Free At Last
Doo

Dalton, GA

#21 Jun 26, 2013
comshau 30711 wrote:
<quoted text> Please Doo tell us everything you know about military guns. Fully auto is illegal unless licensed. By military gun do you mean one with a pistol grip and a black gun. Wow my hunting rifle is a bigger caliber than a 223 or 7.62. There are shot guns with pistol grips. Give us your assfacts Doo.
Who needs a fully automatic gun? An mass murderer or a hunter? Pistol grip and a black gun? who needs a pistol grip black gun? Not me! A little lesson on calibers Comshau. Smaller caliber rifles are much more accurate than a large one. A 223 is a very deadly long range rifle. Larger bullets are not more deadly. Dead is dead Comshau. You want overkill? Why would you want to make it easier for criminals to get guns? Are you or you kin planning a mass murder or something? You can kill someone with a ball bat...a big black one too. They make these military looking guns to sell because they look military. I would rather have a gun with a wood stock that don't look so radical. Just me...so Obama don't bother me none.
Doo

Dalton, GA

#22 Jun 26, 2013
corporate wrote:
My hunting rifle is a bigger caliber than than the AR-15 and I can get a magazine that will almost as many as the AR. Obama wants to ban all guns. I am against Obama.
Have you ever heard Obama say "I want to ban all guns". You wouldn't be making one up would you? I don't think he ever said that in any speech I've heard. Of course I don't watch Fox so I wouldn't know. You see, I like real facts for my News.
corporate

Byron, GA

#23 Jun 26, 2013
Doo wrote:
<quoted text>Have you ever heard Obama say "I want to ban all guns". You wouldn't be making one up would you? I don't think he ever said that in any speech I've heard. Of course I don't watch Fox so I wouldn't know. You see, I like real facts for my News.
It doesn't matter who needs a fully auto gun. If it legal to own then if you want one buy one. If you don't want one then don't buy. But don't tell me not to buy one. It is a free country. I have heard Clinton say he would ban all guns if he could and Obama has the same views. I served two years overseas in combat to protect our rights and I don't want a liberal president to make my service a waste. You are right I don't like our president.
Doo

Dalton, GA

#24 Jun 26, 2013
corporate wrote:
<quoted text>
It doesn't matter who needs a fully auto gun. If it legal to own then if you want one buy one. If you don't want one then don't buy. But don't tell me not to buy one. It is a free country. I have heard Clinton say he would ban all guns if he could and Obama has the same views. I served two years overseas in combat to protect our rights and I don't want a liberal president to make my service a waste. You are right I don't like our president.
I don't need a fully automatic gun to squirrel hunt with. They don't have a chance the way it is. Who does? The purpose of a fully automatic weapon is to kill in mass numbers. I don't have the right to tell you that you can't have one....just the same as I tell you about abortion rights. I don't believe in abortions but do not have the right to tell others they can't. It's a free Country. I appreciate your service to our Country. The only thing that bothers me with people like Bush is the un-necessary wars that got so many killed for no reason that makes sense. We need to stay out of the Middle East Wars. They are too expensive in money and lives. So Liberals don't quite go to war so fast which is a good thing for sure. Fighting to defend someone like Hitler from taking our Country is one thing. Fighting for oil is totally not worth the money and lives. I would rather ride a bicycle than to see people give their lives. Say what you want to but the real reason is all about oil and gasoline for the rich oil tycoons to make more millions with.
Cindy Sheehan

Millbrook, AL

#25 Jun 26, 2013
Why does Obama want to protect the rich oil men?

Blood for oil!!!
Doo

Kathleen, GA

#26 Jul 1, 2013
Cindy Sheehan wrote:
Why does Obama want to protect the rich oil men?
Blood for oil!!!
Because he's trying to clean up Bushes mess...that's why!
comshau 30711

Bradenton, FL

#27 Jul 1, 2013
Doo wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't need a fully automatic gun to squirrel hunt with. They don't have a chance the way it is. Who does? The purpose of a fully automatic weapon is to kill in mass numbers. I don't have the right to tell you that you can't have one....just the same as I tell you about abortion rights. I don't believe in abortions but do not have the right to tell others they can't. It's a free Country. I appreciate your service to our Country. The only thing that bohers me with people like Bush is the un-necessary wars that got so many killed for no reason that makes sense. We need to stay out of the Middle East Wars. They are too expensive in money and lives. So Liberals don't quite go to war so fast which is a good thing for sure. Fighting to defend someone like Hitler from taking our Country is one thing. Fighting for oil is totally not worth the money and lives. I would rather ride a bicycle than to see people give their lives. Say what you want to but the real reason is all about oil and gasoline for the rich oil tycoons to make more millions with.
You mean the way Obama turned Libya over to the kooks.Then he and Hillary refused more security and got four killed while he went back to sleep. Great leadership there Doo!
comshau 30711

