Who do you support for Governor in Ne...
Kelly

Hudson, NY

#6603 Jun 28, 2013
<>LNHU
LOL

Boston, MA

#6604 Jun 30, 2013
como is a homo
saltynuts

Utica, NY

#6606 Jul 3, 2013
jesus as king
Eileen

Ithaca, NY

#6608 Jul 4, 2013
Anyone BUT Cuomo
Crazy Rhoda Zimmerman

AOL

#6609 Jul 4, 2013
tasder wrote:
youtube.com/watch?v=Oi2cHDW9Wd U Get over it vote Bush
Let's Go Mets !!!
Cuomo sr and junior SUCK

New York, NY

#6610 Jul 4, 2013
Cuomo is a bigger Liberal then his old man, and that is saying something, and both are nothing but Lib scumbags. As for who should be Gov. Is David Duke running?
Cracker

Brooklyn, NY

#6612 Jul 5, 2013
Majority of Americans feel blacks are more racist than whites and Hispanics...

http://dailycaller.com/2013/07/03/majority-of...
Soothsayer

Palatka, FL

#6614 Jul 5, 2013
Too many liberals in NY, nose candy Andy will do it again.
Aaron Hernandez

Vienna, VA

#6615 Jul 6, 2013
I'm voting for Sath Dhanda.
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev

Vienna, VA

#6616 Jul 6, 2013
Dhanda in 2013!!!!!!!!
Bernard Continelli

New York, NY

#6617 Jul 6, 2013
If Carl Paladino legalizes pot, repeals the SAFE NY gun law, and also promises NOT to rescind SSM, then I WILL vote for him and not Kristin Davis again.

In short, a conservative is just a liberal who once got mugged, and a libertarian is just a conservative with a triple-digit IQ !!!
Abbs

UK

#6618 Jul 6, 2013
Will it really make much diffrence.Its all false promises.Gun laws do need sorted out and the sooner the better.Why does everyone need a gun? Only people who need guns are the police and the army.Still living in the old wild west days? Move forward and drop the guns.Britain dont need guns so why do Americans.
Bernard Continelli

New York, NY

#6621 Jul 7, 2013
Abbs, I don't own a military-styled "assault" rifle myself and don't feel the need for one, but your statement is simply false and common sense dictates that the police and even military can't possible be everywhere to protect everybody "24/7".

Personally, I think those pro-gunners who specifically maintain that civilian guns can prevent governmental tyranny in this day-and-age are downright silly: Even fully-automatic hand-held firearms in civilian hands (which have been illegal in the U.S. since the 1930s, BTW) could not stand-up to military heavier artillery, so how could a semi-auto-only one do so?

However, even though I have not hunted in several years I'm still reticent to "pound my shotgun into a plowshare" because of two other factors: The modern-day Dicks and Perrys of "In Cold Blood" fame ... i.e. violent burglars and "A Clockwork Orange"-type home invasions, and the possible anarchic breakdown of civil order. There is NO other weapon short of a firearm - not even the deadliest Samurai sword - that could deter a rioting CIVILIAN mob from making one's home a victim of a Molotov cocktail.

Finally, I DON'T consider the basic right of self-defense and the "stand your ground" mentality when dire to be an "American" right, I consider it to be a HUMAN one in the exact same way that actor Rupert Everett claimed he was not part of the 'gay community', but rather the human community!

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#6622 Jul 7, 2013
Abbs wrote:
Will it really make much diffrence.Its all false promises.Gun laws do need sorted out and the sooner the better.Why does everyone need a gun? Only people who need guns are the police and the army.Still living in the old wild west days? Move forward and drop the guns.Britain dont need guns so why do Americans.
When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
Thomas Jefferson

No freeman shall be debarred the use of arms.
Thomas Jefferson

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#6623 Jul 7, 2013
Bernard Continelli wrote:
Abbs, I don't own a military-styled "assault" rifle myself and don't feel the need for one, but your statement is simply false and common sense dictates that the police and even military can't possible be everywhere to protect everybody "24/7".
Personally, I think those pro-gunners who specifically maintain that civilian guns can prevent governmental tyranny in this day-and-age are downright silly: Even fully-automatic hand-held firearms in civilian hands (which have been illegal in the U.S. since the 1930s, BTW) could not stand-up to military heavier artillery, so how could a semi-auto-only one do so?
However, even though I have not hunted in several years I'm still reticent to "pound my shotgun into a plowshare" because of two other factors: The modern-day Dicks and Perrys of "In Cold Blood" fame ... i.e. violent burglars and "A Clockwork Orange"-type home invasions, and the possible anarchic breakdown of civil order. There is NO other weapon short of a firearm - not even the deadliest Samurai sword - that could deter a rioting CIVILIAN mob from making one's home a victim of a Molotov cocktail.
Finally, I DON'T consider the basic right of self-defense and the "stand your ground" mentality when dire to be an "American" right, I consider it to be a HUMAN one in the exact same way that actor Rupert Everett claimed he was not part of the 'gay community', but rather the human community!
I remind you that the worlds' greatest military power was defeated by the will of farmers and merchants who were rebelling against Tyranny, armed only with their personal weapons, and their love of Liberty.
Bernard Continelli

New York, NY

#6624 Jul 7, 2013
... And what year was this? Was it the time when farmers, merchants, AND the military carried the SAME type of muskets?!

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#6625 Jul 7, 2013
Bernard Continelli wrote:
... And what year was this? Was it the time when farmers, merchants, AND the military carried the SAME type of muskets?!
The love of Liberty is timeless in human history.
Besara

Des Moines, IA

#6626 Jul 8, 2013
Abbs wrote:
Will it really make much diffrence.Its all false promises.Gun laws do need sorted out and the sooner the better.Why does everyone need a gun? Only people who need guns are the police and the army.Still living in the old wild west days? Move forward and drop the guns.Britain dont need guns so why do Americans.
Where there are rights, "needs" is not relevant. Why do the police need guns? Old west days? What do YOU know about the Old West days? Britains don't need guns? Is that what the subjects said, or is that what their rulers told them?
Besara

Des Moines, IA

#6627 Jul 8, 2013
Bernard Continelli wrote:
... And what year was this? Was it the time when farmers, merchants, AND the military carried the SAME type of muskets?!
Same time that movable type; the quill & parchment; and the spoken word were the only forms of free speech. Point?
Abbs

UK

#6628 Jul 8, 2013
What do you know fullstop..who needs a gun or they poop their pants? haha

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Portland Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Dunkirk Dog Catcher Steve Purol (Sep '12) 1 hr Rosas 87
fight 2 hr concernedparent 8
Bills are super bowl bound 3 hr Bills 5
DLDC taking cash donations?!? How stupid can th... 3 hr tito 9
Lizzie B. Groomer at petsmart. 4 hr Thewrongone 1
Petey the pill head Sat Jordan 21
News Destination Dunkirk Sat Tito 10

Portland Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Portland Mortgages