Did you vote today?

Did you vote today?

Created by Rick on Jun 8, 2010

6,274 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#21089 Jan 22, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
What Republican said what I just said? Did I say "all of the increases" or did you add that yourself? For someone who prides themselves on citing sources, you sure don't mind inserting things you need to change the meanings to fit your "counterpoints". The question is, do you believe the "new and improved" post after you have edited it? I think you do.
.

It did not change anything, it added to the proof that debunked your statement.


Being the spineless individual you are and incapable of admitting you are wrong, one could only expect such a juvenile rebuttal.
guest

Blytheville, AR

#21090 Jan 22, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>.
It did not change anything, it added to the proof that debunked your statement.
Being the spineless individual you are and incapable of admitting you are wrong, one could only expect such a juvenile rebuttal.
A truly, truly alarming rate...

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#21091 Jan 22, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>What's the difference if Warrior shows you or not, you will just deny it if he did. I see you're hypocrisy continues to grow at an alarming rate...
Tell you what big boy, you find it, then lets just see what I say.

Let us see how well you predict the future.

What YA say,

or you going to just keep on barking from under the porch like a mutt?


Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#21092 Jan 22, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>What's the difference if Warrior shows you or not, you will just deny it if he did. I see you're hypocrisy continues to grow at an alarming rate...
I see your ignorance continues to grow at an alarming rate.
guest

Blytheville, AR

#21093 Jan 22, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Tell you what big boy, you find it, then lets just see what I say.
Let us see how well you predict the future.
What YA say,
or you going to just keep on barking from under the porch like a mutt?
It's not that hard to predict what you will post in the future. Just start with a lie and go from there.

If you were so sure that what you were posting was the truth, you'd let your words stand alone instead of hypocritically demanding others to what you'd never do yourself. It's called confidence, something that your nazi-like responses show you have none of. However, you can't because your entire arguments are, at best, based on false premises. Even the lies you plagiarize from your left-wing hate sites.
Reality Check

Little Rock, AR

#21094 Jan 23, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>.
It did not change anything, it added to the proof that debunked your statement.
Being the spineless individual you are and incapable of admitting you are wrong, one could only expect such a juvenile rebuttal.
You got backed in a corner by your own deception and lies so don't go blaming me. Kinda like Obama still blames Bush. I shouldn't be suprised but somehow since it's you I am suprised. I guess I figured you somehow didn't engage in every liberal gutter tactic but I see I was wrong.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#21095 Jan 23, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>It's not that hard to predict what you will post in the future. Just start with a lie and go from there.
If you were so sure that what you were posting was the truth, you'd let your words stand alone instead of hypocritically demanding others to what you'd never do yourself. It's called confidence, something that your nazi-like responses show you have none of. However, you can't because your entire arguments are, at best, based on false premises. Even the lies you plagiarize from your left-wing hate sites.
If I did not have the "confidence" it was true, I sure would not have issued the challenge to prove me wrong.

What I am "demanding others" to do, YOU Inarticulately, is to prove your opinion,

being my "entire arguments are, at best, based on FALSE premises'

that would be extremely easy to accomplish.

But yet, your still under the porch barking like a scared
Ad hominem attack, Mutt.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#21096 Jan 23, 2013
- I meant in particular, but both would apply to your post.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#21097 Jan 23, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
You got backed in a corner by your own deception and lies so don't go blaming me. Kinda like Obama still blames Bush. I shouldn't be suprised but somehow since it's you I am suprised. I guess I figured you somehow didn't engage in every liberal gutter tactic but I see I was wrong.
Sure I did, show me the facts you base your obvious flawed opinion up on.

