Area gun sales, fears rising

There are 20 comments on the North Port Sun story from Nov 14, 2012, titled Area gun sales, fears rising. In it, North Port Sun reports that:

Gun stores in Charlotte County have experienced increased sales since Election Day as local gun owners brace for an anticipated restriction of gun laws following the re-election of President Barack Obama.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at North Port Sun.

All about tyranny

United States

#3826 Jan 28, 2013
Calm Liberal wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, he says that the bill bans all arms. This is incorrect. The bill contains about 900 exemptions.
The idea that any senator or any member of the house would propose a bill outlawing all firearms is patently absurd.
Shall NOT BE INFRINGED.....

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Puerto Vallarta, Mexico

#3827 Jan 28, 2013
Calm Liberal wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, he says that the bill bans all arms. This is incorrect. The bill contains about 900 exemptions.
The idea that any senator or any member of the house would propose a bill outlawing all firearms is patently absurd.
Boxer and pelosi have tried it before........

They banned all guns in San Francisco until that was overturned....

Since: Jan 13

Largo, FL

#3828 Jan 28, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Boxer and pelosi have tried it before........
They banned all guns in San Francisco until that was overturned....
So what are you complaining about? It looks like you agree with me that a ban on all guns can't be upheld.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#3829 Jan 28, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
When and where??
Why can't you repost it???
Besides the fact that everyone's knows you are lying????
lol!And you're still a proven liar son. No matter how many times I repost!

Woohoo!
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#3830 Jan 28, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
All you need to do is read.....
lol! Something you refuse to do!

That's why you're a proven liar son!

Woohoo!
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#3831 Jan 28, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Like your claim the burden of proof falls on the defense????
lol! And supported son... on point no less!

Your problem is you refuse to think. And you do that by choice!

So you prefer to remain stupid due to your politics... again, by choice!

Woohoo!
Spocko

Oakland, CA

#3832 Jan 28, 2013
All about tyranny wrote:
<quoted text>
Shall NOT BE INFRINGED.....
Shall not have tiny little brains :-/
Spocko

Oakland, CA

#3833 Jan 28, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Oslama the economy slayer
And even when the people that had funded Solyndra would not give them anymore money because they said they were going to fail no matter how much money they got
Oslama handed them tax dollars
Funny how the board of directors gave oslama millions to campaign
How have the GOPers persuaded America to buy into the myth of Obama THE BIG SPENDER when the opposite is true?!
• In fiscal 2010 (the first Obama budget) spending fell 1.8% to $3.46 trillion.
• In fiscal 2011, spending rose 4.3% to $3.60 trillion.
• In fiscal 2012, spending is set to rise 0.7% to $3.63 trillion, according to the
• Finally in fiscal 2013 — the final budget of Obama’s term — spending is scheduled to fall 1.3% to $3.58 trillion. CBO’s estimate of the budget that was agreed to last August.
When America has chosen to believe the horse manure produced by a NEWS agency consistently making false claims, promotes divisive behavior, bigotry and hatred, you will remain ignorant in your anger and self-imposed blindness.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/05...
just another guy

Belleville, IL

#3834 Jan 28, 2013
Calm Liberal wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, he says that the bill bans all arms. This is incorrect. The bill contains about 900 exemptions.
The idea that any senator or any member of the house would propose a bill outlawing all firearms is patently absurd.
A bill outlawing a single one is an infringement.
just another guy

Belleville, IL

#3835 Jan 28, 2013
Calm Liberal wrote:
<quoted text>
So what are you complaining about? It looks like you agree with me that a ban on all guns can't be upheld.
Maybe, maybe not. But in the meantime, if obama has the chance to appoint one more left wing activist, it could very well stand. Even so, in the meantime it will cost the person who challenges it their life and many millions of dollars. It will cause untold chaos. Maybe even civil war. Not very smart.

And if you believe it will not stand , why do you fight for it?

Since: Jan 13

Largo, FL

#3836 Jan 28, 2013
just another guy wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe, maybe not. But in the meantime, if obama has the chance to appoint one more left wing activist, it could very well stand. Even so, in the meantime it will cost the person who challenges it their life and many millions of dollars. It will cause untold chaos. Maybe even civil war. Not very smart.
And if you believe it will not stand , why do you fight for it?
When did I ever say that I fight for a ban on all guns?

Since: Jan 13

Largo, FL

#3837 Jan 28, 2013
just another guy wrote:
<quoted text>
A bill outlawing a single one is an infringement.
Not according the the US Supreme Court. If it were, they would have held that previous bans on assault rifles were an infringment.
just another guy

Belleville, IL

#3838 Jan 28, 2013
Calm Liberal wrote:
<quoted text>
When did I ever say that I fight for a ban on all guns?
You have called for a ban on magazines over 10 rounds and so called "assault weapons". The attempt to ban even one type is an infringement and falls under the classification of treason.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Puerto Vallarta, Mexico

#3839 Jan 28, 2013
Calm Liberal wrote:
<quoted text>
So what are you complaining about? It looks like you agree with me that a ban on all guns can't be upheld.
If they go little by little they can..........

First magazines over ten rounds....
then 5 rounds
Then any removable clip like they tried in Ca.

