LA Fitness ... The New Golds Gym?

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#147 Sep 5, 2012
Polemics wrote:
<quoted text>
Bigot!
Under rock dweller!
Polemics

Douglasville, GA

#148 Sep 5, 2012
Bill in Dville wrote:
<quoted text>
My wife? My wife doesn't post on these boards, Einstein.
Just how stupid are you? Apparently, a lot more than I (or anyone else) thought...
An uneducated and clueless voter is a dangerous thing.
“I don’t want someone who doesn’t pay ANY federal income taxes voting to determine how much I pay.”
If you see a water melon truck across the street it isn’t mine.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#149 Sep 5, 2012
Polemics wrote:
Guess this makes it clear what you and Bill have against Obama.
Wow! We just can't get ANYTHING by you, huh? Sheesh...

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#150 Sep 5, 2012
Polemics wrote:
<quoted text>
Right, no race prejudice here, your wife did everything but use the “N” word.
I have you know I am cat sitting for a relative right now and the cat is BLACK. So, there!

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#151 Sep 5, 2012
Polemics wrote:
<quoted text>
Right, no race prejudice here, your wife did everything but use the “N” word.
Well, I don't have a wife, so that shoots the heck out of YOUR interpretation.
BTW, since you are h*ll bent on picking a fight, let's rumble.
La Member 2

Douglasville, GA

#152 Sep 10, 2012
LA Fitness member wrote:
Hey, I am member at LA and believe it or not, LA is changing. They actually have a white manager now and he is cool and focused on cleaning up the junk that got out of control. He is committed and has implemented new policies concerning those "free passes" and weekly free passes which stops the THUG from coming in and disrupting paying members experience and workouts. Yeah it was bad, but members have called and complained loudly to corporate and actually got their attention. Many of the " THUG" sales force has been replace with some real trainers and sales team - yeah even some white folks that smile-
So with all that said, LA is getting better and is now going in the right direction. Thugs still workout but that is in the 8 - 11 time frame while others work. If you wait until 1 - all the trash has left for the day.
I too almost cancelled, but waited and so far I am glad I did...Hope this helps you.
I also found out they transfered / fired the " Thug " who was a GM and leting all the trash from Atlanta come in free and who was ruining the place and have a great GM and nice guy now.

we are Liking the changes too.... for sure!
Reality Check

United States

#153 Oct 8, 2012
I don't think I ever visited a fitness center and determined whether I would join by the color of the staff’s skin. Unprofessionalism is not acceptable for any race but to single one race out seems outrageous. We are in 2012 and you really need to look at the quality of person and not their skin. I would not want to workout with such closed minded people anyway. Enjoy your day from an African American!!
dylan terreri i

