Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Bruno]

Frankie RIzzo wrote:

<quoted text>
I think my salad would be tossed if I was in New Joisey near your house!

Dude... you've been eating tossed salads from Union City guys for years.

[Frankie RIzzo]

Frankie RIzzo wrote:

My mouth supports gay rights.
My mouth will be supporting gay rights all day long on Valentine's Day.

Wow! Too much information! Keep that stuff private fruitcake.

You L.A. Rizzos sure are gay!

[Pietro Armando]

Frankie RIzzo wrote:

<quoted text>
http://www.rleeermey.com/sounds/dirtbag.wav

That was great paisan!

[Frankie RIzzo]

Bruno wrote:

<quoted text>
Dude... you've been eating tossed salads from Union City guys for years.

Someone mentions salad tossing and the troll from L.A. pipes right up!

Too funny!

Calm down fruitcake!

[m3437KK]

Well, the deal of forcing the popes to resign over them dirty pix where he is doing stuff is just plain wrong. The koreans was so upset they let that nuclear go. Who knows what the koranians will say. This is nasty bad business and makes you sick. And tired.

[Randy -Rock- Hudson]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Start a forum about polygamy.

Since you're not in charge, STFU.

[Randy -Rock- Hudson]

Jazybird58 wrote:

<quoted text>From a legal perspective, your soaking wet

Of course, he's not, but you are, what with all the nonsense about being in his head, which is about as off-topic as can be, even though none of your side told you that. Shows who the real real idiots are. You. And your side of bigoted haters, no ? We all know that you now rely on the same arguments that you argued against last year. And you morons think that it isn't noticed. LOL. Bunch of losers to now embrace an argument that you railed against for years, namely the definition of marriage as being traditionally for 2 people, when you defied the traditions to get what you wanted. So weak. And you know it, explain it if you can, or else, use non sequiturs again. Doy and duh. We have swapped places now. Now your side uses the argument of tradition to defend monogamous marriage for gays, and refuses to embrace equality. Keep talking smack, you dick-head.

[Randy -Rock- Hudson]

Jazybird58 wrote:

<quoted text>Gawdd you people really are clueless. Do single couples have the same rights and privileges of marries couples?
How about married couples VRS Civil Unions???
Lets see if YOU can find out.
How about this. A gay couple, been together for 25 years. One is involved in a horrific auto crash, leaves him brain dead, can the other ask to have the plug pulled?????( If he is even allowed in the room)
Income tax, wills, probate, the list is quite extensive

You're brain dead. What is a single couple ? A marriage of Siamese twins ?

[Randy -Rock- Hudson]

Jazybird58 wrote:

<quoted text>OH snap, now your a judge.

You have no command of proper vocabulary, it's "you're", not "your". Secondly, you make insults like a child. Thirdly, "snap" ? Really ? Speak like a man. You have us all convinced that you are a gay third-grader. And we're right about that.

[Rose_NoHo]

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Of course, he's not, but you are, what with all the nonsense about being in his head, which is about as off-topic as can be, even though none of your side told you that. Shows who the real real idiots are. You. And your side of bigoted haters, no ? We all know that you now rely on the same arguments that you argued against last year. And you morons think that it isn't noticed. LOL. Bunch of losers to now embrace an argument that you railed against for years, namely the definition of marriage as being traditionally for 2 people, when you defied the traditions to get what you wanted. So weak. And you know it, explain it if you can, or else, use non sequiturs again. Doy and duh. We have swapped places now. Now your side uses the argument of tradition to defend monogamous marriage for gays, and refuses to embrace equality. Keep talking smack, you dick-head.

You trolls flood the forum with posts about polygamy because you don't have an argument against gay marriage. Why not start a forum about polygamy? Oh, yeah, you don't give a damn about polygamy, that's why.

[Jazybird58]

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
You have no command of proper vocabulary, it's "you're", not "your". Secondly, you make insults like a child. Thirdly, "snap" ? Really ? Speak like a man. You have us all convinced that you are a gay third-grader. And we're right about that.

Have you seen Flunies vote total?? Whoa baby

[cyberjill]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
You trolls flood the forum with posts about polygamy because you don't have an argument against gay marriage. Why not start a forum about polygamy? Oh, yeah, you don't give a damn about polygamy, that's why.

I love my gay friends, they know they sick and don't want to marry.

[Pod People]

Hello jokers from "out of towners" who post worthless trash on htis site.

[Frankie RIzzo]

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Since you're not in charge, STFU.

YUK!YUK!YUK!

[Frankie RIzzo]

Pietro Armando wrote:

<quoted text>
That was great paisan!

;)))

[Frankie RIzzo]

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
You're brain dead. What is a single couple ? A marriage of Siamese twins ?

Ain't jizzybird58 cute?

[Frankie RIzzo]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
You trolls flood the forum with posts about polygamy because you don't have an argument against gay marriage. Why not start a forum about polygamy? Oh, yeah, you don't give a damn about polygamy, that's why.

Because this is a perfectly good marriage equality thread, thank you.

Why don't you start a thread on red herrings? Over in the fish threads. Or maybe a straw man thread.

[Brian_G]

The left would treat women differently from right and proper:

"We will draw upon the courage and skills of our sisters and daughters and moms, because women have proven under fire that they are ready for combat."
B. Obama
State of the Union

[Quest]

Brian_G wrote:

The left would treat women differently from right and proper:
"We will draw upon the courage and skills of our sisters and daughters and moms, because women have proven under fire that they are ready for combat."
B. Obama
State of the Union

It's voluntary, and women have already been in combat - in harm's way - without the ability to have the same titles or ability for advancement as the men.

Now, if they can make the grade - THEY can choose.

It's THEIR choice - not yours.

[Pietro Armando]

Quest wrote:

<quoted text>
It's voluntary, and women have already been in combat - in harm's way - without the ability to have the same titles or ability for advancement as the men.

Does this mean women will be required to register for selective service?

Now, if they can make the grade - THEY can choose.
It's THEIR choice - not yours.

I wonder how we as a nation would respond to a conflict with mass female service personel casualties, or large numbers of captured American female G.I.s parade on camera by an enemy.