Post #'s please.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#21098 Jan 23, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, the people in oil I know tell a different story. They are telling me that we have more oil under our feet than we know what to do with. Oil is what they do. They are not some numbers cruncher sitting in an office in some building somewhere giving politicians the answers they need to push their agenda. They are the people in the field drilling the wells. But do with it what you will, you haven't listened to anything sensible that anyone has said so I don't know why you would start now. Your "scientists", know that greenhouse gasses are solely responsible how? Everything in science is a hypothesis even after it's been "proven". Scientist set out to prove the big bang theory decades ago. When they finally scientifically got to the point of the actual explosion, the laws of physics simply fell apart. They wouldn't even hold up under the magnitude of such an explosion it would have taken to create life. So with their whole world gone they went back to the drawing board and started creating "what if" scenarios by changing certain aspects of their formulas. The result was what is now considered by many to be the explination of life and that's parallell universes.
"Regarding parallel universes, string theory might eventually prove their existence in other dimensions, he said. As to the concept of the “multiverse,” our universe could be considered like a bubble, and there could be other bubbles existing in a kind of bubble bath, he explained, and sometimes these bubbles bump into each other resulting in something like the Big Bang. What existed before the Big Bang?“We should find evidence of an ‘umbilical cord’…perhaps connecting our universe to a parallel universe,” he posited. NASA is considering launching LISA, a laser space antenna that could reveal data of our cosmological origins." This is an article about Michio Kaku a theoretical physicist and the science world's "new view" on how we came to existence. I wouldn't trust the science community's views on anything that can't be physically touched or accurately traced back to it's origin through historical data. You obviously buy everything the science community says whole heartedly.
Ahh yes. I have done my research. I believe you where referring to
the question. " What gives particles mass?" That can be explained by the Higgs field. It is the field that pushes particles to form mass. Which was proven by the discovery of not 1 but 2 different types of Higgs boson. So the math is sound.

SOURCES: Higgs field. http://profmattstrassler.com/articles-and-pos...
Higgs boson 2. http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observati...

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#21099 Jan 23, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
You got backed in a corner by your own deception and lies so don't go blaming me. Kinda like Obama still blames Bush. I shouldn't be suprised but somehow since it's you I am suprised. I guess I figured you somehow didn't engage in every liberal gutter tactic but I see I was wrong.
Someone as clueless, and spineless as you join you in a little two opinions against one, is hardly being " backed in a corner".


- You are wrong about a lot of things,

but it is good to see you saying you are wrong.


Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#21100 Jan 23, 2013
The Cabbit wrote:
<quoted text>
Ahh yes. I have done my research. I believe you where referring to
the question. " What gives particles mass?" That can be explained by the Higgs field. It is the field that pushes particles to form mass. Which was proven by the discovery of not 1 but 2 different types of Higgs boson. So the math is sound.
SOURCES: Higgs field. http://profmattstrassler.com/articles-and-pos...
Higgs boson 2. http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observati...
You could be new to this thread, so let me warn you, if you have not noticed already, that using research and links could lead to you being accused of,

"engage in every liberal gutter tactic",

or worse yet be branded with this ID

"plagiarize from your left-wing hate sites"..


The Horror.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#21101 Jan 23, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
You could be new to this thread, so let me warn you, if you have not noticed already, that using research and links could lead to you being accused of,
"engage in every liberal gutter tactic",
or worse yet be branded with this ID
"plagiarize from your left-wing hate sites"..
The Horror.
I'm am not bias in any way. I am a devote Christian. Who love discovering God. Through science and faith.

Also it's only plagiarized. If some one. Copies and paste without posting the source. I hate that.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#21102 Jan 23, 2013
The Cabbit wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm am not bias in any way. I am a devote Christian. Who love discovering God. Through science and faith.
Also it's only plagiarized. If some one. Copies and paste without posting the source. I hate that.
I have to disagree with you, a copy & paste is not plagiarizing if you do not claim or purposely lead someone to believe you were the author of the words of the cut & paste.

"Copies and paste without posting the source. I hate that."

I agree it is very inconvenient to put some lines of the post into goggle, or whatever search engine you choose, to find out where that came from.


Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#21103 Jan 23, 2013
The Cabbit wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm am not bias in any way. I am a devote Christian. Who love discovering God. Through science and faith.
Also it's only plagiarized. If some one. Copies and paste without posting the source. I hate that.
I'm am not bias in any way. I am a devote Christian"

So are you saying your not bias toward Christianity though you choose to identify yourself as a "Christian" ?

