Did you vote today?

Created by Rick on Jun 8, 2010

6,170 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#26676 Sep 5, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
There was no pro or con in that post. Where did you come up with the idea I am for military intervention?
I apologize! You suck so much Obama hose I just assumed you were for attacking Syria. My bad. You are a hard lib to figure out.
Reality Check

Camden, AR

#26677 Sep 5, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>How many years off am I when the Hutu slaughtered the Tutsi to the tune of 1 MILLION deaths when Bill Clinton was in office and you libtards did absolutely nothing? The first black President (LOL!) letting a MILLION blacks be butchered without lifting a finger. Now you idiots want to inject yourself into a civil war in Syria. Which American Hating Terrorist side are you rooting for Barney?
Sadam (notice I used one D as in the one D I use when I call you DUMB ASS) violated 17 resolutions, he gassed his own people, we knew he had gas, a weapon of mass destruction, he sent WMD'S into Syria, maybe that is why we need to go into there. You Democrats are stupid and hypocrites! Tell me again Barney Boy which terrorist group you are backing?
Let's not forget the uprising in Egypt where over 5000 people were killed in one week yet, given our "reaction" to Syria, we were suprisingly silent. Maybe 5000 Egyptian men,women, and children are not as important as 1400 Syrian men, women, and children in our President's eyes. Since this doesn't make any sense, AT ALL, I am guessing that the Obama administration fabricated this response in order to take our eyes off of something else they are doing that will further weaken our naion. What that something is will probably be revealed after it's too late.
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#26678 Sep 5, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
He is already setting up the order of blame if we go in and strike and find no chemical weapons. Just listen to what he says. It's a presidential temper tantrum. It's unbelievable that the world's most powerful leader could be such a self absorbed brat that refuses to take the blame for his actions that he hasn't even taken yet. That tells you (or at least it should) that Obama knows what the outcome will be. So that should raise the question of why are we even consindering going in in the first place? So as much as you would like to take the attention off of your ill-equipped, cowardly, anti-American leader, you can't.
Settle down there Reality Check. Barney is not about to be dragged into this mess. He is a good lib, he won't take responsibility or a side until after things are over and history has been written. All good libs are never wrong because they wait for the outcome and are able to say "I told you so!" Obama has blamed everybody he can for this mess just like little Barney always does. We will hear from Boy Barney as soon as msnbc comes up with their talking points about this mess!

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#26679 Sep 5, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>So you are for this attack now? I am starting to like Obama. He is a killing machine. He has killed at least 200 children with his drones and he indiscriminately kills people all over the world. This guy is on FIRE! Don't you cross a red line he puts down or else you will feel his democrat wrath! I don't know why he doesn't release those in GITMO and then close the place down he could drop a missile on them with a drone easy. Obama is a KILLING MACHINE!
One could only assume you love G W Bush then, bad part about that 4,448 of the dead were American soldiers. 4,347 of them after,

.........."Mission Accomplished"..........

Over 115,000 Iraq civilian deaths, but Hell they were just Muslims like the president, so who gives a big rat's ass, right.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#26680 Sep 5, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's not forget the uprising in Egypt where over 5000 people were killed in one week yet, given our "reaction" to Syria, we were suprisingly silent. Maybe 5000 Egyptian men,women, and children are not as important as 1400 Syrian men, women, and children in our President's eyes. Since this doesn't make any sense, AT ALL, I am guessing that the Obama administration fabricated this response in order to take our eyes off of something else they are doing that will further weaken our naion. What that something is will probably be revealed after it's too late.
Were any of those 5000 Egyptians killed by banned chemical weapons?
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#26681 Sep 5, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
One could only assume you love G W Bush then, bad part about that 4,448 of the dead were American soldiers. 4,347 of them after,
.........."Mission Accomplished"..........
Over 115,000 Iraq civilian deaths, but Hell they were just Muslims like the president, so who gives a big rat's ass, right.
Bravo Boy Barney, spot on! It wasn't like it was 1 MILLION BLACKS being slaughtered in RWANDA when Clinton was in office now was it! But of course it wasn't gas, it wasn't an important country to the U.S and they were BLACK! Oh and there was no red line crossed. What an idiot for a President this country has!

