Why They Hate Obama

Why They Hate Obama

There are 12489 comments on the The Daily Beast story from Aug 8, 2013, titled Why They Hate Obama. In it, The Daily Beast reports that:

As the Virginia Flaggers loft their Confederate flag in opposition to the 'tyranny' of 2013, Jamelle Bouie argues that racial bias plays at least some part in Obama's collapse in the South.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Daily Beast.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#7827 Feb 15, 2014
mjjcpa wrote:
<quoted text>
Agreed. They are higher than NPR or the NY Times.
When you spend all your on your knees polishing stranger's knobs, everyone and everything has higher standards, mjjizzem.

Wipe you chin, shug.
John Atlas

Nha Trang, Vietnam

#7828 Feb 15, 2014
mjjcpa wrote:
<quoted text>
Agreed. They are higher than NPR or the NY Times.
;-000h, dat frezy funies
John Atlas

Nha Trang, Vietnam

#7829 Feb 15, 2014
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
When you spend all your on your knees polishing stranger's knobs, everyone and everything has higher standards, mjjizzem.
Wipe you chin, shug.
;-00h, Jim McQuan?;-000
John Atlas

Nha Trang, Vietnam

#7830 Feb 15, 2014
hey kids;) Kerry finishing his dim sum...www.moveon.gov

;-0000
John Atlas

Nha Trang, Vietnam

#7831 Feb 15, 2014
oh, www.moveon.org ;-000
benson

Richmond, VA

#7832 Feb 15, 2014
I see ignorant jurors in FL don't know what the hell murder means. Are there any intelligent ppl. there......don't answer.

“bar0ckalypse n0w”

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#7833 Feb 16, 2014
Woods called on Congress to call Ham and have him give public testimony. He then asked, "If the president's child were in benghazi, would the rescue attempt have been more aggressive?"

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#7834 Feb 16, 2014
Delbert wrote:
<quoted text>
What is the conclusive evidence that proves your point? There had not been any from all of the sources investigating the incident so what could you know that nobody else does?
There are a lot of hypothetical assumptions but nothing proven to confirm your opinion.
New information about the intelligence available in the immediate aftermath of the Benghazi attack raises questions about whether the former No. 2 at the CIA downplayed or dismissed reporting from his own people in Libya that it was a coordinated attack and not an out-of-control protest over an anti-Islam video.

Then-Deputy Director Mike Morell, whose own agency lost two employees at Benghazi, former Navy Seals Ty Woods and Glen Doherty, was heavily involved in editing the administration’s internal narrative on what happened – known as the “talking points”– which served as the basis for then-U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice’s controversial claims about a protest on the Sunday talk shows after the attack.

According to the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report on Benghazi, on Sept. 15, four days after the attack and one day before Rice’s appearance, the CIA's most senior operative on the ground in Libya emailed Morell and others at the agency that the attack was "not/not an escalation of protests."

Fox News has confirmed that three days earlier, the CIA Chief of Station and the agency's team in Libya also sent situation reports, known as sitreps, to Washington.The raw intelligence reporting described a coordinated attack by extremists, not an out-of-control protest.

"In a crisis like Benghazi, you would expect it's going directly to the seventh floor," Sam Faddis, who recently retired from the CIA and writes extensively about the intelligence community, said. The “seventh floor” refers to CIA leadership – at the time, Director David Petraeus and his second-in-command Morell, among others. "In a situation like this, you're going to be looking at it immediately ... your aides are going to be asked to flag it to your attention the second that it comes in and bring it to your desk -- right in front of you," he said.

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#7835 Feb 16, 2014
TonyT1961 wrote:
<quoted text>
Easy to talk shit on line, you little bitch.
Looks like you know quite a bit abbot teabagging - your second job?
I don't need to f'k myself - your mother, sister, and every other skanky bitch in your life offers themselves up - free of charge to boot!
Such a "harmonious" family of skanks you have.
Typical New York skank, Tony the Puffer the new cereal for limp wrist.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#7836 Feb 16, 2014
mjjcpa wrote:
Woods called on Congress to call Ham and have him give public testimony. He then asked, "If the president's child were in benghazi, would the rescue attempt have been more aggressive?"
seems the president told teh military to do all tha was necessary to save them..
your beef seems to be with how slow the military did just that.

maybe that is why Ham won't testify publicly, he knows it won't make his group look good....

