Area gun sales, fears rising

Area gun sales, fears rising

There are 7568 comments on the North Port Sun story from Nov 14, 2012, titled Area gun sales, fears rising. In it, North Port Sun reports that:

Gun stores in Charlotte County have experienced increased sales since Election Day as local gun owners brace for an anticipated restriction of gun laws following the re-election of President Barack Obama.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at North Port Sun.

Yeah

Mililani, HI

#3696 Jan 24, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Then perhaps you should examine your own.
If you are visiting a strange town, how do you know where the good restaurants are? You go to the one that has a full lot of cars. If you need major surgery done and want the best, how do you know who the good surgeons are? The ones with a waiting list. If you want to impress a date by taking her to a play, how do you know what plays are good and what plays are bad? By the trouble it takes to get good seats.
Rush and McDonalds are apples and oranges.
If you had taken your own advice, you'd have invested with Bernie Madoff....
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#3697 Jan 24, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
I hate to ruin your day, but swing voters as you call them are Independent voters, and Romeny did very well among Independents this last election. That leads us to believe one of two things: Independents don't listen to Limbaugh or Independents that listen to Limbaugh were swayed to vote for Romney:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/11/01/r...
I read your article. Romney should have won by a landslide.

Seems there's a math problem that doesn't jive with you!

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#3698 Jan 24, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! You clearly don't think either son! That's for sure!

Woohoo!
Poor little troll

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#3699 Jan 24, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! Well, for a proven liar, I'm sure nothing means much to you !
Once a troll always a troll........LOL

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#3700 Jan 24, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>If you had taken your own advice, you'd have invested with Bernie Madoff....
Yes wittle troll

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#3701 Jan 24, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>I read your article. Romney should have won by a landslide.

Seems there's a math problem that doesn't jive with you!
Only for a troll like you

“Why call 911? 1911 is faster”

Since: Feb 08

Wesley Chapel, FL

#3702 Jan 25, 2013
ToManyLaws wrote:
<quoted text>
Point is your an idiot if all you eat is mcyd,s and also a idiot of you listen to only rush and his race baiting nazi fascist ideals..
I’ve never been a regular listener of Rush. Yesterday I was told Atlanta was expecting bad weather. Since I’m in Atlanta for a few days I decided to attempt to catch a weather report and tuned into WSB Radio. Rush was on, I wasn’t happy but was hopeful I would hear the weather forecast soon. Anyway, I endured Rush for about 30 minutes.

I know he’s made comments which can be interpreted as racist and why I don’t listen to him. Fascist and Nazi? You’re just tossing terms without regard to their meaning. Makes me wonder if you know what those terms mean.

Since: Jan 13

Clearwater, FL

#3703 Jan 25, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again..........LOL
You claimed that more people chose to listen to someone else.......
The majority of Americans that listen to talk radio listen to Rush.......
Yes if you add in infants and young kids along with people that dont listen to the radio you can skew the facts.........
Typical of liberal/morons..........
My God, you're dense. You say, "The majority of Americans that listen to talk radio listen to Rush" Go back and read my posts and you will find that I said EXACTLY the same thing.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#3704 Jan 25, 2013
Calm Liberal wrote:
<quoted text>My God, you're dense. You say, "The majority of Americans that listen to talk radio listen to Rush" Go back and read my posts and you will find that I said EXACTLY the same thing.
Wrong again liberal/moron

Would you like me to repost what you said????

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#3705 Jan 25, 2013
Calm Liberal wrote:
<quoted text>My God, you're dense. You say, "The majority of Americans that listen to talk radio listen to Rush" Go back and read my posts and you will find that I said EXACTLY the same thing.
Do you know what the word exactly means??

Since: Jan 13

Clearwater, FL

#3706 Jan 25, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again liberal/moron
Would you like me to repost what you said????
There is no need for you to repost what I said. I will do so.

I said:“People who listen to talk radio are a small minority of all daily radio listeners.(Most radio listeners prefer music, or regular news programs, etc. But out of that small minority that listens to talk Radio, Rush has the largest share.“

Now, after I said,“Rush has the largest share”, you replied

"You claimed that more people chose to listen to someone else." How do you interpret my saying that “Rush has the largest share” to saying that “more people chose to listen to someone else”?

That makes no sense. You are claiming that I said exactly the opposite of what I actually said.

I think your confusion stems from my earlier comment that “Yes, he is the single most listened to talk radio personality in America, but the overwhelming majority of radio listeners choose to listen to something other than Limbaugh.” Both of those things are correct. In other words,“Rush is the most listened to radio personality in America” But that is among people who listen to talk radio. When I say,“the overwhelming majority of radio listeners choose to listen to something other than Rush” that is also correct. First of all, Rush is on AM radio, so the people who only listen to FM radio (the majority of radio listeners) obviously don’t listen to Rush.

You mistakenly thought I said that the majority of radio listeners listen to some talk radio host other than Rush. I said that the majority of radio listeners listen to some RADIO PROGRAMMING other than Rush. I didn't say, as you claim, that “more people chose to listen to SOMEONE else”, I said that more people choose to listen to SOMETHING else, which is correct.

I hope this explanation helps clarify what I’m saying.
the rest of us

Saint Paul, MN

#3707 Jan 25, 2013
Calm Liberal wrote:
<quoted text>
My God, you're dense.....FART,FART,BLAH......
He's dense.....?? LOLOLOLOLOL.....oh man, look whose talkin'! You think anybody reads your meaningless 500 word posts on here, numbnuts? Good God man, go look at your own self for once you arrogant boob.
hey calm

Moseley, VA

#3708 Jan 25, 2013
why waste your time responding to rush supporters
he is a face of the republican party that was rejected by the American people...

