Legalize COCKFIGHTING in AGRI ZONINGS to fund public schools

Posted in the Rancho Cordova Forum

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
4humanrights

San Mateo, CA

#2 Feb 20, 2013
Board of supervisors need to pass a AGRI ZONING Ordinance to TAX, regulate gamefowl sport in Private Agri zoning properties.

County to issue " Day event PERMIT of $ 300 per day plus $ 3 per chicken to fund public schools".

Home > Opinion > Letters to the Editor


Wednesday, Jun 01 2011 11:05 PM

Cockfighting could earn millions for state


Regarding The Californian's May 26 editorial, "Two cockfighting bills that were long overdue": On behalf of the thousands of game-bird hobbyists, I'd like to say that anyone who has been raised around game birds knows that a rooster cannot be forced or trained to fight; this is a natural instinct that was instilled by God.

Animals that are forced to do what does not come naturally to them is cruel. Were horses meant to be ridden? Are the animals in the circus, zoo or rodeos meant to be used for our entertainment?

When it comes to cockfighting, who are these "experts" who claim that these chickens are "trained" to fight? What real proof is there that connects drugs, gangs, prostitution and gambling to this activity? Just to go Vegas, it's all there. Raising and fighting game birds requires money: money for feed and vitamins, money for building supplies for the pens, money for items to provide their chickens the best care; WIC or EBT benefits cannot be used to purchase these items.

The so-called "barbarians" who participate in this activity are working individuals who have jobs and pay taxes. If there are more than 50,000 cockfighters in California, then just imagine the money the state could produce if it was made legal and each of those 50,000 people had to purchase a yearly permit to fight: a $100 permit times 50,000 people equals $5 million or a $500 permit times 50,000 equals $25 million. Prior to being banned in Louisiana, cockfighting was a $150 million industry.

MIKE HIPOLITO
4humanrights

San Mateo, CA

#4 Feb 20, 2013
unconstitutional anti-cockfighting laws are SPONSORED by a private nontaxpaying Economic Terrorist Vegan syndicates, pls read pages 8-9 of US Homeland Security report on Terrorism, http://www.hsussucks.com/ ,

http://www.humanewatch.org

http://www.hpj.com/archives/2011/dec11/dec12/...

http://msexceptiontotherule.wordpress.com/201...
4humanrights

San Mateo, CA

#6 Feb 20, 2013
Americans & I eat tons of CHICKENS, u cannibal? u bear eater?

http://dailycaller.com/2012/12/28/aspca-pays-...
Tim Truhart wrote:
How about we legalize bear baiting; dueling; and throwing people like 4human... into a volcano? We could charge admission and give 10% to the schools.
4humanrights

San Mateo, CA

#7 Feb 21, 2013
To know WHO are the MAJORITY of US Gamefowl sport practitioneers,

http://gamecocksunlimited.wordpress.com/the-c...
4humanrights

San Mateo, CA

#8 Feb 21, 2013
check out ASPCA/HSUS RACKETEERING SCAM!

http://www.humanewatch.org/index.php/site/pos...

http://thereptilereport.com/federal-racketeer...
Tim Truhart wrote:
How about we legalize bear baiting; dueling; and throwing people like 4human... into a volcano? We could charge admission and give 10% to the schools.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#9 Feb 21, 2013
Tim Truhart wrote:
How about we legalize bear baiting; dueling; and throwing people like 4human... into a volcano? We could charge admission and give 10% to the schools.
I'm all for it and would pay top dollar to watch you perform.
La Migra

Chico, CA

#10 Feb 21, 2013
The only people that enjoy this are Beaners and Gooks.
cwi530

Sacramento, CA

#11 Feb 21, 2013
California legislators will never allow cockfighting unless it's either unionized, involves homosexuals, or declared part of the heritage of the state's illegal alien population.
kelso

