Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Comments (Page 46,777)

Showing posts 935,521 - 935,540 of1,071,719
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Too Vague

Forest, MS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1018203
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Los Angeles Times: "LAX to Add 1,200 Surveillance Cameras for Increased Security"
Date: August 02, 2002

Quote:
The city hopes to curb evacuations and more closely monitor terminals for criminal activity at Los Angeles International Airport by quintupling the number of surveillance cameras focused on facility curbs, ticket lobbies, terminal doors and the airfield.

The city agency that operates LAX will spend as much as $20 million to add 1,200 closed-circuit television cameras in the airport's nine terminals and on the 3,500-acre airfield by December 2004. Each terminal will receive up to 150 new cameras.

Read more: Read more: http://www.google.com/url...

Los Angeles Times: Israeli to help with LAX security
Date: June 14, 2008

Quote:
LOD, ISRAEL — Israel's top airport security official will make periodic reviews of anti-terrorist measures at Los Angeles International Airport under an agreement signed Friday during a visit here by Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa.

The pact, formalizing an arrangement begun nearly two years ago, will send the Israeli official, Nahum Liss, and two colleagues to Los Angeles for regular inspections as $1,000-per-day consultants. The officials work for the authority that operates Ben-Gurion International Airport.

Read more: http://articles.latimes.com/2008/jun/14/local...

Los Angeles Times: Police: LAX dry ice explosions 'an internal job, maybe a labor dispute or a prank'

Quote:
"This appears to be an internal job, maybe a labor dispute or a prank," said Los Angeles Police Deputy Chief Michael Downing. "But we do take this very seriously. This is along the lines of planting a pipe bomb.

"It's a destructive device. The detonation or possession of a destructive device is a felony," Downing added.

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/15/travel/los-ange...

Jewish Virtual Library: U.S.- Israel Homeland Security Cooperation

Quote:
Since its establishment as a state, the reality of life in Israel has forced Israelis to defend themselves against constant terrorist threats. As a result, the Jewish state has become a world leader in designing techniques and technologies in the arenas of homeland security and counter-terrorism. Israel is working with the U.S. government and private entities to develop technologies and equipment aimed at thwarting terrorism and safeguarding citizens in both nations.

Read more: http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/U...
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1018204
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

STOP VOTING UNGODLY wrote:
Pray Fervently. "The king's heart is in the hand of the LORD, Like the rivers of water; He turns it wherever He wishes." Proverbs 21:1
Christians realize that we cannot fix a dying system. God did not intend, however, that Christians stop voting (in countries that allow voting.) Christians have a responsibility to speak up for what is right and to testify of Jesus.
The systems of this world are groaning in travail. Jesus said that things will wax worse and worse, and then the end will come. There is no hope in the systems of this world, but we have our hope in the administration of God's Kingdom.
In socialist countries or Islamic countries, Christians have little choice. In fact, it is difficult just staying alive in such countries--if you serve Jesus. If you have freedom to worship, thank God and pray that He preserve your freedom.
We know that the systems of this world are dying systems that cannot be fixed, but we also know that we have a responsibility before God to do what He puts in our hand to do. The most important thing that the redeemed can do is to pray, to walk in the Spirit and be a witness, to speak the Truth in Love, and not to deny Christ in thought, word, or deed. To abdicate our responsibility is to sin.
The solutions do not lie in human government, but human government will become a real force for evil if the redeemed do not take their place. The redeemed do not live to make money but rather work to make a living as part of their ministries and their orderly lives in God's purpose. In the same way, the redeemed do not live for politics, where such cults as liberalism and Islam do consider politics to be central. If the redeemed back out of the process completely, we open the door for the unregenerate to make all of our decisions for us.http://www.seekfind.net/Ser ving_God_In_An_Ungodly_World.h tml
John Galt wrote:

religion has no place in politics...and you church people cannot ban abortion even with overwhelming Republican majorities in Congress and the White House...so stop tilting at windmills...

