It doesn't take a study to make gay people look bad, they do that pretty good on their own.<quoted text>
Regnerus isn't inept. He set out to get the results that he did. The entire purpose of the study was to make gay people look bad, not to learn something.
No, the initial complaint went to the journal that published the study.
That journal did an internal audit to review the process by which the study got through peer review (corruption) and the study itself (garbage).
The auditor's final verdit: "It's bullshit."
Lucky for you, the political correctness gestapo has a strangle-hold on Acedemia, and fewer and fewer academics are willing to study this demographic. Lucky for you, I say, because gay realities, when analyzed, are super depressing and dismal - the exact opposite of the narrative the Media and Team Obama wish to portray it as.
Those realities haven't changed.
Those damning C.D.C. findings over the years pointing at gays for their drastic overrepresentation in aids, the depraved lifestyle of rampant drug abuse and promiscuity - these realities haven't just magically dissappeared just because the Media says how super it must be to be gay.
You live a lie. You worship a fanciful narrative. Half a century ago, this lifestyle was outlawed the World over. I don't think it's an accident or a bad judgement call that got every society on the planet to condemn it then, I think it's because people had reality in a firm grasp back then.
But in the legacy of Kirk and Madsen, a firm grasp of reality is replaced with the fine art of polishing a turd. That's what promoting homosexuality comes down to.
To quote Swedish pastor A. Green,(before he was thrown in jail), " Homosexuality is a horrible cancer on the body of society".