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#21104 Jan 23, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm am not bias in any way. I am a devote Christian"
So are you saying your not bias toward Christianity though you choose to identify yourself as a "Christian" ?
Yes. I wasn't always a Christian. Growing up as a child. In a Christian household. I was taught the earth was only 5000 years old. I of course believed it. I went to a Christian school. So they only taught creationism, but then they taught erosion. The force that tore down mountain and dug river canyons. I immediately thought of the grand canyon. The time it took for that canyon was well over 5000 years. It took me many years to come to the conclusion that God and nature are one and the same. So why should he/she/it work outside the natural. So for me to understand nature is to understand God.

I choose not to push my faith on others and just less by example. Listen to there side, and try to love them or at least tolerate them.

So no I have not have a but bias that I wish to push on people. I could be wrong though. I would like to hear back from anybody. That had an opinion on this matter.
dont know nothin

Yakima, WA

#21105 Jan 23, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, the people in oil I know tell a different story. They are telling me that we have more oil under our feet than we know what to do with. Oil is what they do. They are not some numbers cruncher sitting in an office in some building somewhere giving politicians the answers they need to push their agenda. They are the people in the field drilling the wells. But do with it what you will, you haven't listened to anything sensible that anyone has said so I don't know why you would start now. Your "scientists", know that greenhouse gasses are solely responsible how? Everything in science is a hypothesis even after it's been "proven". Scientist set out to prove the big bang theory decades ago. When they finally scientifically got to the point of the actual explosion, the laws of physics simply fell apart. They wouldn't even hold up under the magnitude of such an explosion it would have taken to create life. So with their whole world gone they went back to the drawing board and started creating "what if" scenarios by changing certain aspects of their formulas. The result was what is now considered by many to be the explination of life and that's parallell universes.
"Regarding parallel universes, string theory might eventually prove their existence in other dimensions, he said. As to the concept of the “multiverse,” our universe could be considered like a bubble, and there could be other bubbles existing in a kind of bubble bath, he explained, and sometimes these bubbles bump into each other resulting in something like the Big Bang. What existed before the Big Bang?“We should find evidence of an ‘umbilical cord’…perhaps connecting our universe to a parallel universe,” he posited. NASA is considering launching LISA, a laser space antenna that could reveal data of our cosmological origins." This is an article about Michio Kaku a theoretical physicist and the science world's "new view" on how we came to existence. I wouldn't trust the science community's views on anything that can't be physically touched or accurately traced back to it's origin through historical data. You obviously buy everything the science community says whole heartedly.
Your so called people that you know that deal directly with the oil such as drilling and pipelines know nothing further than what their job requires them to do. They know how to drill and where to drill for oil. They DO NOT know how much oil sits underneath the united states and off it's shores. They are being paid to do a job that they may or may not do well. They are not paid to figure out how much oil is able to be drilled, they are there to drill and thats what they do. The company that they work for may or may not know the figures behind what lies beneath the U.S. or off its shores. The researchers and scientist;however, do KNOW what lies beneath and off shores because that is THEIR JOB. Your scenario implies that the drillers know more than the scientist is the same as asking an employee at Mcdonalds drive thru what the stock outlook for 10 years is projected for the company, they do not and would not know. Don't believe me ask the next one you come too. My suggestion to you is if you DO NOT believe in science then why are you using it and involved in it everyday? Everything around you even your body was discovered, learned about, and developed through what? Science! I do not support the theory of the big bang and would like further research done to prove those scientific theories, but i do believe in the research behind them. Physics, chemistry, biology, and other sciences are taught everyday in school and are accepted by our culture as being accurate in far more fields than they are inaccurate. If you do not believe in science then you should NOT go to a doctor, because everything they do and have been taught revolves around such. There are many ways to disprove your thinking and simple minded thesis.
dont know nothin

