Oh my

Blairsville, GA

#109 Jan 20, 2013
- JUST CAUSE - wrote:
http://www.topix.com/forum/cit y/blairsville-ga/TQNJ6157L7P4S D5HM/post91
False flags have always been the most ignored, yet one of the most sinister threats to the Nation we all love.
The necessities of such actions will always be argued, but there is where the real monsters lie, and most times, not only out of sight, but also, completely out of control.
Nevertheless, when children are targeted; it brings one to a realization that to some there are no lines they will not cross.
I guess we must all come to the realization sooner or later that nothing is as it appears. In the eyes of some we are all nothing but pawns.
Of course, those of us of the Christian faith do look forward to Salvation through Christ, as well as eternal separation from such evil.
Unfortunately, many must suffer through such horrors without that comfort.
Sat Jan 19, 2013 at 01:30 PM PST.
Sandy Hook conspiracy theorists are, of course, horrible people
by Hunter
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/01/19/1180...

...So why, aside from America's great and wide collection of stupid people, are people inventing conspiracy theories about a horrific mass murder? It's important to remember that for the most part these people were already spectacularly stupid conspiracy theorists before the Sandy Hook shootings ever happened. The wider Sandy Hook "conspiracy" is, supposedly, that the federal government faked the whole thing in order to finally, at long last, get around to confiscating all the guns that they've been supposed to be confiscating for, hell, decades now but never quite managed. It's not particularly surprising that the particular band of loons and misfits who already believed the earlier conspiracies are just as eager to believe that the conspiracy now goes "even deeper," or whatever the hell they believe.
Zoltar

Dawsonville, GA

#110 Jan 20, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
Sat Jan 19, 2013 at 01:30 PM PST.
Sandy Hook conspiracy theorists are, of course, horrible people
by Hunter
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/01/19/1180...
...So why, aside from America's great and wide collection of stupid people, are people inventing conspiracy theories about a horrific mass murder? It's important to remember that for the most part these people were already spectacularly stupid conspiracy theorists before the Sandy Hook shootings ever happened. The wider Sandy Hook "conspiracy" is, supposedly, that the federal government faked the whole thing in order to finally, at long last, get around to confiscating all the guns that they've been supposed to be confiscating for, hell, decades now but never quite managed. It's not particularly surprising that the particular band of loons and misfits who already believed the earlier conspiracies are just as eager to believe that the conspiracy now goes "even deeper," or whatever the hell they believe.
Unfortunately, our country does have it's share of stupid people. When cynicism and extremism are added, comspiracy theories abound.
It is frightening that these same people actually talk themselves into beieving such total nonsense. A Snady Hook conspiracy is so over-the-top and horrible, it is simply not deserving of much discussion.

It is also unfortunate that these same types of people reside in both ends of the political spectrum. The conspiracy that Bush was in on the 911 terrorist attack was equally horrible and nonsensical.
Informed Opinion

Lehigh Acres, FL

#111 Jan 20, 2013
Zoltar wrote:
<quoted text>Unfortunately, our country does have it's share of stupid people. When cynicism and extremism are added, comspiracy theories abound.
It is frightening that these same people actually talk themselves into beieving such total nonsense. A Snady Hook conspiracy is so over-the-top and horrible, it is simply not deserving of much discussion.

It is also unfortunate that these same types of people reside in both ends of the political spectrum. The conspiracy that Bush was in on the 911 terrorist attack was equally horrible and nonsensical.
Great post.

“A Just Cause isn't capitulated”

Since: Jan 13

Blairsville

#112 Jan 22, 2013
Rick Santorum Lists President Obama’s Constitutional Violations
PATRIOT VOICES
DESPOTISM IN AMERICA

Exclusive: Rick Santorum lists President Obama's constitutional violations

President Obama’s announcement last week on his plans to make sweeping changes to our nation’s gun laws by presidential executive order is yet another example of his continual disregard for the United States Constitution and the separation of powers it set forth to protect the American people from government by fiat.

Putting aside for a moment the misdirected emphasis on gun ownership, as opposed to mental illness and cultural glorification of violence to curb gun crime, President Obama’s actions represent another attempt to circumvent Congress – a Congress elected by the people but controlled by Republicans – to establish public policy that supports his liberal agenda.

As we all learn early on in grade-school civics class, one of the most important and distinguishing aspects of our government is the system of checks and balances.

Our Founding Fathers created a system of divided government, where the power at the federal government is separated among three distinct branches: the legislative (Congress), the executive (the president) and the judiciary (the Supreme Court).

