Did you vote today?

Did you vote today?

Created by Rick on Jun 8, 2010

6,407 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

Reality Check

Little Rock, AR

#28881 Jan 27, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you were ignorant to believe what Fox News told you to believe.
And I guess you weren't ignorant to believe what Reuters told you? Care to explain that one?
Tommy2Toes

Shreveport, LA

#28883 Jan 27, 2014
I have traditionally always voted democrat, except I did not vote for Oblamer either time. Well, come voting day I going strictly Republican. Give the republicans a chance to straighten this mess out ( or make it worse) either way, we will have some fresh (crooked) politicians in office.
Andy

Jonesboro, AR

#28884 Jan 27, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Who needs minimum wage when you can work a 40 hour week at Wal-Mart and be eligible for their corporate welfare programs like food stamps and Medicaid.
If only you would work 40 hours a week and were capable of getting a job at Walmart
Andy

Jonesboro, AR

#28885 Jan 27, 2014
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>"my absents "
LMAO! You are the King of Idiots!
absents-PRICELESS!
You couldn't be a king without a kingdom? You wouldn't been a con if your folks had had a condom
try again

Horseshoe Bend, AR

#28886 Jan 27, 2014
Andy wrote:
<quoted text>
You couldn't be a king without a kingdom? You wouldn't been a con if your folks had had a condom
Barney couldn't be a Molester if there weren't any Children.
Citzens of Salem Arkansas watch out for this guy.
Rupert B Jigglebottom

Horseshoe Bend, AR

#28888 Jan 27, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey you know what else....... I don't look a whole Hell of a lot like the former Senator of New York either,...... but there's her picture on my Moniker ..........
But you are The Original Barney , so everyone take a look at this.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Did_barney_molest_l...

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#28890 Jan 27, 2014
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
And I guess you weren't ignorant to believe what Reuters told you? Care to explain that one?
Why not, it goes kind of like this,

Reuters did a story based on a quote by Marilyn Tavenner, administrator of the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

You see not only Reuters carried the story, Fox News, the AP, and least one other broadcast news agency carried the same story, all saying about the same thing, that's a pretty good indication the story was valid.

Secondly, using a Right Wing source usually prevents such ignorant ass questions .

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#28892 Jan 27, 2014
Would you look what come out today, the Senate Republicans unveiled
their big Obamacare alternative ''''''''''

The party of no tax increases has just proposed a healthcare plan that is a defacto tax increase on 150 million Americans. The tax increase comes on top the fact that at least 9.3 million people would lose their health insurance. Even worse, the Republican plan repeals the ACA’s ban on denying coverage due to preexisting conditions. If the Hatch/Burr/Coburn were to become law millions more Americans who have preexisting conditions would either be thrown off of their insurance, or see their rates skyrocket

Republican alternative is to throw tens of millions off their health insurance, and raise taxes on 150 million other Americans.

Hows that obamacare looking to you now?

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#28893 Jan 27, 2014
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
And how much more affordable would the goods we buy be if there weren't the enormous burden both those programs put on our society? Will you ever figure out that the costs of goods will ALWAYS increase more than any additional benefit handed out by these two programs or any other handout program? The additional cost passed from the government to the businesses that are forced to pay them have always and will always have a profit added to them before they are passed on to the consumer resulting in the recipients of entitlement programs paying more for goods they buy than "benefits" they are handed. If you pass the added cost to the workers of companies in the form of taxes then result is the same. Employers will eventually have to raise wages in order for their employees to be able to afford to live. The employers will then see an increase in, not only the amount of payroll, but also the amount of matched taxes (SS, federal withholdings, and Medicare) paid by the employer out of their profits. Guess what happens then. Increase in prices along with profit added to those increases. Again, the "benefit" recipients lose. Unfortunately, there are only a VERY few companies that can afford to absorb those increase in costs without going out of business but they won't. Not understanding how business operates, I can see how you don't understand this but your still wrong

