Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201884 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Dan

Sacramento, CA

#144402 Jun 4, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
When she compares me with you, I might not be the loony.
You are afraid to, aren't you?
Smile(s).
Afraid to what Crazy Critter?

Skydive?

And so far I'm one up on you as far as who is the nutter. I never had to get a "letter" to use the public john or decide to take a night time stroll....LOL!!!!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#144403 Jun 4, 2012
Sodomites Not A 3rd Sex wrote:
Sodomites have always been "allowed" to marry. A male

sodomite is allowed to marry a female sodomite, which is

necessary in order to consummate the marriage via sexual

intercourse.

Their problem is they want sodomy to be legally equal to sex

in marriage consummation, an act that was grounds for divorce

only 2 decades ago in most states if a husband demanded that

as his "right" as if it were sex.

In states where sodomy legally consummates marriage, men have

the right to do that to their wives (equal protection, 14th

amendment, etc.). Result: Man has control over whether she

can procreate and courts will have to rule against her if

they follow hundreds of years of precedent that a marriage

license is "consent."

When sodomy was beginning to be legalized in a few states in

the 1970s, sodomites were shouting down anyone who suggested

that one day they'd want sodomy to consummate marriage,

saying "None of us want marriage: You're a bigoted nut!"

Sodomy is not a "form of sex." It's a form of masturbation.

It can't create new citizens. The natural pity of a natural

father for his own natural children makes him work all the

harder to support them and his wife.

And that harder effort makes all society richer and safer.

Sodomy is titillation without value. "Committed, faithful

sodomites" constantly die of AIDS. Why? Because there's

something perverted about their definition of "committed and

faithful."

Tolerance doesn't include redefining sex to include sodomy as

a "form" of it.

When Freud coined the word "Homosexual" he specifically and

repeatedly explained sodomites are not a "3rd sex" but a

perverted manifestation of their own sex. Their unhealthy

lifestyle is a burden on all the health system. There is no

"safe sodomy," only safe sex: Married, faithful sex.

I have no objections personally to grown-ups committing

sodomy by consent with each other, but great objections to

forcing their bigoted view that all must accept the

redefinition of sodomy as a "form of sex."

What will they redefine next? The anus as a differently

oriented vagina. Fingers as differently positioned

phalluses? The tongue as a reproductive organ?

With all the anti-biological redifining they've forced on

society so far, it's not out of the realm of possibility.
Dan

Sacramento, CA

#144404 Jun 4, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
But aliens do, right?
I heard blown out nutballs see aliens all the time so you tell us.

BAH HAH HAH!!!!
Dan

Sacramento, CA

#144405 Jun 4, 2012
KiMare wrote:
Sodomites Not A 3rd Sex wrote:
Sodomites have always been "allowed" to marry. A male
sodomite is allowed to marry a female sodomite, which is
necessary in order to consummate the marriage via sexual
intercourse.
Their problem is they want sodomy to be legally equal to sex
in marriage consummation, an act that was grounds for divorce
only 2 decades ago in most states if a husband demanded that
as his "right" as if it were sex.
In states where sodomy legally consummates marriage, men have
the right to do that to their wives (equal protection, 14th
amendment, etc.). Result: Man has control over whether she
can procreate and courts will have to rule against her if
they follow hundreds of years of precedent that a marriage
license is "consent."
When sodomy was beginning to be legalized in a few states in
the 1970s, sodomites were shouting down anyone who suggested
that one day they'd want sodomy to consummate marriage,
saying "None of us want marriage: You're a bigoted nut!"
Sodomy is not a "form of sex." It's a form of masturbation.
It can't create new citizens. The natural pity of a natural
father for his own natural children makes him work all the
harder to support them and his wife.
And that harder effort makes all society richer and safer.
Sodomy is titillation without value. "Committed, faithful
sodomites" constantly die of AIDS. Why? Because there's
something perverted about their definition of "committed and
faithful."
Tolerance doesn't include redefining sex to include sodomy as
a "form" of it.
When Freud coined the word "Homosexual" he specifically and
repeatedly explained sodomites are not a "3rd sex" but a
perverted manifestation of their own sex. Their unhealthy
lifestyle is a burden on all the health system. There is no
"safe sodomy," only safe sex: Married, faithful sex.
I have no objections personally to grown-ups committing
sodomy by consent with each other, but great objections to
forcing their bigoted view that all must accept the
redefinition of sodomy as a "form of sex."
What will they redefine next? The anus as a differently
oriented vagina. Fingers as differently positioned
phalluses? The tongue as a reproductive organ?
With all the anti-biological redifining they've forced on
society so far, it's not out of the realm of possibility.
I think we're learning how you gained entrance to the Crazy Cottage wearing a straightjacket suit.

