with respect to the cause of death the facts are already out slick.<quoted text>
Since there was no autopsy, why would you take the word of people that never examined the child over the hospital statement and that of the spokesperson FOR the family?
The facts will come out in the trial.
You will be wrong as usual.
who says because there was no autopsy that means the ocme did not examine the child? of course they did. they are going to release an official cause of death statement sight unseen? based on what -- hearsay? conjecture? assumption?
and where are these official hospital statements you people keep blabbering about? can you provide just one?