|
Since: Sep 08
Fulton, NY
|
Please wait...
sasylicious wrote: <quoted text> You are learning a few thing about what God has to say. Either you chose him or you dont. Psssssssst.....Stupid Skanky - YOU dont speak for G-d, and you certainly dont know how to interpret what he had to say. ROFLMAO You dumb thing. You dont even know what it means when you keep babbling about how we're "made in His image". You dont have a damn clue.
|
|
Forum
Hobbs, NM
|
Judged:
1
sasylicious wrote: <quoted text> I don't have a problem. Kthanks. Leave the babies alone.
|
|
Gtown71
United States
|
STO wrote: <quoted text> Heya Foo. Sjm isn't lying THIS TIME ( I know, I know. hard to believe). She doesn't know the circumstances, either. But she'll go on claiming my siblings are dead. She's kinda sick like that. Yes, if his interpretation was correct, I would agree, BUT it is not. He's the only one looking foolish, by trying to even say that there is a pregnant woman in numbers 5, let alone an abortion taking place. He and all who agree with him on this matter.
|
|
Forum
Hobbs, NM
|
STO wrote: <quoted text> Settle down, sunshine. Just beause you misapply scripture doesn't mean I have to sign on. You have a good night, as well. It is too late for scripture. Rapture.
|
|
The Prince
Allentown, PA
|
Long Night Moon 13 wrote: <quoted text> Hey, maybe I can't reconcile it, according to you, but still you did not address my point about elevating the rights of the z/e/f above the rights of the woman. The z/e/f is not born, but the woman is. And I don't have the legal expertise of a Supreme Court Justice ya know? Every time you ejac-late (topix doesn't like that word) millions of live sperms will die...sperm that had the *potential* to become a person. Would you want your sperm's rights elevated above your own? I realize it's not the best analogy, but I think you get the point. What we need is BC that is 100% effective and then 100% compliance with using it and then we could be arguing something else. I've got to get to work. Have a good one. It is a terrible analogy. However, most of you proabortion pagans make terrible analogies in order to make your pointless points of view. All you care about are yourselves. The unborn child is just a casulty of your wanton sexual behavior. An unborn child starts life at conception. Sperm is alive and so is a female egg but an unborn child is just that, an unborn human being developing to the point of full independent life. That is something nothing but the unborn child can accomploish. It is a basic fact of life that you pagans cannot or I should say willnot grasp becasue it would shatter your self-centered universe.
|
|
The Prince
Allentown, PA
|
cpeter1313 wrote: Your god supposedly killed everyone in sodom and gomorrah (except his favorite incestuous family). He killed the first-born of every egyptian family. He drowned the WORLD'S population except for a few favorites, ensuring that all humans afterwards would be the products of incest (he likes keepin' it in the family.)" EVERY ONE of those people were so sinful they deserved to die? You worship a psychopathic mad-dog killer. If that is god, I sure as hell can do a better job. <quoted text> No because God is perfection and even as an imperfect human being, you are also gay.
|
|
The Prince
Allentown, PA
|
Ocean56 wrote: <quoted text> Want some cheese with that WHINE? That's all the above is; a big, fat WHINE because the world isn't the way YOU want it to be. Too bad. As I said previously, this ISN'T the 19th century, and women DO have rights now. That includes the right to decide for THEMSELVES whether or not they want to get married, whether or not to have children, and whether or not to continue a pregnancy. If some women want to REJECT marriage and/or motherhood, that's THEIR decision and none of YOUR business. I'm very glad I was born in the 20th century, and NOT the 19th, when women had NO RIGHTS whatsoever, and were treated like PROPERTY by men. I am very grateful for the brave women of the past and present women's rights movements that fought hard to obtain the rights women DO have. Being able to make my OWN personal decisions is MUCH better than being forced to allow some guy make those decisions FOR me. WE have all heard your pitch before. You are a closet lesbian that wishes she was born a man. Please get your husband and child some therpy. Living with you is cruel and unnatural punishment.
|
|
“Reality is better than truth.”
Since: Nov 09
Indianapolis
|
Please wait...
Better gay than a child rapist like your deity. The Prince wrote: <quoted text> No because God is perfection and even as an imperfect human being, you are also gay.
|
|
|
|
Since: Feb 07
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
cpeter1313 wrote: Better gay than a child rapist like your deity. <quoted text> Is there a reason that you keep posting this stupid comment?
|
|
Ocean56
AOL
|
The Prince wrote: It is a terrible analogy. However, most of you proabortion pagans make terrible analogies in order to make your pointless points of view. All you care about are yourselves. The unborn child is just a casulty of your wanton sexual behavior. An unborn child starts life at conception. Sperm is alive and so is a female egg but an unborn child is just that, an unborn human being developing to the point of full independent life. That is something nothing but the unborn child can accomploish. It is a basic fact of life that you pagans cannot or I should say will not grasp becasue it would shatter your self-centered universe. Awwwwwwww, still mad that WOMEN can make our OWN sexual and reproductive decisions without a man's permission or approval, I see. Too bleeping bad. A woman can decide for HERSELF whether or not she wants to get married, have children, and (IF she chooses motherhood) how many children SHE wants to have. A woman can also decide to REJECT marriage and motherhood and become a financially independent career woman instead. Yes, I know how angry this fact makes anti-choice regressive guys like yourself. You would prefer that women go back to the 19th century, when women had NO RIGHTS whatsoever. Well, that ISN'T going to happen. Happy to disappoint you.
