Did you vote today?

Did you vote today?

Created by Rick on Jun 8, 2010

6,407 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

“Conserve Wildlife Habitat”

Since: Dec 10

SE Michigan

#18567 Nov 23, 2012
dont know nothin wrote:
<quoted text>ok so here's the point if the guy was actually paying his workers an honest days pay for an honest days work and generous at christmas and easter then cudos for him for telling the worker to eff off.. greed has no place niether on the owner nor the employees behalf. does this make sense? no employer should hamper their business by condoning poor work ethic on any level.. does this make sense? so with that being said i hope that all of this will have enough time to marinate because i did not spend half a page trying to prove a point.. succinct and simple.
That was much better.

“Conserve Wildlife Habitat”

Since: Dec 10

SE Michigan

#18568 Nov 23, 2012
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
First off Bill Clinton campaigned for Obama more than other former republican presidents campaigned for Romney because the democrats are far more passionate and well organized than the republicans are at this point, plain and simple. Do you really believe that the country was bleeding 700K NEW jobs each month or, more realistically, the level gradually reached 700K over the course of a year. There is a HUGE difference in the two scenarios. We have around 435K jobless claims currently and the unemployment is just a hair above 8%. Does it at all strike you as odd that under Bush we had 700K jobless claims (almost double)yet the unemployment was only 7.8%. The unemployment rate is a measure of the prevalence of unemployment and it is calculated as a percentage by dividing the number of unemployed individuals by all individuals currently in the labor force. It's simple math. Do you think that maybe the percentage is higher under Obama because there are so many that have dropped out of the workforce thus hiding the fact that the situation is far worse under this president. This is just looking at the facts of the numbers. Try it. Since inflation can be manipulated by the fed keeping interest rates low, you can't really use it as a metric of a healthy or unhealthy economy. I noticed that you launched into a finger pointing, demonizing rant instead of addressing the FACT that taxing the rich won't come close to fixing our debt problems. How about you tell me how spending twice as much as we take in every year will EVER turn things around for America. Would it make your personal situation better if you did that in your household? How will Obama's policies bring America back to the greatest, strongest, and most prosperous nation in the world? Try to use facts and not talking points.
"First off Bill Clinton campaigned for Obama more than other former republican presidents campaigned for Romney because the democrats are far more passionate and well organized than the republicans are at this point, plain and simple."

I would say it's because the republicans, George Bush in particular, are a bit more honorable. Once a president is done serving his time in office, traditionally, they faded into the background and kept their mouth shut, as it should be.

“Conserve Wildlife Habitat”

Since: Dec 10

SE Michigan

#18569 Nov 23, 2012
libertarian wrote:
If everyone who didn't vote went to the polls for libertarian party, they would have achieved their popular vote goal of 5% to enable them to be involved in the debates next election.
Get out and vote for liberty.
If only we could convince the conservatives in the two parties to embrace liberty and freedom, and ignore the news media, we'd now have a President Paul.

“Conserve Wildlife Habitat”

Since: Dec 10

SE Michigan

#18570 Nov 23, 2012
stfufool wrote:
<quoted text>
Libertarians want legal, tax dollar provided dope. Period. Go to hell.
Where in the hell did you hear this false bullshit from?

“Conserve Wildlife Habitat”

Since: Dec 10

SE Michigan

#18571 Nov 23, 2012
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody that you have a disagreement with wants anyone to not have personal freedoms. I would argue that forcing someone who has made an honest living to give some of their money to those who are "less fortunate" (and I use that term losely) is a perfect example of stealing personal freedoms from those that make the money AND from those who accept a set income from a government that promises the moon but never delivers it. Those that accept that lifestyle see their drive to succeed simply melt away and all that is left is a slavery of dependence and anger towards those who they don't know and certainly didn't cause their dependent state. America is like no other nation in that here a person sets their own destiny and level of success dependent on their drive to succeed. There are a handful, and I mean a minute percentage of people in this country that are excessively greedy and evil at their core but you wouldn't know that by the rhetoric being thrown around. I can't think of one single person who is poor and unsuccessful (and i know a lot of people like that) that their lives were directly shaped by any rich person and I would be willing to bet that you don't either. It's sad that anyone would actually buy in to the lie that the rich in this country caused all of the pain and suffering we see all around us. Everyone in this country has a path to success and is significantly more free than anyone in any other nation. It is up to each and everyone of us to preserve that personal freedom by doing all we can to prevent having to live off of the success of other people. It's just sad that so many choose fun and irresponsibility instead of drive, determination, and responsibility.
This is an excellent post. Worded perfectly!

