"So the person who paid the money is indeed the sole owner."<quoted text> Here in the USA where we have a Republic god dont get a say so. The US counstition & laws of the land apply. So the person who paid the money is indeed the sole owner. and that sole owners counstitional rights cannott be overridden by the wishes & wants of the many. I may not agreee with a lot of things people do but I would fight to defend their counstitional & god given right to do them. A example would be to divide up a farm into a subdivision.
One would think so. Why then, do I not have a right to the minerals under my land if the previous owner says they are still his, even though I paid money for the property? In fact, why can the previous owner tell me I am NOT allowed to cut the trees even though I paid money for the property? Property owners rights don't mean much in our republic.