Did you vote today?

Created by Rick on Jun 8, 2010

6,206 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

Redd

Little Rock, AR

#20135 Jan 1, 2013
Interesting read for you Bible scholars...and perfectly normal and required for an adult male Jew.

This in no way discredits Jesus' stature or work, just brings into play the male dominated hierarchy within the early Church hellbent on excluding women from any meaningful place within their leadership.

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeo... .

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeo...
Guest

Oklahoma City, OK

#20136 Jan 1, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope.
That would not be Barny's way of thinking.
Yeah, Barney would say, "Nip it in the bud."
Guest

Oklahoma City, OK

#20137 Jan 1, 2013
Redd wrote:
<quoted text>
How would your salary compare to that of a Wal-Mart worker or say even a Fed-Ex drivers?
Oh, so like your man you want everyone equal, uh? That's fine as long as everyone works the same number of hours. Is that going to happen?
Redd

Little Rock, AR

#20138 Jan 1, 2013
Guest wrote:
<quoted text> Oh, so like your man you want everyone equal, uh? That's fine as long as everyone works the same number of hours. Is that going to happen?
Every man is already equal, from there it becomes individual initiative that determines ones success or failure, but I don't think Topix time is considered work.
Billy Bob

Fayetteville, AR

#20139 Jan 1, 2013
Raptor in Michigan wrote:
<quoted text>
What are you saying? That I only see one side? I beg to differ. But then you don't know me well enough to know that I have applauded and condemned both sides where and when it was deserved. I have been called a liberal here on Topix. I have also been called a right-winger.
And yet when you don't agree with what i post you jump straight away to calling me a liberal.... That's hypercritical.
Guess Who

Ash Flat, AR

#20140 Jan 1, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not going to throw the tenant out. It's one of the only avenues tax payers like myself have to get some of the money we pay in back. The problem is that it isn't near enough compared to what I pay in. I will never have to go on food stamps and I think no one is below me but I don't pretend that their circumstances are not, for the most part, self inflicted. That just rubs ideological liberals like yourself the wrong way because you like to pretend that ones bad circumstances can be blamed on the successful behavior of another thus the successful behavior needs to be penalized and given to the one in the bad circumstance. I certainly don't see it that way so you see me as greedy, though nothing could be farther from the truth.
Most liberals and many other parasite takers mistakenly think their success or lack of it and their well being is entirely dependent on other people things or conditions. Thats why they dont approve of those who are self reliant & have Know How.
Reality Check

Sherwood, AR

#20141 Jan 1, 2013
Guess Who wrote:
<quoted text> Most liberals and many other parasite takers mistakenly think their success or lack of it and their well being is entirely dependent on other people things or conditions. Thats why they dont approve of those who are self reliant & have Know How.
They fear those that are self reliant because they could never be that way. It's not in their makeup.
Guest

Greenbrier, AR

#20143 Jan 1, 2013
Think I'll just sit in my trailer and watch football today.. Maybe drink a beer and see Michgan get its ass stomped.. Gonna enjoy that..

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#20144 Jan 1, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>

They fear those that are self reliant because they could never be that way. It's not in their makeup.
Same person who said that says this;

"and I think no one is below me but I don't pretend that their circumstances are not"

You saying poor people are not below you, but yet you say self reliance, "It's not in their makeup"

In other words, those "circumstances" which are below you, are self inflicted, by those who are not below you.