“Conserve Wildlife Habitat”

Since: Dec 10

SE Michigan

#18572 Nov 23, 2012
Reality Check wrote:
Brady Madison wrote:
just watched Pres Obama answer questions .......... he is getting a little tougher on the opposition upper income set. God will bless him. He is doing just what Jesus Christ would have done. Assure us healthcare, lower our taxes, end war, prevent depression, create jobs, pay off the deficit, end tax cuts for the rich. I just cannot have a problem with any of that. He is the best since Kennedy.
God would never want someone taking money from someone more affluent and giving it to someone less fortunate. Who would be blessed? The affluent individual rightfully earned the money but doesn't have a say in where that money is given thus it can't be considered sincere and from the heart. Obama didn't earn it, he just took it from the rich and gave it to the poor so he isn't sincere or sacrificing. Finally, the poor American that recieves the money has every opportunity to make something of himself or herself in this country but hasn't so that can't be blessed. Do you really think God blesses stealing because that is exactly what it is. If the rich doesn't give any of his/her excess for the better good of mankind then God will take care of that in the end I can assure you. If Obama tries to do God's work then he will answer for that in the end as well. If a person is poor because he or she didn't take advantage of the endless opportunities this country offers then God will take away or give whatever blessing He wants to. We all need to take care of our own salvation and deeds here on earth and let God take care of the rest.
"Obama didn't earn it, he just took it from the rich and gave it to the poor.."
In truth, nobody really knows WHO he gives that money to. It is not possible for the government to know who is poor simply because they filled out some forms.

I know people who you would think are poor, but in reality, they make very good money. Money the government doesn't know about because it is all done in cash and no taxes are paid either.

“Conserve Wildlife Habitat”

Since: Dec 10

SE Michigan

#18573 Nov 23, 2012
dont know nothin wrote:
<quoted text>um apparently you have lost your mind .. greed and ignorance has no place on this earth so do us all a favor and just keep your comments and yourself on that little republican planet in that alternate universe you guys have accomplished in making... bout the only thing republicans can accomplish because everyone knows they can't pass a simple jobs bill that would put millions back to work. no place in american history has washington been so gridlocked and controversal.. not even when dummy-o newt was speaker.
You condone theft? What do you say I break into your home uninvited and take some of your stuff against your will and give it to your neighbor that doesn't have the same things you do? Of course you would be more than willing to oblige, correct? Reality Check was dead on with this post. Here; read it again and think about it!
"God would never want someone taking money from someone more affluent and giving it to someone less fortunate. Who would be blessed? The affluent individual rightfully earned the money but doesn't have a say in where that money is given thus it can't be considered sincere and from the heart. Obama didn't earn it, he just took it from the rich and gave it to the poor so he isn't sincere or sacrificing. Finally, the poor American that recieves the money has every opportunity to make something of himself or herself in this country but hasn't so that can't be blessed. Do you really think God blesses stealing because that is exactly what it is. If the rich doesn't give any of his/her excess for the better good of mankind then God will take care of that in the end I can assure you. If Obama tries to do God's work then he will answer for that in the end as well. If a person is poor because he or she didn't take advantage of the endless opportunities this country offers then God will take away or give whatever blessing He wants to. We all need to take care of our own salvation and deeds here on earth and let God take care of the rest."
Reality Check

United States

#18574 Nov 23, 2012
Raptor in Michigan wrote:
<quoted text>
"First off Bill Clinton campaigned for Obama more than other former republican presidents campaigned for Romney because the democrats are far more passionate and well organized than the republicans are at this point, plain and simple."
I would say it's because the republicans, George Bush in particular, are a bit more honorable. Once a president is done serving his time in office, traditionally, they faded into the background and kept their mouth shut, as it should be.
I agree 100% that the Republicans are more honorable and that a former president should fade away. The problem is that the mass of uninformed voters that vote strictly on emotion will never vote for someone like a Mitt Romney because he is not cool or edgy enough. So the choice to the Republicans is stay true, honorable, and stick to principle and die a slow and painful death with the rest of America, or use the same tactics the democrats use, like divide and conquer, making issues of non issues to take voters attention away from the aspects of your record that the opposition is trying to draw attention to, and promising voters with the things they want to hear using the conservative message instead ofthe socialistic message. Either way, America has lost her values and is suffering greatly for it.
Reality Check