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#7837 Feb 16, 2014
TonyT1961 wrote:
<quoted text>
Briebart's not news you imbecile - it's the equivalent of the National Enquirer for the GOP low info numbskulls - you know the type - look in the mirror.
"Perhaps no issue related to Benghazi has been as mischaracterized as the unclassified talking points prepared by the Central Intelligence Agency" in the days immediately after the attacks, the committee writes. "The majority [of senators on the committee] believes that the CIA talking points were flawed but —as discussed in the report — painted a mostly accurate picture" of what was known at the time.
"It is important to reiterate that the reference to 'al-Qa'ida' included in early drafts of the talking points was removed by CIA staff, not by the White House or the FBI, as was incorrectly alleged by some members of Congress and the press," the committee says."
"On the issue of the role al-Qaida operatives played in the Benghazi attacks, the committee says that "individuals affiliated with terrorist groups" linked to that network "participated." But, the report adds that "it remains unclear if any group or person exercised overall command and control of the attacks or whether extremist group leaders directed their members to participate."
That conclusion puts the committee at least somewhat at odds with a New York Times report that concluded there is:
"No evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault. The attack was led, instead, by fighters who had benefited directly from NATO's extensive air power and logistics support during the uprising against Colonel Qaddafi. And contrary to claims by some members of Congress, it was fueled in large part by anger at an American-made video denigrating Islam."
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2014/01/1...
You enjoy being made an ass of it seems.
Your mindless attack only shows the desperation of the vacuum you call your head.

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#7838 Feb 16, 2014
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Now now... even the National Enquirer has standards.
Biden: Be Optimistic on State of the Nation 'In Spite of Who's President'...

“bar0ckalypse n0w”

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#7839 Feb 16, 2014
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>seems the president told teh military to do all tha was necessary to save them..
your beef seems to be with how slow the military did just that.
maybe that is why Ham won't testify publicly, he knows it won't make his group look good....
barock went campaigning after Hillary's state dept. refused additional security.

It can't look worse than that.
wondering

Coffeyville, KS

#7840 Feb 16, 2014
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>seems the president told teh military to do all tha was necessary to save them..
your beef seems to be with how slow the military did just that.
maybe that is why Ham won't testify publicly, he knows it won't make his group look good....
Well good then, so just WHERE was the president when he said this? For some reason he doesn't want anyone to know that.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#7841 Feb 16, 2014
wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
Well good then, so just WHERE was the president when he said this? For some reason he doesn't want anyone to know that.
why is it you are so ignorant about his after well over a year? he was in the white house right after he heard of the attack. the pentagon clearly states this is what he told them.

why are you so ignorant on this subject and still feel you can talk about it without making a total ass of yourself?

Obama's wherebouts on that night have never been hidden from anyone.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#7842 Feb 16, 2014
mjjcpa wrote:
<quoted text>
barock went campaigning after Hillary's state dept. refused additional security.
It can't look worse than that.
they refused security for Tripoli, that wouldn't have helped Benghazi at all. and Stevens also refused the security.

Stevens knew the situation in Benghazi and went there on his own on 9-11. he was our most knowledgeable asset on the security in that area.

but you know all this already. you know the lies you spew are lies already...

why do you continue to dance on the graves of those that dies serving you?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#7843 Feb 16, 2014
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>New information about the intelligence available in the immediate aftermath of the Benghazi
The tea bag cryathon continues: year #5.

If only the tea bag time tunnel actually worked.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#7844 Feb 16, 2014
mjjcpa wrote:
<quoted text>
barock went campaigning
so did Romney and the other 8 dwarfs.

“bar0ckalypse n0w”

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#7845 Feb 16, 2014
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>they refused security for Tripoli, that wouldn't have helped Benghazi at all. and Stevens also refused the security.
Stevens knew the situation in Benghazi and went there on his own on 9-11. he was our most knowledgeable asset on the security in that area.
but you know all this already. you know the lies you spew are lies already...
why do you continue to dance on the graves of those that dies serving you?
barock, the yellow, of Benghazi, went campaigning.

I think the two SEALs should get medals for conspicuous gallantry.

Why did Hillary and barock lie to the parents?

Why did barock blame it on a video?

“bar0ckalypse n0w”

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#7846 Feb 16, 2014
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
so did Romney and the other 8 dwarfs.
Neither Romney nor McCain would have went campaigning if they were CinC.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Powhatan Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
rhonda langfitt Oct '17 daphne 1
Bluegrass Music at The County Seat Restaurant -... (Jul '16) Jul '16 mmelvin 1
Debate: Marijuana - Powhatan, VA (Aug '10) Apr '16 jeanette farrar l... 3
News Powhatan murder defendant says Taliaferro shoot... (Mar '09) Apr '16 jeanette farrar l... 5
Commonwealth Attorney (Jan '15) Jan '15 Belona Ben 1
County line kennel reviews. (Mar '14) Mar '14 Furs Flying 2
Review: Butler Kennel Inc (Apr '10) Feb '14 Concerned buyer 8

Powhatan Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Powhatan Mortgages