Romney will take our guns
Calling the kettle black

Williamsville, MO

#24 Sep 14, 2012
Buckwheat Rules wrote:
<quoted text>
Like I said. It's all in writing but Republicans have their heads in the sand. Obama has a relaxed gun laws. Look at Romney's gun record. It speaks for itself.
Don't see the NRA endorsing Obama, Obama is anti-gun. Like I said for you to be spinning your lies about which candidate is pro-gun lets me know you do not support the 2nd Amendment. If you were you would be touting that Obama as the great defender of the constitution; you would know Obama is ANTI-GUN. Maybe you should research your king and his beliefs a little more.
rob

West Plains, MO

#25 Sep 14, 2012
go to nra website they are for romney
biggn

Farmington, MO

#26 Sep 14, 2012
rob wrote:
go to nra website they are for romney
They gave Romney and F rating in his last political office. And Obama a D.

But as Romney flip flopped on the Gun control issue, the NRA started endorsing him.

The problem is the same as always. I have no idea what Romney is really for or against, it changes with the crowd he wants to impress at every speech.
Calling the kettle black

Williamsville, MO

#27 Sep 14, 2012
biggn wrote:
<quoted text>
They gave Romney and F rating in his last political office. And Obama a D.
But as Romney flip flopped on the Gun control issue, the NRA started endorsing him.
The problem is the same as always. I have no idea what Romney is really for or against, it changes with the crowd he wants to impress at every speech.
I went to NRA website. Romney "b" Obama you guessed it big fat "f". Not to mention ad displaying Obama as anti-gun.
biggn

Farmington, MO

#28 Sep 14, 2012
Calling the kettle black wrote:
<quoted text>I went to NRA website. Romney "b" Obama you guessed it big fat "f". Not to mention ad displaying Obama as anti-gun.
Like I said, they all flip flop all over the place. Should fish instead of hunt.

The NRA is a political organization, nothing else, they do what they think is
best for business, not best for gun owners.

I canceled my membership, when all I
started getting from them were recommendations on who to vote for, then i'd research those candidates, and find that they had nothing to do with guns, period.

Just another political machine!
dont vote for either one

Santa Monica, CA

#29 Sep 14, 2012
romney gets up ever morning, wets his thumb to see which way the breeze is blowing before he opens his mouth to announce his latest position on this or that.
romney is no better than a hundred simpletons i pass in the street everyday. he's a chicken sh!t punk. it's shameful that a obvious shyster like romney could be a candidate for prez. in the u. s. a.. if i ever saw him i would spit on the piece of sh!t. i despise him and his ilk.
dont vote for either one

Santa Monica, CA

#30 Sep 14, 2012
.... i'm serious. don't mess with me sticking romney in my face. i can't bare 4 funking years of looking at that evil satanic son of a b!tch every day. don't even think about making him prez. obama is bad enuf. romney- ryan are nothing but a evil satanic shysters. you vote for him you are sh!t .
dont vote for either one

Santa Monica, CA

#31 Sep 14, 2012
.... where are the decent men like repub eisonhower or dem jfk. answer: probably just trying to raise a family and don't want to get shot dead by the new world order nazi globalists.
Well Well

Kennett, MO

#32 Sep 14, 2012
Both the NRA and Chamber of Commerce are just political affiliations for the Republican party. You really cant bet the farm on what either one says.

If you don't like what Romney the flip flopper is saying. Just stick around until tomorrow and it will change.
american

Saint Louis, MO

#33 Sep 17, 2012
Second Amendent right: was initially envisioned as one dealing with state militias.through the years States and Congress have enacted various gun ownership restrictions with very little Supreme Court interpretation. In 2008 the Court ruled that gun ownership is a constitutionally protected individual right.
Allthough i do not support Rommney, he cannot take our guns anymore than Obama. I personally dont care for either of our options. we have run out of good presidents. it's like have to pick the fat kid to play on your team because he is less fat than your only other option.
Rest assured, I will have my guns untill they get passed on to my son.
cry me a river

United States

#34 Sep 17, 2012
so many guns are bought sold and traded with little more than good faith that the receiver is a good person, both pistols and rifles/shotguns. If anyone wants to take my guns they will first have to somehow trace them to me then actually find them.
absolutely

Steele, MO

#35 Sep 17, 2012
cry me a river wrote:
<quoted text> Then explain why i can go to any pawn shop or gun store and walk out with an ak47, m16, or similar ASSAULT rifle and an entire case of ammo in less than 10 minutes?
Do you know the difference in a deer rifle an an assault weapon? None, except The shape of the rifle. Fully Auto matic guns were banned in 1935. If you want a hunting rifle, you had better support people that don't want to ban semi-automatics. That is the first step.
Calling the kettle black

Williamsville, MO

#36 Sep 17, 2012
Buckwheat Rules wrote:
<quoted text>
Like I said. It's all in writing but Republicans have their heads in the sand. Obama has a relaxed gun laws. Look at Romney's gun record. It speaks for itself.
LOL...and I have a million dollars to give you. Not
absolutely

