Did you vote today?

Did you vote today?

Created by Rick on Jun 8, 2010

6,407 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

Hog Heaven

United States

#16623 Oct 12, 2012
guest wrote:
Watching Joe Biden make a fool of himself last night reminded me of Proverbs 29:9 "When a wise man argues with a foolish man, the fool only gets angry or laughs, and there is no peace and quiet."
Yeah, sort of like arguing with Barn and all of his "LMAO" and his retorts that have nothing to do with the subject or his cut and pastes that try to change the subject after he's been proven the fool. Barn creates a lot of characters on here, who knew he was also Joe Biden. It wouldn't surprise me if Biden spent most of his time on Topix.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#16624 Oct 12, 2012
guest wrote:
Watching Joe Biden make a fool of himself last night reminded me of Proverbs 29:9 "When a wise man argues with a foolish man, the fool only gets angry or laughs, and there is no peace and quiet."
I was reminded of Romney shooting off his mouth immediately after the Benghazi attack":

Seest thou a man [that is] hasty in his words?[there is] more hope of a fool than of him."

Proverbs 29:20

guest

Pearcy, AR

#16625 Oct 12, 2012
ET wrote:
I'm going to vote for Romney because he's white. That's how Obama was elected anyway. Pure Racist ignorance
Cause only black people voted for obama right? Moron
what

United States

#16626 Oct 12, 2012
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
I was reminded of Romney shooting off his mouth immediately after the Benghazi attack":
Seest thou a man [that is] hasty in his words?[there is] more hope of a fool than of him."
Proverbs 29:20
Romney's not the one who hastily, and foolishly to the entire world, said that the attack was because of a YouTube video when they knew it wasn't.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#16627 Oct 12, 2012
what wrote:
<quoted text>Romney's not the one who hastily, and foolishly to the entire world, said that the attack was because of a YouTube video when they knew it wasn't.
The same can be said for President Obama'

In fact, Obama called the assault "an act of terror" in remarks on Sept. 12

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2...
Whodunit

Jonesboro, AR

#16630 Oct 12, 2012
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
I was reminded of Romney shooting off his mouth immediately after the Benghazi attack":
Seest thou a man [that is] hasty in his words?[there is] more hope of a fool than of him."
Proverbs 29:20
You are so right, both Romney and Ryan were arguing with idiots
Disillusioned

Jonesboro, AR

#16631 Oct 12, 2012
URtheracistmoron wrote:
<quoted text>
No, black people and idiot wiggers who convinced themselves that voting for a proven loser just because of his race was necessary to prove that they were not racists. Duh.
Most voted for him because we hoped for the real America, Obama spoke of hopes and dreams, he just hasn't carried through with his promises. We wanted him to succeed, he wanted to see the world, golf and visit with celebrities.
guest

Pearcy, AR

#16632 Oct 12, 2012
URtheracistmoron wrote:
<quoted text>
No, black people and idiot wiggers who convinced themselves that voting for a proven loser just because of his race was necessary to prove that they were not racists. Duh.
I am not a wigger or black and I still voted for him and guess what I will again this year too! We dont need a republican that is going to make the rich richer and the poor poorer! DUH! S.A.
Disillusioned

Jonesboro, AR

#16634 Oct 12, 2012
guess wrote:
<quoted text>But be smart this time. It's as through obama speaks and it puts everybody in a trance. This man only cares about your vote. He isn't worry about making things better. When all our taxes go up in january(taxameggen).You will see. His main reason for staying in office he doesn't want to give up all his spending, all his vacations, all his traveling and all those vacation. Think about that before you go vote. Obama has to go.
Obama has to go? Name a popular vacation spot that he hasn't gone to.
Chevy

Newport, AR

#16635 Oct 12, 2012
No
guest

United States

#16636 Oct 13, 2012
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
The same can be said for President Obama'
In fact, Obama called the assault "an act of terror" in remarks on Sept. 12
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2...
Again, your comprehension of the english language is either severely flawed or your just continuing to misrepresent reality. "What" didn't say anything about Obama calling it an act of terror, just that Obama is the one who "hastily, and foolishly to the entire world, said that the attack was because of a YouTube video," and not Romney who was correct about the situation from the beginning. So, no, the same ( as put forth by "What") can not be said of your dear leader, our President Obama.
harley

Newport, AR

#16637 Oct 13, 2012
Uh no
guest

United States

#16638 Oct 13, 2012
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
The same can be said for President Obama'
In fact, Obama called the assault "an act of terror" in remarks on Sept. 12
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2...
One other thing, no protests or violence about the video that was brought out in JULY actually occurred until AFTER the president and the rest of his crew started shouting about it to the rest of the world.
Disillusioned

