Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

[Bitner]

sasssylicious wrote:

<quoted text> Wonderful! Now get going and find that post.
Kthanks.

You didn't understand a word I said, did you?

I'm not surprised.

[Susanm]

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
ALL but Gosnell were convicted of murder and sent to jail. Not one represents legal safe abortions. Gosnell WILL be convicted as it goes to trial.

How long was Gosnell allowed to continue running his filthy "clinic" AFTER the NAF inspected it-and didn't report it?

[Bitner]

SeattleVehix44 wrote:

<quoted text>i said steaks? oops
but it just figures ud mock me instead of someone defending mass murderers... only a liberal

Okay, this is an instance of you lying. I've told you I'm not a liberal. We've had whole conversations about it. And here you are, doing it again.

So don't fuss at LNM about calling you a liar. You're not "making mistakes". You're lying.

[sasssylicious]

elise in burque wrote:

The point is and always has been that a woman has a moral right to choose to have any pregnancy of hers aborted, for any reason. The procedure must be legal and safe. Period. End of story.

You said that it is a newborn once it comes out while still attached( umbilical cord). Katie says it is still a fetus "technically". Is it "technically" a fetus ?.

[sasssylicious]

Bitner wrote:

<quoted text>
You didn't understand a word I said, did you?
I'm not surprised.

I did. You said there is a post. Go find it. Ask foo to find it for you if need be.

[Anonymous]

Bitner wrote:

<quoted text>
Okay, this is an instance of you lying. I've told you I'm not a liberal. We've had whole conversations about it. And here you are, doing it again.
So don't fuss at LNM about calling you a liar. You're not "making mistakes". You're lying.

no i just disagree with you, you cant possibly NOT be a liberal, far lefter

sorry but yea......liberal

[sasssylicious]

Katie wrote:

<quoted text>
Anyone but the individual pregnant woman deciding her pregnancy is unjust.
If you call that a hardened view or propaganda you have no clear understanding of the issue. Looking at women's civil rights from only the perspective of a lost ZEF due to induced abortion is lacking every perspective but one. Your audience most likely has considered this one perspective plus various others. There are too many variables concerning women's right to privacy and autonomy.

Anyone=Katie. Why? Because you are "unjust"(according to your statement above)to want the govt to decide her pregnancy(restrictions).

Ut oh.

[sasssylicious]

Susanm wrote:

<quoted text>
How long was Gosnell allowed to continue running his filthy "clinic" AFTER the NAF inspected it-and didn't report it?

Pregnant women kept him in business. THEIR choices to kill their baby in utero while patronizing him, kept him open.

[Bitner]

SeattleVehix44 wrote:

<quoted text>
no i just disagree with you, you cant possibly NOT be a liberal, far lefter
sorry but yea......liberal

Not at all.

But please, do tell me what, exactly, makes me a "liberal" in your mind?

[Bitner]

sasssylicious wrote:

<quoted text> I did. You said there is a post. Go find it. Ask foo to find it for you if need be.

Obviously, you didn't.

Now, think back, Stupid Sassy, to where I said that if I can't remember approximately where a post is, I don't GO looking for it, but that I might save the two recent ones to refer to later. Got it now, Moron?

[STO]

Gtown71 wrote:

<quoted text>
You are right.
Again though, it never refers to abortion.
The bitter water do show an outward sign, that the woman commited adultry -nothing more.
Do you believe the unborn is a child?

The woman's body is reacting to the "bitter water" because she has had intercourse. The intercourse with another man means she is defiled. If she is defiled she cannot conceive with her husband. The signs evidencing that she has been defiled are physical, specifially regarding her womb, loins, and procreational organs. The signs are evident to the community. Abortion of a pregnancy fits these criteria.

[elise in burque]

sasssylicious wrote:

<quoted text> You said that it is a newborn once it comes out while still attached( umbilical cord). Katie says it is still a fetus "technically". Is it "technically" a fetus ?.

I made it abundantly clear that that is my personal opinion, nothing more. I think Katie provided her rationale for her argument, already. Why don't you look up the subject and find a rationale for yours? Do your own research, lady.

[STO]

Gtown71 wrote:

<quoted text>
Well many women doesn't seem to look at the unborn as a child.

As far as the other, it is becouse they want to be a mother of a live child that they can raise.

You wouldn't tell a woman who has no children and miscarried a pregnancy that she is the mother of a dead child, or would you?

[STO]

sasssylicious wrote:

<quoted text> I disagree with your assertion that *most* women do not consider themselves to be mothers if they have a deceased child (miscarriage or death after birth). It is just the woman who miscarries and has no other children, never had an opportunity to "mother " her child.

"It is just the woman who miscarries and has no other children, never had an opportunity to "mother " her child."

I'm sure that's true of some women, but others don't consider themselves to be mothers when they have no children, are trying to have children, and miscarry.

You wouldn't tell that woman she's the mother of a dead child would you?

[Gtown71]

sasssylicious wrote:

<quoted text> What do you suggest should be done in the case of a woman finding out that she doesn't want to be a mother after she has given birth? Example; the story of that young miserable mom (you posted the other day) who hates being a mom. Do you think that child should be taken away?

Exactly -why should a woman be "punished " for the rest of her life , just for getting pregnant, and having a baby?

Same thing they use to condone abortion.

[Bitner]

Gtown71 wrote:

<quoted text>
Exactly -why should a woman be "punished " for the rest of her life , just for getting pregnant, and having a baby?
Same thing they use to condone abortion.

You're not very bright, are you?

No woman must parent. She can opt to adopt the child out.

[Katie]

sasssylicious wrote:

<quoted text>Anyone=Katie. Why? Because you are "unjust"(according to your statement above)to want the govt to decide her pregnancy(restrictions).
Ut oh.

I said, Anyone but the individual pregnant woman deciding her pregnancy is unjust.

This refers to the time span between learning one is pregnant and the end of the first trimester. So sorry, princess, forgot to take your illiteracy into account while typing easy reader sentences.

[Forum carlsbad nm]

Maxie wrote:

<quoted text>
Why would anyone say such a thing?

For every baby that you kill. I hate you more.
Why are you still here?

[Long Night Moon 13]

sasssylicious wrote:

<quoted text>
You "had your kids"?. Kids? Are you suggesting that you were carrying your "kids" when you chose to "have them"?.
Ut oh!
Would you be opposed to aborting or for your daughters?
You specifically used the term "shallow" to describe an abortion choice. Can you explain please?

"You specifically used the term "shallow" to describe an abortion choice. Can you explain please?"

I did not. I clearly stated that I felt BC was inferring that women who have had abortions did so for shallow reasons. I personally did not use that term to describe abortion as a choice. You are being dishonest about my post to BC.

LNM..."And in its way, it infers that the ones who have had an abortion did so for shallow reasons."

[Anonymous]

Bitner wrote:

<quoted text>
Not at all.
But please, do tell me what, exactly, makes me a "liberal" in your mind?

you, like most on here, support unmidigated abortion, for any reason, in any numbers, you love Obama, you hate guns, etc........what are you then??