Posted in the Quakertown Forum
Comments (Page 3)
|
OM and Brad should learn something about voter history and turnout before they offer mindless criticism.
|
||||
|
OM knows all about voter history. You know who will vote in these elections and you target THOSE voters, the same number of people voted in 2007 as in 2005 and the results were the same. You have to motivate those voters. All we heard was how great Murphy was doing, and what happened, he did a little better than Vic Stevens.
|
||||
No, we don't want to chase Woldow out of town, we just want the convicted child molester and all the other ones who have falling through the cracks to be known by all so if some poor soul as to live next store to one of these perverts...they know about it so they can protect their children! The way you try to defend child molester Woldow makes me wonder if you are him or one of his good buddies?? |
||||
No sensible person would care about your identity unless they hope to avoid running into you in person. Who would want to know someone as negative as you?! ROTTEN IN RICHLAND -- your name says it all. At least you have achieved some degree of self realization. If more voters came out, Murphy would have lost by a greater margin. Everyone who wanted him to win, voted. Everyone with a strong distaste for Orloff, voted. The rest was and would be by party affiliation. |
||||
|
No, we have passed a constitutional (so far) sex offender ordinance in the township. What Murphy wanted was unconstitutional and driven by his hate of Woldow. I do not like what Mr woldow writes about the school board, but I take it with a grain of salt. He has brought many TRUE revelations about a bad council over in Quakertown. Murphy gave me zero reason to vote for him.
|
||||
|
AOL |
Seems to me Paul, that you haven't been written about in w's slam sheet. You two buddy,buddy or what. Close personal friends, birds of a feather. How about true revalations about you Paul. When will W do an in depth ( oh I forgot, your not a very deep person, you are a shallow fellow)interview with you. You are part of his do no wrong clan. So what is it cigars and brandy at O's or a beer and a shot at Casey's that keep you all fastened at the hip. I think it's keeping enemies close by. Your day will come and he will turn on you, but alas nobody will spare you from the spear. |
|||
|
hey pat
if your such a watchdog..where is your website Guidos wins you lose |
||||
Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" |
||||
|
I heard that murphy ran his last election like a presidential race but yet he decided not to run against tim arnold this year...wonder why??
|
||||
Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" |
||||
Sounds to me that you fit the description of a "sore loser" |
||||
|
Mommy, mommy, theres a bunch of douche bags blogging again!
|
||||
Not at all. In fact, I have congratulated Tim on his win on several threads, but this particular poster has sunken to schoolyard taunts including on the Judge of Elections thread: "hey brian..the sooner you accept the loss to arnold, guidos and fox the better you will sleep. we win you lose na na na na!!!!" This poster needs to grow up. |
||||
|
Judged:
1 You repeated the above comment on at least three other threads. Why this rant? In your own words: "this particular poster has sunken to schoolyard taunts including on the Judge of Elections thread" "This poster needs to grow up." Wonder why Reps and Dems alike are breathing a sigh of relief that both the Murphys and Tribue and by extension their " talented political consultants" lost, even though "Kline and Murphy are couple of smart guys who introduced real political strategy to Upper Bucks. Aside from Murphy, what other supervisor candidate had a billboard strategy to increase his/her name ID?" What delusional consultant has run many losing campaigns with the following plan?-"you can't fault Kline and Murphy's campaign strategy. When you have an underfunded candidate with low name ID you have to make the election an referendum on your opponent. You must stoke the public's anger with one simple issue recognizing it's human nature to react against something, than for something" Their "brand" is all negative. Wonder why nobody takes anything you do seriously? |
||||
|
Why don't you two duke it out on the school yard?
|
||||
|
Judged:
1
1
1 <quoted text>Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" Again, GROW THE HELL UP!!! You certainly fit the description of a "sore winner!" "George" wrote: "Why don't you two duke it out on the school yard? " Guess who wrote this gem: "you can't fault Kline and Murphy's campaign strategy. When you have an underfunded candidate with low name ID you have to make the election an referendum on your opponent. You must stoke the public's anger with one simple issue recognizing it's human nature to react against something, than for something" We can all be especially thankful this Thanksgiving that these people have not been placed in a position of authority in our community. Kudos to the voters who saw through them. |
||||
|
[QUOTE who="RealityStrikesWe can all be especially thankful this Thanksgiving that these people have not been placed in a position of authority in our community. Kudos to the voters who saw through them.
