Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,186

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#153829 Aug 8, 2012
Spike wrote:
Did the earth move for you too?
Actually, it did.

"Moderate earthquake shakes Los Angeles area"
http://news.yahoo.com/moderate-earthquake-sha...
ELH

Portland, OR

#153830 Aug 8, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks.:)
What I really don't get is why Fido thinks that if i were a man, I'd consider being told I have a huge member an insult.
This sort of thing is usually based on some sort insecurity or self doubt. Professor Moldilocks made a reference to his "Black" man meat ( I think the word large was also thrown about) yesterday and it got all the "straight" men here a little worked up.
ELH

Portland, OR

#153831 Aug 8, 2012
Prof Dingleberry wrote:
LOL! What a moron you are. People don't respond the way you want them to, so instead you just pretend they did!!!! What a complete tool you are Gary!!!
Yep.

BTW I LOVE your new avatar!

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#153832 Aug 8, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama is a complete idiot.
Even gays were shocked by his endorsement of same-sex marriage; they knew it would give every Christian against Romney all the reasons they need to overlook Romney's Mormonism and vote homosexual-loving Obama out of office.
Add to this, he's even alienated blacks and Catholic Hispanics with his monstrous stupidity -- who won't vote against him, but won't show up at the polls either.
The man is a loose canon who needs to be booted out of office before he really fouls things up.
He's meddling with shit he doesn't even remotely understand.
Obama passes gas that is smarter than you. Loose cannon? LOL! He even had the VP test the waters first.
The Puppet Master

Beacon, NY

#153833 Aug 8, 2012
Mikhail Prokhorov wrote:
<quoted text>
Military outlawed sex with homosexual and animal in one and the same law. This was day I respect USA country.
Only a half truth! Bestiality was removed and then put back! BUT,sodomy was taken out of the UCMJ and remains out! I mean it's NOT only gays who perform and partake in anal sex! 34% to 38% of heterosexuals also partake in anal sex with their girlfriends and or wives! You are misinformed! Just ask GaYry he can tell you all about it! LOL

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Puerto Vallarta, Mexico

#153834 Aug 8, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks.:)
What I really don't get is why Fido thinks that if i were a man, I'd consider being told I have a huge member an insult.
You were never a man..........Male yes but never a man......

And no matter how many whoremoans you take and how many surgeries you get you will never be a lady.......

Just a tranny trampy ghetto ho.......

“The Great and Wonderful Marvel”

Since: Aug 09

Atlanta, GA

#153835 Aug 8, 2012
Pam Jordan wrote:
<quoted text>
I called the book weird liar, no mention was made in accordance to sex.
And that little book probably demonstrates what homosexual sex is like about as much as a book on sado-masochism outlines what heterosexual sex is like.
In other words it's a bullshit claim.
You called it weird, offensive, and, as we see directly above, continue to doubt its a faithful depiction of the homosexual lifestyle.

Earlier you said the name of the gay-run organizations printed on its pages had to be a plant to discredit these organizations. In other words, your reaction speaks for itself -- you are repulsed by the booklet, so repulsed you find it difficult to believe gays had anything to do with it.

All you're doing now is trying to mislead us about your initial reaction. You want us to believe you weren't talking about the content when you called it offensive, that you were talking about the conspiracy of homophobes who must be behind it.

But there was no conspiracy of homophobes behind this publication as a little honest research will show you. To date, not one gay-run non-profit associated with The Little Black Book has denied their association with it.

Everyone here knows this, Pam; the point is old hat.

But continue along this vein if you wish. It too makes my point about straight morons who support same sex marriage -- you're in denial about the LGBT community.

Better yet, find one gay person in this forum who'll tell you the practices in the booklet are weird or offensive to him. None has come forth yet to say this; none will.

And that's because it faithfully depicts the gay male lifestyle -- at least in the gay publishers of this piece of filth.

You can't have it both ways, Pam.

