Comments
41,401 - 41,420 of 56,584 Comments Last updated 10 min ago

“Smarter Than You”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42954
Oct 7, 2013
 

Judged:

1

No TSF, I'm at a real hospital, but prayer can't hurt!
Allen

Penrose, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42955
Oct 7, 2013
 

Judged:

1

waco1909 wrote:
You misunderstand.Health care professionals got their info on Obamacare before the general public.Makes sense.Never said I'm being refused treatment.I said, I don't know what my status under Obamacare will be.
Spoken like a true member of the "party of stupid". Obamacare didn't work for my sister, even though it hadn't started yet. I don't know if it will work for me. I'm just a republiCON, who doesn't know whether to crap or go blind. Instead of writing "don't touch this" on your body parts just write "replace this" on your forehead.

On the other hand good luck with your surgery, hopes for a speedy recovery:)
TSF

Clayton, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42957
Oct 7, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Jealous of money someone has earned? No. Pissed about giving them MY money, yes. You worry about redistribution to the poor but fall all over yourself in support of gushing out welfare to the rich,$1.2 trillion dollars of it annually. Call me greedy if you like. I would stop welfare, period. I would start with the most expensive first, the wealthy. That is such a foreign notion that the neocon shit birds think I am a liberal and the la de dah liberals think I am tea party.
As a white male politically incorrect unaffiliated voter, you think I have not been a target already? You are FOS.
State of Denial wrote:
<quoted text>
Forget political party affiliation way and try doing things because it's the right thing to do.
You get on here and moan and groan about welfare for the rich CONSTANTLY. This leads me to believe you're more than a tad bit jealous of their success. You want them to give away the money they've earned because they have more. Wake up smell the roses. Why should anyone be penalized for being wealthy. I know you're going to say it's because they're able to have more tax write offs and it's not fair. Well, life's not fair get over it. Speak to the IRS about changing the tax codes to take money from people that have earned it. Hell, they can do everything else. They're now into the healthcare business. Do you think it's right for the IRS to penalize people for standing against being forced to purchase healthcare or anything when they don't want it. Do you think it's right for the IRS to target and audit groups that disagree with the current party in the WH. Does it not bother you at all that one day you might be a target because you're a man, own a dog, like fast food, drive a certain make of car etc. Those were just hypotheticals.
While all this crap about the shutdown is going on, try giving the citizens of this country a little credit. We can all do our part to help out those in need. You greedy thing. Have you ever thought about buying some extra food to take to a soup kitchen, food pantry at your church or a local church or organizations that depend on donations to do the job you and I are too lazy to get out and do. Notice I included myself.
Get off the government bandwagon and start being your own man. Your co-dependence on the government is nauseating.

“ We are not permanent”

Since: Oct 08

Gaston County

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42958
Oct 7, 2013
 

Judged:

1

What is hard to understand with the shutdown? Why in the hell does the media want to imply Republicans have shutdown government?

Freaking retards! And the vast majority of the American people are to damn brainwashed to no the difference.
TSF

Clayton, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42959
Oct 7, 2013
 

Judged:

1

What is really stupid is that with 800,000 federal workers laid off, congress now says they will get paid for staying home. WTF
That is costing taxpayers over 250,000,000 dollars per day. Why close it if you are going to pay them anyway?
The Enemy Within wrote:
What is hard to understand with the shutdown? Why in the hell does the media want to imply Republicans have shutdown government?
Freaking retards! And the vast majority of the American people are to damn brainwashed to no the difference.
Franklin Citizen

Franklin, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42960
Oct 7, 2013
 

Judged:

1

What have you ever done for NC? Nothing I bet.

Bet you just whine and complain, and point fingers.

Your input isn't needed here, I Bleed blue of Greensboro, NC

“ We are not permanent”

Since: Oct 08

Gaston County

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42961
Oct 7, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

TSF wrote:
<quoted text>What is really stupid is that with 800,000 federal workers laid off, congress now says they will get paid for staying home. WTF
That is costing taxpayers over 250,000,000 dollars per day. Why close it if you are going to pay them anyway?
This is nothing new and was expected to happen. The furloughed workers during the 1995-1996 shutdown were retroactively paid as well.

Nancy Pelosi said the ones at home are "non-essential" jobs. If this is the case why aren't those "non essential" jobs eliminated?
State of Denial

Mount Holly, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42962
Oct 7, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

TSF wrote:
Jealous of money someone has earned? No. Pissed about giving them MY money, yes. You worry about redistribution to the poor but fall all over yourself in support of gushing out welfare to the rich,$1.2 trillion dollars of it annually. Call me greedy if you like. I would stop welfare, period. I would start with the most expensive first, the wealthy. That is such a foreign notion that the neocon shit birds think I am a liberal and the la de dah liberals think I am tea party.
As a white male politically incorrect unaffiliated voter, you think I have not been a target already? You are FOS.
<quoted text>
If you're pissed about giving your money, then why do you keep harping on welfare to the rich. At least they're out working to make money. I say start from the bottom up. Stop handouts to the welfare kings and queens and actually propose they WORK for a living. The wealthy are contributing by paying taxes no matter how much you think they're getting a break.

