Area gun sales, fears rising

Nov 14, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: North Port Sun

Gun stores in Charlotte County have experienced increased sales since Election Day as local gun owners brace for an anticipated restriction of gun laws following the re-election of President Barack Obama.

Comments (Page 275)

Showing posts 5,481 - 5,500 of7,574
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Lake Charles, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5888
Mar 14, 2013
 
Spocko wrote:
<quoted text>No you don't see ... your "lazy" people is code for what? ItÂ’s a righwingnuz invention and constant talking point based on what - stupidity? What have you ever done to benefit and lift society - talking stupid shit all day?
No code. Lazy people = lazy people. You know, those who don't work, don't pay taxes, yet live off of other people's taxes. No hidden code.

I have done plenty, including donating time, money, food, and vitamins to those in need. The difference is, I did it by choice, not by force of law. Secondly, I donated to those who would utilize the contributions to help themselves, not those who feel entitled to it.
xxxrayted

Beachwood, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5889
Mar 14, 2013
 
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
No code. Lazy people = lazy people. You know, those who don't work, don't pay taxes, yet live off of other people's taxes. No hidden code.
I have done plenty, including donating time, money, food, and vitamins to those in need. The difference is, I did it by choice, not by force of law. Secondly, I donated to those who would utilize the contributions to help themselves, not those who feel entitled to it.
Forced charity is not charity at all. Forced charity is theft. Theft is defined as taking property from somebody who doesn't want to surrender such property to you.

Jesus didn't force people to give up their money. He only asked that they be charitable if they wish to follow him. Nor did Jesus ask the government to forcefully take money from people to give aid to the poor. Jesus knew theft was one of God's big ten no-no's.

"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article, that grants Congress the right, of expending on articles of benevolence, the money of their constituents."
James Madison. Annals of Congress, 1794.

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Lake Charles, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5890
Mar 14, 2013
 
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>Forced charity is not charity at all. Forced charity is theft. Theft is defined as taking property from somebody who doesn't want to surrender such property to you.

Jesus didn't force people to give up their money. He only asked that they be charitable if they wish to follow him. Nor did Jesus ask the government to forcefully take money from people to give aid to the poor. Jesus knew theft was one of God's big ten no-no's.

"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article, that grants Congress the right, of expending on articles of benevolence, the money of their constituents."
James Madison. Annals of Congress, 1794.
Absolutely spot on. And I like the quote.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5891
Mar 14, 2013
 
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>Really? SS sends out annual statements showing all your contributions to the program and what you would be paid today if you retired. Now take that pamphlet to a reputable investment company and ask them to calculate what you would be worth today had all that money been invested in a conservative growth account all of these years.
Great point!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5892
Mar 14, 2013
 
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>No code. Lazy people = lazy people. You know, those who don't work, don't pay taxes, yet live off of other people's taxes. No hidden code.

I have done plenty, including donating time, money, food, and vitamins to those in need. The difference is, I did it by choice, not by force of law. Secondly, I donated to those who would utilize the contributions to help themselves, not those who feel entitled to it.
Wow, what does a liberal say to that? Lol. Another great post.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5893
Mar 14, 2013
 
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>Forced charity is not charity at all. Forced charity is theft. Theft is defined as taking property from somebody who doesn't want to surrender such property to you.

Jesus didn't force people to give up their money. He only asked that they be charitable if they wish to follow him. Nor did Jesus ask the government to forcefully take money from people to give aid to the poor. Jesus knew theft was one of God's big ten no-no's.

"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article, that grants Congress the right, of expending on articles of benevolence, the money of their constituents."
James Madison. Annals of Congress, 1794.
3 in a row. I think y'all have things well in hand here. Think I will bounce to another thread.
xxxrayted

Beachwood, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5894
Mar 14, 2013
 
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
Absolutely spot on. And I like the quote.
Thanks, but I screwed it up. He actually said "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution, that grants Congress the right, of expending on articles of benevolence, the money of their constituents."

Just in case you want to use it in the future :-D

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Lake Charles, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5895
Mar 14, 2013
 
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>Thanks, but I screwed it up. He actually said "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution, that grants Congress the right, of expending on articles of benevolence, the money of their constituents."