Bradenton, FL

#28 Jul 1, 2013
comshau 30711 wrote:
<quoted text>You mean the way Obama turned Libya over to the kooks.Then he and Hillary refused more security and got four killed while he went back to sleep. Great leadership there Doo!
Also Doo which would do more damage in a crowd? A 300 magnum or a 223.
Doo

Kathleen, GA

#29 Jul 1, 2013
comshau 30711 wrote:
<quoted text>You mean the way Obama turned Libya over to the kooks.Then he and Hillary refused more security and got four killed while he went back to sleep. Great leadership there Doo!
I don't think you are taking in all the facts in this case Comshau. It's easy to point fingers but the Congress voted not to fund money for more security in these regions. So point your fingers to them that won't take responsibility for their actions. It's easy for the right wing to blame Obama for everything but most Americans know better. That is why he got re-elected. Don't be so bias.
Doo

Kathleen, GA

#30 Jul 1, 2013
comshau 30711 wrote:
<quoted text>Also Doo which would do more damage in a crowd? A 300 magnum or a 223.
In reality a 223 will kill just as many. A bomb will kill a whole lot of people also...but bombs are illegal an should some automatic weapon be. Hunting rifles are one thing but combat weapons are another entirely. Making these weapons harder to get is a good thing. Weeding out people that have the need to kill in mass killings is also a good thing. Any tool that helps point out these type people is a good law. You talk about your freedoms being taken away. They are not being taken away but are insuring Americans that they will be safer living and raising families here. Our children should be safe in schools. You want easy access to these kinds of weapons. Get real Comshau and think for yourself for once and give Fox up. You are deluted.
comshau 30711

Bradenton, FL

#31 Jul 1, 2013
Doo wrote:
<quoted text>
In reality a 223 will kill just as many. A bomb will kill a whole lot of people also...but bombs are illegal an should some automatic weapon be. Hunting rifles are one thing but combat weapons are another entirely. Making these weapons harder to get is a good thing. Weeding out people that have the need to kill in mass killings is also a good thing. Any tool that helps point out these type people is a good law. You talk about your freedoms being taken away. They are not being taken away but are insuring Americans that they will be safer living and raising families here. Our children should be safe in schools. You want easy access to these kinds of weapons. Get real Comshau and think for yourself for once and give Fox up. You are deluted.
Yea Doo lets all give up freedom for security. One more time Doo! Full autos are illegal unless one gets a permit from the ATF which is a thourgh back ground check. My point is that just because a gun looks military doesn't make it more dangerous than a higher caliber hunting rifle that can be retrofitted with a high capisity mag. Also funding had nothing to do with the security and the ability to get those people out of Libya. All other Embacies had been removed due to the unrest ..It was a complete failue of Obama and the State Dept. and the lies and cpver-up should have led to heads rolling. But noooooo Susan Rice got a promotion for her going out and lying to cover Obama's axx.
Doo

Kathleen, GA

#32 Jul 1, 2013
comshau 30711 wrote:
<quoted text>Yea Doo lets all give up freedom for security. One more time Doo! Full autos are illegal unless one gets a permit from the ATF which is a thourgh back ground check. My point is that just because a gun looks military doesn't make it more dangerous than a higher caliber hunting rifle that can be retrofitted with a high capisity mag. Also funding had nothing to do with the security and the ability to get those people out of Libya. All other Embacies had been removed due to the unrest ..It was a complete failue of Obama and the State Dept. and the lies and cpver-up should have led to heads rolling. But noooooo Susan Rice got a promotion for her going out and lying to cover Obama's axx.
What about when George Bush's people went to sleep at the wheel on 911? Did you fuss about that incident? Your are too bias Comshau.
really

Byron, GA

#33 Jul 1, 2013
Doo wrote:
<quoted text>What about when George Bush's people went to sleep at the wheel on 911? Did you fuss about that incident? Your are too bias Comshau.
At least Bush retaliated against the planners of the attack. Clinton and Obama did nothing when we were attacked doing their terms.
franks n beans

Chickamauga, GA

#34 Jul 1, 2013
heres who Ocommie supports

Doo

Dalton, GA

#35 Jul 1, 2013
really wrote:
<quoted text>
At least Bush retaliated against the planners of the attack. Clinton and Obama did nothing when we were attacked doing their terms.
Where were you when Bush said "mission accomplished" to the whole World when he thought it was over and when reality was just starting. Obama stopped it and got Bin Ladin which Bush couldn't doo. All he managed to doo was get a lot of our guys killed and blowed trillions of tax payer dollars.
really

Byron, GA

#36 Jul 1, 2013
Doo wrote:
<quoted text>Where were you when Bush said "mission accomplished" to the whole World when he thought it was over and when reality was just starting. Obama stopped it and got Bin Ladin which Bush couldn't doo. All he managed to doo was get a lot of our guys killed and blowed trillions of tax payer dollars.
Bush wasn't perfect by no means but when he identified the attackers he did something. When the USS Cole was attacked Clinton just sat on his thumb. Obama doesn't have the guts to defend America. I am glad I am glad I am not under his command now.
Doo

