helpers (Mar '16) Jan 31 crkessler 4
Stanford Provost John W. Etchemendy dismantles ... Jan 30 Toweringeggman 1

Redwood City Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Redwood City Mortgages