Yet time and time again, when President Obama has met resistance from Congress, the check on his powers in the executive branch, he has found ways to circumvent our system and impose his views and vision.

Some examples:

• Two days after he took office, President Obama rescinded by executive order the “Mexico City policy,” which prevents foreign aid going to organizations that perform or promote abortions. No legislation passed, no debate, just an executive order.

• In early 2011, the Obama administration stop enforcing the Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, a law duly passed by Congress and signed into law. Here President Obama has directed his Department of Justice to ignore the Constitution and separation of powers and not enforce a law.

• In early 2012, Obama’s Health and Human Services department set forth the so-called “contraceptive mandate,” which requires all employers – including religious charities and institutions – to provide free contraception to all employees, a clear violation of the Constitution’s guarantees for freedom of conscience and freedom of religion.

• Last June, the president announced that the Department of Homeland Security will no longer deport young illegal immigrants who meet certain criteria. These criteria were proposed by the controversial DREAM Act, which has been working its way through Congress but has not been passed into law. Forget about whether this is a good law or a bad one; it’s about respecting the legislative process and letting these issues be debated and discussed. No, instead the president just picked aspects of the bill he liked and ordered his administration to follow them, even if they are illegal.

• Earlier this month, as the nation endured the “fiscal cliff” crises and negotiation, the administration floated the idea of minting the trillion-dollar coin. Why? Because the president needs Congress to raise the debt ceiling for the U.S. Treasury to borrow more to fund the government. Rather than have to negotiate with Congress, he could have had the U.S. Mint create a coin for $1 trillion and deposit it in the treasury. Though ultimately rejected as an idea, once again here was a plan to avoid confronting the “check” in the system – the Republican-controlled House.

This brings us to Wednesday’s announcement of 23 executive orders to be signed by the president to attempt to address gun violence in the wake of the Sandy Hook tragedy. Once again, rather than respect the rule of law and the checks and balances in our system, President Obama is unilaterally implementing public policy without the normal process that involves legislation, debate and passage by a vote of Congress.

continued

“A Just Cause isn't capitulated”

Since: Jan 13

Blairsville

#113 Jan 22, 2013
continued

And I take issue with the underlying policy, too. There are some reasonable suggestions in the president’s orders, but I reject the administration’s efforts to take more control of our lives on the gun issue, when we already have laws in place.

The Bill of Rights clearly states that our government cannot stand in the way of law-abiding citizens using their legal firearms as a means of self-protection.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/despotism-in-ameri...

“A Just Cause isn't capitulated”

Since: Jan 13

Blairsville

#114 Jan 22, 2013
Bill Clinton Warns Dems: Don’t ‘Patronize’ and Look ‘Down Your Nose’ at Gun Culture
Erica Ritz
Jan. 19, 2013 11:07pm theblaze.com

Former U.S. President Bill Clinton spoke with top Democratic donors at a private meeting on Saturday where, according to Politico, he warned the group to treat gun control differently than other political issues.

“Do not patronize the passionate supporters of your opponents by looking down your nose at them,” Clinton reportedly said.“A lot of these people live in a world very different from the world lived in by the people proposing these things…”

He proceeded to explain how, though polling data is certainly useful for politicians, it doesn’t measure the emotion and enthusiasm associated with an issue. And it’s the passion associated with gun control, Clinton argued, that makes it so delicate.

Politico continues:

Clinton dedicated a substantial portion of his 40-minute address before a joint meeting of the Obama National Finance Committee and a group of business leaders to the issue of guns and gun control, saying that it was a test-case for President Barack Obama’s grass-roots movements…

“The way the Obama campaign won Florida, won Ohio, won this election by more than projected was the combination of technology, social media and personal contact,” Clinton said. That’s “the only way that our side will ever be able to even up the votes in the midterms and as these issues come up, really touch people and talk to them about it.”

[...]

But he said that he understands the culture that permeates a state like Arkansas —where guns are a longstanding part of local culture.
“A lot of these people …all they’ve got is their hunting and their fishing,” he told the Democratic financiers.“Or they’re living in a place where they don’t have much police presence. Or they’ve been listening to this stuff for so long that they believe it all.”[Emphasis added]

In the opinion of the former president, those who are patting themselves on the back for their “brave” efforts on gun control may not be seeing the full picture.

“Do not be self-congratulatory about how brave you [are] for being for this” gun control push, he said.“The only brave people are the people who are going to lose their jobs if they vote with you.”

