Deconstructing the Gay Marriage Lie
First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Tom

Harlingen, TX

#21 Oct 10, 2012
The_Box wrote:
<quoted text>
Regnerus isn't inept. He set out to get the results that he did. The entire purpose of the study was to make gay people look bad, not to learn something.
<quoted text>
No, the initial complaint went to the journal that published the study.
That journal did an internal audit to review the process by which the study got through peer review (corruption) and the study itself (garbage).
The auditor's final verdit: "It's bullshit."
http://chronicle.com/blogs/percolator/controv...
It doesn't take a study to make gay people look bad, they do that pretty good on their own.

Lucky for you, the political correctness gestapo has a strangle-hold on Acedemia, and fewer and fewer academics are willing to study this demographic. Lucky for you, I say, because gay realities, when analyzed, are super depressing and dismal - the exact opposite of the narrative the Media and Team Obama wish to portray it as.

Those realities haven't changed.

Those damning C.D.C. findings over the years pointing at gays for their drastic overrepresentation in aids, the depraved lifestyle of rampant drug abuse and promiscuity - these realities haven't just magically dissappeared just because the Media says how super it must be to be gay.

You live a lie. You worship a fanciful narrative. Half a century ago, this lifestyle was outlawed the World over. I don't think it's an accident or a bad judgement call that got every society on the planet to condemn it then, I think it's because people had reality in a firm grasp back then.

But in the legacy of Kirk and Madsen, a firm grasp of reality is replaced with the fine art of polishing a turd. That's what promoting homosexuality comes down to.

To quote Swedish pastor A. Green,(before he was thrown in jail), " Homosexuality is a horrible cancer on the body of society".

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#22 Oct 10, 2012
Tom wrote:
<quoted text>
It doesn't take a study to make gay people look bad, they do that pretty good on their own.
No, they don't. That's why homophobes have to MAKE UP negative things like this study's "results".

***Yet another post where Tom refuses to discuss the science***
Tom wrote:
Half a century ago, this lifestyle was outlawed the World over. I don't think it's an accident or a bad judgement call that got every society on the planet to condemn it then, I think it's because people had reality in a firm grasp back then.
It's not an accident; it's bigotry based on tradition, primarily religion.

Thanks for the laugh that the religious have a firm grasp on reality!
Tom

Harlingen, TX

#23 Oct 10, 2012
The_Box wrote:
<quoted text>
No, they don't. That's why homophobes have to MAKE UP negative things like this study's "results".
***Yet another post where Tom refuses to discuss the science***
<quoted text>
It's not an accident; it's bigotry based on tradition, primarily religion.
Thanks for the laugh that the religious have a firm grasp on reality!
Your expectations of the methodology and protocol are unrealistic. There simply ISN'T a statistically large enough body of gay "parents" who've reared children from cradle to college, and definitely not by the standards of random sampling that would be necessary. THEY DON'T EXIST. Very, very rarely does this demographic have anything resembling longevity, or monogamy for that matter. That is the distortion that the Regnerus study exposes, albeit inadvertantly.

Gays simply don't wed down. Except for rare scenarios among lesbians, they don't form enduring, perennial bonds. Gays partner jump. They have higher rates of domestic violence than straights. This is why there will never be a study of same-sex "parents" rasing a child their entire life - because that sort of household scenario doesn't exist! It is nothing more than a myth dreamed up in the minds of gay activists to promote a false image of what gay people really are.

The heart of the gay movement, it's most coveted virtue since it started, was the embracing of complete sexual freedom over family. The fact that the children who spent part of their childhood in the midst of a gay parent underscores the grim reality that anyone who spends any amount of time near the poisoned stream of homosexuality, any amount of influence from it, comes away tainted and dysfunctional. Any parent who strayed into the gay lifestyle for any amount of time has a diminished capacity to maintain and nurture all of their human relationships.

It reminds me of that Hollywood matchmaker who became so discouraged and frustrated that she couldn't apply the same matchmaking standards and methods to gays as she routinely applied to straights, quipping how gays will "...basically 'whip it out' on eyelock", and how, despite her training, couldn't put gays together in relationships the way she routinely did with straights.

Homosexual domestic unions can only bring domestic dysfunction and severe identity crisis' and eternal confusion and strife in the worldly outlook of any child.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#24 Oct 11, 2012
Tom wrote:
<quoted text>
Your expectations of the methodology and protocol are unrealistic. There simply ISN'T a statistically large enough body of gay "parents" who've reared children from cradle to college, and definitely not by the standards of random sampling that would be necessary.
Yes, the number of families with 2 gay parents is small. Why is that surprising given that they can't have kids naturally and are prevented from using artificial methods or adopting in most places?

