Did you vote today?

Did you vote today?

Created by Rick on Jun 8, 2010

6,407 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#20784 Jan 16, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Fact: It doesn't take almost 2 years to find a job if you are not lazy and have a good work ethic which is something that merely needs to be decided and not granted or won.
Fact: Someone working making a wage will always help the economy more than that same person drawing unemployment based on that same wage. Never quote Nancy Pelosi. She is quite possibly the most ignorant person on the planet.
And for the first half of the second part, that is just pretty much a no brainer is it not?

Even though they are both an asset to the economy, the other is a temporary debit to the U.S.Treasury.
Old Army

Bee Branch, AR

#20785 Jan 16, 2013
Redd wrote:
<quoted text>
Your being both a smart-ass and a horses-ass more than qualifies you to join us in the stable marked dumb-ass too.
That's better than what my wife calls me.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#20786 Jan 16, 2013
Old Army wrote:
<quoted text>
That's very kind of you Mr. WHO. I thought you were on first base.
He is, who is on second, I don't know..........

who is on third.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#20787 Jan 16, 2013
Old Army wrote:
<quoted text>

That's better than what my wife calls me.
I see your wife and I, think somewhat alike.
Redd

Little Rock, AR

#20788 Jan 16, 2013
Old Army wrote:
<quoted text>
That's better than what my wife calls me.
That's their job.
Redd

Little Rock, AR

#20790 Jan 16, 2013
guess wrote:
<quoted text>Since someone didn't explain it to you. It's the working man paycheck that's getting cut, not those on welfare that line is getting bigger. Why do you think everybody else's paycheck is smaller. We got more lasy people on welfare than ever before.
Really

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#20792 Jan 16, 2013
So Redd what ever happen to "WARRIOR", never mind I see hear where someone said they shut all the hypocrites up!
Redd

Little Rock, AR

#20793 Jan 16, 2013
WRRR wrote:
Lks lk WRRR shut ll th hypcrts up!
What
Redd

Little Rock, AR

#20795 Jan 16, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>Apperantly I did not as you continue to yap like a little chihuahua! Your boyfrined does not want any part of me. You are on your own!
Apperantly

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#20796 Jan 16, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>Apperantly I did not as you continue to yap like a little chihuahua! Your boyfrined does not want any part of me. You are on your own!
Your safe,,,,,

I am not going to exploit, for political purposes, my opponent's youth and inexperience

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#20797 Jan 16, 2013
"I am not going to exploit, for political purposes, my opponent's youth and inexperience"

Better add some quotation marks, best not to get you Saint Ronnie fans in an uproar.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#20798 Jan 16, 2013
Redd wrote:
<quoted text>
Apperantly
Apperantly chihuahua boyfrined , is typing for him now.

Its not real good at spelling yet.

Since: Jan 13

Little Rock, AR

#20799 Jan 16, 2013
Vote on what? Are you a retard? Yes!
Old Army

Bee Branch, AR

#20800 Jan 16, 2013
Missed free throws almost cost Arkansas the game. Luckily, Auburn couldn't hit them either.

How can I be a "go getter" (take her to work and go get her), when we can't get up the hill for the damn ice? Cabin fever!!!!

Goodnight, its bedtime for Bonzo.
Reality Check

United States

#20802 Jan 16, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
It appears that the fact that the USA has an unemployment rate of 7.8% is of no consequence in finding a job in your minds.
Let's say you are the most energetic person on earth, would you take less money each week so you could beat your chest and say I HAVE A JOB and I AM saving the U.S..
Hell no you would not.
Get off your High Horse and quit making such catch all accusations.
Especially about shit that did not enter your mind till you sit down in front of your computer and started quoting Republican propaganda.
When you have leaders like Obama you do what you have to do to survive until you get someone more qualified and certainly more pro-American as president. Your post is a perfect example of how out of touch liberals are. The way you see it that if person making $100K per year loses their job they should go on unemployment/welfare until they find another 100K job but under no circumstances should they take a lesser job even if their family is starving to death. If there are not 100K jobs then we should just extend the unemployment benefits out to the point where the 100K jobs return. You completely neglect the fact that every single person has tendencies to become lazy and unmotivated if given enough time. This happens faster in some and slower in others but it's in each of us. The longer you pay someone to do nothing the better the chance they become life long welfare recipients. You just don't want to admit that welfare and unemployment are tools, not programs, the democrats use to gain support and stay in power. They have nothing without that.
Reality Check

United States

#20803 Jan 16, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
And for the first half of the second part, that is just pretty much a no brainer is it not?
Even though they are both an asset to the economy, the other is a temporary debit to the U.S.Treasury.
They are not both assets. Unemployment should be seen as a last resort and not a driver of the economy. Unemployment is a temporary debit to the Treasury that would not have to be used near as much as it is if today's democratic party would stop enacting freedom and prosperity killing policies.
Guest

United States

#20804 Jan 17, 2013
Old Army wrote:
<quoted text>
That's better than what my wife calls me.
I'll just bet she call you worse. Something like wee wittle won.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#20805 Jan 17, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
When you have leaders like Obama you do what you have to do to survive until you get someone more qualified and certainly more pro-American as president. Your post is a perfect example of how out of touch liberals are. The way you see it that if person making $100K per year loses their job they should go on unemployment/welfare until they find another 100K job but under no circumstances should they take a lesser job even if their family is starving to death. If there are not 100K jobs then we should just extend the unemployment benefits out to the point where the 100K jobs return. You completely neglect the fact that every single person has tendencies to become lazy and unmotivated if given enough time. This happens faster in some and slower in others but it's in each of us. The longer you pay someone to do nothing the better the chance they become life long welfare recipients. You just don't want to admit that welfare and unemployment are tools, not programs, the democrats use to gain support and stay in power. They have nothing without that.
No, that is not the way I see it at all.

This is what I see,

folks living in areas of high employment scraping by on UE money, lacking the resources to relocate for employment, and some self righteous idiots calling those people lazy.

So the next you want to quote "what I see", you can start with this.


Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#20806 Jan 17, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
They are not both assets. Unemployment should be seen as a last resort and not a driver of the economy. Unemployment is a temporary debit to the Treasury that would not have to be used near as much as it is if today's democratic party would stop enacting freedom and prosperity killing policies.
"Not both assets"..........Really?? ????

Looks like the CBO disagrees with you there, I think I will accept their opinion over yours. No offense


I think it is time to let you folks know that the thriving gun an ammunition industries only make up a very small part of our economy.

So that "prosperity killing policies" thing, not so much!


“Conserve Wildlife Habitat”

Since: Dec 10

SE Michigan

#20808 Jan 17, 2013
guess wrote:
I bet all the criminals out there are just loving the executive actions that the president is trying to pass on all law abiding citizens. This just gives all them criminals more freedom to do what they want too. This in no way makes us safer.
He's not trying to make us safer. He's only pandering to the anti-gunners. It's a feel good moment that does not stop crime.

Here's a thought. What if the doctor is anti-gun? Might he or she decide to report a patient who poses no threat, just to have guns removed from their homes?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pocahontas Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
old woman 43 min Guest 3
holly at riverside 7 hr ohyaknow 8
Chicken Plant (Dec '14) 17 hr curious 188
What's being done to slow down the stealing? (Jan '15) 19 hr Spider bug 20
cooler weather Wed no options 3
Clowns in pocahontas Wed Pennywise 11
mcghee baby abused Tue Information 6

Pocahontas Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Pocahontas Mortgages