“God bless you, Mr. President”

Since: Jul 08

Peaceful, prosperous second

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1018205
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
You are correct about the words "always" and "never". You made up the "only" part.
So you have no room to question anyone else's credentials.
You're a none too bright liar, Batty--what does only mean except a variant of none as opposite of all. My right to question? I'm still keeping up the good fight, even if I may have missed a few firsts along the way. Do you really think it makes sense to say you "left" teaching to be a full-time mom when by the time you quit (and were obviously not capable of delayed gratification necessary to leave pension funds alone) said child was ten years old? I don't. You're a liar, and I will continue to treat you as such.
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1018206
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
why not simply state that abortion cannot be banned and that the candidate's views are private...
"unborn" means just about as much as "undead"...
"unborn" means just about as much as "undead"

I disagree.

That is an insult to zombies everywhere.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Hartford, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1018207
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

5

leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>Oh, Batty, did you never learn that statements using always, never, all, or only are almost always false? You never had the chance to screw up "America's future" as you could not have received a degree and certification with test score like that.
<pathetic>
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1018208
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

The Real Reason That The Cancer Patient Writing In Today’s Wall Street Journal Lost Her Insurance

But Sundby shouldn’t blame reform — United Healthcare dropped her coverage because they’ve struggled to compete in California’s individual health care market for years and didn’t want to pay for sicker patients like Sundby.

The company, which only had 8,000 individual policy holders in California out of the two million who participate in the market, announced (along with a second insurer, Aetna) that it would be pulling out of the individual market in May. The company could not compete with Anthem Blue Cross, Blue Shield of California and Kaiser Permanente, who control more than 80 percent of the individual market.“Over the years, it has become more difficult to administer these plans in a cost-effective way for our members,” UnitedHealth spokeswoman Cheryl Randolph explained.“We will continue to keep a major presence in California, focusing instead on large and small employers.”

The two insurers were also operating at a tax disadvantage in the state. As California Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones explained,“One of the factors I believe contributed to this decision….is the special tax break that California law gives to Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, which has allowed and continues to allow those two companies to avoid paying $100 million in state taxes a year.”“Aetna and United Healthcare don’t get the special tax break provided to Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, and so they faced a major competitive disadvantage in California.”

And then there is the company’s own justification for leaving.“The company’s plans reflect its concern that the first wave of newly insured customers under the law may be the costliest,” UHC Chief Executive Officer Stephen Helmsley told investors last October.“UnitedHealth will watch and see how the exchanges evolve and expects the first enrollees will have ‘a pent-up appetite’ for medical care. We are approaching them with some degree of caution because of that.”

Get that? The company packed its bags and dumped its beneficiaries because it wants its competitors to swallow the first wave of sicker enrollees only to re-enter the market later and profit from the healthy people who still haven’t signed up for coverage.

Sundby is losing her coverage and her doctors because of a business decision her insurer made within the competitive dynamics of California’s health care market. She’ll now have to enroll in a new plan that offers tighter networks of providers as a way to control health care costs and offer lower premiums. Eleven insurers are participating in Covered California and for the first time they won’t be able to deny coverage to Sundby or any other cancer patients.

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/11/04/28...

but i suppose you nutjobs will need FOX to tell you that before you'll believe it.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Hartford, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1018209
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>You're a none too bright liar, Batty--what does only mean except a variant of none as opposite of all. My right to question? I'm still keeping up the good fight, even if I may have missed a few firsts along the way. Do you really think it makes sense to say you "left" teaching to be a full-time mom when by the time you quit (and were obviously not capable of delayed gratification necessary to leave pension funds alone) said child was ten years old? I don't. You're a liar, and I will continue to treat you as such.
<dolt>
Too Vague

Forest, MS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1018210
Nov 4, 2013
 
LAPD Chief Admits to Training For the Exact Scenario of the LAX Shooting Just 3 Weeks Ago
Watch: http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1018211
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
total BS....
As Voltaire once said, "I may disapprove of what you say but will fight to the death your right to say it."

Do you no longer stand behind the freedom to express one's beliefs?

Just trying to figure out where you stand exactly.