Jonesboro, AR

#16639 Oct 13, 2012
guest wrote:
<quoted text>One other thing, no protests or violence about the video that was brought out in JULY actually occurred until AFTER the president and the rest of his crew started shouting about it to the rest of the world.
Most of Obama's claims to fame are tweaked after the fact. I believe that just prior to the election it will be announced that he and Biden, in secret experiments conducted late at night, have created a cure for all illnesses, except for conservatism. Several days after the election it will be announced that the procedure needs further tweaking, that at the present all it will really do is cause acid reflux and that is Bush's fault.
Really

United States

#16640 Oct 13, 2012
Ok no I did not

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#16641 Oct 13, 2012
guest wrote:
<quoted text>One other thing, no protests or violence about the video that was brought out in JULY actually occurred until AFTER the president and the rest of his crew started shouting about it to the rest of the world.
WRONG AGAIN;

Mr. Romney’s team was following the increasingly volatile developments in the Middle East. The embassy statement, issued hours before protests in Cairo and the attack in Libya began, had tried to mollify Muslims upset at an American-made anti-Islam video.“We firmly reject the actions by those who abuse the universal right of free speech to hurt the religious beliefs of others,” the statement said.

Again, the protests had already begun. And, again, the embassy tweeted that it stood by its statement after the attacks were underway.

This came from a Right wing blog...

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#16642 Oct 13, 2012
guest wrote:
<quoted text>Again, your comprehension of the english language is either severely flawed or your just continuing to misrepresent reality. "What" didn't say anything about Obama calling it an act of terror, just that Obama is the one who "hastily, and foolishly to the entire world, said that the attack was because of a YouTube video," and not Romney who was correct about the situation from the beginning. So, no, the same ( as put forth by "What") can not be said of your dear leader, our President Obama.
Romney who was correct about the situation from the beginning"

what world are you living in?

Romney] personally read and approved his campaign’s statement before it was sent out at 10:10 p.m. Tuesday.“It’s disgraceful that the Obama administration’s first response was not to condemn attacks on our diplomatic missions, but to sympathize with those who waged the attacks,” it said…


Those statements even pissed off the Republicans.


Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#16643 Oct 13, 2012
guest wrote:
<quoted text>Again, your comprehension of the english language is either severely flawed or your just continuing to misrepresent reality. "What" didn't say anything about Obama calling it an act of terror, just that Obama is the one who "hastily, and foolishly to the entire world, said that the attack was because of a YouTube video," and not Romney who was correct about the situation from the beginning. So, no, the same ( as put forth by "What") can not be said of your dear leader, our President Obama.
"just that Obama is the one who "hastily, and foolishly to the entire world, said that the attack was because of a YouTube video"

OH Really, I do not see the name Obama in that post, do you?


"Romney's not the one who hastily, and foolishly to the entire world, said that the attack was because of a YouTube video when they knew it wasn't"



Your comprehension skills are that of a clairvoyant.........
Reality Check

Alexander, AR

#16644 Oct 13, 2012
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
I was reminded of Romney shooting off his mouth immediately after the Benghazi attack":
Seest thou a man [that is] hasty in his words?[there is] more hope of a fool than of him."
Proverbs 29:20
You mean these remarks?“It’s disgraceful that the Obama administration’s first response was not to condemn attacks on our diplomatic missions but to sympathize with those who waged the attacks”. Romney's comments weren't shooting off his mouth, they were spot on. I would far rather hear these type of strong and decisive comments immediately following the attacks rather than listen to 2 weeks of lies from the clown and chief we have "leading" our country. Lying is the norm for socialistic liberals so I guess you saw nothing wrong with the 2 week coverup. Besides, if Obama had have taken care of business immediately after the attack then Romney would not have had to call him out.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#16645 Oct 13, 2012
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean these remarks?“It’s disgraceful that the Obama administration’s first response was not to condemn attacks on our diplomatic missions but to sympathize with those who waged the attacks”. Romney's comments weren't shooting off his mouth, they were spot on. I would far rather hear these type of strong and decisive comments immediately following the attacks rather than listen to 2 weeks of lies from the clown and chief we have "leading" our country. Lying is the norm for socialistic liberals so I guess you saw nothing wrong with the 2 week coverup. Besides, if Obama had have taken care of business immediately after the attack then Romney would not have had to call him out.
Romney was running his mouth even before the next of kin of the dead were notified, and was condemned by his own party for his remarks.

And you defend him for that?


Where was the respect for the family of the deceased, Brother Realty Check?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pocahontas Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
taco casa 1 hr Ball sack 13
Mad 4 hr Mad 1
Mikey 5 hr Otnot 14
Bo Shipp 6 hr Bugar thief 24
Dakota jones 6 hr Bugar thief 2
gaye carter 9 hr Watching closely 27
Anyone know that Christine Smith girl that work... 17 hr Curious 1

Pocahontas Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Pocahontas Mortgages