Just in case you want to use it in the future :-D
Still like it, and thanks.
Spocko

Oakland, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5896
Mar 14, 2013
 
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? SS sends out annual statements showing all your contributions to the program and what you would be paid today if you retired. Now take that pamphlet to a reputable investment company and ask them to calculate what you would be worth today had all that money been invested in a conservative growth account all of these years.
Why is Social Security so difficult for some people to understand?
By law, since 1939, it must be in invested in securities backed by the U.S. government, which essentially are IOUs: The government uses the cash for other programs but promises to pay it back with interest. By law, it must be paid back.–Why is that so difficult for some people to understand–? I suspect, the answer to that is that they have no desire to understand it, because they desperately hold to the troglodyte right-wing fiction that the funds are "gone" - so they can outright lie to younger people and irresponsibly mislead them into thinking they will never see a dime of their Social Security. That is false in every way and on so many different levels.

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Lake Charles, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5897
Mar 14, 2013
 
Spocko wrote:
<quoted text>Why is Social Security so difficult for some people to understand?
By law, since 1939, it must be in invested in securities backed by the U.S. government, which essentially are IOUs: The government uses the cash for other programs but promises to pay it back with interest. By law, it must be paid back.–Why is that so difficult for some people to understand–? I suspect, the answer to that is that they have no desire to understand it, because they desperately hold to the troglodyte right-wing fiction that the funds are "gone" - so they can outright lie to younger people and irresponsibly mislead them into thinking they will never see a dime of their Social Security. That is false in every way and on so many different levels.
Nobody has said social security is bankrupt. They are saying that it is headed in that direction.
Being required by law to pay it back doesn't mean anything. This country is $16 trillion in debt. Social security is: being defrauded by illegals, drawn on by illegals, amnesty is being granted to the young ones, bills are being introduced to grant amnesty to the older ones, beginning to pay out to the Baby Boomers which will be retiring in record numbers for decades to come, with fewer people working to pay into it. It's not rocket science.
People are required by law to pay back their debts too. What happens when they go broke and declare bankruptcy?
You can't get blood out of a turnip.
If you can't see that, you are blind to reality.
xxxrayted

Beachwood, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5898
Mar 14, 2013
 
Spocko wrote:
<quoted text>
Why is Social Security so difficult for some people to understand?
By law, since 1939, it must be in invested in securities backed by the U.S. government, which essentially are IOUs: The government uses the cash for other programs but promises to pay it back with interest. By law, it must be paid back.–Why is that so difficult for some people to understand–? I suspect, the answer to that is that they have no desire to understand it, because they desperately hold to the troglodyte right-wing fiction that the funds are "gone" - so they can outright lie to younger people and irresponsibly mislead them into thinking they will never see a dime of their Social Security. That is false in every way and on so many different levels.
Not at all. How do you explain the fact that most SS recipients get back more than they pay in? By the 1% interest rate gained by SS? Sorry, that doesn't work mathematically.

Sure, there are IOU's and plenty of them. But when those IOU's come due, where does the government get the funds to replace them? Think of that!

See, in my IRA account, nobody is borrowing one dime of my money. Nobody is buying votes with my money. If I die before I can collect, my family gets all of that money I contributed to my IRA. They won't see one dime from SS.

Now the talk is about making people work longer. Oh really? These are usually the suit and tie people promoting this. But they can't explain how they will make a roofer climb up and down those ladders and work on dangerous heights at the age of 67. Or perhaps a bricklayer or carpenter. Maybe even a carpet layer? Did you ever try to carry a room sized carpet into a room? Their knees are usually shot by the time they reach their mid 50's. I'll even take my profession: a truck driver. When the roads ice up, and quick reactions are needed to stop a 70,000 lbs vehicle, do you want to be the car in front of me when I'm driving that truck?

If everything was so fine and dandy, politicians from both sides would not be talking about increasing the age of retirement. They would be giving SS recipients cost of living increases. But they aren't, and do you know why? Social Security is going broke, and don't let any politician tell you different.