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/01/19/bi...

“A Just Cause isn't capitulated”

Since: Jan 13

Blairsville

#115 Jan 22, 2013
“Under God” Axed From Obama’s Invocation
Posted on January 22, 2013 byCowboy Byte

We can at least say that the man is consistent. On the other hand, this is the first time in presidential inaugural history where the invocation was given by a non-clergy member.“Progress.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

“A Just Cause isn't capitulated”

Since: Jan 13

Blairsville

#116 Jan 22, 2013
Krauthammer: Obama Speech

"A Declaration That The Era Of Big Government Is Back"
realclearpolitics.com

realclearpolitics.com

CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: I thought it was an amazing speech. Historically very important, not memorable. There's not a line here that will ever be repeated, but I think very important historically because this was really Obama unbound.

And I think what's most interesting is that Obama basically is declaring the end of Reaganism in this speech. Remember, he once said that Ronald Reagan was historically consequential in a way that Bill Clinton was not. And what Obama meant is that Obama had changed the ideological course of the country.

In 1981, in his inaugural address within two minutes, Reagan had declared that government is not the solution, government is the problem.

Today's inaugural address was a rebuke to that entire idea. This speech today was an ode to big government. It was a hymn to big government.

In his refrain, the three we the people's, he said, number one I'm going to defend what liberalism has achieved in the 21st century -- where he mentioned Social Security. Medicare, Medicaid. So, I'm not going to let any of that be chipped away.

And then, second, he said the vision for the future is climate change and green energy, this is going to be his new expansion of liberalism in the new century.

And then the third element was his expansion of civil rights, where he talked about immigrants and gays and even shoe-horned the gun rights under the rubric of security.

He outlined the liberal agenda, the big government agenda in the future.

And Brit [Hume] talked earlier, remarkably there's absence of any mention of the economy, of deficits, of what outsiders would say is the great challenge of our time headed in over a cliff, a real cliff of debt into a sort of a Greek future.

There is nothing of that in this speech. Obama had zero interest in that and this was a declaration that his interest is to restore us to the liberal ascendency of 60 years, that Reagan stopped. He gave us these three decades and Clinton, in the middle of the three decades, said in his '96 State of the Union address, the era of big government is over. This speech was a declaration that the era of big government is back, I'm the man to do it. A remarkable speech.

Amy Walter: Where Was The Talk About Jobs In Inaugural Address?

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/0...

“A Just Cause isn't capitulated”

Since: Jan 13

Blairsville

#117 Jan 22, 2013
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

To the Members of the 113th Congress

We, the People of the United States of America, demand that our President, our elected representatives, governmental appointees, judges and Justices, and any other government officials adhere to the authority and rule of law as defined by the Constitution of the United States of America and its Bill of Rights.

In this Citizen Petition, we especially demand respect for the First Amendment, ensuring Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Conscience, and Freedom of Religion, and the Second Amendment, guaranteeing every American's right to bear arms.

We demand that our federal government respect the balance of power as brilliantly established in the Constitution's framework. Congress must act accordingly to ensure that the rights of citizens are protected against an empirical presidency – including an action of impeachment, if necessary.

•We will not stand by and allow continued mockery and subversion of the Constitution by our President and his administration.

•We will not accept the continuous violations of our rights and freedoms guaranteed by our Constitution.

•We will not put up with any more unconstitutional "mandates" being forced through Congress or enacted by federal bureaucrats.

•We will not countenance any more judicial nominees who look to international law for precedent and view the Constitution as antiquated or out of date.

•We will not allow the United States' national or international policy to be dictated by ANY foreign entity, including the United Nations.

http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Oh my

Dahlonega, GA

#118 Jan 23, 2013
- JUST CAUSE - wrote:
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
Rick Santorum Lists President Obama’s Constitutional Violations
PATRIOT VOICES
DESPOTISM IN AMERICA
Exclusive: Rick Santorum lists President Obama's constitutional violations

Some examples:
• Two days after he took office, President Obama rescinded by executive order the “Mexico City policy,” which prevents foreign aid going to organizations that perform or promote abortions. No legislation passed, no debate, just an executive order.
When can we expect the President to be brought up on charges?

