It didn't relate to GENDER at all - and was about marriage equality as well as race. Period.<quoted text>
The focus was on discrimination based on race. It didn't relate to two human beings w/ vaginas getting married. At all.
SCOTUS has been shaping a more extensive area of privacy around marriage since the dustbowl in the 20's. SCOTUS, via the Constitituion, guarantees that personal questions like who will marry (ie forced arranged marriages), whether a couple can/will have children, the use of contraception, abortion - particularly in the first trimester or how to raise & educate kids are left largely inviolable by legislators and government.
FURTHER - Justice Kennedy cited Planned Parenthood v. Casey when SCOTUS overturned Lawrence v. Texas - affirming a "constitutional protection to personal decisions relating to marriage, procreation, contraception, family relationships, child rearing, and education."
So AGAIN we have SCOTUS discussing marriage in regard to CIVIL RIGHTS moron boy.
He went on to say: ""These matters, involving the most intimate and personal choices a person may make in a lifetime, choices central to personal dignity and autonomy, are central to the liberty protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. At the heart of liberty is the right to define one's own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life. Beliefs about these matters could not define the attributes of personhood were they formed under compulsion of the State."
Justice Kennedy finished reading his decision by saying, "persons in a homosexual relationship may seek autonomy for these purposes, just as heterosexuals do."
You're wrong as usual No Relevance. Dig out that undropped testicle and deal with it.
Strikes me that its YOU that doesn't know what you're talking about as usual, and is spouting your usual wishful, hatefilled thinking.