Dec 8, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: KING-TV Seattle
Since obesity and diseases related to obesity cost the healthcare system so much, as does smoking, would it be acceptable for employers to not hire people based on their weight and physical condition? Should an employer be able to fire someone for eating something with little to no nutritional value?
What if the hot office secretary gets pregnant or simply gains weight? I think it.may drop the bottom line, since looks matter.
Or what if one of the employers eats meat and I think it makes them less productive?? No less science on that then any adverse effect from pot..
Since: Oct 12
....We hired a Vegan Moving company once....but, unfortunately they could'nt lift anything........lol.....
You should have hired ME then. I don't know any friends my age who can lift more and they are ALL carnivores, LOL.
Add your comments below
|Jesus statue on Montana mountain stirs church a... (Oct '11)||7 hr||patty||6|
|Reasons Why Washington State Sucks - Post Them ... (Apr '12)||Mon||Me too||289|
|Forget Metro cutbacks, Seattle now has a Weed B...||Mon||Me too||3|
|Megapastor's Own Ministers Accuse Him Of Creati...||Aug 24||Skeptic||1|
|State governments may be expanding wealth gap||Aug 23||Coal||16|
|WA Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Washingto... (Oct '10)||Aug 19||Mr Blue||713|
|How do I find Hill top Cemetery? (Apr '11)||Apr '11||Lost a relative||1|
Find what you want!
Search Port Gamble Forum Now