Maybe, Maybe, Maybe,
so many persona's,
so much to do,
so many warnings,
so little time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Poli...
The Mexico City Policy, also known by critics as the Mexico City Gag Rule and the Global Gag Rule,[1] is an intermittent United States government policy that requires all non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that receive federal funding to refrain from performing or promoting abortion services as a method of family planning with non-US government funds in other countries. The policy has not been in effect since January 23, 2009. Since 1973, USAID has followed the Helms Amendment ruling, banning use of US Government funds to provide abortion as a method of family planning anywhere in the world.[2]

The policy is a political flashpoint in the abortion debate, with Republican administrations adopting it and Democratic administrations rescinding it. The policy was enacted by Republican President Ronald Reagan in 1984, rescinded by Democratic President Bill Clinton in January 1993, re-instituted in January 2001 as Republican President George W. Bush took office, and rescinded January 23, 2009, 2 days after Democratic President Barack Obama took office.
Informed Opinion

Naples, FL

#119 Jan 23, 2013
Can you never please some folks ?

The Inaugural I watched had so many prayers and references to God it was more of a prayer meeting than a secular event.

Obama got bin Laden killed, and has killed more alleged terrorists than Bush did in his wettest dream - but he's not tough enough.

Obama has criminally prosecuted more Whistleblowers than Bush ever did; never revealed any government secrets like President Cheney did; still illegally imprisons kidnaps and occasionally kills "enemies"; and appoints the same Goldman Sachs people to run tge world; but he's a "liberal". Lord, I wish he was.

Maybe they're geniuses though.

One of our attorneys once said; "Good negotiators are like teenagers, when they get everything they want - want more."
will v

Dahlonega, GA

#120 Jan 23, 2013
oh my lady were do you hide your guns and rpg that you know so much about?
I bet informed and oh my are the same old lady .

“A Just Cause isn't capitulated”

Since: Jan 13

Blairsville

#121 Jan 24, 2013
&fe ature=player_embedded

“A Just Cause isn't capitulated”

Since: Jan 13

Blairsville

#122 Jan 24, 2013
Highlights from Secretary Clinton’s Staged Testimony on Benghazi
independentsentinel.com

Hillary Clinton said she was responsible for the failures of the State Department’s handling of Benghazi –sort of. She claimed that State didn’t have enough funding [blaming Republicans in the House though that has been disproven].

She said she has 70,000 employees and there was the fog of war.

The worst excuse was that she never read any of the cables from Benghazi. At one point she said the blame rests with the Assistant Secretary on down.

While there was a scathing report about the systemic problems at the State Department, no one in our government was held accountable. There was a pretense of firing people and that never happened:

No attackers were held accountable though President Obama promised to hunt them down:

President Obama promised to relentlessly pursue the attackers:

In fact, the one suspect has been released by Tunisia and another attacker gave an interview to the New York Times in a cafe in Benghazi.

Hillary Clinton said during the hearing on Benghazi today that she was not consulted about Susan Rice’s appearances on the Sunday News Shows.

Susan Rice said she went on the shows because Secretary Clinton was tired:

REMEMBER WHAT REALLY HAPPENED? WATCH HERE

http://www.independentsentinel.com/2013/01/hi...

Copyright ©2013 Independent Sentinel . All Rights Reserved. Magazine Basic theme designed by Themes by bavotasan.com . Powered by WordPress .

“A Just Cause isn't capitulated”

Since: Jan 13

Blairsville

#123 Jan 24, 2013
Background Checks for Guns and Apartments, Why Not for Presidency!- The Last Resistance

lastresistance.com

One of the key features in all of the gun control talks is the requirement for everyone purchasing a gun to have a full background check done of them. California wants to go a step further and require a background check to purchase ammunition.

If you have ever tried to rent an apartment these days, you will find that most apartment managers run a background and credit check on you before they will agree to rent to you. I’ve known people who had difficulty finding a decent apartment because of minor arrests in their backgrounds.

Try buying a house without having a background check. You think it’s only a credit check but think again. I recall reading of a couple that wanted to purchase their dream home and had a large down payment. Their credit check was great, but when a background check came back showing that the husband had been convicted of two felonies when he was a teenager (I believe they said he was in his mid-thirties at the time of the article), he was told the interest rate would be 2% higher than they previously quoted him because he was a legal risk.

I had a Series 6 Securities license a few years back and I had to get finger-printed and the company I worked for did a background check to make sure I didn’t have any felonies or major misdemeanors on my record. The same holds true with many other types of professional licensing.

Many years ago, I had applied for the police department in my home town. Upon submitting my application, they automatically ran a complete background check on me. I know because they asked questions about my past and had my background check in front of them to see how honest I was.