Give moron/liberals a inch and they will take a mile

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Puerto Vallarta, Mexico

#3840 Jan 28, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol!And you're still a proven liar son. No matter how many times I repost!
Woohoo!
When and where???

Or are you too stupid to do this?

Post # 696 here…………http://www.topix.com/f orum/us/politics/T863HQPC29OHD 73VF/p34#lastPost

The moron sheeples admits that no gun ban will prevent criminals from getting a gun………LOL
.
.
.
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
You ate the bait again..........
So you admit banning any gun will not prevent criminals from getting their hands on them......
And once again I NEVER SAID IT WOULD.

Why don't you just have a conversation with both your personalities since you obviously can't have one with me.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Puerto Vallarta, Mexico

#3841 Jan 28, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! Something you refuse to do!
That's why you're a proven liar son!
Woohoo!
Yea says Zim is guilty with ZERO evidence………..LOL
Post 47036 here……http://www.topix.com/for um/us/politics/TKPEED6J6ONM651 R6/p1975

Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Only in your dreams..........
.
.
.
.
Prove that Zim attacked the perp.....
The 911 tape supports the fact Zim had a right to follow the perp.........215 suspect.......so the act of following the perp is not going to be a issue for the jury.....
For a conviction you will need to convince a jury that a big, strong, scary looking, drug using, foul mouthed foot ball playing tough guy did not attack Zim..........
But Zim attacked some skinny puny little boy..........But this boy was able to toss Zim on his back withe a single blow to Zims nose that broke it and blackened both eyes and then Zims head bounced on the ground at least three times
Then the poor kid fell down on his knees.......A inch from the gun.....
Then the evil monster security meanie killed the poor boy in cold blooded murder..........
Even a all black jury would be tough on believing that whopper
Unless you have something that proves another reality??

Yea wrote
Zimmerman killed him with his loaded weapon. I'd say that's about as clear a definition as one can get.

We all know Zimmerman left his vehicle with a loaded weapon and specifically stalked Martin. After all, there was no one else there.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Puerto Vallarta, Mexico

#3842 Jan 28, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! And supported son... on point no less!
Your problem is you refuse to think. And you do that by choice!
So you prefer to remain stupid due to your politics... again, by choice!
Woohoo!
Yes when no facts can be proven the troll spin spin spin comes out

Prove that Zim attacked the perp.....

The 911 tape supports the fact Zim had a right to follow the perp.........215 suspect.......so the act of following the perp is not going to be a issue for the jury.....

For a conviction you will need to convince a jury that a big, strong, scary looking, drug using, foul mouthed foot ball playing tough guy did not attack Zim..........

But Zim attacked some skinny puny little boy..........But this boy was able to toss Zim on his back withe a single blow to Zims nose that broke it and blackened both eyes and then Zims head bounced on the ground at least three times
Then the poor kid fell down on his knees.......A inch from the gun.....
Then the evil monster security meanie killed the poor boy in cold blooded murder..........

Even a all black jury would be tough on believing that whopper

Unless you have something that proves another reality??

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Puerto Vallarta, Mexico

#3843 Jan 28, 2013
Spocko wrote:
<quoted text>
How have the GOPers persuaded America to buy into the myth of Obama THE BIG SPENDER when the opposite is true?!
• In fiscal 2010 (the first Obama budget) spending fell 1.8% to $3.46 trillion.
• In fiscal 2011, spending rose 4.3% to $3.60 trillion.
• In fiscal 2012, spending is set to rise 0.7% to $3.63 trillion, according to the
• Finally in fiscal 2013 — the final budget of Obama’s term — spending is scheduled to fall 1.3% to $3.58 trillion. CBO’s estimate of the budget that was agreed to last August.
When America has chosen to believe the horse manure produced by a NEWS agency consistently making false claims, promotes divisive behavior, bigotry and hatred, you will remain ignorant in your anger and self-imposed blindness.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/05...
It does not matter if you have 1 dollar or 100 trillion dollars........

If you spend more than you take in you are a big spender......
Spocko

Oakland, CA

#3844 Jan 28, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
It does not matter if you have 1 dollar or 100 trillion dollars........
If you spend more than you take in you are a big spender......
And who are the biggest spenders in history? The spending by Ronald Reasgan and the two Bushes exeedes all spending by all the Presidents in history ...

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#3845 Jan 28, 2013
Calm Liberal wrote:
<quoted text>So in other words, you're saying that she has introduced a bill banning all "arms"?
No, where did I say that? The 2nd Amendment covers ALL bearable arms.

The bill lists specific weapons, or classes of weapons. Still, the bill is unconstitutional, because the 2nd covers all of the ones listed in the bill.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Punta Gorda Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Lisa Lowe Sun LEO 477 2
News Sheriff: December shooting victim had loaded AK-47 (Jan '13) May 1 castASpell 13
North Port Pawn shops (Aug '10) Apr 29 Angry 14
Review: Dehdashti, Houman DDS - Houman Dehdasht... (May '09) Apr 29 Sheila Port Charl... 9
2 Teachers and 2 kids moving to Punta Gorda. Ad... Apr 27 BethD 1
News On Your Side - Ken Amaro Answers Your Mail (Nov '07) Apr 26 usuck61 69
GRAND THEFT Auto N.Ft.Myers Apr 22 BLU 1
More from around the web

Punta Gorda People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]