[/QUOTE]But we are so fortunate to have this mindset running our township: "hey pat if your such a watchdog..where is your website Guidos wins you lose " Reads like a schoolyard bully to me. Again, Grow the hell up! This is the type of behavior you wouldn't let you own kids do, but it's fine if it's an adult in Richland Township who bashes a political rival. Besides, this poster obviously didn't go to QCSD, otherwise he would have written the post with proper grammar! |
||||
|
Judged:
1
1
1 I don't know who the second quote is from but it certainly does not refelct that person being a bully. The third quote- no person cited- is gloating but not bullying. If you want to play in the political arena you should be willing to tell the truth, be accurate, and be willing to disclose your past. Kline and Murphy and Tribue missed some or all of these marks, as been documented on these threads. If you or your favorite candidate wants to brag about "hoodwinking" your neighbprs you should be prepared to listen to or ignore their reactions. Repeating "grow the hell up" over and over on several threads reflects negatively on the writer's level of maturity. |
||||
I agree...Paul Stepanoff LIED about being ENDORSED by Paul Clymer. He, and YOU, Richard, failed to mention that his running mates daughter is a highly paid QCSD employee. When Murphy was running for supervisor in 2007, you had no problem is disclosing that he was sued by one of his clients, but NO ONE brought up the fact that Arnold was sued by two clients and a vendor. You overlook the fact that other posters, including our ever-nasty West Chester ISP poster, have made some very vile and childish posts and comments about Tribue, Murphy, and Kline, but jump all over me when I tell this peabrain to shut the hell up! Ah, life by the Richland double standard...gotta love it...NOT! |
||||
|
Judged:
1 I have ignored the West Chester posters inappropriate posts just as I have ignored the postings of "Dave" or who ever he is. I don't comment on Hess trucks. I don't write about national policies here because it is meaningless to try to influence strangers with opinions- I prefer citing sources that local citizens can verify for themselves. I am not compelled to comment on everything. I never disclosed that Patrick Murphy was sued by a client. Most businesses are sued eventually. Anybody can sue anyone for anything. After all, look at Vic Stevens record of suing over a dozen local citizens, and Murphy's record of suing others and even Zowniriw jumping into the fray. Just like Patrick Murphy, the plaintiff isn't always on the right side of the law- Murphy admitted that the Township had engaged in NO wrongdoing against him. I'm not "Richard". Paul Clymer supported all Republicans on the ticket. If Stepanoff was on the ticket, Clymer supported his candidacy. I don't personally care about other people's endorsements and am capable of deciding who I will vote for without following some hand-out at the poll or claim that somebody else will be voting for a particular candidate. I ignored Vic Stevens implying that Clymer endorsed him (he did not) by posting his picture with Clymer on his website when he was running. Nothing excuses "NotZKM" posting the offensive "SHUT THE HELL UP!!!" over and over on many threads. Mature adults react appropriately or keep silent. "NotZMK" is evidentally unable to practice impulse and anger control or to acknowledge obvious personal lapses in judgment. |
||||
|
||||
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Review: Always Beautiful Flowers-Gifts | 14 min | Tom | 5 |
| Weird odors on heller road? | 1 hr | Remove Obama | 4 |
|
|
1 hr | One hundred ... | 3 |
|
|
1 hr | One hundred ... | 18 |
| Michelle Obama's Spending | 1 hr | One hundred ... | 16 |
| Salary Info - QCSD | 1 hr | TruthBeTold | 55 |
| Electric supplier choice? | 3 hr | jp - quake... | 14 |