When you enlist in the military, a background check is run to see if you meet military qualifications to defend your country. My brother was in the Air Force during Vietnam. He trained as a nuclear weapons specialist. Before being accepted, they ran a very thorough background check on him. The FBI not only interviewed everyone in the family and ran background checks on us, but they also interviewed his friends and some of his teachers from high school.

So why is it that no one bothered to run a background check on anyone running for the most powerful and dangerous position in the country: the President of the United States? You cannot convince me that a thorough background check was run when Barack Obama submitted his paperwork to run for the presidency back in 2008. If they had, they would have found all kinds of reds flags, stumbling blocks and hidden records, not to mention the question of where his birth took place and Obama would not have been allowed to run for the office and we would not be in the mess we’re in right now.

http://lastresistance.com/1119/background-che...
Oh my

Blairsville, GA

#124 Jan 25, 2013
- JUST CAUSE - wrote:
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
Background Checks for Guns and Apartments, Why Not for Presidency!

...So why is it that no one bothered to run a background check on anyone running for the most powerful and dangerous position in the country: the President of the United States? You cannot convince me that a thorough background check was run when Barack Obama submitted his paperwork to run for the presidency back in 2008. If they had, they would have found all kinds of reds flags, stumbling blocks and hidden records, not to mention the question of where his birth took place and Obama would not have been allowed to run for the office and we would not be in the mess we’re in right now.
Formal background checks are not mentioned in the US Constitution for this office, but the requirements that ARE mentioned in the US Constitution have been met.

Course there's a small group that believes there's a conspiracy behind every action, especially when the folks they voted for aren't in power, and doubly espcially if there's a non-white person involved. Why it's just common knowledge that non-white folks ALWAYS get special treatment.

Lord knows it must have been a copnspriacy that allowed a black guy to run, and get elected, twice, there's just no other explination.

Tell us again why you find it necessary to post under so many different personas, perhaps to hide aspects that might not be considered reasonable or rational.
Informed Opinion

Orlando, FL

#125 Jan 25, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>Formal background checks are not mentioned in the US Constitution for this office, but the requirements that ARE mentioned in the US Constitution have been met.

Course there's a small group that believes there's a conspiracy behind every action, especially when the folks they voted for aren't in power, and doubly espcially if there's a non-white person involved. Why it's just common knowledge that non-white folks ALWAYS get special treatment.

Lord knows it must have been a copnspriacy that allowed a black guy to run, and get elected, twice, there's just no other explination.

Tell us again why you find it necessary to post under so many different personas, perhaps to hide aspects that might not be considered reasonable or rational.
Isn't it amazing how the folks who conspire repeatedly to use the system's anachronistic rules to exercise power far in excess of their right, still complain the system works to their disfavor.

More Americans voted for Democrats than Republicans for Members of the House of Representatives - but thanks to Gerrymanding, Republicans control the House, despite most Americans voting for the contrary.

Having lost the election for President, now Repubs in "Swing States" want to change the rules for the Electoral College, so that they get to win the Presidency even though they lose the majority vote.

Hey, if they can steal the House against the will of most Americans, why not steal the Presidency.

Gotta admit, they are smart, if completely amoral. They want to rig the election for the Presidency like they rigged the House elections, so that even though they lose elections - they win.

Let's see how many who post here actually support democracy in America, or want to emulate Fascism - and keep rigging the rules to get offices for which they have lost the elections.

Gonna be interesting, at least.

“A Just Cause isn't capitulated”

Since: Jan 13

Blairsville

#126 Jan 25, 2013
We Need Hearings on Un-American Activities, Now!- The Last Resistance

lastresistance.com

The destructive actions and agenda of President Obama and his Executive Branch can no longer be tolerated by Americans. Obama has no plans to respect our laws and founding principles. He only wishes to weaken them and cripple what once was a country worthy of the title World Superpower. A country that the planet could count on to lay down our lives to defend good against aggression and shake compliance out of the stupidly arrogant and dangerous.

Obama’s priority is to destroy his opposition and complete his dream of transforming our Republic into a government controlled hell where citizens obey the government—over our faith in God and morality—or he will see us marginalized and subjugated. If he is allowed to advance his un-American delusions the United States future is certain. We will all be sacrificed to his world view.

Unlawful acts that rise to the level of treason and espionage cannot be abided to accommodate a dishonest man’s claim of privilege. Lies do not grant a criminal absolution for his mistakes nor his fabricated victories. Political patronage is graft and Obama is the spawn of this insidious illness that he has encouraged as President of our country. Obama has no respect is devoid of a conscience and his dangerous addiction to power and fame is destroying our nation.