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#26682 Sep 5, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>I apologize! You suck so much Obama hose I just assumed you were for attacking Syria. My bad. You are a hard lib to figure out.
Your bad was assuming.

Evidently you did not understand, I did not say I was against it - or for it.

Damn boy, straighten up, an act right.

Come to think of it, you are acting like a Right wing fanatic.
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#26683 Sep 5, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's not forget the uprising in Egypt where over 5000 people were killed in one week yet, given our "reaction" to Syria, we were suprisingly silent. Maybe 5000 Egyptian men,women, and children are not as important as 1400 Syrian men, women, and children in our President's eyes. Since this doesn't make any sense, AT ALL, I am guessing that the Obama administration fabricated this response in order to take our eyes off of something else they are doing that will further weaken our naion. What that something is will probably be revealed after it's too late.
Don't forget Obama and Hillary are responsible for 4 American deaths in Benghazi and 2 American deaths for Operation Fast and Furious!
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#26684 Sep 5, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Were any of those 5000 Egyptians killed by banned chemical weapons?
Does it matter to you in the manner one is murdered? Of course it matters to libs, that's why you libs and Clinton didn't stop the MILLION men, women and children being massacred in RWANDA! No gas, no problem! LIBS are PATHETIC!
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#26685 Sep 5, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Your bad was assuming.
Evidently you did not understand, I did not say I was against it - or for it.
Damn boy, straighten up, an act right.
Come to think of it, you are acting like a Right wing fanatic.
Well Boy Barney which is it? Are you for it or against it?
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#26687 Sep 5, 2013
This dumb President vowed to bring the troops home tomorrow yet he is proposing starting a war in Syria. You just can't make this stuff up folks!

He says he didn't set the red line the world set the red line, yet nobody in the entire world is backing this idiot President up!

What a disaster Obama is not only to America but to the entire world.

This idiot should give back his Nobel Peace Prize!

LMAO!
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#26688 Sep 5, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Your bad was assuming.
Evidently you did not understand, I did not say I was against it - or for it.
Damn boy, straighten up, an act right.
Come to think of it, you are acting like a Right wing fanatic.
Reality Check

Camden, AR

#26689 Sep 5, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Were any of those 5000 Egyptians killed by banned chemical weapons?
Are they any less dead? Does their families and friends miss them any less? Are their lives somehow less valueable since they died via beating, shooting, hacking or bludgeoning to death with various objects? Are you really going to make that argument?
Reality Check

Camden, AR

#26690 Sep 5, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>Don't forget Obama and Hillary are responsible for 4 American deaths in Benghazi and 2 American deaths for Operation Fast and Furious!
NO, NO, NO!!! Secretary of State Kerry said that doesn't matter anymore since this has come up and Hillary said "what does it matter who's fault it is at this point". That means we should just praise Obama for how great he handled the whole situation. After all, there was an arrest made in the case, right? It doesn't matter that the film maker had nothing to do with anything. There was a crime and there was an arrest. Case closed.
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#26691 Sep 5, 2013
Idiot Obama has us on the brink of Nuclear War! It's right here in black and white. You people who voted for him are stupid!

http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/09/05/rus...

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#26692 Sep 5, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Are they any less dead? Does their families and friends miss them any less? Are their lives somehow less valueable since they died via beating, shooting, hacking or bludgeoning to death with various objects? Are you really going to make that argument?
You have a talent to simplify a topic, to expect any more from a conservative is an exercise in futility any way.

To answer your question, I would say "dead" is 'dead', but I have never died that I know of, so I cannot say for sure.

Let me put you back on track here, I was alluding to the Geneva Conventions, particularly the Second Hague Conference of 1907, and the prohibited use of bio–chemical warfare .