|
|
Katie
Milton, WA
|
The Prince wrote: <quoted text> It is a terrible analogy. However, most of you proabortion pagans make terrible analogies in order to make your pointless points of view. All you care about are yourselves. The unborn child is just a casulty of your wanton sexual behavior. An unborn child starts life at conception. Sperm is alive and so is a female egg but an unborn child is just that, an unborn human being developing to the point of full independent life. That is something nothing but the unborn child can accomploish. It is a basic fact of life that you pagans cannot or I should say willnot grasp becasue it would shatter your self-centered universe. You're thought process is truly lacking if you honestly believe PCers are incapable of understanding a human embryo/fetus is "developing to the point of 'full independent life.'" A newborn definitely hasn't reached a "full independent life", but if all goes well, should, by the time they're 20-25 years old. Unfortunately, what you fail to grasp is that, sometimes, not all goes well.
|
|
feces for jesus
East Meadow, NY
|
sasylicious wrote: <quoted text> Nobody is denying the word of God STO. I would deny your claim, since you have no evidence to support your belief.
|
|
Ink
Eatontown, NJ
|
Judged:
1
1
STO wrote: <quoted text> You are ignoring the Law of Jealousies, which was given by God. Refusal does not play a part in it. You have stated this Law of God's makes no sense. What if she doesn't want to drink it? It's like me telling my kid that I'm going to make him eat something that will make his tongue rot off if he is lying but he will be fine if he didn't. Before I could get it in his mouth, he would be admitting to every lie he ever told. It's scare tactics and they probably worked.
|
|
Ink
Eatontown, NJ
|
Judged:
1
STO wrote: <quoted text> Ink is. No I didn't. I just think the law worked in a different way to flush out cheaters.
|
|
“Red Haired Atheist”
Since: May 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
The Prince wrote: <quoted text> It is a terrible analogy. However, most of you proabortion pagans make terrible analogies in order to make your pointless points of view. All you care about are yourselves. The unborn child is just a casulty of your wanton sexual behavior. An unborn child starts life at conception. Sperm is alive and so is a female egg but an unborn child is just that, an unborn human being developing to the point of full independent life. That is something nothing but the unborn child can accomploish. It is a basic fact of life that you pagans cannot or I should say willnot grasp becasue it would shatter your self-centered universe. Naturally you missed the ultimate point which was men do not have a comparable situation where they will ever face having their autonomy/rights/freedom subjugated by a U.S. court for an unborn entity. Get a clue for once, fundie.
|
|
“Red Haired Atheist”
Since: May 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
cpeter1313 wrote: Better gay than a child rapist like your deity. <quoted text> Or an ignorant plodding caveman-like moron like Tommyboy.
|
|
“Red Haired Atheist”
Since: May 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Susanm wrote: <quoted text> Is there a reason that you keep posting this stupid comment? Is there a reason why Tom Tom keeps making insulting remarks about people just because they're gay?
|
|
“Red Haired Atheist”
Since: May 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Ocean56 wrote: <quoted text> Awwwwwwww, still mad that WOMEN can make our OWN sexual and reproductive decisions without a man's permission or approval, I see. Too bleeping bad. A woman can decide for HERSELF whether or not she wants to get married, have children, and (IF she chooses motherhood) how many children SHE wants to have. A woman can also decide to REJECT marriage and motherhood and become a financially independent career woman instead. Yes, I know how angry this fact makes anti-choice regressive guys like yourself. You would prefer that women go back to the 19th century, when women had NO RIGHTS whatsoever. Well, that ISN'T going to happen. Happy to disappoint you. Tommyboy is seething with impotent rage. It's no longer acceptable for men to club women over the head and drag them back to the cave and that just fills him with penis-shriveling fury.
|
|
“Red Haired Atheist”
Since: May 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
1
Katie wrote: <quoted text> You're thought process is truly lacking if you honestly believe PCers are incapable of understanding a human embryo/fetus is "developing to the point of 'full independent life.'" A newborn definitely hasn't reached a "full independent life", but if all goes well, should, by the time they're 20-25 years old. Unfortunately, what you fail to grasp is that, sometimes, not all goes well. God's way of thinning the herd.
|
|
feces for jesus
East Meadow, NY
|
Judged:
2
2
Ink wrote: <quoted text> Lev 18:22 Lev 20:13 Corinthians 6:9-11 Timothy 1:8-10 I can accept that Leviticus appears to speak of homosexuality, but Corinthians and Timothy do not mention it at all. I'd love to know if you put your faith in Leviticus since it says that someone who violates those laws should be put to death. And hey.... Jonnycakes (gtown), you might want to skip Leviticus 20:10 says you should be put down for cheating on your wife. How Pro-Life of God! I guess you religitards can refer to Leviticus at your discretion, ignoring or honoring the "Word(s)" as you please.
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|