Yesterday, I watched our Secretary of State refuse to answer to the American people for her failures and the deaths of four Americans serving our country. Incompetence is not an excuse Madam Secretary, it is criminal when you run our State Department and you watch four of your staff murdered and take political cover to protect your boss’s re-election and your political future. You Madam are not an American and you should be tried for your ineptitude and resolute betrayal of your fellow countrymen.

Manufacturing crisis is a form of sedition and it is a crime in America. Our President is fabricating carefully scripted crisis in order to assault our Constitution. Arbitrary and meritless gun bans are illegal in the United States of America. So is auctioning off sensitive U.S. assets and technologies to foreign governments. The mere thought of or plotting to undertake such a venture can carry the death sentence. It’s called espionage. Both of these crimes are being committed by our Executive Branch every day to satisfy their lust for deficit funding.

Our elections and our rights to vote for legitimate candidates openly vetted have been compromised by foreign money laundered through shell corporations, tax exempt charities, unions and lobbies. Not only does Obama willingly except this corruption, but he is now moonlighting on our time and dime for his campaign turned his tax free interest lobby. Conflict of interests abound and laws are broken as the Chicago school of machine politics rules the day and destroys what is left of a representative government and free and open elections. This too is against the law in the United States. This too is a crime.

Obama denies his Islamist loyalties. He strategically weakens U.S. military threats to his global brethren and exploits U.S. taxpayer money to provide terrorists camouflaged as Arab reformers with the equipment and aid they require to flourish and strengthen their anti-American offensive. Subterfuge is his ally, as he boldly claims victory where none exists; all to allow Islamist ideology to advance on American rights, laws and sovereignty. Access to the White House is now purchased by Sheiks and their errand boys. This too is a crime.

contnued

“A Just Cause isn't capitulated”

Since: Jan 13

Blairsville

#127 Jan 25, 2013
contuned

The United States of America is not a social engineering project. No President is ever elected to tinker with the inalienable rights that provide the foundation of our freedom and liberty. They all swear an oath to protect and defend these rights. Obama has proven to us he has no respect for the oath he took 4 years ago and re-took 4 days ago. His loyalties are un-American and he is no longer afraid to show his true intent. Obama’s ultimate target, our countries fiscal and social destruction, is no longer a secret. This is treason and it too is a crime.

President Obama is the greatest domestic threat our nation faces. This man possesses the power to soothe and heal our nation, yet he arrogantly chooses the path of confrontation, corruption and denial furthering the disintegration of our American way of life and our exceptionalism.

Whatever heroes that still remain in our government and in our communities must demand investigation into this administrations serial corruption and willful disregard for their oaths and the breaking of our nation’s laws. We must take the fight for our rights to the White House. We must rid our nation of the sinister threat that has stolen the high political high ground and doomed us to 4 more years of Obama’s Amerika. Un-American activities can no longer be forgiven for they have become the new norm and eventually they will take us all.

http://lastresistance.com/1126/we-need-hearin...
Oh my

Blairsville, GA

#129 Jan 26, 2013
- JUST CAUSE - wrote:
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
We Need Hearings on Un-American Activities, Now!- The Last Resistance
Thank you,
Thank you,
thank you,
for posting this.

It is another fine example
of why you must
post under multiple personas.
Airs of rationality
would be impossible to maintain.

Again, Thank you.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Ranger Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
DAKOTA SHERWOOD involved in DOLLAR STORE ROBBERY 1 hr The Mountains Noise 4
Congratulations To Angela Garmley 2 hr pow 48
Where ia Corner Service Station Now 9 hr bigboo 5
bryant cochran and jqc (Aug '12) 10 hr Bubba G Gump 71
Mt. View Baptist Church (Jan '12) 10 hr Bubba G Gump 61
Seafood 10 hr want to know 54
blonde girl in black mercedes 11 hr HollyChesser 6

Ranger News Video

Ranger Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Ranger People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Ranger News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Ranger

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 9:45 am PST

Bleacher Report 9:45AM
Complete Preview for Falcons vs. Saints
Bleacher Report10:16 AM
Complete Preview for Saints vs. Falcons
CBS Sports 4:35 AM
Falcons expected to fire Mike Smith; could be eyeing Broncos' Adam Gase
NFL 6:10 AM
Injury roundup: Falcons optimistic Julio Jones will play
NFL 6:52 AM
Tennessee Titans prepping for possible Jay Cutler deal