Dalton, GA

#37 Jul 1, 2013
really wrote:
<quoted text>
Bush wasn't perfect by no means but when he identified the attackers he did something. When the USS Cole was attacked Clinton just sat on his thumb. Obama doesn't have the guts to defend America. I am glad I am glad I am not under his command now.
He identified the attackers and attacked another Country. Bin Ladin wasn't even in Iraq. After the USS Cole was attacked by some sucidle nuts and actually pulled it off...then what was Clinton expected to doo. How can you defend yourself is the offender dies in the incident? Looks to me like the nuts paid the ultimate price with their own lives. What did you want Clinton to doo, go kick their dead bodies or something. They were blown to bits. Of course you could have done a better job....because your a Republican. Obama has more guts than any other President before him. He fights battles without getting a lot of other people killed. He uses swift and accurate means to doo so. He gets the enemies killed and that's what counts. I am glad he was our two time President.
really

Byron, GA

#38 Jul 1, 2013
Doo wrote:
<quoted text>He identified the attackers and attacked another Country. Bin Ladin wasn't even in Iraq. After the USS Cole was attacked by some sucidle nuts and actually pulled it off...then what was Clinton expected to doo. How can you defend yourself is the offender dies in the incident? Looks to me like the nuts paid the ultimate price with their own lives. What did you want Clinton to doo, go kick their dead bodies or something. They were blown to bits. Of course you could have done a better job....because your a Republican. Obama has more guts than any other President before him. He fights battles without getting a lot of other people killed. He uses swift and accurate means to doo so. He gets the enemies killed and that's what counts. I am glad he was our two time President.
The suicide bombers are financed and the attack is planned by someone. They need to be punished. Clinton was too busy getting bummers in the Oval Office to do his job. No Obama don't want to kill his honeys so we are screwed. The attack on 9/11 was funded by Iraq as well as some other countries and deserved the bombs they received. Republican or democrat, the Muslims want us dead.
Doo

Dalton, GA

#39 Jul 1, 2013
really wrote:
<quoted text>
The suicide bombers are financed and the attack is planned by someone. They need to be punished. Clinton was too busy getting bummers in the Oval Office to do his job. No Obama don't want to kill his honeys so we are screwed. The attack on 9/11 was funded by Iraq as well as some other countries and deserved the bombs they received. Republican or democrat, the Muslims want us dead.
I agree that all the enemies should be gone after and the planners should be punished for their actions. The ones that actually carried out the plans were the true criminals that did the crime. President Obama does go after these planners still today even after the death of Bin Laden which Obama played a big part in. Picking off the enemy one at a time is much better strategy than involving the whole Nations military that so many of our guys could be killed in the process. The drones Obama is using with our well trained troups is a much better way to deal with. Believe me, the enemy is scared to death of him today. They hide like the cowards and are afraid to be seen anywhere. We learned a lot about alkida from things retrieved from Bin Laden including plans to kill Obama. One thing you are very wrong is that you think all Muslims are out to kill Americans. Truth is, there are all kinds of bad people and good people hiding under a Religion name. Worshiping false Gods don't make you something you are or are not. You are either bad, good or in between. Obama is not a Muslim like you try to put one him. His father was but he is not and was raised up in Hawii with Chistain beliefs reguardless of what the right wing likes to accuse him of. Lies and distortions are what the right wing does better than anything else they doo. The have and will always be for the wealthy class and don't give a crap about the working class. Look at how the giant corpaorations fleece us all daily out of money for gasoline, drugs, insurance, health care and anything else that involves them in our lives. I'm not saying Iraq and Sadam Huseen was good at all. It was what it was and he was a killer dictator, but we had no business getting involved in this war in this way. There were more options that could have been used to solve the problem. The Iraq people are the ones that actually hanged him by the neck till dead. Not us. You label them all the same. Huseen was cruel to his own people and paid the Ultimate price for his crimes. He didn't have weapons of mass destruction or anything that was a real threat to us as a Nation. Your being so bias makes you blind to the real facts. Stop and slow down and study the real facts. It will make you a better and more understanding person in the future.
Bobby

Chatsworth, GA

#40 Jul 1, 2013
I can't believe you good people are actually using up good time arguing with doodypile.
That is like arguing with a pile of rocks. Wait, that's not fair to a pile of rocks so I apologize.
He has no concept what is really going on in the World his response to everything he doesn't agree with is bull crap. He bases all of his opinions
on what master Obama says not what is right or wrong or true or false. How do you argue with that?
Just insult him and move on to more productive pursuits.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Ranger Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Replace Judge Dwain Brackett (Jun '12) 13 hr zaz zu 395
For Hire Sexy Decoy (Mar '14) 20 hr God is a bad ass 34
Tthe Meadow Apartments Wed Jimmy 14
Armadillo Grill Tue Cops Suck 48
News Police car thieves arrested in Haralson County Jan '17 Mimi 1
l can't believe that I am going to college (Jul '16) Nov '16 thomas short bus 4
rail road (Sep '16) Sep '16 clif booker 1

Ranger Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Ranger Mortgages