United States

#18575 Nov 23, 2012
Raptor in Michigan wrote:
<quoted text>
"Obama didn't earn it, he just took it from the rich and gave it to the poor.."
In truth, nobody really knows WHO he gives that money to. It is not possible for the government to know who is poor simply because they filled out some forms.
I know people who you would think are poor, but in reality, they make very good money. Money the government doesn't know about because it is all done in cash and no taxes are paid either.
I know people that don't have a dime to their name yet they are some of the richest people I know. I was speaking of the rich in terms of taxable income that is reported.
Redd

Maumelle, AR

#18577 Nov 24, 2012
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree 100% that the Republicans are more honorable and that a former president should fade away. The problem is that the mass of uninformed voters that vote strictly on emotion will never vote for someone like a Mitt Romney because he is not cool or edgy enough. So the choice to the Republicans is stay true, honorable, and stick to principle and die a slow and painful death with the rest of America, or use the same tactics the democrats use, like divide and conquer, making issues of non issues to take voters attention away from the aspects of your record that the opposition is trying to draw attention to, and promising voters with the things they want to hear using the conservative message instead ofthe socialistic message. Either way, America has lost her values and is suffering greatly for it.
There’s no such thing as destiny, there is only the certainty of change. Honor and principle is not exclusive, it crosses all walks of life.

“Conserve Wildlife Habitat”

Since: Dec 10

SE Michigan

#18578 Nov 24, 2012
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree 100% that the Republicans are more honorable and that a former president should fade away. The problem is that the mass of uninformed voters that vote strictly on emotion will never vote for someone like a Mitt Romney because he is not cool or edgy enough. So the choice to the Republicans is stay true, honorable, and stick to principle and die a slow and painful death with the rest of America, or use the same tactics the democrats use, like divide and conquer, making issues of non issues to take voters attention away from the aspects of your record that the opposition is trying to draw attention to, and promising voters with the things they want to hear using the conservative message instead ofthe socialistic message. Either way, America has lost her values and is suffering greatly for it.
The Republicans can stay true, honorable, AND stick to principle and NOT die a slow and painful death. But they do need to change tactics, OR learn how to spread their message loudly and more effectively, like the democrats.

For example, something struck me during one of the debates as Romney was speaking. He was talking about energy independance and made the statement, "20 or 25 birds were killed and brought out a migratory bird act to go after them," speaking about Obama going after the oil company for those deaths. That was the ONLY statement Romney made on this issue- as though he considered it a non-issue. I knew right then he had probably lost the environmentalists and the animal lovers who DO consider that a big issue.

Romney could have used that moment to his, and the republican party's, advantage by pointing out how deadly wind turbines are to birds, and that the renewable energy Obama touts is not as environmentally friendly as he would like people to believe. He could have given a figure of Golden Eagles fatalities at one wind farm (Altamont Pass) in California. He could have pointed out the number of acres of pristine wildlife habitat permanently altered or destroyed to build wind farms. He could have let the voting public know that very tall and lighted structures, wind turbines included, kill millions of migratory birds every year and that violations of the Migratory Bird Act are only brought on when birds are killed at oil facilities, but not wind farms. People who consider themselves to be environmentalists may not even know this happens.

He could have, right then and there, painted the democrats as unfriendly to the environment and our wildlife by pandering to renewable energy companies by giving them a free pass to kill wildlife. Any intellectually honest democrats, and independants may have had an eye opening moment had Romney brought this to their attention.
Billy Bob