You can't call the practices weird and offensive then tell us the people who engage in these practices don't engage in weird and offensive sex practices.

Not the way it works, I'm afraid.

“All things considered”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#153836 Aug 8, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
<quoted text>
You called it weird, offensive, and, as we see directly above, continue to doubt its a faithful depiction of the homosexual lifestyle.
Earlier you said the name of the gay-run organizations printed on its pages had to be a plant to discredit these organizations. In other words, your reaction speaks for itself -- you are repulsed by the booklet, so repulsed you find it difficult to believe gays had anything to do with it.
All you're doing now is trying to mislead us about your initial reaction. You want us to believe you weren't talking about the content when you called it offensive, that you were talking about the conspiracy of homophobes who must be behind it.
But there was no conspiracy of homophobes behind this publication as a little honest research will show you. To date, not one gay-run non-profit associated with The Little Black Book has denied their association with it.
Everyone here knows this, Pam; the point is old hat.
But continue along this vein if you wish. It too makes my point about straight morons who support same sex marriage -- you're in denial about the LGBT community.
Better yet, find one gay person in this forum who'll tell you the practices in the booklet are weird or offensive to him. None has come forth yet to say this; none will.
And that's because it faithfully depicts the gay male lifestyle -- at least in the gay publishers of this piece of filth.
You can't have it both ways, Pam.
You can't call the practices weird and offensive then tell us the people who engage in these practices don't engage in weird and offensive sex practices.
Not the way it works, I'm afraid.
You're becoming as strange as this little book you keep touting around by the way.

If you want to believe that represents homosexuals or that they engage in devil worship or whatever lost thought you can add to that pile of bullshit thought then by all means....it's your opinion.

Just don't be expected to be taken seriously.

K???
ELH

Portland, OR

#153837 Aug 8, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
I try to avoid responding to your claptrap, ELH, because it gives the impression I consider you my intellectual equal.
Yes, you "avoid" responding to me about a dozen times a day.

"intellectual equal"...yea right.

&fe ature=related


Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#153838 Aug 8, 2012
Franz wrote:
<quoted text>
Anybody who would click on that link, look at the book they were handing out to middle school children and then say they support it has to be sick in the head. And most likely a pedophile.
Even the homophobic group "Mass Resistance" says the book was handed out at "Brookline High School".(Don't know what middle school age kids would be doing there, but as long as someone has finished puberty, they should have access to accurate info about sex.)

http://www.massresistance.org/docs/issues/bla...

I don't see anything wrong with the book. Can you point out anything in it that isn't factually accurate?
Hey Gayry

Alhambra, CA

#153839 Aug 8, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
<quoted text>
You can't have it both ways.
I guess you figured that out when you were blowing drag queens.
ELH

Portland, OR

#153840 Aug 8, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
The Little Black Book! gays.
"Queer Youth"... "queer" or "gay" at least 20 times:"queer" or "gay""queer " or "gay""queer " or "gay" "queer" or "gay""queer " or "gay""queer " or "gay""queer " or "gay""queer " or "gay""queer " or "gay""queer " or "gay""queer " or "gay"throughout its pages....The Little Black Book!
"Mutual jerking off is hot fun!" and "rimming -- butt licking" "queer" The Little Black Book!...gay bar bathhouse..."for the younger, leather queer crowd."homosexual guide"... The Little Black Book! gay-run organization gay activist... pornographic...gay lifestyle...Gays gay bars and bathhouses...The Little Black Book! The Little Black Book! The Little Black Book!
FYI: You forgot to mention fisting, peepee play or assless chaps.
ELH

Portland, OR

#153841 Aug 8, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
I don't see anything wrong with the book. Can you point out anything in it that isn't factually accurate?
Good thing Gary memorize every word before the pages got all stuck together.