.
You are getting your cart ahead of your horse Hoss '

How much of an economy would we have if you removed all the money from those two programs from the economy.
Reality Check

Lonoke, AR

#28896 Jan 27, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Why not, it goes kind of like this,
Reuters did a story based on a quote by Marilyn Tavenner, administrator of the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
You see not only Reuters carried the story, Fox News, the AP, and least one other broadcast news agency carried the same story, all saying about the same thing, that's a pretty good indication the story was valid.
Secondly, using a Right Wing source usually prevents such ignorant ass questions .
Barney's quote yesterday: "No, you were ignorant to believe what Fox News told you to believe"

Barney's quote today: "You see not only Reuters carried the story, Fox News, the AP, and least one other broadcast news agency carried the same story, all saying about the same thing, that's a pretty good indication the story was valid"

Well what is it Barney? Is Fox News not to be believed or are they reliable? Just like Obama thinking no one will call you out on talking out of both sides of your mouth. It's why liberals like Obama and you have no credibility.
Reality Check

Lonoke, AR

#28897 Jan 27, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
Would you look what come out today, the Senate Republicans unveiled
their big Obamacare alternative ''''''''''
The party of no tax increases has just proposed a healthcare plan that is a defacto tax increase on 150 million Americans. The tax increase comes on top the fact that at least 9.3 million people would lose their health insurance. Even worse, the Republican plan repeals the ACA’s ban on denying coverage due to preexisting conditions. If the Hatch/Burr/Coburn were to become law millions more Americans who have preexisting conditions would either be thrown off of their insurance, or see their rates skyrocket
Republican alternative is to throw tens of millions off their health insurance, and raise taxes on 150 million other Americans.
Hows that obamacare looking to you now?
You mean go back to the more affordable pre-Obama premiums? I'll take it. Do you really think that any program can cover 100% of all Americans? Obamacare should have shown you otherwise since it has added to the already 30 million that were uninsured. So to recap. 9 million uninsured under the Republicans and 36 million headed to over 100 million uninsured under Obamacare. What would you choose? You don't have to answer that.
Reality Check

Lonoke, AR

#28899 Jan 27, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
You are getting your cart ahead of your horse Hoss '
How much of an economy would we have if you removed all the money from those two programs from the economy.
If you remove all the money from government it would have had to stayed with the people so I would say we would have a robust economy.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#28900 Jan 27, 2014
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Barney's quote yesterday: "No, you were ignorant to believe what Fox News told you to believe"
Barney's quote today: "You see not only Reuters carried the story, Fox News, the AP, and least one other broadcast news agency carried the same story, all saying about the same thing, that's a pretty good indication the story was valid"
Well what is it Barney? Is Fox News not to be believed or are they reliable? Just like Obama thinking no one will call you out on talking out of both sides of your mouth. It's why liberals like Obama and you have no credibility
As I said, they reported on the very same quote as everybody else.

Then added their Fox opinion (spin) to the story.

So, Hell No, they are not to be believed.

You see if it was, ONLY Fox that carried the story I would question it, get the idea here, same story, published several different places good chance it is true......... get it?

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#28901 Jan 27, 2014
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean go back to the more affordable pre-Obama premiums? I'll take it. Do you really think that any program can cover 100% of all Americans? Obamacare should have shown you otherwise since it has added to the already 30 million that were uninsured. So to recap. 9 million uninsured under the Republicans and 36 million headed to over 100 million uninsured under Obamacare. What would you choose? You don't have to answer that
LOL, no one ever said it was going to cover " 100% of all Americans"

But Congress has funded Obamacare for 2014, its the law of the land, live with it!

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#28902 Jan 27, 2014
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
If you remove all the money from 100% of all Americans?it would have had to stayed with the people so I would say we would have a robust economy

.
IM a bit confused, do you consider yourself one of the "100% of all Americans" or do you belong to the " the people" ?