“God bless you, Mr. President”

Since: Jul 08

Peaceful, prosperous second

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1018212
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Buroc Millhouse Obama wrote:
<quoted text>
<pathetic>
Yes you are...of course, considering the company you keep (in a drawer), you're not even in the 96th percentile of loser.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1018213
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>You're a none too bright liar, Batty--what does only mean except a variant of none as opposite of all. My right to question? I'm still keeping up the good fight, even if I may have missed a few firsts along the way. Do you really think it makes sense to say you "left" teaching to be a full-time mom when by the time you quit (and were obviously not capable of delayed gratification necessary to leave pension funds alone) said child was ten years old? I don't. You're a liar, and I will continue to treat you as such.
Well, speaking on behalf of teachers everywhere, we're proud of you, leosnana, for keeping up the good fight.

Unfortunate you're losing it...along with your mind, apparently. No offense.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1018214
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Homer wrote:
<quoted text>
John Galt wrote:
religion has no place in politics...and you church people cannot ban abortion even with overwhelming Republican majorities in Congress and the White House...so stop tilting at windmills...
DBWriter wrote:
"just read the 10th Amendment verbatim."

Next question?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1018215
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

sonicfilter wrote:
The Real Reason That The Cancer Patient Writing In Today’s Wall Street Journal Lost Her Insurance
But Sundby shouldn’t blame reform — United Healthcare dropped her coverage because they’ve struggled to compete in California’s individual health care market for years and didn’t want to pay for sicker patients like Sundby.
The company, which only had 8,000 individual policy holders in California out of the two million who participate in the market, announced (along with a second insurer, Aetna) that it would be pulling out of the individual market in May. The company could not compete with Anthem Blue Cross, Blue Shield of California and Kaiser Permanente, who control more than 80 percent of the individual market.“Over the years, it has become more difficult to administer these plans in a cost-effective way for our members,” UnitedHealth spokeswoman Cheryl Randolph explained.“We will continue to keep a major presence in California, focusing instead on large and small employers.”
The two insurers were also operating at a tax disadvantage in the state. As California Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones explained,“One of the factors I believe contributed to this decision….is the special tax break that California law gives to Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, which has allowed and continues to allow those two companies to avoid paying $100 million in state taxes a year.”“Aetna and United Healthcare don’t get the special tax break provided to Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, and so they faced a major competitive disadvantage in California.”
And then there is the company’s own justification for leaving.“The company’s plans reflect its concern that the first wave of newly insured customers under the law may be the costliest,” UHC Chief Executive Officer Stephen Helmsley told investors last October.“UnitedHealth will watch and see how the exchanges evolve and expects the first enrollees will have ‘a pent-up appetite’ for medical care. We are approaching them with some degree of caution because of that.”
Get that? The company packed its bags and dumped its beneficiaries because it wants its competitors to swallow the first wave of sicker enrollees only to re-enter the market later and profit from the healthy people who still haven’t signed up for coverage.
Sundby is losing her coverage and her doctors because of a business decision her insurer made within the competitive dynamics of California’s health care market. She’ll now have to enroll in a new plan that offers tighter networks of providers as a way to control health care costs and offer lower premiums. Eleven insurers are participating in Covered California and for the first time they won’t be able to deny coverage to Sundby or any other cancer patients.
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/11/04/28...
but i suppose you nutjobs will need FOX to tell you that before you'll believe it.
<spam>
<another excuse to explain the reason ObamaKare is causing millions of people to lose their health insurance when otherwise they wouldn't>
TSM

El Paso, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1018216
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
why not simply state that abortion cannot be banned and that the candidate's views are private...
"unborn" means just about as much as "undead"...
Galt looks like you pick up a friend; Nuculur agrees with you’ Silence is Golden!! Is unborn or undead same as what ‘Is’ is?
John Galt

Temecula, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1018217
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
tell the deficit. it's evidently not buying into that excuse.
still voluntary, and the Part D deficit is negligible compared to ObamaKKKare deficit...but Galt has no problem with repeal...or with increasing premiums as long as the program is voluntary...
STOP VOTING UNGODLY