Sewickley, PA

#154 Jan 28, 2013
a letter i wrote to gold's gym and wal-mart:
as an enthusiastic woman beater/wife beater, as the webmaster of www.legalizerape.org , i want to accuse the gold's gym corporation AND the wal-mart in cranberry township (pennsylvania) for false advertising.
i am offended because i bought a "thigh toner" (made by the gold's gym corporation) at wal-mart, it had pictures of both genders on the box - both the lesser gender and the greater gender - but when i took it out of the box and started to use it...well, let's just say that i didn't have to guess which gender it was designed for. right out of the box, it appeared to me as breakable...which is how i regard the lesser (wannabee) gender every time i notice the pipsqueaks who are wearing high-heeled shoes and shoulderpads as if they want to be equal to mens' greater heights/widths/appetites. let me just say that the existence of a gender full of breakable pipsqueaks should not be reason for any company (gold's gym or wal-mart) to compromise the resistance-level of a portable exercise-machine that they make available to the public.
i should have known that something with pink handles would be no challenge to a full-grown man, i should not have bought this "thigh toner," but i was desperate for something fitness-related to do while on my bed and designing Strongwoman-bashing and gay-bashing webpages to add to my websites (strongwomen.info and anti-gay.com ). i have been dong butt-clenches, and it looks like i'm going to have to continue with them until i find something like the "thigh toner" that is "strong enough for a man and not made for a woman". i have no use for anything that is "strong enough for a woman," i should have known that anything i bought that is "strong enough for a woman" would not be challenging at all for men. I AM A MAN, MY LEVEL OF STRENGTH SHOULD NOT BE COMPROMISED ON ACCOUNT OF WHAT IS BENEFICIAL TO THE GENDER OF PIPSQUEAKS.
and, might i add, although men excite me to no end like i see them as some kind of "discovery zone" - although i am easily aroused by shirtless or naked masculine images - although my ever-present curiosity of the masculine gender names me a "masculivoid" of sorts...i am still a man and i still possess a physical competency that FAR SURPASSES that of a mere wombn. i may be gay enough to feel a burning curiosity (or a desire to discover) when i am around the masculine gender, i therefore may be gay enough to be unable to truly consider myself as superior to men (or even as mens' equal), but i am DAMNED sure that i am superior to the little, milk-spouters and egg- bleeders of the world who've lacked manly shoulders/backs ever since their hips widened to allow the passage of a baby. wombn are all about dairy, from their milk-spurting MOMmary glands to their bloody egg-receptacles, why do we placate them by telling them that they weren't designed to be used as tools for men to impregnate and for babies to get nourishment from?
i am DAMNED sure that i am superior to the egg-bleeders - it's hard not to feel superior to the lesser gender when sports teams and military requirements and "hot dog eating" competitions and even strength competitions at the ymca are gender-based. isn't there a song about how one gender would be considered as a "handicap" to another gender if both genders were competing in the same activity? wasn't that song called "keep 'em separated" or something?
this also points my offense of something else that gold's gym is responsible for. gold's gym has come to be known as a place to build strength and muscle, yet so many of their billboards and product-boxes feature pictures of members of the lesser gender. i can't decide whether they are trying to equate "strong" with "womb," or if they are trying to tell men to get another fitness provider because men are only going to get "woman-strong" by using anything made by gold's gym.
i will be starting a boycott.
thank you,
dylan terreri, i
sheldon cooper, ii
Fighter

Douglasville, GA

#156 Feb 6, 2013
I was at the Yogurt shoppe and saw that the Police had to be called today and after I questioned several memmbers coming out to why the cops were there I was told it was because 3 " BLACK thugs" jumped a white guy in the gym.

What do you expect when they give free passes to those Obamanites?

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#157 Feb 6, 2013
Gold's Gym is full of smelly white people who dont bathe before they come to workout. And when they finish showering it smells like a kennel in there.
Wee Said

Douglasville, GA

#158 Feb 6, 2013
_Reality Speaks_ wrote:
Gold's Gym is full of smelly white people who dont bathe before they come to workout. And when they finish showering it smells like a kennel in there.
That's Ok, LA Fitness is full of Obamanites who don't and won't work and are Leeches of the US Government.

Ok

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#159 Feb 6, 2013
Wee Said wrote:
<quoted text> That's Ok, LA Fitness is full of Obamanites who don't and won't work and are Leeches of the US Government.
Ok
Its Republican poor whites who are the vast majority of all welfare recipients, not blacks. It is the red states who are most dependent on government handouts and assistance, as well as being the poorest states in the US.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_reckoning/2012...

Still, what does that have to do with the poor hygiene of whites who attend Gold's Gym? I am not fond of LA Fitness either, but that is because they oversell trainer services not because of blacks being there. Besides that, the blacks have better hygiene and do not smell like wet dogs.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#160 Feb 6, 2013
_Reality Speaks_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Its Republican poor whites who are the vast majority of all welfare recipients, not blacks. It is the red states who are most dependent on government handouts and assistance, as well as being the poorest states in the US.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_reckoning/2012...
Still, what does that have to do with the poor hygiene of whites who attend Gold's Gym? I am not fond of LA Fitness either, but that is because they oversell trainer services not because of blacks being there. Besides that, the blacks have better hygiene and do not smell like wet dogs.
Your link is from an extreme left wing site AND we have discussed the percentage of blacks vs whites on government handouts ad nauseum. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that percentage-wise, there are more blacks on government handouts. But, you are right about one thing, it doesn't have a thing to do with the discussion about L.A. Fitness.
Your last sentence is idiotic. You must be an Obamamite.'nuff said.

