You guys come up with a single paper all the time claiming clouds, or cosmic rays, or burning goat horns causes warming, and you run with it.<quoted text>
With the thousands of predictions made, ONE seems to be accurate thereby validating all the failed ones?
Reminds me of Hype posting a single article about a researcher who itemized his expenses from a grant, as "proof" that all the others do the same.
Nothing's validated except what was in this paper. If he was the only one who came close, he was the only one who came close.