Lacking a large sample size doesn't mean you DRAW FALSE CONCLUSIONS or MISREPRESENT DATA.
Tom

Harlingen, TX

#25 Oct 11, 2012
The nuclear family.

The traditional family.

The God-ordained union of a man and a woman in the bond of marriage. Anything else is counterfeit - as proven by the uncompromising human biology that makes male-female sexual unions the only model for the basis of marriage.

Uncompromising human biology. All deviance from the above standard is counterfeit.

Counterfeit marriage.

Counterfeit copulation with a counterfeit phallus (lesbians).

Males copulating with a counterfeit vagina, traumatizing an exit-only organ which has zero applicaiton for anything other.

A counterfeit dad ("butch" lesbian).

A counterfeit "mom" (an effeminate, nurturing gay male).

Counterfeit logic: defying and denying the natural, procreative, anatomical complimentariness of opposite-sex individuals.

Counterfeit gender realities.

Counterfeit normalcy.

Counterfeit: phony as a three-dollar bill.

You gays enjoy your unions to the best of your ability, just don't cheapen and taint the institution of marriage to authenticate and sanctify your lifestyle.

The gay lobby is one of the richest organizations in America, so go get your gay rights, call it what you want, just not "marriage".
Brian

Reading, PA

#26 Jan 8, 2013
Oh my god, suddenly the truth.

I almost went down that gay path. Stopped being with women, started fooling with men. But I was not sure. I was living on the periphery, doing the hookup thing but sure that I would eventually go back to women.

Then Steve came along. I had a buddy that I "clicked" with. We bounced off of each other. He was really not that into me, since he spurned my attempts to get together more often. But when he came to the house it felt right. And he came to the house over 6 years.

He was a gay activist. Always urging me to come out, telling me that gay kids were in desperate need of roll models. Always takling about the gay civil rights fight. I actually started feeling guilty. He was this single guy who worked a full time job and boarded with a friend while he was the caretaker for his sick mom and sister. Here I was "hooking up" on the side and feeling guilty because he did not need to do that and did not even date. I could relate to that becase for years I did not date. He was always talking about the sanctity of gay marriage.

He eventually moved out of the area, to the West coast, as he always talked about. I had gotten feelings for him, and told hm so, in that last year. He was okay about that, but I reasoned that he always kept some wall up between the two of us because I would not come out and because he had always planned to move. We hadknown each other 6 years when he left.

Then 6 months after he left I discovered the truth. He was in a relationship the entire time that I knew him, and his partner referred to him as his husband. He even lied about the town he lived in.

When I asked why he did it, I was greeted with anger. I was told that I was one of many and that I saw multiple men and did the same thing. I was threatened with arrest for stalking should I ever contact him again. And he threatened to send a naked picture that I foolishly sent to him once to my employer, to the local newspaper, and to all the non profits that I work with. All to keep me silent about him. I pleaded with his husband why he would do this, and the husband told me I should die and go to hell where I belong.

This is gay marriage. For three years after I could not enter a gay bar. I felt intense hatred when I say the rainbow flag. I felt loathing when the term "gay marriage" came up. I have not had sex with a guy in 5 years since the last contact with him, because I cannot. I think about it and am repulsed. This is gay marriage.

This is gay marriage. I reached out for help to other gays and was told "Everybody does it." This is gay marriage: "I use you, you use me,I lie to you, you lie to me." This is gay marriage. I was at a point that I thought that I could do that, and now I am repulsed at the thought. This is gay marriage: the certainty that absolutely everyone in your life is always lying, and that it is okay.

I half expect him and his husband to show up lovingly on a gay marriage poster, and if I do I will expose them and it will be the turning point of banning gay marriage across the land.

I have lived gay marriage and it was truly the ugliest thing that ever happened to me.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Portland Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Weird 59 mins ago 9:59 p.m.Ghostly, translucent... Sep 6 The Lone Stranger 3
News Man pleads guilty to smuggling, harboring illeg... Sep 2 tomin cali 1
john peppercorn the prophet Aug 28 Anonymous 1
how sex traffickers find victims Aug 27 coco4u 1
Bullying at Binghamton University (Apr '12) Aug '17 yidfellas BARn 19
Maine in September Aug '17 tourist 2
Scott hamann Jul '17 Jeb 1

Portland Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Portland Mortgages