Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201888 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

thisGuy

Killeen, TX

#142954 May 26, 2012
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
No, they cannot, the law does not recognize animals as having rights. in most jurisdictions they are classified as property.
Hmmm...kind of like children /sarcasm
thisGuy

Killeen, TX

#142955 May 26, 2012
Bill Of Rights wrote:
<quoted text>
Bisexual fool! Now tell us all the circumstances when you came to the realization that you were a heterosexual and "Chose" to go that route,I mean since it's a choice like you said,right? LOL,Even though the vast majority of mental health professionals say you are full of shit! But we'll listen to you because you know more than the experts,right? Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha!
I'm sorry but I hate bi people. If you ask me what I hate, I'll say exactly that. They like boys and girls, and it's usually awkward for boys AND for girls- for everyone! It's so sketchy, like pick one: either you're gay or straight, DECIDE! otherwise this just freaks me out, GOD DAMN IT!

“WAY TO GO”

Since: Mar 11

IRELAND

#142960 May 26, 2012
Rational Adult wrote:
Hi Doc,
Your post comes from a Religious site......with no numbers but lots of percentages, which truly mean nothing.

But you know that and enjoy posting bogus figures anyway!!!

Since: Jan 10

Charleston, WV

#142966 May 26, 2012
Rational Adult wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry liar, but studies show that gays are promiscuous by nature. The rate of gay men being 80% of the new HIV cases in Canada and 71% in the U.S. is irrefutable.
Here is the link, gay ride: http://www.theroadtoemmaus.org/RdLb/22SxSo/Pn...
Sorry doc, your link is run by Emmaus Ministries, a gay hating fake religious christian site. Your stats are scientifically inept as always, as GodSmacked so eloquently busted you on. So you ran here. Idiot.

“WAY TO GO”

Since: Mar 11

IRELAND

#142968 May 26, 2012
Rational Adult wrote:
<quoted text>No wonder you lie about your child abuse, you lie about all.
This is where they got the information from:
1. International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 26, 657-661, "Modelling the Impact of HIV Disease on Mortality in Gay and Bisexual Men."
It appears as an article written in 1997 and is used in many sites....mostly Religious or anti-gay sites.

Figures that you would back peddle......lol!!!

“WAY TO GO”

Since: Mar 11

IRELAND

#142969 May 26, 2012
Rational Adult wrote:
<quoted text>Hi Black Rose T-H, your information comes from NAMBLA and a child abuse site.
This is where he got his information from and the source of it, gay fool:
1. International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 26, 657-661, "Modelling the Impact of HIV Disease on Mortality in Gay and Bisexual Men."
Sorry doc......only idiots like yourself bring up NAMBLA.

And you already posted the link to where he got his information........now, your just back peddling because you got your butt handed to ya!!!
thisGuy

Killeen, TX

#142970 May 26, 2012
Al Garcia wrote:
<quoted text>Soooo..... Infertile couples are not a true marriage... Check...
And consider this. There are are many studies that show that "gayness" is not passed on any more than "heterosexualness" (is that a word?)
What the studies do show is that for the overwhelming number of children in gay households are better attended to than heterosexual couples where many may be "accidental" births because every child has been planned for.
I frankly don't subscribe to the "fear" of homosexuality and you shouldn't either.
Get to know them. There's something to be said about knowing people personally rather than as a number or statistic on paper. I encourage you to have the intelligence and courage to find out for yourself before passing judgement.
Just saying.
Peace
"What the studies do show is that for the overwhelming number of children in gay households are better attended to than heterosexual couples where many may be "accidental" births because every child has been planned for. "
-Probably because gays can't reproduce. No reproducing = no babies = more $$$ to spend for themselves, like recuiting children for molesting. LOL

"I frankly don't subscribe to the "fear" of homosexuality and you shouldn't either."
-LOL I wasn't even aware I had a "fear" of homosexuals. As much as their buttsex & orgies disgust me, I loathe their excuses much more.

"Get to know them."
-I know a few...unfortunately

"There's something to be said about knowing people personally rather than as a number or statistic on paper."
-Yeah, it sure seems like AIDS & STDs no longer becomes a "personal" matter once an epidemic occurs. You can thank the Gay & Sexual Revolution for that!

