Posted in the Putnam Station Forum
#1 Jul 2, 2013
Who owns that nasty hole? And what is with all the drug dealing and prostitution???
#2 Jul 2, 2013
But from Stewart's, you can see known drug dealers (those with a criminal record) coming and going from there all the time. It's not exactly a secret. That place should be torn down.
#3 Jul 2, 2013
Where is the place?
#4 Jul 3, 2013
Its is in Schroon Lake next to the Sunoco Station
#5 Jul 5, 2013
Next to Stewarts (Ti). Pillbillies!
#8 Jul 6, 2013
Someone tell me again WHY we have a PD in Ti?
These names are the same people who have been moving around Ti and selling drugs for years. Maybe some day the PD will get off their stupid asses and arrest these people?
SHAME on whoever owns that place!!!
#9 Jul 6, 2013
I was told that it didn't change hands.
So, in effect, they are harboring criminals and aiding in criminal activity, as far as I'm concerned.(Because they cannot possibly NOT know what goes on there.) Disgusting renters; disgusting owners!!!
#11 Jul 10, 2013
If you were brought up watching your parents sucking off the county tit, drunks and drug addicts all around, stealing, in and out of jail, you probably wouldn't see a problem with "living" like that either. It would be the only life you know, if you want to call it a life. People say sh*t about her father but at least he smartened up and got away and stays away. Nothing will ever change there. Just another generation of welfare kids.
#12 Jul 11, 2013
Oh, poor me. My parents were scumbags and my grandparents were scumbags, so I should be a scumbag too.
That's just crap, and certainly is not a reason for criminal activity of all sorts, drug and alcohol abuse, child molestation, welfare fraud. You name it.
We all make our own choices!
#13 Jul 11, 2013
1 Penal Law § 190.65(2).
2See Penal Law § 15.05(1).
SCHEME TO DEFRAUD IN THE FIRST DEGREE
(Class E felony)
(Ten or more persons)
PENAL LAW 190.65(1)(a)
(Committed on or after January 1, 1977)
The ______ count is Scheme to Defraud in the First Degree
Under our law, a person is guilty of a scheme to defraud in
the first degree when that person engages in a scheme constituting
a systematic ongoing course of conduct with intent to defraud ten
or more persons or to obtain property from ten or more persons by
false or fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises, and so
obtains property from one or more of such persons.
It is necessary to prove the identity of at least one person
from whom the defendant so obtained property, but it is not
necessary to prove the identity of any other intended victim.1
The term, "intent," used in this definition has its own special
meaning in our law. I will now give you the meaning of that term.
INTENT means conscious objective or purpose. Thus, a
person acts with intent to defraud ten or more persons or to obtain
property from ten or more persons by false or fraudulent pretenses,
representations or promises, when that person’s conscious
objective or purpose is to do so.2
In order for you to find the defendant guilty of this crime, the
People are required to prove, from all of the evidence in the case,
beyond a reasonable doubt, each of the following three elements:
1. That on or about (date), in the county of (county), the
defendant,(defendant's name), engaged in a
scheme constituting a systematic ongoing course of
2. That the defendant did so with intent to defraud ten or
more persons or to obtain property from ten or more
persons by false or fraudulent pretenses,
representations or promises; and
3. That the defendant so obtained property from one or
more of such persons, at least one of whom has been
Therefore, if you find that the People have proven beyond a
reasonable doubt each of those elements, you must find the
defendant guilty of the crime of Scheme to Defraud in the First
Degree as charged in the _____ count.
On the other hand, if you find that the People have not
proven beyond a reasonable doubt any one or more of those
elements, you must find the defendant not guilty of the crime of
Scheme to Defraud in the First Degree as charged in the _____
#14 Jul 11, 2013
July 10, 2013
· 22:30 Arrested Jennie E. Fusco for Scheme to defraud 1st (E-Felony) and Petit Larceny (A-Misd.). Subject was arraigned and remanded to the Essex County Jail for lack of $2,500.00 cash/$5,000.00 bond
#15 Jul 12, 2013
Finally, someone is talking about all the welfare-drug traps around town, including this one. Maybe the people who are supposed to be policing S.S. fraud, HUD fraud, drug sales will pay attention!
Now, where did Post #7 go???
#16 Jul 16, 2013
The "landlord" knows all about what goes on there and couldn't care less.
CPS ought to be looking into the children that live around all this criminal activity!
#17 Jul 17, 2013
So he smartened up.....So being a pamper peeler just goes away? He is a pig and molested his niece lives in Ticonderoga and is on the sex offender registry that says he lives in California.Also got himself a wife his daughters age.He works but sued a company from Ti because he got hurt. I think he just hides it well.
#18 Jul 17, 2013
Wasn't he being a "pamper peeler" when he spawned his first kid? Where was that girl's parents? Drunk maybe?
#19 Jul 17, 2013
If you suspect a child is being molested please call the authorities. These posts are very disturbing. Hearing the term pamper peelers sounds as if it is a common term for some. Please help the children you suspect of being hurt.
#20 Jul 18, 2013
Anyone who lets their kids NEAR that place is insane!
#21 Jul 21, 2013
azes next door ant no better with Donnie F amd maranda Mc living their!!
#22 Jul 27, 2013
#23 Aug 5, 2013
Answers: Yes and yes.
Add your comments below
|Furniture junk tires Trash||4 hr||citizen||8|
|Paki stores||14 hr||Out and About||34|
|An apology to bipolar||17 hr||Conused||9|
|Traffic stop||21 hr||eyes in the red jeep||4|
|Drugs will be back soon||Sun||othertaxi||11|
|School district fraud||Sun||Our communities||2|
Find what you want!
Search Putnam Station Forum Now
Copyright © 2018 Topix LLC