Rocky Mount, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1018218
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Hate the Sin but Love the Sinner
How many people in this world have you ever - hated? I know of some people I dislike - but hated? If we are to love, as God loves, are we not to hate as God hates? But you say, "God is all love, He never hated anyone" - or did He
Today, regardless of the issue, "hate" is the buzz word used by virtually everyone who disagrees with another person. When honest differences cannot be discussed intelligently, a picture is often portrayed of the sinner being a victim of the sin, instead of its evil author. In this case hate is more than likely the scapegoat. Although saint and sinner alike are equally guilty of this same deception, to disagree with another person is not by any means hateful.
Modern day use for the word "hate," which is closely aliened with tolerance, started as a deflection of truth by sodomites who promote the homosexual lifestyle and is purely an attempt to redirect the issue to a discussion that is more defensible on their part. Although the term "hate crime," was invented for this purpose, as with the word "choice," it is totally deceptive and destructive to the furtherance of honest debate and pro-life / profamily ministry efforts. The old proverb, "When the good are overly merciful to the bad, the good eventually become the bad," comes to mind. For some time churches have been doing whatever they could to convince believers we should always "turn the other cheek," to avoid controversy, like the great SINS of our day, abortion, sodomy, adultery, divorce, gambling, pornography, addictions, political liberalism, etc., to do anything else would be ... it would be ... hateful - wouldn’t it? Biblical references to God’s wrath and anger are too frequent to easily be counted. But in order to understand Scripture and God’s instructions we must begin by acknowledging a universal law of Christianity and three laws of hermeneutics (the science of interpretation).
The Universal Law of Christianity is that a statement by Jesus Christ (Son) cannot contradict a Law from God (Father). To state otherwise is heresy. Anyone who makes such a statement is acting completely contrary to God’s will, deliberately lying, or completely stupid - don’t believe them! The first law of hermeneutics is to examine what the text actually says. To do this, there are times when we must go beyond the English text in order to understand what was said in the original language, the Hebrew of the Old Testament or the Greek of the New Testament. This will require a Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible. The second law is to examine the immediate context in which the passage is found. What is the subject discussed? The third law is to examine the whole analogy of Scripture, meaning, the entire context of the document being studied.
Take the word "hate." (Luke 14:26)- "If anyone comes to me and does not hate his mother and father, wife and children, brothers and sisters, yes, and his own life also He cannot be my disciple." Common sense tells us this does not mean we are to literally hate our parents and everyone else, that’s crazy. So what does it mean?
First Law - Although "hate" in Old Testament Hebrew means "personally," in New Testament Greek it means to "love less." We are to love everyone less than we love God - same word but two different meanings.
Second Law - What is the subject? The term "hate the sin but love the sinner" is a paraphrase taken from a letter by St. Augustine, giving instruction for discipline to a religious order of nuns. It was never meant as a panacea to serve in place of punishment for a wrongdoer! In the commonly referred to pro-life verses of Psalm 139:1-18, David lists a stirring message of God’s perfect knowledge of man. But have you ever read the continuing verses 19-22,? "Oh God, if only you would destroy the wicked! Get out of my life, you murderers! They blaspheme you; your enemies take your name in vain. O Lord, shouldn’t I hate those who hate you?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1018220
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
like how the ACA reduces the deficit while Part D adds?
but you avoid that fact that dems stood up for Part D even after they didn't vote for it.
not that it matters. the ACA is here to stay no matter how many failed votes the GOP congresscritters think they need to have so the nutjobs will think they got their monies worth.
Ok, moron. I'm just curious.
What makes you think any Marxist program at all can reduce any government deficit? That has never occurred in history. Why do you think ObamaKare will be the first Marxist program in history to reduce a government deficit?
STOP VOTING UNGODLY

Rocky Mount, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1018221
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Shouldn’t I despise those who resist you? Yes, I hate them with complete hatred, for your enemies are my enemies." In the Hebrew version of these verses David states he personally and extremely did not "love" God’s enemies. Again in Hebrew translation, Mal 1:3 states also that God did not love Esau, "Yes I have loved Jacob, but Esau I have hated." Additionally, 2 Chronicles 19:2 asks in a condemning tone, "Should you help the wicked and love the Lord? Therefore the wrath of the Lord is upon you." In Proverbs 6:17 God also states in Hebrew that He hates, not only shedding of innocent blood, but the person (human form) that was responsible for the evil! Psalm 5:6-7 states, "The boastful shall not stand in your sight; You hate all workers of iniquity. You shall destroy those who speak falsehood; The Lord abhors the bloodthirsty and deceitful man," - including the abortionist. Proverbs 14: 17 states, "And a man of wicked intentions is hated." Proverbs 8:13, "And the perverse mouth I hate." We cannot address sin without affecting the sinner. An evil spirit needs a body to occupy. It will not be the sin that is sentenced to hell at the Judgment, it will be the unrepentant sinner.