Since: Jan 10

Lewis Center, OH

#153842 Aug 8, 2012
ELH wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, you "avoid" responding to me about a dozen times a day.
"intellectual equal"...yea right.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =_SCj7AEMyz8XX&feature=rel ated
I think he's trying to say that the deepest conversations he has are with gnats.
ELH

Portland, OR

#153843 Aug 8, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama passes gas that is smarter than you. Loose cannon? LOL! He even had the VP test the waters first.


Gary should see if he can get a job being the "black guy" who gets panned in the crowd at the upcoming GOP convention.
ELH

Portland, OR

#153844 Aug 8, 2012
Pam Jordan wrote:
Just don't be expected to be taken seriously.
K???
Apparently, for Professor MoldiLocks, any attention is GOOD attention.
TiS

Escondido, CA

#153845 Aug 8, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
<quoted text>
You called it weird, offensive, and, as we see directly above, continue to doubt its a faithful depiction of the homosexual lifestyle.
Earlier you said the name of the gay-run organizations printed on its pages had to be a plant to discredit these organizations. In other words, your reaction speaks for itself -- you are repulsed by the booklet, so repulsed you find it difficult to believe gays had anything to do with it.
All you're doing now is trying to mislead us about your initial reaction. You want us to believe you weren't talking about the content when you called it offensive, that you were talking about the conspiracy of homophobes who must be behind it.
But there was no conspiracy of homophobes behind this publication as a little honest research will show you. To date, not one gay-run non-profit associated with The Little Black Book has denied their association with it.
Everyone here knows this, Pam; the point is old hat.
But continue along this vein if you wish. It too makes my point about straight morons who support same sex marriage -- you're in denial about the LGBT community.
Better yet, find one gay person in this forum who'll tell you the practices in the booklet are weird or offensive to him. None has come forth yet to say this; none will.
And that's because it faithfully depicts the gay male lifestyle -- at least in the gay publishers of this piece of filth.
You can't have it both ways, Pam.
You can't call the practices weird and offensive then tell us the people who engage in these practices don't engage in weird and offensive sex practices.
Not the way it works, I'm afraid.
If you find the practices in the book weird and offensive then that's your opinion, to which you're entitled for sure. That doesn't mean squat though. Your opinion versus people's rights..you lose.

It's a good thing too. Otherwise the opinion of people like me would have people like you picking cotton in the fields again.

(BTW responsiblity for the 'little black book' incident was taken on by Fenway Community Health Group. They say they _mistakenly_ had 10 of these books out on a table. Of course if you're so very against anybody under the age of 18 seeing/hearing any of these things I suggest you immediately take on the internet. It's full of it)

“The Great and Wonderful Marvel”

Since: Aug 09

Atlanta, GA

#153846 Aug 8, 2012
Prof Dingleberry wrote:
More lies and ranting from failed author Gary Lloyd.....
<quoted text>
Yes, they sponsored the event Gary. However, as previously noted, they did not BRING this material nor did they DISTRIBUTE this material. And this material was NEVER handed out. Yet another complete lie from you and massrisistence. There were a handful of these booklets, they were placed on a vendor table belonging to Fenway Community Health. The president and CEO of Fenway Community Health, Stephen Boswell, apologized for the error, and the principal of the school where the event was held has publically stated that he doesn't even believe that any student actually picked up a copy of the booklet.
But don't let facts get in the way of your decietful shilling you lying piece of shit!!! Enjoy hell Gary!
<quoted text>
Why is it "also worth noting" what a man who thinks he wears magical underwear thinks Gary? Romney, like you, thinks there is a "gay lifestyle". Pretty much proving he's as big a moron as you are. The booklet was not intended for young children, and quite frankly you can't prove that it ever did find its way int othe hands of a young child.
But don't let facts get in the way of your deceitful posts Gary. We all know its all you've got loser.
<quoted text>
I never said the booklet had nothing to do with gays you stupid moron.
<quoted text>
There are no bathhouses listed in it, and it was never distributed to children. That's just more of your lying. Lying is all you do, because you are incapable of supporting yourself using truthful information.
<quoted text>
Gary, please don't use words you don't know what they mean. You wouldn't recognize honesty if it bit you on the hand.
<quoted text>
Who said the booklet was intended for straights? Let us know when you have an answer dumbass.
<quoted text>
Nope, I sure don't Gary. It's difficult to see when all you present is fabricated lies, obfuscation and nonsense.
<quoted text>
I've made perfect sense. And I've demonstrated what lying sack of shit you are at the same time.
Have a nice day Gary.
You need to pick one lie and stick with it, Dingleberry. You keep telling us the booklet is a harmless safe sex manual, then immediately insist not one child saw it. But if it was a harmless safe sex manual why do you keep pressing home the point not one child saw it?