I'm not full FOS, I'm full of reality. I know from raising children that if they're given everything they want without understanding the concept of earning money to purchase things they want, we become enablers.

You sir are an enabler because you have a beef with the wealthy. You don't believe in ending welfare for everyone, only the wealthy. You've stated it over and over and then you throw a few crumbs about stopping welfare for the poor after your rants about the wealthy.

You can stop "welfare" for the wealthy and they'll still be wealthy; however, can you say the same about the poor. Do you really think they may actually look around and decide they need to work and pay their own way?
TSF

Clayton, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42963
Oct 7, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

You sir are FOS. Welfare to the wealthy consumes more than $1.2 trillion dollars per year from the US treasury. The wealthy are the most conspicuous, most expensive welfare queens and deadbeats of all.
State of Denial wrote:
<quoted text>
If you're pissed about giving your money, then why do you keep harping on welfare to the rich. At least they're out working to make money. I say start from the bottom up. Stop handouts to the welfare kings and queens and actually propose they WORK for a living. The wealthy are contributing by paying taxes no matter how much you think they're getting a break.
I'm not full FOS, I'm full of reality. I know from raising children that if they're given everything they want without understanding the concept of earning money to purchase things they want, we become enablers.
You sir are an enabler because you have a beef with the wealthy. You don't believe in ending welfare for everyone, only the wealthy. You've stated it over and over and then you throw a few crumbs about stopping welfare for the poor after your rants about the wealthy.
You can stop "welfare" for the wealthy and they'll still be wealthy; however, can you say the same about the poor. Do you really think they may actually look around and decide they need to work and pay their own way?
TSF

Clayton, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42964
Oct 7, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Bank of America gets a $20 billion dollar bailout from the US government. That's $20,000,000,000 of OUR tax money. Then the man who helped drive the bank into near insolvency , Ken Lewis, gets a$125,000,000 severance package. WE paid for that package . That is just one example involving just one man. A logical person intending to end welfare would start with the most expensive welfare queens first. Idiots want to start with the least expensive and most helpless, the children. That is why I think you are either stupid or dishonest or both.
TSF

Clayton, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42965
Oct 7, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

The most non productive, corrupt and counter productive federal employees are those in congress. We need to start with eliminating their pay. Then eliminate those sugar daddy jobs invented for their cronies that we are paying for.

The Enemy Within wrote:
<quoted text>
This is nothing new and was expected to happen. The furloughed workers during the 1995-1996 shutdown were retroactively paid as well.
Nancy Pelosi said the ones at home are "non-essential" jobs. If this is the case why aren't those "non essential" jobs eliminated?

“ We are not permanent”

Since: Oct 08

Gaston County

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42966
Oct 7, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

TSF wrote:
<quoted text>The most non productive, corrupt and counter productive federal employees are those in congress. We need to start with eliminating their pay. Then eliminate those sugar daddy jobs invented for their cronies that we are paying for.
Term limits are needed now more than ever.

“Smarter Than You”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42967
Oct 7, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Allen wrote:
<quoted text>
Spoken like a true member of the "party of stupid". Obamacare didn't work for my sister, even though it hadn't started yet. I don't know if it will work for me. I'm just a republiCON, who doesn't know whether to crap or go blind. Instead of writing "don't touch this" on your body parts just write "replace this" on your forehead.
On the other hand good luck with your surgery, hopes for a speedy recovery:)
Allen you're the only person on here that makes me laugh.Now, if you'd read my post carefully, you'd know I said that her doctors quit their practices and became company doctors, as they said that Obamacare would cost them money.Then,I said at this point, she remains unaffected by Obamacare otherwise.The surgery came out ok, I had a Republican doctor!:)

“Smarter Than You”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42968
Oct 7, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

TSF wrote:
Bank of America gets a $20 billion dollar bailout from the US government. That's $20,000,000,000 of OUR tax money. Then the man who helped drive the bank into near insolvency , Ken Lewis, gets a$125,000,000 severance package. WE paid for that package . That is just one example involving just one man. A logical person intending to end welfare would start with the most expensive welfare queens first. Idiots want to start with the least expensive and most helpless, the children. That is why I think you are either stupid or dishonest or both.
BANK OF AMERICA is the crookedest corporation on earth.
State of Denial

Mount Holly, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42969
Oct 7, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

TSF wrote:
You sir are FOS. Welfare to the wealthy consumes more than $1.2 trillion dollars per year from the US treasury. The wealthy are the most conspicuous, most expensive welfare queens and deadbeats of all.
<quoted text>
You sir still did not answer my question. If welfare were cut off as you would like it to be to everyone, who would fare better?

REALITY is the rich. So what if they don't get tax breaks, they'll get it some other way-i.e. passing on the cost to the consumers.

Do you think the poor will finally see living off the government is not a means of income and get a job?