Third Law - The Bible as a whole universally condemns looking at another person with an unloving heart, but there are instances where hating is justified as in the examples listed above. So the word "hate" can mean one thing in one paragraph and something entirely different in another.

In your life you will always love something and hate something. We can talk all we want about overcoming evil with good, but unless we have a holy hatred for evil, we will never overcome it with good. Most believers say they love the Lord but do not hate what He hates. God is holy; therefore, He cannot tolerate evil in any form - sin or sinner. An unrepentant sinner (regardless of a verbal conversion) cannot dwell in heaven with a holy God! If our love for the Lord is sincere, then we will learn to hate everything that competes against Him.
The question is whether you will not only love what God loves but hate what He hates. What you love is a clue to what you hate, and what you hate is a clue to what you love.

To touch the Lord is to have mercy on the multitudes and hatred toward their oppressors. Holy love and holy hatred are gifts from God and fueled by the other. The term, "hate the sin but love the sinner," is man made, not part of Scripture, and a tool from Satan to hamper the defense of the defenseless and the cause of Christ!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1018222
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

4

sonicfilter wrote:
The Real Reason That The Cancer Patient Writing In Today’s Wall Street Journal Lost Her Insurance
But Sundby shouldn’t blame reform — United Healthcare dropped her coverage because they’ve struggled to compete in California’s individual health care market for years and didn’t want to pay for sicker patients like Sundby.
The company, which only had 8,000 individual policy holders in California out of the two million who participate in the market, announced (along with a second insurer, Aetna) that it would be pulling out of the individual market in May. The company could not compete with Anthem Blue Cross, Blue Shield of California and Kaiser Permanente, who control more than 80 percent of the individual market.“Over the years, it has become more difficult to administer these plans in a cost-effective way for our members,” UnitedHealth spokeswoman Cheryl Randolph explained.“We will continue to keep a major presence in California, focusing instead on large and small employers.”
The two insurers were also operating at a tax disadvantage in the state. As California Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones explained,“One of the factors I believe contributed to this decision….is the special tax break that California law gives to Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, which has allowed and continues to allow those two companies to avoid paying $100 million in state taxes a year.”“Aetna and United Healthcare don’t get the special tax break provided to Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, and so they faced a major competitive disadvantage in California.”
And then there is the company’s own justification for leaving.“The company’s plans reflect its concern that the first wave of newly insured customers under the law may be the costliest,” UHC Chief Executive Officer Stephen Helmsley told investors last October.“UnitedHealth will watch and see how the exchanges evolve and expects the first enrollees will have ‘a pent-up appetite’ for medical care. We are approaching them with some degree of caution because of that.”
Get that? The company packed its bags and dumped its beneficiaries because it wants its competitors to swallow the first wave of sicker enrollees only to re-enter the market later and profit from the healthy people who still haven’t signed up for coverage.
Sundby is losing her coverage and her doctors because of a business decision her insurer made within the competitive dynamics of California’s health care market. She’ll now have to enroll in a new plan that offers tighter networks of providers as a way to control health care costs and offer lower premiums. Eleven insurers are participating in Covered California and for the first time they won’t be able to deny coverage to Sundby or any other cancer patients.
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/11/04/28...
but i suppose you nutjobs will need FOX to tell you that before you'll believe it.
absent ObamaKKKare, the woman would still have her insurance...period...

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1018223
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
why not simply state that abortion cannot be banned and that the candidate's views are private...
"unborn" means just about as much as "undead"...
Suppose they could say that too. It's just that the majority in 2011 supported pro life according to a Gallup poll and that number shot up from 33% in 1995 to 50% in 2011. Pro-choice was down to 41% in 2011.

Maybe that has changed in the past two years.

But then there's also this.

http://www.bing.com/images/search...

Unless it's fake.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 935,521 - 935,540 of1,071,719
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
Pompano Beach Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Pompano Beach Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Pompano Beach People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Pompano Beach News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Pompano Beach
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••