Seems as though your opinion changes depending on whom you are talking to.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#20145 Jan 1, 2013
Guest wrote:
Think I'll just sit in my trailer and watch football today.. Maybe drink a beer and see Michgan get its ass stomped.. Gonna enjoy that..
Don't forget to walk the dogs'
Guest

Oklahoma City, OK

#20148 Jan 1, 2013
Redd wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey Danzig, while I agree with where you're coming from, it's a waste of your time expecting any converts among these cowboys. Hell they've still got cowshit on their Sunday boots.
Yeah, ignorant me, with my Masters Degree, will cling to my religion and my guns. And I have you know I have Sunday go to meetin cowboy boots.
Reality Check

Sherwood, AR

#20149 Jan 1, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Same person who said that says this;
"and I think no one is below me but I don't pretend that their circumstances are not"
You saying poor people are not below you, but yet you say self reliance, "It's not in their makeup"
In other words, those "circumstances" which are below you, are self inflicted, by those who are not below you.
Seems as though your opinion changes depending on whom you are talking to.
If your going to quote me at least do it in the context in which I posted. I said "I will never have to go on food stamps and I think no one is below me but I don't pretend that their circumstances are not, for the most part, self inflicted" meaning their circumstances are, by in large, a result of poor life choices by the individual and not some external factor. Even though you are a liberal, I expected you to be better than the gutter tactics that the sleeziest on the left use. I guess not.
People and circumstances are two completely different things. No one person is better than another but choices people make can cause them to end up in situations where life is much harder than those who have made responsible life choices. Those that made responsible life choices should always be willing to help someone who has not, climb out of the hole they are in if the person that made the bad choices is willing to make the tough decisions it will take to overcome their current situation. If the person who is in a bad situation isn't willing to do what it takes to overcome their poor decisions then they should be allowed to waller in their pitty but they deserve no help. Before you go popping off about "what about this" or "what about that", I realize there are those circumstances that are beyond ones control like losing ones house in a fire or a husband dying that was the sole bread winner in a family leaving the wife a widow. Those are the individuals that NEED help and should recieve all the assistance they NEED. Noone that goes through something like that should have to go it alone. To take it a step farther, I would venture to say that if we eliminated the waste and abuse in the social programs we would have more than enough to take care of those that NEED assisstance. As it stands now, we have people that need help that "don't qualify" while others that are just lazy qualifying for every single government program on earth.
Guess Who

Ash Flat, AR

#20151 Jan 1, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
If your going to quote me at least do it in the context in which I posted. I said "I will never have to go on food stamps and I think no one is below me but I don't pretend that their circumstances are not, for the most part, self inflicted" meaning their circumstances are, by in large, a result of poor life choices by the individual and not some external factor. Even though you are a liberal, I expected you to be better than the gutter tactics that the sleeziest on the left use. I guess not.
People and circumstances are two completely different things. No one person is better than another but choices people make can cause them to end up in situations where life is much harder than those who have made responsible life choices. Those that made responsible life choices should always be willing to help someone who has not, climb out of the hole they are in if the person that made the bad choices is willing to make the tough decisions it will take to overcome their current situation. If the person who is in a bad situation isn't willing to do what it takes to overcome their poor decisions then they should be allowed to waller in their pitty but they deserve no help. Before you go popping off about "what about this" or "what about that", I realize there are those circumstances that are beyond ones control like losing ones house in a fire or a husband dying that was the sole bread winner in a family leaving the wife a widow. Those are the individuals that NEED help and should recieve all the assistance they NEED. Noone that goes through something like that should have to go it alone. To take it a step farther, I would venture to say that if we eliminated the waste and abuse in the social programs we would have more than enough to take care of those that NEED assisstance. As it stands now, we have people that need help that "don't qualify" while others that are just lazy qualifying for every single government program on earth.
almost every so called wealthy or richperson ive ever known is always looking for opportunities to give back. Believe it or not the harder a person works and the more they give back the luckier they become. Having stated that I believe that a life without problem,s or worry would not be worth living.
Redd

Little Rock, AR

#20152 Jan 1, 2013
Guess Who wrote:
<quoted text>
Having stated that I believe that a life without problem,s or worry would not be worth living.
Exactly.