In addition, how do you know not one child saw it? All the people you quote saying not one child saw it had a vested interested in wanting us to believe that.

We're talking about child pornography, a very serious crime. These people were busted with literature that could have landed them in jail for a very long time. Do you honestly believe they'd have told the truth had 10 kids took the booklets?

In any event, a crime was committed -- are you at least bright enough to grasp that? If so, stop telling us not one child received a copy of the booklet -- the booklet was discovered on a display table at a high school event. Anybody sitting behind that table goes straight to jail.

I think that's a good rule -- why don't you, Dingleberry?

As to your point that "the booklet was not intended for children" are you kidding? Perhaps you missed these things:

1. Cherubic cartoon characters lifted from 1940's era school readers.

2. Youth slang like "Awesome!" "Cool!" "Mutual jerking off is hot fun!"

3. Admonitions such as "Ask your parents first!"

4. "Hey, Queer Boys!"

5. Tips on "coming out" -- if your parents don't approve ...

These are just a few of the signs that mark this book as one intended for a high school audience. But the biggest one, of course, is that it was on a display table at a high school event.

DUR ...

Honestly, Dingleberry, Helen Keller could see all this -- why can't you?

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Puerto Vallarta, Mexico

#153847 Aug 8, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Even the homophobic group "Mass Resistance" says the book was handed out at "Brookline High School".(Don't know what middle school age kids would be doing there, but as long as someone has finished puberty, they should have access to accurate info about sex.)
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/issues/bla...
I don't see anything wrong with the book. Can you point out anything in it that isn't factually accurate?
Yes the trampy ho would see no problem with children getting a book about fisting with a list of gay bars the boys can go sell themselves at......

But what do you expect from a tramp tranny ho........

He will see nothing wrong with prostituting young boys......

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#153848 Aug 8, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
<quoted text>
So now we learn the gay symbol for "frivolity" is the phallic symbol.
Is that what you fellows are teaching kids in Boston area schools, Dingleberry?
And what about the half-nude bottom boys wearing chaps exposing their bare-buttocks while being led down the street by their Tops?
What do you tell kids that's a symbol of?
You typed that with one hand, didn't you?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Redwood City Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Daly City Officer Charged With Excessive Force (Aug '06) 19 hr yes call me 09864... 376
yahoo nd skype id nhi h 22 hr sam-7 1
Police chase on Sunday early morning thru EPA Dec 21 D mann 1
Bill Widmer named new Rancho Palos Verdes city ... Dec 20 Are you serious 1
HELP STOP UNJUST PERSECUTIONS of TAXPAYERS over... Dec 19 EQUAL RIGHTS 27
sri ganganagar Dec 18 parmjeet 1
Good Night... Dec 16 Ashik love 2

Redwood City News Video

Redwood City Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Redwood City People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Redwood City News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Redwood City

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 1:48 pm PST

NBC Sports 1:48PM
49ers' Anthony Davis seems to have a problem with Greg Roman
NFL 2:01 PM
Michael Crabtree uncertain about 49ers future
Bleacher Report 2:46 PM
Breaking Down San Francisco's Game Plan vs. Cards
NBC Sports 3:43 PM
49ers' Crabtree doesn't know what future holds - NBC Sports
NBC Sports 3:54 PM
Derek Carr returns to practice with Raiders - NBC Sports