United States

#18579 Nov 24, 2012
you all need to get a life...
Reality Check

United States

#18580 Nov 24, 2012
Raptor in Michigan wrote:
<quoted text>
The Republicans can stay true, honorable, AND stick to principle and NOT die a slow and painful death. But they do need to change tactics, OR learn how to spread their message loudly and more effectively, like the democrats.
For example, something struck me during one of the debates as Romney was speaking. He was talking about energy independance and made the statement, "20 or 25 birds were killed and brought out a migratory bird act to go after them," speaking about Obama going after the oil company for those deaths. That was the ONLY statement Romney made on this issue- as though he considered it a non-issue. I knew right then he had probably lost the environmentalists and the animal lovers who DO consider that a big issue.
Romney could have used that moment to his, and the republican party's, advantage by pointing out how deadly wind turbines are to birds, and that the renewable energy Obama touts is not as environmentally friendly as he would like people to believe. He could have given a figure of Golden Eagles fatalities at one wind farm (Altamont Pass) in California. He could have pointed out the number of acres of pristine wildlife habitat permanently altered or destroyed to build wind farms. He could have let the voting public know that very tall and lighted structures, wind turbines included, kill millions of migratory birds every year and that violations of the Migratory Bird Act are only brought on when birds are killed at oil facilities, but not wind farms. People who consider themselves to be environmentalists may not even know this happens.
He could have, right then and there, painted the democrats as unfriendly to the environment and our wildlife by pandering to renewable energy companies by giving them a free pass to kill wildlife. Any intellectually honest democrats, and independants may have had an eye opening moment had Romney brought this to their attention.
Exactly!

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#18581 Nov 25, 2012
NO, are the polls open?
Linguist

Jonesboro, AR

#18582 Nov 25, 2012
Willie Granville wrote:
<quoted text>If your figures are true about the 22 million jobs created under Reagan, you can bet 80 per cent were GOVERNMENT JOBS. Nancy Reagan told the American people JUST SAY NO TO DRUGS, that is all case closed. Cops were arresting people every moment. More jails & prisons built during the time. More cops, prison guards, wardens, security etc. Payed by WHO? The American worker. Oh, yea building an American military to OUT DUE RUSSIA. Do you know who PAYED for all this. I spent more time looking for work under Reagan-Bush than working.
I was making $11.90 per hour in 1981 it went down to $4.50 per hour under Reagan-Bush. Just to have a JOB. Don't tell me how GREAT REAGAN-BUSH was. I saw the ILLEGALS move into TEXAS and take jobs while others moved into the WHITE HOUSE AND STATE HOUSE under REAGAN-BUSH. I was looking at the JOBS GOING OVERSEAS UNDER REAGAN-BUSH and nothing done. Not only did he try to break the UNIONS (I am not a member wish I was) but he broke the AMERICAN WORKER, LOWER WAGES just a simple fact, like it or not. And I didn't (WISH OBAMA TO BE RE-ELECTED) I just HOPED he would. I am still so HAPPY, HAPPY, HAPPY ABOUT THE ELECTION.
English is your second language? I doubt if you spent a lot of time looking for work, don't doubt that you were e employed. Google your statements, come back with a fact.
BarneyIII

Jonesboro, AR

#18583 Nov 25, 2012
Facts on Obama Economic Stimulus Package

This is indeed a very exciting program, and I'll explain it
by using a Q & A format:

Q. What is an 'Economic Stimulus' payment ?

A. It is money that the federal government will send to
taxpayers.

Q. Where will the government get this money ?

A. From taxpayers.

Q. So the government is giving me back my own money ?

A. Only a smidgen of it.

Q. What is the purpose of this payment ?

A. The plan is for you to use the money to purchase a
high-definition TV set, thus stimulating the economy.

Q. But isn't that stimulating the economy of China ?

A. Shut Up.

Below is some helpful advice on how to best help the U.S.
Economy by spending your stimulus check wisely:

* If you spend the stimulus money at Wal*Mart, the money
will go to China or Sri Lanka.

* If you spend it on gasoline, your money will go to the
Arabs.

* If you purchase a computer, it will go to India, Taiwan or
China.

* If you purchase fruit and vegetables, it will go to Mexico
, Honduras and Guatemala.

* If you buy an efficient car, it will go to Japan or Korea.

* If you purchase useless stuff, it will go to Taiwan.

* If you pay your credit cards off, or buy stock, it will go
to management bonuses and they will hide it offshore.

Instead, keep the money in America by:

1) Spending it at yard sales, or

2) Going to ball games, or

3) Spending it on prostitutes, or

4) Beer or

5) Tattoos.

(These are the only American businesses still operating in
the U.S.)

Conclusion:

Go to a ball game with a tattooed prostitute that you met at
a yard sale and drink beer all day!