Change your name back, it was a good one.
Danzig

Borås, Sweden

#20154 Jan 1, 2013
Redd wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey Danzig, while I agree with where you're coming from, it's a waste of your time expecting any converts among these cowboys. Hell they've still got cowshit on their Sunday boots.
Haha, ok. Well, shitty boots are ok, but crap in the mind makes things bad for all of us. Pretty funny when you think of it though, didn't Jesus advocate open-mindedness? I seems that the bible is in conflict with that, but then again, Jesus didn't write the bible. Maybe it was written by people with a different agenda than the truth?
Redd

Little Rock, AR

#20155 Jan 1, 2013
To hell with this fiscal cliff deal, raise taxes on everyone.

Then later work on revenues with a new Congress.
Guest

Greenbrier, AR

#20156 Jan 1, 2013
Ahhhh beer was good so was football game... Michgan sucked hehe!!!
what

Dallas, TX

#20157 Jan 1, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Same person who said that says this;
"and I think no one is below me but I don't pretend that their circumstances are not"
You saying poor people are not below you, but yet you say self reliance, "It's not in their makeup"
In other words, those "circumstances" which are below you, are self inflicted, by those who are not below you.
Seems as though your opinion changes depending on whom you are talking to.
No, he's saying liberals, like you, not poor people, fear the self reliant. Learn to comprehend what your are replying to before you post. Or did you purposefully mean to put words in someone's mouth?

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#20158 Jan 1, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
If your going to quote me at least do it in the context in which I posted. I said "I will never have to go on food stamps and I think no one is below me but I don't pretend that their circumstances are not, for the most part, self inflicted" meaning their circumstances are, by in large, a result of poor life choices by the individual and not some external factor. Even though you are a liberal, I expected you to be better than the gutter tactics that the sleeziest on the left use. I guess not.
People and circumstances are two completely different things. No one person is better than another but choices people make can cause them to end up in situations where life is much harder than those who have made responsible life choices. Those that made responsible life choices should always be willing to help someone who has not, climb out of the hole they are in if the person that made the bad choices is willing to make the tough decisions it will take to overcome their current situation. If the person who is in a bad situation isn't willing to do what it takes to overcome their poor decisions then they should be allowed to waller in their pitty but they deserve no help. Before you go popping off about "what about this" or "what about that", I realize there are those circumstances that are beyond ones control like losing ones house in a fire or a husband dying that was the sole bread winner in a family leaving the wife a widow. Those are the individuals that NEED help and should recieve all the assistance they NEED. Noone that goes through something like that should have to go it alone. To take it a step farther, I would venture to say that if we eliminated the waste and abuse in the social programs we would have more than enough to take care of those that NEED assisstance. As it stands now, we have people that need help that "don't qualify" while others that are just lazy qualifying for every single government program on earth.
There you go again with that self righteous Malarkey.

"As it stands now, we have people that need help that "don't qualify" while others that are just lazy qualifying for every single government program on earth"

Just who give you the moral authority to make that call, where are your numbers you like to discuses so much, to give us some hard data to back up such a bold statement?

Tell you something else, if calling out a self righteous, lying, greedy, moniker named Reality Check is

"gutter tactics that the sleaziest on the left use"

then Barney II is 100% guilty.

The real person (the Liberal) behind Barney, will assume that the person behind R.C. is a better person than his moniker.



Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#20159 Jan 1, 2013
what wrote:
<quoted text>No, he's saying liberals, like you, not poor people, fear the self reliant. Learn to comprehend what your are replying to before you post. Or did you purposefully mean to put words in someone's mouth?
Nope not putting words in "in someone's mouth"

but you sure as Hell just did by speaking for him.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pocahontas Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Amanda Moore 40 min Disgusted 6
Audrey Willcutt 58 min friend 1
Lagoon Discharge Into Black River 1 hr Rupert B Jigglebo... 13
Girl who works at Italian place 2 hr donna 5
darrah harmon wedding 10 hr guest 11
smallest wiener in town 19 hr girl tellin it all 1
Topix will be shut down permanently May 1st Sun guest 4

Flood Warning for Randolph County was issued at March 30 at 9:42AM CDT

Pocahontas Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Pocahontas People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]