Wouldn't " the people" also have to be "100% of all Americans" to create a "robust economy since their the ones with the money?

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#28903 Jan 27, 2014
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>Thanks for AGAIN exposing that LYING HYPOCRITE!

This would be not so obvious if you put a little time in between these straw man post , just 2 min. apart looks a little fishy, different time zones and all, and show up together as regular as
Old Faithful goes off!

“Frankly my dear...”

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

#28904 Jan 28, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Please list the last 3 statements that have been " retracted' by the White House .
I declare, Barney, I do believe your little pea-size mind must have fallen right out of your nose!
Seems like I was reading a story from CNN that there was an Obama uncle facing deportation (among garish behavior very unbecoming to the legacy of one so upstanding) that your hero said he had never met. Well, what do you know, the White House had to RETRACT that statement, because lo and behold, turns out not only did Kenyan Uncle Obama and nephew Obama happen to have crossed paths, the younger Obama had actually lived with his forgotten uncle in the early '80's before attending Harvard.
Now, I'm sure that was an oversight. Why, probably anyone reading this has lived with someone in the past that they have absolutely no memory of knowing. Well, I mean, I haven't ever had it happen, nor do I know anyone that has experienced it, but things are fuzzy up there at the Obama homestead...and that means any homestead Mr. Honest remembers or not.

Then, of course, there are the embarrassing lies and retractions surrounding ObamaCare...YOU WILL KEEP YOUR CURRENT INSURANCE...nope, you weren't really ever going to be able to keep it, but it's too late to do anything about it now...YOU WILL BE ABLE TO KEEP YOUR DOCTOR...haha, not really, but it sure sounded good at the time...

Barney, what an embarrassing question for you to ask! I'm sure glad you only asked for 3...for your sake! There are lots more, but I'm betting you know this already!

“Frankly my dear...”

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

#28905 Jan 28, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
This would be not so obvious if you put a little time in between these straw man post , just 2 min. apart looks a little fishy, different time zones and all, and show up together as regular as
Old Faithful goes off!
Speaking of Old Faithful, this is one of your very few and very predictable safety nets that spews whenever the going gets tough for you. Such typical liberal tactics...same story different day. I can't decide if I'm more bored by your comment or more embarrassed for you not having any more sense that to use it.
Oh fiddle-de-de, I will just think about it tomorrow, after all...tomorrow is another day!
Rupert B Jigglebottom Jr

Mountain Home, AR

#28906 Jan 28, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
This would be not so obvious if you put a little time in between these straw man post , just 2 min. apart looks a little fishy, different time zones and all, and show up together as regular as
Old Faithful goes off!
Barney just is back from his nightly patrol of the Salem Arkansas stockyards where he was sniffing out the Manure in the STRAW. He misses those love goats BIG TIME! His life would be PERFECT if he could save enough money from his fry cook job so he could a fford a pasture to keep some female goats at .
You just got to love it

Mountain Home, AR

#28907 Jan 28, 2014
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Barney's quote yesterday: "No, you were ignorant to believe what Fox News told you to believe"
Barney's quote today: "You see not only Reuters carried the story, Fox News, the AP, and least one other broadcast news agency carried the same story, all saying about the same thing, that's a pretty good indication the story was valid"
Well what is it Barney? Is Fox News not to be believed or are they reliable? Just like Obama thinking no one will call you out on talking out of both sides of your mouth. It's why liberals like Obama and you have no credibility.
You just Gave Old Barney a real case of Butt hurt!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pocahontas Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Unsolved murders in Randolph County (Mar '09) 6 hr Plain 120
taco casa 12 hr lady 14
Mikey 12 hr Greasy 15
Mad Wed Mad 1
Bo Shipp Wed Bugar thief 24
Dakota jones Wed Bugar thief 2
gaye carter Wed Watching closely 27

Pocahontas Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Pocahontas Mortgages