No need to thank me, I'm just glad I could be of help.
not the one for Michelle


This is indeed a very exciting program, and I'll explain it
by using a Q & A format:

Q. What is an 'Economic Stimulus' payment ?

A. It is money that the federal government will send to
taxpayers.

Q. Where will the government get this money ?

A. From taxpayers.

Q. So the government is giving me back my own money ?

A. Only a smidgen of it.

Q. What is the purpose of this payment ?

A. The plan is for you to use the money to purchase a
high-definition TV set, thus stimulating the economy.

Q. But isn't that stimulating the economy of China ?

A. Shut Up.

Below is some helpful advice on how to best help the U.S.
Economy by spending your stimulus check wisely:

* If you spend the stimulus money at Wal*Mart, the money
will go to China or Sri Lanka.

* If you spend it on gasoline, your money will go to the
Arabs.

* If you purchase a computer, it will go to India, Taiwan or
China.

* If you purchase fruit and vegetables, it will go to Mexico
, Honduras and Guatemala.

* If you buy an efficient car, it will go to Japan or Korea.

* If you purchase useless stuff, it will go to Taiwan.

* If you pay your credit cards off, or buy stock, it will go
to management bonuses and they will hide it offshore.

Instead, keep the money in America by:

1) Spending it at yard sales, or

2) Going to ball games, or

3) Spending it on prostitutes, or

4) Beer or

5) Tattoos.

(These are the only American businesses still operating in
the U.S.)

Conclusion:

Go to a ball game with a tattooed prostitute that you met at
a yard sale and drink beer all day!

No need to thank me, I'm just glad I could be of help.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#18584 Nov 25, 2012
BarneyIII wrote:
Facts on Obama Economic Stimulus Package
This is indeed a very exciting program, and I'll explain it
by using a Q & A format:
Q. What is an 'Economic Stimulus' payment ?
A. It is money that the federal government will send to
taxpayers.
Q. Where will the government get this money ?
A. From taxpayers.
Q. So the government is giving me back my own money ?
A. Only a smidgen of it.
Q. What is the purpose of this payment ?
A. The plan is for you to use the money to purchase a
high-definition TV set, thus stimulating the economy.
Q. But isn't that stimulating the economy of China ?
A. Shut Up.
Below is some helpful advice on how to best help the U.S.
Economy by spending your stimulus check wisely:
* If you spend the stimulus money at Wal*Mart, the money
will go to China or Sri Lanka.
* If you spend it on gasoline, your money will go to the
Arabs.
* If you purchase a computer, it will go to India, Taiwan or
China.
* If you purchase fruit and vegetables, it will go to Mexico
, Honduras and Guatemala.
* If you buy an efficient car, it will go to Japan or Korea.
* If you purchase useless stuff, it will go to Taiwan.
* If you pay your credit cards off, or buy stock, it will go
to management bonuses and they will hide it offshore.
Instead, keep the money in America by:
1) Spending it at yard sales, or
2) Going to ball games, or
3) Spending it on prostitutes, or
4) Beer or
5) Tattoos.
(These are the only American businesses still operating in
the U.S.)
Conclusion:
Go to a ball game with a tattooed prostitute that you met at
a yard sale and drink beer all day!
No need to thank me, I'm just glad I could be of help.
not the one for Michelle
This is indeed a very exciting program, and I'll explain it
by using a Q & A format:
Q. What is an 'Economic Stimulus' payment ?
A. It is money that the federal government will send to
taxpayers.
Q. Where will the government get this money ?
A. From taxpayers.
Q. So the government is giving me back my own money ?
A. Only a smidgen of it.
Q. What is the purpose of this payment ?
A. The plan is for you to use the money to purchase a
high-definition TV set, thus stimulating the economy.
Q. But isn't that stimulating the economy of China ?
A. Shut Up.
Below is some helpful advice on how to best help the U.S.
Economy by spending your stimulus check wisely:
* If you spend the stimulus money at Wal*Mart, the money
will go to China or Sri Lanka.
* If you spend it on gasoline, your money will go to the
Arabs.
* If you purchase a computer, it will go to India, Taiwan or
China.
* If you purchase fruit and vegetables, it will go to Mexico
, Honduras and Guatemala.
* If you buy an efficient car, it will go to Japan or Korea.
* If you purchase useless stuff, it will go to Taiwan.
* If you pay your credit cards off, or buy stock, it will go
to management bonuses and they will hide it offshore.
Instead, keep the money in America by:
1) Spending it at yard sales, or
2) Going to ball games, or
3) Spending it on prostitutes, or
4) Beer or
5) Tattoos.
(These are the only American businesses still operating in
the U.S.)
Conclusion:
Go to a ball game with a tattooed prostitute that you met at
a yard sale and drink beer all day!
No need to thank me, I'm just glad I could be of help.
The Economic Stimulus Act of 2008, was signed into law on February 13, 2008 by President Bush.