“Why call 911? 1911 is faster”

Since: Feb 08

Wesley Chapel, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5900
Mar 15, 2013
 
Protester wrote:
<quoted text>
I went back and checked the posts and here’s what happened. I answered the questions, then posted a link about guns. You then criticized me for not answering the questions, etc.
Your research skills are convenient. You went off about the bible belt.
Protester wrote:
<quoted text>
You’re obviously too lazy to do any research, and too blind to reality to accept the truth, so I won’t waste my time on you.
People:
The Bible Belt is satanic because RELIGION IS BIG BUSINESS, the OPPOSITE OF FAITH, but they’re so dumb they never get it. It’s a waste of time to teach those who refuse to learn.
(next post)
eternal cynic wrote:
<quoted text>
You have to be kidding. I’ve lived in the south for nearly three decades, 26 of those years in Georgia. I know about the bible belt from first-hand experience. You on the other hand approach this from a my brand of religion is better. Your knowledge comes from whackadoo websites.
Protester wrote:
<quoted text>
It’s very evident that you spent a lot of time in the South because of your refusal to accept reality and inability to see the obvious truth. Because of your inbred stupidity, I will try to make this so simple that any child can understand it.
---much drivel removed---
eternal cynic wrote:
<quoted text>
Reality check for you. I view religion from a very different perspective than you, I am an atheist. I believe I would notice what you claim.
In one paragraph you claim Southerners are godless. In the next you claim they have god involved in politics. Which is it? Do they not believe or do they believe?
The rest of your post generalizes about people who live in a portion of our nation. Has anyone ever told you that seeking professional intervention might help you with some of your mental issues?
Protester wrote:
<quoted text>
No wonder you’re so clueless about religion. Only a moron would think he could bluff his way through that conversation.
eternal cynic wrote:
<quoted text>
Try addressing the points you clueless fool.
Then you bitch about off-topic
Protester wrote:
<quoted text>
Dear Duh-where-am-I,
The POINT of this discussion is GUNS, so, while you're ranting about other subjects, I injected something ON TOPIC.
As for your other complaints, since you have no intention of learning anything, there’s no point in wasting my time on you.

“Why call 911? 1911 is faster”

Since: Feb 08

Wesley Chapel, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5901
Mar 15, 2013
 
Spocko wrote:
Ever wonder why the wealthy are exempt from social security? Contrary to what GOPers want you to believe social security does not contribute to the national debt – period!
Here’s the reality:
No matter what, even if no financing changes are made, Social Security can pay 100% of anticipated benefits out through 2037. Even after that, if no changes are made, enough money will still be coming in to pay about 75% of anticipated benefits for roughly 50 more years after 2037.(We can’t speak to what will happen after that because the Social Security actuaries only look 75 years into the future when they make estimates.) The total amount of wages that are subject to Social Security tax (also known as the “wage pool”) does not equal 100% of the total amount of wages paid to workers in the United States.
That’s because income above a certain amount (at the moment,$106,800) is exempt from Social Security taxes. During the 1980s and early 1990s, the wage pool represented about 90% of all wages ... but because wage income has become more and more concentrated in the hands of the highest wage earners, 15 years later the wage pool now represents only about 83% of all wages. In fact: due to high levels of earnings inequality, roughly 1% of the population earn 10% of all the earnings.
Removing that $106,800 cap and making all wage income taxable for Social Security purposes, all by itself, will either solve the funding problem entirely or get you to 99% of where you need to be. Would you prefer that Social Security benefits be cut, now and in the future, or would you prefer to see the wealthiest among us pay their fair share of Social Security taxes, just as every other wage earner does—and cut the tax rate, both at the same time?
How exactly are the wealthy exempt from Social Security? They must pay the tax for just over the first $100,000 of the income. They do pay. Benefits are capped. If the cap on income is removed would you support removing the cap on benefits?

Social Security does cost. In 2010 the government had to borrow $37 billion to keep the program funded.
http://www.factcheck.org/2011/02/democrats-de...

“Why call 911? 1911 is faster”

Since: Feb 08

Wesley Chapel, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5902
Mar 15, 2013
 
Spocko wrote:
<quoted text>
Well now we know why you're not accountant - no wonder you're losing money as slum lord
How would you possibly know what his financial situation is? As with all your other drivel you assume.

“Why call 911? 1911 is faster”

Since: Feb 08

Wesley Chapel, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5903
Mar 15, 2013
 
Protester wrote:
<quoted text>
Here’s ANOTHER conservative FREELOADER who expects us to spend our time, having to try and educate these village idiots. They all think we OWE IT TO THEM to let them sit on their dead azzes, too LAZY to look for information themselves, so we‘re supposed to be the political welfare dept.
We‘re also supposed to feel obligated to answer because their statements are demonic, we‘re supposed to feel obligated to FEED THEM information for FREE.
NO, we owe them NOTHING, and that’s what they deserve.
I’m a freeloader? Last year I paid approximately $40,000 in federal income tax. What did you pay? Wasn’t it you that proudly proclaimed you paid nothing?