San Mateo, CA

#13 Feb 22, 2013
Gamefowl Sport will create more tax revenues to local gov't , jobs & businesses to open in agri zonings compared to POPEYE chicken, kfc..........& hsus/aspca/peta
4humanrights wrote:
Board of supervisors need to pass a AGRI ZONING Ordinance to TAX, regulate gamefowl sport in Private Agri zoning properties.
County to issue " Day event PERMIT of $ 300 per day plus $ 3 per chicken to fund public schools".
Home > Opinion > Letters to the Editor
Wednesday, Jun 01 2011 11:05 PM
Cockfighting could earn millions for state
Regarding The Californian's May 26 editorial, "Two cockfighting bills that were long overdue": On behalf of the thousands of game-bird hobbyists, I'd like to say that anyone who has been raised around game birds knows that a rooster cannot be forced or trained to fight; this is a natural instinct that was instilled by God.
Animals that are forced to do what does not come naturally to them is cruel. Were horses meant to be ridden? Are the animals in the circus, zoo or rodeos meant to be used for our entertainment?
When it comes to cockfighting, who are these "experts" who claim that these chickens are "trained" to fight? What real proof is there that connects drugs, gangs, prostitution and gambling to this activity? Just to go Vegas, it's all there. Raising and fighting game birds requires money: money for feed and vitamins, money for building supplies for the pens, money for items to provide their chickens the best care; WIC or EBT benefits cannot be used to purchase these items.
The so-called "barbarians" who participate in this activity are working individuals who have jobs and pay taxes. If there are more than 50,000 cockfighters in California, then just imagine the money the state could produce if it was made legal and each of those 50,000 people had to purchase a yearly permit to fight: a $100 permit times 50,000 people equals $5 million or a $500 permit times 50,000 equals $25 million. Prior to being banned in Louisiana, cockfighting was a $150 million industry.
MIKE HIPOLITO
semper fi

San Mateo, CA

#14 Feb 22, 2013
check out ASPCA/HSUS in RACKETEERING SCAM!
http://www.humanewatch.org/index.php/site/pos...
IT's IMMORAL & Unconstitutional to IMPOSE once personal MORAL CHICKEN VALUES to others, anti-cockfighting laws SPONSORED by a private nontaxpaying ECONOMIC TERRORIST VEGAN Syndicates, read pg 8-9 of the US HOMELAND Security report on TERRORISM, http://www.hsussucks.com/
La Migra wrote:
The only people that enjoy this are Beaners and Gooks.
semper fi

San Mateo, CA

#15 Feb 22, 2013
u have to be one of Peter Singer members........

u need to STOP eating MAGIC mushroom/drugs, u think chickens americans EAT are humans??????

u are not FIT to roam in US community!

http://msexceptiontotherule.wordpress.com/201...
Tim Truhart wrote:
What if it's part of a sensitive religious ceremony? We get loaded on magic mushrooms; place Ms Fire on the stone altar, and I'll cut her heart out with a broken beer bottle. Who could object to that?
TAXPAYERS

San Mateo, CA

#25 Mar 10, 2013
4humanrights

San Mateo, CA

#31 Apr 3, 2013
Vern

Chico, CA

#32 Apr 4, 2013
Dog fighting is illegal and cock fighting should remain illegal as well.

How people can get a thrill from defenseless animals being thrown in the pit to fight one another?

It's just inhumane plain and simple as most are destroyed after losing.
4humanrights

San Mateo, CA

#33 Apr 4, 2013
IT's IMMORAL & Unconstitutional to IMPOSE once personal MORAL CHICKEN VALUES to others, anti-cockfighting laws SPONSORED by a private nontaxpaying ECONOMIC TERRORIST VEGAN Syndicates, read pg 8-9 of the US HOMELAND Security report on TERRORISM, http://www.hsussucks.com/
MsSoccerMom

Elk Grove, CA

#34 Apr 4, 2013
Vern wrote:
Dog fighting is illegal and cock fighting should remain illegal as well.
How people can get a thrill from defenseless animals being thrown in the pit to fight one another?
It's just inhumane plain and simple as most are destroyed after losing.
I agree, our food should not be allowed to fight before we slaughter and cook it.
Vern

Chico, CA

#35 Apr 5, 2013
MsSoccerMom wrote:
<quoted text>I agree, our food should not be allowed to fight before we slaughter and cook it.
You eat dog?
MsSoccerMom

Elk Grove, CA

#36 Apr 5, 2013
Vern wrote:
<quoted text>
You eat dog?
I don't, do you?
4humanrights