Steele, MO

#37 Sep 17, 2012
dont vote for either one wrote:
both romney and obama are bought and paid for by the new world order globalists who will take your guns once they declare martial law. and for anyone who doubts me please do a search of "g. w. bush orders all guns seized from katrina louisiana homeowners" or "military and police under the bush administration seizes guns from law abiding citizens during katrina" and you will see a video of them seizing peoples guns going door to door.
Since Katrina, the law has been changed. They can no longer sieze guns during a natural disaster. But watch out for any reason to seize guns, they will think of something.
Preach It

Poplar Bluff, MO

#38 Sep 17, 2012
ROMNEY will GIVE US GUNS! He is so funking dumb on foreign policy he & his boy blunder sidekick will get us in another suckass pointless war, make Bush look the Dalai Lama.
Yes, we will be fighting like the Baldknobbers, Romney will need to give us guns!
cry me a river

United States

#39 Sep 17, 2012
absolutely wrote:
<quoted text>Do you know the difference in a deer rifle an an assault weapon? None, except The shape of the rifle. Fully Auto matic guns were banned in 1935. If you want a hunting rifle, you had better support people that don't want to ban semi-automatics. That is the first step.
lol i really dont even have to explain how stupid you are but here it goes. I can go in any gun store and buy an AK-47 or M-16. Those are typically called assault weapons. I guess you could kill a deer with one but who needs to rapid fire 20+ rounds a deer? Well you prolly would. While its true most people including me couldn't own a fully auto rifle it doesn't really matter because anyone can pull a trigger rapidly or even "bump fire" it. HOWEVER you are totally wrong about a fully auto gun being banned...

http://www.ehow.com/how_6742869_fully-automat...

Now go crawl back in your grandma's basement and reply so we can all laugh at your stupidity.
cry me a river

United States

#40 Sep 17, 2012
absolutely wrote:
<quoted text>Since Katrina, the law has been changed. They can no longer sieze guns during a natural disaster. But watch out for any reason to seize guns, they will think of something.
Yea and you would be dumb enough to give them all of yours.
mike

United States

#41 Sep 17, 2012
cry me a river wrote:
<quoted text>Yea and you would be dumb enough to give them all of yours.
it doesnt matter who is elected they arent getting my guns until
Im dead. Thats MY line in the sand.
gfys

Farmington, MO

#44 Sep 18, 2012
Operation Northwoods wrote:
If there is a gun confiscation in this country, it will not be pretty for either the citizen, nor, for those who attempt to confiscate our weapons.

That was a crude remark about "rambo." I know what he was saying, and Mike is right, too.

Our problem is that we are generally unorganized, where the military, particularly, the Marine Corps, has been preparing and training to confiscate our guns for years. Remember the 29 Palms survey? Back in the 80's, 24% of the Marines who took the survey at 29 Palms (California USMC Base) said that they would KILL Americans if given the order by the president. Since then, I can only assume that that number has increased.

Well, here is how I think it may go down. First, there will be a period where Americans will be ordered to turn in their weapons. Many will, as some idiot, scum sucking phony as hell preachers will preach ROMANS:13, submission to government, even though Jesus was anything but submissive. Just ask the Jews in the Temple when he overturned the tables of the "money changers."

Be that as it may. The wimps, the men who are pussy whipped, will turn in their guns.

Next, confiscation will begin. They will block the exits of the cities, like Poplar Bluff, and set up road blocks on HY 160, HY 67, HY 53, etc. They will search vehicles for guns, question you as to if you have weapons. Face scan you, get your address information off of your drivers license and all in
Dude, I believed everyone had a right to own guns, until I read your post. Now I'm thinking a required psychological test, may not be a bad idea.

Ted Kezinsky Jr?
gfys

Farmington, MO

#48 Sep 18, 2012
Operation Northwoods wrote:
gfys,

Had better than a psychological test, dummy. I have had an FBI background check, and you?

With what that I said do you disagree? Be specific. Turd remarks like comparing me to Mr. Kezinsky, is just a dumb ass comment from a turd who has no thought in his brain, but to make comments, even though he has no research, or, information to impart to the topic of discussion.

Similar turd like comments include references to "Black Helicopters," "Tin Foil Hats," and "Conspiracy Theories." You have nothing, but you are so anxious to hold your hand up in class and blurt out something stupid, instead of thought out comments, opinions, or, the like.

You can put your hand down, now. No need to keep it up and blurt out another stupid ass comment.

How do you see a gun confiscation going down, if you, indeed, believe my theory to be in error?
I believe, like all sane people, that nobody has any plans to confiscate our guns. Calling an overactive imagination and a subscription to conspiracy theory weekly, your theory, doesn't make any of your points disprovable, due to the fact that no reputable organization has researched how our government would seize our weapons. Simply because it woul be a complete waste of time and money to do a study on such an asinine idea.

People like you are simply unable to live without having something to fear, you fear our government, and the general population fears people like you. As a gun owner, I don't fear either one.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Poplar Bluff Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
john dunivan's funeral (Oct '08) 2 min guest 26
pbjhs 4 min Bystander 9
UBER in poplar bluff LOL 1 hr bullseye 6
Blonde cashier at heartland express. 1 hr bullseye 5
Hey JJ! 2 hr guest 3
Drug Doctors 3 hr Mike71 5
Kushner's Russian ties draw FBI attention. 4 hr Guest 3

Poplar Bluff Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Poplar Bluff Mortgages