1. No, I was saying pleasure is a key component of sex. It's a huge motivating factor for animals to have sex. I doubt our more primitive ancestors would have mated if that key component was absent.<quoted text>
Gays exist, I will not deny... However I do find fault in the idea and I worry... Sex is a tool, I say procreate, you say pleasure... Might be I find pleasure creating...
Are you so much a heterophobe the idea of right and future are foreign?
Your argument simply seems gay is the answer to a population crisis...
Can you further justify the lifestyle?
2. How can I be a "heterophobe"? I'm a straight male who enjoys sex with his wife. Oh, I get it. If I am for gays rights, I must, then, be against straight people. Silly me.
3. No, again. My argument is that there is absolutely no reason to fret if a small segment of the general population does not reproduce because of homosexuality. At least 95% of people are straight or about 6 billion possible reproducers. The human population is not going to crash anytime soon.
4. Why does it need to be justified? I never had to justify being straight. Do you think it must justified for everyone to be able to drink from the same water fountain?