Little clues like the one above are seeping out giving us all slight hints.

LOL!!!!

If being a nutter was a smell you'd put a thousand skunks being kept in a 2 car garage to SHAME baby....LOL!!!

Since: Jan 12

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

#144406 Jun 4, 2012
KiMare wrote:
But aliens do, right?
But you are retarded, right?

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#144407 Jun 4, 2012
akpilot wrote:
People said that about the southern secession too.
A completely less than analogous 19th century event is proof that in the 21st century 2/3 of the states would successfully call for a constitutional convention to consider a federal marriage amendment how exactly? For all of its relevance, you could have said that people said that about man in flight. You have proved nothing but the lengths you'll go to to grasp at straws.
akpilot wrote:
I love how with all you people the idea that the people might come together and end this once in for all and take it out of the hands of the courts is a long shot, while the idea that over night the country will accept it is a valid reality.
Dear, I'm good at picking long shots and I wouldn't bet that horse with your money. On the continuum of cogency, a constitutional convention isn't even a remote possibility in this climate. Oh, by the by, the only ones who say we're looking for acceptance are those who have "issues" when it comes to accepting us. Your acceptance simply isn't needed.
akpilot wrote:
You people need to stop functioning in fantasy land.
Says the one whose fantasy we're discussing.
akpilot wrote:
While many people are willing to accept same sex marriage, me included, there are a far larger number who are fed up with the Federal Government and the Courts telling them their opinions don't matter- your cause just might be the one that pushes people over the edge, to the point where they finally stand up and say enough is enough. Making you the brunt of the attack, misguided as it may be.
Those who you describe as "fed up" over this issue are a disorganized mess who often work at cross purposes, it's a wonder that anyone falls for their message.
john

Perris, CA

#144408 Jun 4, 2012
....and i repeat: anytime "one man", can overturn the power of the people, it's a disgrace, and you do not understand, the risk your freedoms are in! would you want "one man" to judge your trail, without a jury?? how about one man, to say if you live or die?.. then you are a ship of fools!!
Bill Of Rights

Livermore, CA

#144409 Jun 4, 2012
john wrote:
....and i repeat: anytime "one man", can overturn the power of the people, it's a disgrace, and you do not understand, the risk your freedoms are in! would you want "one man" to judge your trail, without a jury?? how about one man, to say if you live or die?.. then you are a ship of fools!!
Yeah,it's a real bitch when that pesky Constitution gets in the way of your bigotry! LOL,Sorry the Judge made the right decision,the only one he could and the higher court confirmed his verdict! Sorry for the sour grapes buddy,and sorry you don't like our Constitution!
Dan

Sacramento, CA

#144410 Jun 4, 2012
Bill Of Rights wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah,it's a real bitch when that pesky Constitution gets in the way of your bigotry! LOL,Sorry the Judge made the right decision,the only one he could and the higher court confirmed his verdict! Sorry for the sour grapes buddy,and sorry you don't like our Constitution!
I wouldn't worry about 'john' above here.

He usually passes out after finishing off half the bottle of his friend Jose Cuervo and as you can tell he's getting close to the worm already.
RiccardoFire

Sacramento, CA

#144411 Jun 4, 2012
RnL2008 wrote:
<quoted text>
And you have no proof that one is born straight either......so, it must be a choice as well......and if it is a choice.....THEN WHO CARES?
There is no proof that being Gay is a Sex Cult.....otherwise being straight MUST be part of the SAME sex cult.....what a idiot you are!!!
You are so busy being concerned with what consenting adults do in the privacy of their homes, that you fail to realize that straights don't do anything different than Gays or Lesbians do.....they just do it with the opposite-sex!!!
"no proof that one is born straight"..lol are u freaking serious?? This is why so many are afraid of this gay marriage pushed on us, next you will be teaching elementary students that they need to make sure they are not straight...you very sick. thank u for showing us.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#144412 Jun 4, 2012
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Not too bright are you.
It's playing out now friend no different than past discriminations had to be eliminated.
You'll only slither away once that last state says "Gays...we open our doors to same sex marriage" and that's alright.
There's a lot of grumbling 83 year old losers out there bitching that the blacks should be pyushed back to the bus in "the good ol' days".
LOL!!!
You're nobody friend...just some ass posting on the internet. As am I but I'll bet my Pez collection outside of you and me typing nonsense on a keyboard at night like a crazed chicken on cocaine looking for a kernel of corn between the keys you have nothing to offer in real life.
Just my hunch.
Not too bright are you, 31 States have Constitutional Bans to same sex marriage. BTW, that's one more than last month.. And you think you are some how winning the fight?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#144413 Jun 4, 2012
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>