President Bush on Wednesday signed the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008, calling it a "booster shot" for the American economy.

"The bill I'm signing today is large enough to have an impact, amounting to more than $152 billion this year, or about 1 percent of the GDP (gross domestic product)," the president said in the brief ceremony in the East Room of the White House.

The government hopes the measure, which will send most Americans tax rebate checks by May, will either prevent a recession or make one relatively brief.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#18585 Nov 25, 2012
Redd wrote:
<quoted text>
Well isn't that just pitiful, why not put down that ham samich and try exercising a bit.
"Here's to not apologizing for the stupidity of others."

*raises glass*
Barney II sux

Amsterdam, Netherlands

#18586 Nov 25, 2012
Now that President Obama has been re-elected, how will he attempt to complete the fundamental transformation of America first pledged in 2008?

The New York Times bestselling book “Fool Me Twice: Obama’s Shocking Plans for the Next Four Years Exposed” may now be more relevant than ever.

The work, by Aaron Klein and Brenda Elliott, documents Obama’s specific, second-term agenda in all major policy areas, including the economy, jobs immigration reform, healthcare, the military and electoral reform.

The specific plans uncovered in the book have one major theme – massive, unprecedented government involvement in the private sector.

Obama has made clear he will use the next four years to push the generalized themes of “economic fairness” and a “new economic patriotism.” However, the president has not endeavored to define those mantras in detail.

“Fool Me Twice” not only uncovers the socialist origins of the “economic fairness” term but spells out the specific, second-term policy prescriptions recommended to the president by the very progressive groups, activists and advisers behind Obama’s first-term agenda.

Among the second-term Obama policies detailed in the book:

An expansive, de facto amnesty program for illegal aliens via executive order and interagency directives linked with a reduction in the capabilities of the U.S. Border Patrol and plans to bring in untold numbers of new immigrants with the removal of caps on H-1B visas and green cards.
Government-funded, neighborhood-based programs to better integrate the newly amnestied immigrants into society, including education centers and health-care centers. A “federal solution” to ensure that the amnestied immigrants are treated “equitably” across the United States.
The re-creation of a 21st century version of FDR’s Works Progress Administration program within the Department of Labor that would oversee a massive new bureaucracy and millions of new federal jobs;
Specific plans for a National Infrastructure Bank. This entity would “evaluate and finance infrastructure projects ‘of substantial regional and national importance’” and would finance “transportation infrastructure, housing, energy, telecommunications, drinking water, wastewater, and other infrastructures.”
Wresting control of the military budget from Congress by attempting to place an “independent panel” in charge of military spending while slashing the defense budget in shocking ways.
The vastly reduced resources of the U.S. armed forces will be spread even thinner by using them to combat “global warming,” fight global poverty, remedy “injustice,” bolster the United Nations and step up use of “peacekeeping” deployments;
A new “green” stimulus program and the founding of a federal “green” bank or “Energy Independence Trust,” which would borrow from the federal treasury to provide low-cost financing to private-sector investments in “clean energy.”
Detailed plans to nudge closer to a single-payer health-care system controlled by the federal government.
Federal government intervention to determine the “value” of individual jobs in the private sector instead of allowing employers to pay what they want.
The enactment of a “living wage” that would force all employers to increase the salaries of the nation’s workers to meet “basic needs” such as housing, food, utilities, transportation, health care and recreation.
liberalsare2stup id2live

Tempe, AZ

#18587 Nov 25, 2012
AP - Nov 2012 -- During the campaign Biden claimed “President Clinton bankrupted Chrysler so that Italians could buy it to ship jobs overseas to China.”

Biden recently referred to Virginia’s Democratic Senate candidate Tim Kaine as “Tom” and complained to an Ohio audience about TV ads “here in Iowa.”

Biden, who is known for going off script, did not correct himself on Sunday and the crowd at the high school outside Cleveland appeared not to notice.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pocahontas Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Shack ups 2 hr Melissa 3
Mikey 9 hr zmj2003 2
taco casa 12 hr True 17
Senior Deacon of the Free Mason's? 18 hr guest 10
relocating (Apr '11) 21 hr Guest 56
Cody berry Fri Bongwater 3
Erica Duff (Feb '10) Fri Gump 5

Pocahontas Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Pocahontas Mortgages