Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[KiMare]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Rose's Law:
Morons with no real argument scream, "But what about the children!?"

You are lying, nobody is demanding anybody totally remove the consideration of children.

I'm shocked!!!

You undermine your own counter.

Ho, Ho, Ho.

[Razored]

You know why so many Glendora, California politicans and their friends hate "TOPIX.COM , right?

Things get said here that nobody else will print.

The truth is their worst enemy, and that is what you get here.

But then you get nasty posting blogers who rant and rave, threated posters etc. typical Glendora Racists etc.

The Glendora Police Department knows who they are bu they are told by City Hall officials and City Council member's not to stop them from posting threatening messages.

[Frankie Rizzo]

Jazybird58 wrote:

<quoted text>Stuck on stupid.

Well try to get unstuck, stupid. Don't tell me. I know you are and it makes it easy for me.

[akpilot]

Edgar wrote:

<quoted text>
You bet, buddy.
History has shown this: given enough momentum, a rights-activism movement in America cannot be stopped (i.e. racial equality, gender equality, the American revolution...)
Everyone has a purpose. That's what sets the two sides of this debate apart; one side's extreme is shown to consistently show more faith in human capability than the other.
And it ain't your side, if I may resort to briefly using Texan slang.

It's not my fault you are a bigot.

BTW, what is my side? We all know you can't answer that question.

[Dusty Mangina]

KiMare wrote:

KiMare wrote:
Moreover, homosexuality is a far more promiscuous orientation than heterosexuality.

Jealous?

[Frankie Rizzo]

Jazybird58 wrote:

<quoted text>Umm she hates your lying no good two timing dead beat azz???

No, that's not it.

It's because it used to be believed that procreation between close relatives causes medical problems in the offspring.

This had proven to be greatly exaggerated and mostly false.

But the old law remains.

Try and get unstuck from stupid fruitcake.

[akpilot]

Edgar wrote:

<quoted text>
If you want to legalize multiple-partner marriage than go right on ahead, see where you get.

Interesting, so you aren't for equal right's? I figured since you have claimed the moral high ground you would be.

But that's OK, bigot.

[Paroolah Busw3aanaritsa]

Buy many disposable bags soonest. We have them on sale. Immediately when your dollar devalues you will want to sell them back but we will be only be able to offer a fraction of the money you have invested. We love a bargain and your stoopid sequester guarantees that all of Afrika will be able to buy you out cheap when the tumble of your economy has ended. Great plan. Haaaagh!
Strategic thinking.

[akpilot]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Stupid, don't have a right to be happy. As horrible as you are, you obviously aren't, and no law is being broken.

Wow, you need med's... Lots of them!!!!

[akpilot]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you have a point?
No, you don't. You're just a bitter troll.

I do, but we don't expect you to understand it.

[akpilot]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you have a point? You post doesn't have anything to do with arguments for or against gay marriage.

I can't help it if you are confused, that has been an issue of yours since long before I began posting here, I can hardly fix your ignorance.

[Frankie Rizzo]

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
It's not my fault you are a bigot.
BTW, what is my side? We all know you can't answer that question.

Like Pietro succinctly put it, what's good for the gay goose is not good for the poly gander.

[akpilot]

Jazybird58 wrote:

<quoted text>
Please indicate how property disbursement will be allocated in a poly marriage where a man has say 4 wives.
wife # 1 , married 15 years, 5 children
wife #2, married 10 years, 4 children
wife #3 Married, 5 years,3 children
wife # 4 married 1 year, 1 child
The husband wishes to divorce wife #1. Will she get the house, and a bulk of his assets? How will that be fair to the 3 remaining wives.
He wants to divorce all 4, how will the property be split, will it be based on duration of each marriage.
The husband dies, at that point all 4 are widows, tell me Frank who will receive his social security, for the children, will each of them receive the same?
As you can see same sex marriages will not affect any standing laws.

Last I checked, the difficulty of applying equality wasn't a litmus test for granting it.

[akpilot]

Xavier Breath wrote:

<quoted text>No, doesn't sound better, you moron. The government grants marriage. OF COURSE they have a say. It seems that you lack even a basic understanding of the world.

"Government grants"??? My how far we have come since 1776.

[All Toll]

An indictment unsealed in Yolo County this afternoon lays out 35 counts against former West Sacramento police Officer Sergio Alvarez, who authorities sexually assaulted several woman while on duty.

The indictment says that two of the six victims were allegedly assaulted on more than one occasion.

The 37-year-old Alvarez faces charges of rape, sodomy, oral copulation and kidnapping for crimes that occurred between Oct. 1, 2011 and Sept. 23, 2012, according to the indictment.

=cpy

[Xavier Breath]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
I call bullsh!t. I don't use anti gay epithets Miss Thing. Maybe you sense my contempt for you, but it's not because you're gay.
I have friends and family I love dearly that are homosexuals bla bla bla.
It's a NY thing. You're from Joisey. You never heard someone call another "fruitcake" or fruitloops"? It has no sexuality connotation. You have a huge chip on your shoulder.
If it has any meaning beyond "dude" or etc. It means you're crazy. Nuttier than a fruitcake.
Having said that fruitloops, Screw off you miserable old malcontent hypocrite. Glad it makes you angry.
Hope that helps.

Makes me angry? hahahahaahahahha Yeah, right..... you have the power to "make me" angry.... That's a good one, for a bullshit artist. I can't believe you even tried to claim fruitcake and fruitloops are not anti-gay epithets. You lie so often you can't tell the difference any more.

[Xavier Breath]

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
"Government grants"??? My how far we have come since 1776.

Yes. I hope you catch up before you die.

[Xavier Breath]

Dusty Mangina wrote:

<quoted text>
Jealous?

He's retarded.

[Rose_NoHo]

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
"Government grants"??? My how far we have come since 1776.

Yeah, murder is illegal, as is slavery, and women can vote.

[akpilot]

Xavier Breath wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes. I hope you catch up before you die.

That was intelligent.