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#26693 Sep 5, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>Does it matter to you in the manner one is murdered? Of course it matters to libs, that's why you libs and Clinton didn't stop the MILLION men, women and children being massacred in RWANDA! No gas, no problem! LIBS are PATHETIC!
In 1994 the Democrats were the minority in both houses, why did the Republicans not do anything?


Like I said, lets get back on topic again. There has been genocide in this world since history has been recorded. The point, using gas was a violation of the Geneva Conventions.

To say its just two civil wars, what is the difference, is just plain ignorance and desperation to act like you have a clue.
Reality Check

Lonoke, AR

#26694 Sep 5, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
You have a talent to simplify a topic, to expect any more from a conservative is an exercise in futility any way.
To answer your question, I would say "dead" is 'dead', but I have never died that I know of, so I cannot say for sure.
Let me put you back on track here, I was alluding to the Geneva Conventions, particularly the Second Hague Conference of 1907, and the prohibited use of bio–chemical warfare .
So what you are saying is that if there is no international law prohibiting a specific method a dictator might use to exterminate his opposition then that method is ok no matter how many innocent people die? I don't know why I'm surprised, progressive liberals have condoned the murder of innocent children in a mother's womb for no better reason than the child is "out of sight, out of mind". Why wouldn't you support the extermination of innocent and helpless citizens of a dictator as long as chemical weapons weren't used. And you guys get mad at conservatives and Republicans for wanting to cut entitlements. Your argument? That cutting entitlements will kill women and children but you actually condone it. You should be proud.
Reality Check

Lonoke, AR

#26695 Sep 5, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
In 1994 the Democrats were the minority in both houses, why did the Republicans not do anything?
Classic. You have told me on countless occasions that just because the Democrats have control of 2/3 of our government that it doesn't mean they can get anything done because of the apparent power of the 1/3. But when it's Republicans that have the 2/3 you question why they couldn't get anything done with that much power. Following your leader I see. One year ago Obama said that if any dictator uses chemical weapons against his people, that was HIS red line. Now that they have allegedly been used, he says "it's not my red line, it's the world's red line". It would be funny if it weren't true.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#26696 Sep 5, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
So what you are saying is that if there is no international law prohibiting a specific method a dictator might use to exterminate his opposition then that method is ok no matter how many innocent people die? I don't know why I'm surprised, progressive liberals have condoned the murder of innocent children in a mother's womb for no better reason than the child is "out of sight, out of mind". Why wouldn't you support the extermination of innocent and helpless citizens of a dictator as long as chemical weapons weren't used. And you guys get mad at conservatives and Republicans for wanting to cut entitlements. Your argument? That cutting entitlements will kill women and children but you actually condone it. You should be proud.
My God man, have you been siting there all night hitting that refresh button waiting on me?

Now if you want to think that is what my post said, all I can tell you is, I hope that silly notion brings you cheer.

Since you are so keen on remembering what I say, I am sure you have seen me say, I am not pro abortion, and if a woman who exercises her right to free choice, that is between here and her maker.

Pitiful how you have twist another's words, or lets just call it what it really is, lying, to appease your self.

Seriously, get some help.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pocahontas Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Topix mother fu€kers 2 hr Wendy 1
Winter storm 4 hr guest 7
The end 4 hr guest 6
i heard u fart in church 4 hr sister b 18
Ola amigos 5 hr agree 5
Prichard furniture 8 hr Tamatha 4
Chase Cissell 11 hr Disgusted 4
Pocahontas Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Pocahontas People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 5:36 pm PST

Yahoo! Sports 5:36PM
Falcons release veteran running back Steven Jackson
Bleacher Report 8:55 PM
St. Louis Rams: 5 Best Options to Replace Joe Barksdale This Offseason
Bleacher Report 4:00 AM
Why the Browns Need to Stay Far Away from Bradford
NFL 7:00 AM
Weinke makes a Luck-Bradford collegiate comparison
Bleacher Report 9:58 AM
Vince Young Registered at NFL Vet Combine