San Mateo, CA

#37 Apr 5, 2013
HISTORY LESSON ON ANIMAL RIGHTS AND TYRANNY

“Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

Hitler's Nazi Germany was marked by a preoccupation with "animal rights." Hitler's Third Reich passed numerous animal protection laws, such as declaring that shoeing a horse was cruel, and declared an end to dissection. This reduced Man’s status to that of animals, and justified treating men as animals. Before the war was ended, the Nazis stepped up experiments on the best way to castrate a Jew without anesthesia, and turned countless men, women and children into lampshades and soap. These Nazi actions were justifiable by their belief that it was possible to "...increase the moral standing of animals and decrease the moral standing of people, thus integrating human characteristics to animals... elevating animal life to the level of cult worship...which would lead to the spiritual and ideological changes necessary... for a new national identity."

The real political objective of “animal rights” is to eliminate "unalienable rights," and to make way for all these other supposed rights and pervert our Bill of Rights to the point where only the perverted are protected. A favored socialist strategy is to separate the population from common sense and its own laws by bringing about chaos, clouding real issues, then bring about “change” through gradual “legislation from within.” Ruling by planned crisis is the favored method, as this short-circuits the brain’s ability to think and reason clearly about true issues. This planned chaos (such as “animal cruelty,”“puppy mills” and “cock fighting”) is designed to rob the nation of its creativity and life force, degrade human existence, make everything seem uncontrollable and bad, which then allows the introduction of a tyrannical form of government.

The Gestapo was first used by Goring to do away with political opponents. A "temporary" state of emergency was declared after the Reichstag fire, but was never rescinded. This allowed the Gestapo to enforce conformity at every level of society. Block wardens monitored their neighbors, and children were recruited to inform on their teachers and parents. The Gestapo was authorized to hold people in "protective custody" which was really arbitrary arrest and imprisonment. At first, only political prisoners were taken under the guise of "preventive protective custody" and placed in SS-controlled concentration camps; later, anyone was hunted down and taken who was deemed to not fit in with SS and Gestapo vision of a perfect Aryan society.("SS" came from Schutzstaffel which means "elite guard").

Today we see this same conduct and set of circumstances appearing in some of our civic institutions. The only way for one man to achieve dominion and control over another is through the darkness of IGNORANCE. Let’s get educated about our own laws, so that tyranny cannot gain a foothold in America, and so that we can once again have “happiness and good government flowing forth” as paraphrased by all our early education laws. We do have some beautiful laws. Let’s learn them, and insist that our civic institutions obey them for the good of our nation. God Bless America.





-Compiled by: Janet I. Fischer and S.A. Martin

17954-A S. Euclid Ave.

Chino, CA 91710
4humanrights

San Mateo, CA

#38 Apr 5, 2013
tp://gtte.wordpress.com/2012/1 0/17/liberty -...

LAWRENCE COUNTY, AL (WAFF)-
A Lawrence County jury acquitted five men charged with cockfighting.

Related content
31 arrests made after cockfighting ring bust
The verdict came down Wednesday following two days of testimony.

The five were arrested in August of 2011 after undercover officers went to the fights and documented what they saw.

The fights reportedly happened at a home in the Speake community.

Defense attorneys argued that cockfighting is a sport, saying that George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Abe Lincoln all were known to be involved in it.

They also tried arguing that since a chicken doesn't have four legs and fur, it's not an animal - so animal abuse charges wouldn't make sense.

The jury seemed to hinge on whether or not the fights were on private or public property.

"In short, if you fight cocks in a public place, then that's a violation of the law. The flip side of that is, theoretically, well, you can fight at a private place," said Lawrence County District Attorney, Errek Jett.

The judge told jurors to ignore the argument that chickens weren't animals.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Rancho Cordova Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Review: Stephanie H Stilley 29 min Annoyed 3
anyone can help me w h? (Mar '13) 15 hr horseyhorselookin 5
Review: Sacramento Valley Ambulance (Nov '08) 18 hr blankperson 11
Shooting range set to open next to a Sacramento... 20 hr Here Is One 171
Lori Sue Jordan Mon Fahim Mohammed Jones 5
Fair oaks explosion (Jan '13) Oct 18 goldseekers4 9
Ar you a submissive bottom? Oct 18 Krieger muffin 1
Rancho Cordova Dating
Find my Match

Rancho Cordova Jobs

Rancho Cordova People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Rancho Cordova News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Rancho Cordova

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]