Therefore he was rejected along with Stupid Palin,
Donald Frump..Scantorum..and the rape experts

Do not fall for the Rubio(immagration) crap his plan is amensty
which his party will reject

Since: Jan 13

Clearwater, FL

#3709 Jan 25, 2013
the rest of us wrote:
<quoted text>
He's dense.....?? LOLOLOLOLOL.....oh man, look whose talkin'! You think anybody reads your meaningless 500 word posts on here, numbnuts? Good God man, go look at your own self for once you arrogant boob.
Well, if you don't read my posts, how do you know if what I'm saying is correct or not? Do you realize that you just admitted that you don't know what you're talking about?

Think about it. You just stated that nobody reads my posts, then you make judgments about me (arrogant boob,etc.) based on something that you admit you didn't even read.

In other words, you essentially are stating "I do not read Calm Liberal's posts. Instead, I just formulate my opinion based on nothing but my own irrational hatred, anger, and ignorance."

And you wonder why you can't persuade people to see things your way.

Incredible.

Since: Jan 13

Clearwater, FL

#3711 Jan 25, 2013
hey calm wrote:
why waste your time responding to rush supporters
he is a face of the republican party that was rejected by the American people...
Therefore he was rejected along with Stupid Palin,
Donald Frump..Scantorum..and the rape experts
Do not fall for the Rubio(immagration) crap his plan is amensty
which his party will reject
You are right of course. It is essentially a waste of time. Rush listeners are the kind of people that the sociologist Eric Hoffer referred to as "the True Believer". But I still try to reason with them anyway. In that respect, I'm like the alcoholic who says, "Ok, just one more drink, and I'll quit."

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#3712 Jan 25, 2013
Listen to Walton and Johnson in the morning. Problem solved.

Since: Jan 13

Clearwater, FL

#3713 Jan 25, 2013
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
Listen to Walton and Johnson in the morning. Problem solved.
I have a feeling I'm going to regret asking this, but who are Walton and Johnson?

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#3714 Jan 25, 2013
Calm Liberal wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no need for you to repost what I said. I will do so.
I said:“People who listen to talk radio are a small minority of all daily radio listeners.(Most radio listeners prefer music, or regular news programs, etc. But out of that small minority that listens to talk Radio, Rush has the largest share.“
Now, after I said,“Rush has the largest share”, you replied
"You claimed that more people chose to listen to someone else." How do you interpret my saying that “Rush has the largest share” to saying that “more people chose to listen to someone else”?
That makes no sense. You are claiming that I said exactly the opposite of what I actually said.
I think your confusion stems from my earlier comment that “Yes, he is the single most listened to talk radio personality in America, but the overwhelming majority of radio listeners choose to listen to something other than Limbaugh.” Both of those things are correct. In other words,“Rush is the most listened to radio personality in America” But that is among people who listen to talk radio. When I say,“the overwhelming majority of radio listeners choose to listen to something other than Rush” that is also correct. First of all, Rush is on AM radio, so the people who only listen to FM radio (the majority of radio listeners) obviously don’t listen to Rush.
You mistakenly thought I said that the majority of radio listeners listen to some talk radio host other than Rush. I said that the majority of radio listeners listen to some RADIO PROGRAMMING other than Rush. I didn't say, as you claim, that “more people chose to listen to SOMEONE else”, I said that more people choose to listen to SOMETHING else, which is correct.
I hope this explanation helps clarify what I’m saying.
Yes comparing all radio listeners to talk radio listeners is like saying more people drive cars than chevys........
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#3715 Jan 25, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes comparing all radio listeners to talk radio listeners is like saying more people drive cars than chevys........
lol! As a proven liar, I'm sure you believe your personal opinions are those of others son.

One day, you might grow up. But I won't put any stock in that!

Woohoo!

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#3716 Jan 25, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! As a proven liar, I'm sure you believe your personal opinions are those of others son.
One day, you might grow up. But I won't put any stock in that!
Woohoo!
This is how you prove someone a liar troll..........
.
.
But for some reason you cant do it????

tell us why troll???
.
.
.
.

Lets all watch the moron Yea claim that the burden of proof is on the defense..........LOL

How stupid must a person be to think this???

Ok.......

You might want to use the restroom before you read this as some have wet their pants from laughing so hard........

.
.
.
.
.

On post # 46912 here http://www.topix.com/forum/us/politics/TKPEED...
The moron yea claimed that the burden of proof falls on the defense even after I had posed a link from a legal law lib ray showing what everyone else knows that the burden of proof falls on the prosecution……

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
Please post a link that shows that???
Would you like the link again that proves you wrong???
Burden of proof is on the prosecution
http://nationalparalegal.edu/conlawcrimproc_p...

Yea wrote.
lol! Nope. Don't need to son.

That's the defense's job. Even a dumb person would know that!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Punta Gorda Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Disturbance in front of Bayfront Hospital on 8/... 12 hr Dr Schmitty 1
Indians ruining our town (Jun '15) Mon Wamo 5
Tuscany Isle , New Homes any advice Aug 21 Thomas 1
News Police arrest 10th suspect in Cash Feenz case (Jan '08) Aug 19 Justsayn 90
Derick with silver porsche (Jan '15) Aug 13 Anyone 10
News Cape Coral councilman wants investigation into ... Aug 12 Well Duuhh 3
News Punta Gorda residents fighting proposed waterwa... Aug 8 Paul S 1

Punta Gorda Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Punta Gorda Mortgages