Let them get a job or starve.

“Why call 911? 1911 is faster”

Since: Feb 08

Wesley Chapel, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5904
Mar 15, 2013
 
Protester wrote:
<quoted text>
Robin Hood is a hero to people who aren’t mentally ill, or have criminal mentalities. If you’re not institutionalized in one of those places, then you should be.
People: Those sickos are so hooked on greed and are overgrown children, going through life screaming,‘ME-ME-ME!’, and ‘NOBODY matters except ME-ME!’
They’re so emotionally retarded they are hopeless, so keep them out of your life.
It’s you screaming me-me-me, not hard working tax payers. You expect someone should do nothing and receive benefit. Earn your own income.

“Why call 911? 1911 is faster”

Since: Feb 08

Wesley Chapel, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5905
Mar 15, 2013
 
Protester wrote:
Symantec (Norton) is still attacking me.
Since I started posting here today, I've gotten over 30 blocks.
This time it says:
Security Warning
Do you want to install this hardware?
When I click no, it kicks me off Topix. So, I have to find the page and start all over again.
Before this I must have gotten scores of Norton warnings blocking every post.
Norton is dangerous so I've gotten rid of their progam, but it didn't make any difference.
I think it was probably Norton security that was behind an email about one of my Works files.
That means Norton is monitoring computers for information.
This is really dangerous, and just a step away from keeping all of us, who post the truth about the Fed, off the internet completely.
They still can't openly cut access, so they try to harass people into giving up.
Keep posting warnings about Norton, etc. every day.
If you can't stand up to them here, you're truly a loser.
Symantec is attacking you? You sound like Tory and the cops. He thinks every cop in the world is out to get him. You believe a corporation is out to get you. I assure you, that corporation has no idea who you are and doesn’t give a damn about you.

You're a wackadoo.

“Why call 911? 1911 is faster”

Since: Feb 08

Wesley Chapel, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5906
Mar 15, 2013
 
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow, a liberal conspiracy theorist. What are the odds?
I think I'll go buy a power ball ticket!
It’s over $200 million. I buy one set of numbers for 10 draws every 5 weeks. Not because I expect to win but it’s a voluntary tax. But, if you don’t play you can’t win. Never know.

My guess is “protester” is going to go off about the lottery now claiming it’s an unfair tax on the poor.

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Lake Charles, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5907
Mar 15, 2013
 
eternal cynic wrote:
<quoted text>ItÂ’s over $200 million. I buy one set of numbers for 10 draws every 5 weeks. Not because I expect to win but itÂ’s a voluntary tax. But, if you donÂ’t play you canÂ’t win. Never know.

My guess is “protester” is going to go off about the lottery now claiming it’s an unfair tax on the poor.
So if I win, the government gets half. Do you think $100million will buy a private island?
Frank

Oakland, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5908
Mar 15, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
No code. Lazy people = lazy people. You know, those who don't work, don't pay taxes, yet live off of other people's taxes. No hidden code.
I have done plenty, including donating time, money, food, and vitamins to those in need. The difference is, I did it by choice, not by force of law. Secondly, I donated to those who would utilize the contributions to help themselves, not those who feel entitled to it.
Yeah right, you are a regular Mother Theresa - f-ing bigot!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 5,481 - 5,500 of7,574
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Punta Gorda Discussions

Search the Punta Gorda Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
FL 'Hiccup girl' charged with murder in Florida (Oct '10) 47 min pose of a Hero 1,833
FL 2010 Florida Governor Race Election Results a "... (Nov '10) Thu Panamaed 2,631
Super Boat races brings big business to Englewood Apr 15 Mike McGuinty 1
Debate: Marijuana - Port Charlotte, FL (Aug '10) Apr 13 Piper 61
sea food restaurant Apr 13 fat and sassy 2
health care (Sep '13) Apr 9 Bomo Care 90
Teens arrested after car, home burglaries Apr 8 middle aged woman 1
•••

Rip Current Statement for Charlotte County was issued at April 19 at 5:05AM EDT

•••
•••
•••
•••

Punta Gorda Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Punta Gorda People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••