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#161 Feb 6, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
Your link is from an extreme left wing site AND we have discussed the percentage of blacks vs whites on government handouts ad nauseum. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that percentage-wise, there are more blacks on government handouts. But, you are right about one thing, it doesn't have a thing to do with the discussion about L.A. Fitness.
Your last sentence is idiotic. You must be an Obamamite.'nuff said.
Its takes COLD HARD FACTS. If you are referring to the ridiculously irrelevant "per capita by race" statistics, those are created for poor whites to gobble up so that they do not internalize the fact that THEY are America's welfare problem. All that matters in welfare expenditures is the bottom line, and in that regard, whites on public assistance and welfare and food stamps and every other type of government assistance are OVERWHELMINGLY the majority. More than all other groups combined.

If you believe that the relatively tiny total number of blacks on welfare is a bigger problem than the exponentially larger number of whites on the program, you are unaware, uneducated white trash. It is not necessary to guess at these numbers. They are listed clearly on the Census Bureau website. It is not important what percentage of a "race" is collecting welfare. To illustrate that, you could have 100 people with only one black. If that black is on welfare, then the white trash propaganda will spin it as "100% of blacks on welfare", while dismissing the other 99 people who are white people collecting welfare. Extreme example, but perfectly applicable to the statistical parlor trick called "per capita by race".

I believe you are out of your league here. Im not Tyrone from the hood. I have a graduate level college degree.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#162 Feb 6, 2013
_Reality Speaks_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Its takes COLD HARD FACTS. If you are referring to the ridiculously irrelevant "per capita by race" statistics, those are created for poor whites to gobble up so that they do not internalize the fact that THEY are America's welfare problem. All that matters in welfare expenditures is the bottom line, and in that regard, whites on public assistance and welfare and food stamps and every other type of government assistance are OVERWHELMINGLY the majority. More than all other groups combined.
If you believe that the relatively tiny total number of blacks on welfare is a bigger problem than the exponentially larger number of whites on the program, you are unaware, uneducated white trash. It is not necessary to guess at these numbers. They are listed clearly on the Census Bureau website. It is not important what percentage of a "race" is collecting welfare. To illustrate that, you could have 100 people with only one black. If that black is on welfare, then the white trash propaganda will spin it as "100% of blacks on welfare", while dismissing the other 99 people who are white people collecting welfare. Extreme example, but perfectly applicable to the statistical parlor trick called "per capita by race".
I believe you are out of your league here. Im not Tyrone from the hood. I have a graduate level college degree.
Out of MY league??? You are just too funny AND full of yourself. Yes, there ARE more whites on welfare because there is a larger number of whites in the country PERIOD. But if you talk percentages, there is a larger percentage of blacks on welfare than the percentage of whites(comparitively speaking) on welfare. BTW, I have TWO graduate degrees. What does THAT have to do with anything? You sound like an arrogant BORE.
Will all those who are impressed with "Reality Speaks" graduate degree(wooooooo) please raise your hand? Sheesh.....
No one CARES about your graduate degree, "Unreality".....espe cially moi. Perhaps you should GO to the HOOD and brag on your education. I'm sure the folks there would be REALLY impressed. Next.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#163 Feb 6, 2013
_Reality Speaks_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Its takes COLD HARD FACTS. If you are referring to the ridiculously irrelevant "per capita by race" statistics, those are created for poor whites to gobble up so that they do not internalize the fact that THEY are America's welfare problem. All that matters in welfare expenditures is the bottom line, and in that regard, whites on public assistance and welfare and food stamps and every other type of government assistance are OVERWHELMINGLY the majority. More than all other groups combined.
If you believe that the relatively tiny total number of blacks on welfare is a bigger problem than the exponentially larger number of whites on the program, you are unaware, uneducated white trash. It is not necessary to guess at these numbers. They are listed clearly on the Census Bureau website. It is not important what percentage of a "race" is collecting welfare. To illustrate that, you could have 100 people with only one black. If that black is on welfare, then the white trash propaganda will spin it as "100% of blacks on welfare", while dismissing the other 99 people who are white people collecting welfare. Extreme example, but perfectly applicable to the statistical parlor trick called "per capita by race".
I believe you are out of your league here. Im not Tyrone from the hood. I have a graduate level college degree.
And YES. The larger number whites are a drag on the welfare system just as those who aren't white are a drag on the system. There are no checks and balances.(Just wanted you to know that I understand the point you are making REGARDLESS of your big, bad graduate degree.)