Yakima, WA

#21106 Jan 23, 2013
guess wrote:
Well everybody it's true don't know nothin is still following obama around like a puppy. And getting on to all of you because don't know nothin and obama ain't figured out that we can actually think for ourselves. After all i got accused of being childish because i actually told the truth and don't know nothin couldn't handle it. After all obama thinks he is the parent and he knows best and now don't know nothin is acting just like obama. You have to agree with them or you are a child. I really know it's not us that needs to grow up but him/her. In the first place i'm pretty sure most of you don't even get carded anymore. So i'm little curious on something else how do most of you feel about phil mickleson since he living in calfornia has to pay out 63 cents out of every dollars in federal state local in taxes. I personal think this is absolutely discussing. You work your readend off and you have to give 2/3 of income in taxes to the government that any right. Any of you say that's ok you need to have your heads checked. I mean that for everybody it's you that works to get it, not government.
lol Name 1 truth you've told on here. As for phil he is just as greedy as these ceo's that are being taxed at the same rate. The only difference is you don't see all of them whining to the press about how they are now making. Most of his taxes are due to californias new tax laws and if he does not agree with them then let him move, he has the money. He also over exagerated his taxes and is more closer to 50 instead of 63. He later went on ESPN and said he regreted openly airing his opinion of how much he makes and how much he is being taxed. Lets say he makes 10M a year, do you not think someone can live comfortably off of 5m million a year after taxes? Do you not thik that people that make that much should pay what they are required to by law to help better the country and further advance our economy? I have no problem with paying my taxes and anyone who does is simply unamerican. They have no interest in helping this country but are rather concerned about how much capitol they can gain and keep to help by that next yacht or jet they have always wanted.
guest

Blytheville, AR

#21107 Jan 23, 2013
dont know nothin wrote:
<quoted text>They are being paid to do a job that they may or may not do well. They are not paid to figure out hoYour so called people that you know that deal directly with the oil such as drilling and pipelines know nothing further than what their job requires them to do. They know how to drill and where to drill for oil. They DO NOT know how much oil sits underneath the united states and off it's shores. w much oil is able to be drilled, they are there to drill and thats what they do. The company that they work for may or may not know the figures behind what lies beneath the U.S. or off its shores. The researchers and scientist;however, do KNOW what lies beneath and off shores because that is THEIR JOB. Your scenario implies that the drillers know more than the scientist is the same as asking an employee at Mcdonalds drive thru what the stock outlook for 10 years is projected for the company, they do not and would not know. Don't believe me ask the next one you come too. My suggestion to you is if you DO NOT believe in science then why are you using it and involved in it everyday? Everything around you even your body was discovered, learned about, and developed through what? Science! I do not support the theory of the big bang and would like further research done to prove those scientific theories, but i do believe in the research behind them. Physics, chemistry, biology, and other sciences are taught everyday in school and are accepted by our culture as being accurate in far more fields than they are inaccurate. If you do not believe in science then you should NOT go to a doctor, because everything they do and have been taught revolves around such. There are many ways to disprove your thinking and simple minded thesis.
How do you know what they know? Do you know them?
No one has a more fitting name on here than you.
dont know nothin

Yakima, WA

#21108 Jan 23, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>It was an operation conducted by FEDS dumb ass. Do you know what FEDS are? You are the stupidest person to ever post on topix. It is still an on going investigation because obama and holder have swept it under the rug. You are an idiot. Terry was killed in Arizona and Zapata was killed in Mexico. This administration has blood on their hands and you support those who kill Americans pure and simple.
The hearings are OVER not postponed for a later date and are NOT currently ongoing. The feds, and by feds i mean FBI, were in charge of the investigation of the incident. The ATF was conducting and have been for years a series of sting operations that were even going on under president Bush. This was one that went wrong and was misshandled on the state and local levels and accountability and firings along with other proceedures have been taken against several individuals ranging from the local all the way up to those involved in the ATF. As much as you would like to believe that somehow erik holder or the president were directly involved and that someday later they will be held for the murders of those boarder patrol agents you are believing in false interpertations and hopes.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pocahontas Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Supreme Court 2 min bud 32
Old Hill Crest Hotel 3 hr BEWARE 10
kathy smith 12 hr CBG 4
Ty Story Thief 13 hr Feedup 3
savanah heart 19 hr friend 16
mikey johnson 20 hr MaryJane 22
Is your mail late? Fri BEWARE 2
More from around the web

Pocahontas People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Pocahontas Mortgages