"I encourage you to have the intelligence and courage to find out for yourself before passing judgement."
-Don't lecture me having intelligence & courage. I happen to be very blunt & if there is something I disagree with, goddammit I will disagree with it! I am entitled to that right & I don't have accept another person's behavior if I don't want to. Most people I know are afraid to say they disagree with homosexuality because they know you freaks will bully them & shun them as "homophobes." And I am one of the very few people who will openly admit he disagrees with homosexuality, pedophilia, & other disgusting/destructive lifestyles. So don't lecture on using courage & intelligence until you have leveled yourself with that criticism first!
thisGuy

Killeen, TX

#142972 May 26, 2012
Rational Adult wrote:
<quoted text>No, bisexuals are at least half normal. Gays are completed screwed and were abused to the max.
If you chart the sexual deviancy brain factor in both homosexuals and pedophiles, you will find no difference.
Seems kind of shady if you ask me. I mean, why can't they just pick a side? They are obviously confused. All the bisexuals I have met were very promiscuous. There are many LUGs (Lesbians-Until-Graduation) & they are all "bi-curious" only for the attention & I can't tell the real bisexuals (which are really closet homos) from the ones that are faking it. Bisexuals are just greedy. Plain & simple. They want to have the cake & eat it too. Bi girls are probably great for threesome, but they aren't wifey material. Personally I prefer straight women because I'm a straight guy. Plus many bisexuals are polygamists, meaning they are all perverts

Since: Jan 12

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

#142973 May 26, 2012
_Reality Speaks_ wrote:
Obama supporting it does not equate to blacks supporting it. Not by a longshot.
But your wrong.

Poll: People of Color More Likely to Support Gay Marriage Than Whites

http://colorlines.com/archives/2012/05/people...

Notably among groups, 59 percent of African-Americans in this survey express support for gay marriage - up from 41 percent in combined ABC/Post polls this spring and last summer. Likewise, 65 percent support Obama's new position on the issue. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People announced its support for gay marriage last weekend.

Fewer whites, 46 percent, approve of Obama's announcement, and 50 percent support gay marriage - numerically (albeit not statistically significantly) the fewest since 2010.
thisGuy

Killeen, TX

#142974 May 27, 2012
RnL2008 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't personally have a total understanding of Bisexuality......but it's not like flipping on a light switch.
As I understand it.....when a person is bisexual and they are with someone of the opposite-sex.....they consider themselves heterosexual and function as heterosexual for as long as they are in that relationship........their bisexuality NEVER goes away, but it is not acted upon.....again as I understand it. The same is true when they are involved with someone of the Same-Sex.
Being bisexual doesn't give them the right to have 2 votes.....that's just being ignorant on your part!!!
Chaz's girlfriend didn't change because of Chaz's surgery.....she's still attracted to Chaz and Chaz's sexual orientation didn't change either.....He's still attracted to women!!!
FREAKS!
Bill Of Rights

Livermore, CA

#142976 May 27, 2012
Frank Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey Bill, remember when you decided my posts weren't tolerant and diverse enough for you so you went "Poof" and all my posts were gone? How do you do that?
Never happened,remember when that mouth is open! LOL,To bad that Alzheimer's is finally catching up to you dic head! The Mods are the one's who read the posts and then delete them so blame them! Apparently you've had a lot of them removed but don't blame me,look unto thy self! Prove it or STFU! And whats with the creepy stalking of people eh,did you do that to the X-wifey?
Bruno

Redondo Beach, CA

#142982 May 27, 2012
Why chose the word "Gay" to describe a queer?

Queer or Odd would be more appropriate.

Since: Jan 12

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

#142984 May 27, 2012
Bruno wrote:
Why chose the word "Gay" to describe a queer?
Queer or Odd would be more appropriate.
Wow you homophobes really have nothing better to do with your time but spend all day long worrying what gay people do.

Since: Jan 12

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

#142985 May 27, 2012
Rational Adult wrote:
<quoted text>No, bullcrapper, trickery would be a gay judge in California or the 7 legislative routes that have caused 7 states to have same sex marriage against their will.
The people in Arizona voted to not allow same sex marriage, so the trickery was gays thinking they could trick them.
It's 2012 and you still don't know about the tyranny of the majority?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyranny_of_the_m...

For the last time America isn't a direct democracy. it is a Representative democracy. The founding fathers realized that they could not allow the majority to vote on things because they would vote in their own interests over the interests and rights of minorities. American elect politicians and judges to follow the Constitution. And since the 14th amendment of the US Constitution says all people are equal under the law all of this gay marriage bans are null, void, and unconstitutional.

Since: Oct 11

Beggs, OK

#142987 May 27, 2012
Silent Assassinat wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, I have proven just that and that you are a typical gay liar.
Yes, there are gay men and women who are in opposite sex marriages and they molest same sex children.
95% of the RCC priest molestation cases were homosexuals molesting children.
Why would any sane person argue for gays marrying same sex animals, which is what you are saying?
It is also a fact that all pedophiles are homosexuals, and none of these pedophiles ever focus on the boy's penis, but the boys butt and the girl's vagina. This is also why 70% of prisoners admit to consensual gay sex.(It is all one same shame perversion)
Psychiatrist also report that none of you freaks ever engage in exclusive perversions.
I've never heard anything so insane as your comments. You ought to print that out and take it to a professional and ask for help.