I agree with you and some other poster about getting rid of government "non-essentials" without pay who are living off the government for doing nothing as well and term limits on those elected to Congress. BTW, Congress is just like the poor with their hands out taking money from us and they don't do a darn thing but vacation and name call for a living. I'll go as far as saying the POTUS is as lazy as Congress and all he wants to do is have pissing contests with anyone that disagrees with him. Kick him out too and his Obamacare or Romney care or whatever you guys want to call it and be done with whole crowd.

As citizens we could do a better job than the crowd in Washington. We would protect each other, feed those that are really in need and expect a day's work for a day's pay and make healthcare affordable by not forcing people to by but negotiating with insurance companies for reasonable/fair health insurance and if they don't want to play, then they'll figure it out when they're left in the dark. It's not rocket science.
Taxpayer

Point Harbor, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42970
Oct 7, 2013
 

Judged:

1

TSF wrote:
I believe you are right about incidents governmental terrorism.
Sand Creek, Waco, Wounded Knee are domestic examples. The fire bombing of Dresden on Feb 13, 1945 killed 135,000. That was more killed than in either Nagasaki or Hiroshima . The bomber crews were even told "this is a terror raid".
NY on 9.11.01 was a terror raid ON the USA by SAUDIs . So Dubya responded by attacking Iraq. Obama has been effectively terrorizing
the terrorists with drone strikes and by killing Bin Laden.
However, I am unaware of any domestic governmental terrorism during Obama's tenure. Perhaps you could enlighten me.
<quoted text>
I am sure you wouldn't because you support a fascist terrorist government that has destroyed America. Hitler and his supports did not think they were criminals either.
Taxpayer

Point Harbor, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42971
Oct 7, 2013
 

Judged:

1

TSF wrote:
Your sister's doctors quit before Obamacare even started, according to you. Your doctor is refusing to treat you because of Obamacare and you have not even signed up for Obamacare yet?. I really do not understand that. If you can pay for your treatement and/or already have insurance, what does Obamacare have to do with anything? If your doctor is that irrational, it may be better if he doesn't treat you. I empathize with your situation. I have experienced the same situation long before Obama was even elected.
<quoted text>
People like you have already made most of America a third world country now you want to make the medical system third as well.
Taxpayer

Point Harbor, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42972
Oct 7, 2013
 

Judged:

1

TSF wrote:
Bank of America gets a $20 billion dollar bailout from the US government. That's $20,000,000,000 of OUR tax money. Then the man who helped drive the bank into near insolvency , Ken Lewis, gets a$125,000,000 severance package. WE paid for that package . That is just one example involving just one man. A logical person intending to end welfare would start with the most expensive welfare queens first. Idiots want to start with the least expensive and most helpless, the children. That is why I think you are either stupid or dishonest or both.
No it is your Socialist government playing with social engineering again trying to get the banks to loan money. Of course the government wants them to lend it to people that cannot pay it back. That is ok, your social government will them steal more tax money form working Americans to pay for the loans the freeloader could not pay for.
Taxpayer

Point Harbor, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42973
Oct 7, 2013
 

Judged:

1

waco1909 wrote:
<quoted text> BANK OF AMERICA is the crookedest corporation on earth.
You need to get the whole story. It is not the bank. If some one offered you free money you would take it too. And that is what the Dems did offered money to get the banks to make risky loans. Been down this path before.
All banks are in business for one thing, making money. Not for me not for you and not for tsf,tfs,#$#% or what ever.
TSF

Clayton, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42974
Oct 7, 2013
 

Judged:

1

You live in a dream world. Those poor innocent bankers were tricked and forced into loaning money to those who couldn't pay it back. They got bonuses for making more and more bad loans. Then they bet that the money wouldn't be paid back and made the USA their insurance company. So they wrote off the loans as losses and got paid for the losses they didn't truly have. Inventing an instrument called derivatives, they sold the bad loans to each other. Then they got the bailouts and gave themselves huge bonuses. Bankers got the gold mine, we taxpayers got the shaft. Then they blamed the government for "forcing" them into the bad decisions and laughed all the way to the Caymans to deposit their winnings. Idiots in the public bought the cock and bull story and still believe it today.
Taxpayer wrote:
<quoted text>
No it is your Socialist government playing with social engineering again trying to get the banks to loan money. Of course the government wants them to lend it to people that cannot pay it back. That is ok, your social government will them steal more tax money form working Americans to pay for the loans the freeloader could not pay for.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Polkton Discussions

Search the Polkton Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Let's play Marshville Jeopardy (Jun '10) Wed Elm Street Visionary 576
outdoor art Jul 29 Dauphine Eggers 3
Man arrested after flipping off deputy at crime... Jul 29 Dauphine Eggers 2
STD epidemic Jul 28 Tracy little 9
Do it yourself teeth whitening (May '10) Jul 24 luvnut 21
Editer of Home newspaper Jul 23 whowhat 2
welcome signs Jul 20 luvnut 7
•••
•••
•••
•••

Polkton Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Polkton People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Polkton News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Polkton
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••