92067 Rancho Santa Fe Free Press brea...

92067 Rancho Santa Fe Free Press breaks story on local earmarks in federal Omnibus Spending Bill

There are 2 comments on the www.92067FREEPRESS.com story from Mar 14, 2009, titled 92067 Rancho Santa Fe Free Press breaks story on local earmarks in federal Omnibus Spending Bill. In it, www.92067FREEPRESS.com reports that:

THIS JUST IN FROM THE 92067 FREE PRESS INVESTIGATIVE TRUTH SQUAD:

Brian Bilbray, R-50th Congressional District, respresenting Rancho Santa Fe and North County from Carmel Valley to Escondido, opposed, and voted against, the 2009 Omnibus Spending Bill saying "It is littered with wasteful and questionable spending that has no place in a stimulus package" (follow this link for his full statement) also placed four individual earmarks totaling almost $1.5 million and added his name to six additional earmarks totaling $3.3 million, according to an analysis of the bill by 92067 Rancho Santa Fe Free Press based on information provided Friday, March 13 by the non-partisan budget watchdog group Taxpayers for Common Sense.

Bilbray's earmarks included:

$476,000 for the San Diego County Public Health Information Management System;

$475,000 for the Highway 56/Interstate 5 Widening Project;

$285,000 for the Encinitas Boulevard/I-5 Interchange Environmental Review;

$263,000 for the Solana-Encinitas Shoreline;

$237,500 for the Encinas Creek/Highway 101 Bridge Replacement;

$500,000 for the Costal Field Collection California Beach Processes Study;

$1.35 million for San Diego and Imperial County Communication Upgrades.

Now, in fairness, Bilbray had help with one of the earmarks. Reps. Bob Filner, Susan Davis and Darryl Issa each co-sponsored the communication upgrade earmark.

In fairness as well, 92067 Free Press supports many of these local projects, notably the Highway 56/I-5 widening project.

BUT...If someone issues press releases and public statements in a partisan manner saying earmarks in the National Rescue Omnibus Spending Bill are "wasteful and questionable" then shouldn't that representative NOT put in earmarks, regardless of how much they might benefit the community. You decide.

We have asked Bilbray's office for comment and received none as of Saturday, March 14.

92067 Rancho Santa Fe Free Press has broken this story exclusively. We will have an in-depth look at local earmarks later this week.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.92067FREEPRESS.com.

Jerry Gordon

Bonsall, CA

#1 Mar 22, 2009
Brian Bilbray's and Darryl Issa's position of being against earmarks but also sponsoring some, makes perfect sense to me. If their anti-earmark position is in the minority and the pro-earmark position wins, then why shouldn't we get some of the earmark "goodies" dispensed?

Since: Nov 08

Escondido, CA

#2 Sep 30, 2009
Because we're not p-i-g-s like you ma'am

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Rancho Santa Fe Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Is oceanside a good place to live? (Jan '16) 15 hr Mallory1329 3
Corinne Hogg and her VA disability - What's wro... (Sep '15) Mon Annonymous 11
2003 Chevy Trailblazer-CHECK ENGINE LIGHT AND R... (Dec '11) Mon Yvette 285
Review: Jim's Mobile RV Repair (Jun '15) Jul 22 justtryingtostaya... 12
News Wally the dead whale finally laid to rest in So... Jul 22 Ed Muntin 5
booming noise last night and this am (Jul '09) Jul 20 Cat lover 36
Mary Botto Artist (Aug '12) Jul 14 marion goff 39

Rancho Santa Fe Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Rancho Santa Fe Mortgages