Meanwhile, all you have to do if you want to see the percentage of gays who mo1est is go to a $ex offender registry like the one for the State of Texas that lists the age and gender of each mo1ester's victim(s). You can enter even a gay-friendly zip code and pull a random sample and you'll see that well over 90% are men mo1esting little girls ONLY. 2 to 3% are women molesters. 2 to 3% are men who molested both genders. 2 to 3% are men who molested males only.

Nice try, but lies don't work when there are real world examples that ANYONE can go look at.

Since: Oct 11

Beggs, OK

#142988 May 27, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
The risk of anal cancer "soars" by nearly 4,000% for men who have sex with men. The rate doubles again for those who are HIV positive. A Michigan homosexual newspaper admits there is no such thing as "safe sex" to prevent this "soaring" cancer risk. Condoms offer only limited protection.
- Homosexual men face a significantly higher risk of HIV/AIDS, hepatitis, anal cancer, gonorrhea and gastrointestinal infections as a result of their sexual practices.
- Men who engage in sodomy are 860% more likely to contract a sexually transmitted disease (STD), increasing up to 500% their risk of contracting HIV/AIDS. Men who commit acts of sodomy with men have large numbers of anonymous partners, which can result in rapid, extensive transmission of STDs. Control of STDs is a central component of HIV infection prevention in the United States; resurgence of bacterial STDs threatens national HIV infection prevention efforts.
According to the CDC, as of 2005, they knew of not one single case of le$bain to le$bian transmitted HIV and well over 200,000 cases of women who contracted HIV through heterosexual $ex, yet for some reason, the bigots aren't on here suggesting that all straight women turn le$bian for the sake of their health and lives. Why the double standard???

Since: Oct 11

Beggs, OK

#142989 May 27, 2012
Silent Assassinat wrote:
<quoted text>Why don't you admit that all that you ever post is a lie and that is why you have never posted a single source.
Pay attention, newbie, these people have seen the sources and links 100 times.
SO, gay liar, why don't you do a google search and get back to me?
Typical response from a liar: I have no sources to post, but do a "google search" and I'm sure you'll find it. Why do you think anyone even might believe someone who posts something that ignorant?

Since: Oct 11

Beggs, OK

#142990 May 27, 2012
Silent Assassinat wrote:
<quoted text>They know this, but they do not want you to know this.
2010: gay men accounted for over 71% of new HIV cases in the U.S.
2010: gay men accounted for over 80% of new HIV cases in Canada
They don't even have the numbers for 2010 completed yet. The most recent is 2009. Why don't you try posting those and a source...

Since: Oct 11

Beggs, OK

#142991 May 27, 2012
Silent Assassinat wrote:
<quoted text>You're a gay idiot, the issue has to do with a constitutional rights for gays to marry members of the same sex. There is none.
The issue is equal protection rights for sexual orientation under the Constitution and federal protection. There is none.
Why don't you admit that what you said was a lie. Gay Troll
The Constitution guarantees equal rights for all. That's all it has to say. That's what Loving vs Virginia's ruling was based on.

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#142992 May 27, 2012
Rational Adult wrote:
<quoted text>You're an idiot and a liar. Often information is found on many sites, fool. You are gay, so you are sick and wrong.
Nobody has to provide a link to anything.
You see, you were born gay, as you say, so no facts, sources, links or a consensus from 100% of all doctors will change your vile filthy perversion and that is because you have chosen the filth.
Actually, there are NO mainstream medical organizations that support your odd belief.

And, really, if all you can imagine in your head is "perversion" when you think of gay folks marriages, that would point to the problem existing in your own thoughts and fantasies.

Why blame others for the feverish imaginings in your own mind?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pollock Pines Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
White Guys: Would you date a black girl? Elaborate (Nov '07) 6 min Noobdra 5,422
News Transgender Ken doll cake triggers outrage afte... 9 hr Wholly Silicon Wafer 26
Clinton Foundation Money from Dictators 11 hr Battle Tested 16
Catch the bus 23 hr Endstage 1
Do White Women generally prefer Black Guys over... Sat HankBDog 1
trapped in pollock, desperately need black (Jun '15) Apr '16 Anonymous 4
Why do Harleys always appeal to the white trash... (Aug '11) Jan '16 Notsotuff 13

Pollock Pines Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Pollock Pines Mortgages