You'll only slither away once that last state says "Gays...we open our doors to same sex marriage" and that's alright.
I won't be "slithering" anywhere. I don't give a damn if homosexuals get married, I have voted against a State Constitutional Amendment before. Personally I don't see any reason why they shouldn't be allowed to. But unlike you, I have the intelligence to comprehend that there is NOTHING in the Constitution which compels a State to do so.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#144414 Jun 4, 2012
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey DUMBFUCK...
..if you were so righteous why do you argue this shit in an anonymous intrernet?
Why not contact you local representative, start a grassroots campaign, be active, etc...
..I know why. Because your hobby isn't about action it's about playing games in TOPIX.
You don't amount to CHICKEN SPIT you loser...LOL!!!!
Hey DUMBFUCK...

You have no idea what I do, stop acting like you do..

Now take your childish nonsense somewhere else.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#144415 Jun 4, 2012
ELH wrote:
<quoted text>
I should get a life? Then what should the sore loser who just posted five responses in a row to 'prove' his off topic OPINION do? Do you have any sage advice for HIM?
I would have had to have lost something to be a sore loser.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#144418 Jun 4, 2012
Mona Lott wrote:
<quoted text>
Hernandez v Robels????? Really?
Are gay couples permitted to marry in New York?
Loving v Virginia????? Really?

Get a life Mona..

Yes, same sex marriage is allowed in New York, and it was done the correct way, through the legislature, not the court.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#144428 Jun 4, 2012
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually it will be directly after those 31 bans are declared unconstitutional.
Any other stupid questions we can help you with?
Good luck with that. Have you listened to the SCOTUS, they aren't all that partial to this idea that marriage falls under the purview of the Federal Government. Hell, even Obama's pick isn't on board.
thisGuy

Stephenville, TX

#144432 Jun 4, 2012
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
The delusional soul was Momma Guy who thought her beloved son might graduate from the 9th grade by the tender young age of THIRTY TWO.
BAH HAH HAH!!!!!
You don't speak for anyone class clown so siddown.
FAIL

I speak for those who DON'T support the homosexual agenda
thisGuy

Stephenville, TX

#144433 Jun 4, 2012
Wat the Tyler wrote:
Attention jesus freaks! Newsflash! God doesn't exist.
Attention homosexual freaks! Newsflash! The gay gene doesn't exist.
thisGuy

Stephenville, TX

#144439 Jun 4, 2012
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
That's it????
Some memo written in 2007? And more harmless than a frozen housefly inder 4 feet of permafrost ni the Antarctic???
LOL!!!
You lying sack of shit - there's no 'pornography' here. Just a bunch of fuckwads like you who if they saw 2 men holding hands might be damaged for life exclaimnig they saw a live gay porn activity right before their very amazed eyes...LOL!!!!!
And BTW...I never had to go to an insane asylum, see a psychologist or get a letter to use as a pass....that's one of those in your camp. KiKrazy.
LOL!!!!!!!
Problem?

Not tolerating gay pedophilia & gay pornography in the schools...gee how "homophobic" of me /sarcasm
Bill Of Rights

Livermore, CA

#144440 Jun 4, 2012
thisGuy wrote:
<quoted text>
Problem?
Not tolerating gay pedophilia & gay pornography in the schools...gee how "homophobic" of me /sarcasm
Tell us all,were you born retarded or was it something later in life that caused your obvious brain damage? There is NO pedophilia or porn being taught in the public schools stupid! The same as there is NO Christianity being taught in our schools! And that I thank "GOD" for that! Now slither away you little cock roach,you're to stupid to even post!LOLOLOL

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Redwood City Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
specialized bike from dealer Jammed w/Injuries Jan 20 JammedTrailBike 1
News Redwood City: Tenants protest large rent hikes ... Jan 14 Redwood City 2
HELP STOP Discrimination against Agricultural Z... Jan 9 un agenda 21 4
News Man gets 6 months in cockfighting (Mar '08) Jan 9 un agenda 21 20
Google likely to buy Instagram from Facebook (Feb '17) Jan 8 No Tweets 3
Looking for family of Robert Silveria JR Dec 23 John 1
My Teen Verbally Abuses Me (Feb '09) Dec '17 Leslie 141

Redwood City Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Redwood City Mortgages