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#164 Feb 6, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
Out of MY league??? You are just too funny AND full of yourself. Yes, there ARE more whites on welfare because there is a larger number of whites in the country PERIOD. But if you talk percentages, there is a larger percentage of blacks on welfare than the percentage of whites(comparitively speaking) on welfare. BTW, I have TWO graduate degrees. What does THAT have to do with anything? You sound like an arrogant BORE.
For an allegedly degreed individual, you are quite dullwitted. I will have to assume that statistics was not among the classes you took. A per capita statistic is valid when counting heads, but not for "race" since it does not exist (please check that before making a further fool of yourself. Hint: Human Genome Project.

The percentage of a "race" collecting welfare is IRRELEVANT. It does not talk about the dollars and cents of welfare, and in that regard, WHITE PEOPLE collect the vast majority of all welfare dollars. Any "racial" comparisons you want to make are merely your need to feel like you are not the problem.
Will all those who are impressed with "Reality Speaks" graduate degree(wooooooo) please raise your hand? Sheesh.....
No one CARES about your graduate degree, "Unreality".....espe cially moi. Perhaps you should GO to the HOOD and brag on your education. I'm sure the folks there would be REALLY impressed. Next.
WHITE PEOPLE COLLECT THE VAST MAJORITY OF ALL WELFARE DOLLARS.

This is a cold hard fact that you cannot debunk. You are dismissed.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#165 Feb 6, 2013
_Reality Speaks_ wrote:
<quoted text>
For an allegedly degreed individual, you are quite dullwitted. I will have to assume that statistics was not among the classes you took. A per capita statistic is valid when counting heads, but not for "race" since it does not exist (please check that before making a further fool of yourself. Hint: Human Genome Project.
The percentage of a "race" collecting welfare is IRRELEVANT. It does not talk about the dollars and cents of welfare, and in that regard, WHITE PEOPLE collect the vast majority of all welfare dollars. Any "racial" comparisons you want to make are merely your need to feel like you are not the problem.
<quoted text>
WHITE PEOPLE COLLECT THE VAST MAJORITY OF ALL WELFARE DOLLARS.
This is a cold hard fact that you cannot debunk. You are dismissed.
Just as I thought. Having a graduate degree certainly didn't supply you with CLASS.
BTW, as far as I am concerned, YOU are ALLEGEDLY degreed, as well.
While you are immersed in your research, perhaps you should research how to dislodge that chip from your shoulder.
You can't dismiss class. You can't dismiss something you don't have.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#166 Feb 6, 2013
the reality sets in:

Let me axe a question. Is ur graduate degree in ghetto or hood? Both?

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#167 Feb 7, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
Just as I thought. Having a graduate degree certainly didn't supply you with CLASS.
BTW, as far as I am concerned, YOU are ALLEGEDLY degreed, as well.
While you are immersed in your research, perhaps you should research how to dislodge that chip from your shoulder.
You can't dismiss class. You can't dismiss something you don't have.
LOL, you are no one to assess class or refinement. I know that people who do not pay attention to their hygiene have less class than someone who does. I can even excuse the occasional skipped shower, but my experience at Golds has been smelly and unpleasant. I am not fond of LA Fitness either.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Powder Springs Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
sad day in america 2 hr Member 53
Kimberly Kay 3 hr Member 6
Law "Enforcement" in DC 4 hr observation 4
have we as a community forgotten Larry Bolen 15 hr AmandaQ 2
It's time for the middle-class to make a comeback! 16 hr bored monitor 46
another police shooting 16 hr SCOTUS 7
Debate: Gay Marriage - Douglasville, GA (Jul '10) 17 hr Concernedcitizen 185
More from around the web

Powder Springs People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Powder Springs Mortgages