Did you vote today?

Created by Rick on Jun 8, 2010

6,111 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

Reality Check

Lonoke, AR

#26419 Aug 18, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
I did not take you to be very old, and often wonder where you come up with the crap you do. I just found my answer to that, you are just a damn good student.
United States History Heritage of Freedom in Christian Perspective,
In the "Christian Perspective" history books, it describes President Roosevelt's presidency has one that was totally failed. They talk about how President Roosevelt tried to strip away the freedom of the American people and fully take over the country using the government. Unions are destroyed by the author and are the main reason given for jobs being sent to other countries. It continues on about how the "free market" is one of the greatest aspects of America and how government needs to stay completely out of private business. They also talk about the presidency of George W. Bush and how he kept America safe and strong after the attacks of 9/11. Any history book that speaks negatively about one of the greatest presidents America has ever had, Franklin Roosevelt, and speaks fondly about President W. Bush when he is universally accepted as one of the worst, is a book that needs to be removed from all classrooms.
http://www.examiner.com/article/how-the-relig...
The only Christian book I care about is the Holy Bible. I have no idea where the rest of that post came from. Do you really have to understand where I come from? All you need to know is why you keep ending up on the losing side of every argument. More importantly, why you keep thinking your right. For someone who doesn't want to talk about the Bible you sure have been doing a lot of it lately. Why is that?
Reality Check

Lonoke, AR

#26420 Aug 18, 2013
Oneford wrote:
<quoted text>
LMFAO, When Barney makes it back from the back nine I will tell *** that *** fan club is getting impatient waiting on *** return.
Foot Note:
***-Thought I better not reveal Barney's gender.
Barney can be just as wrong as a male or a female. It doesn't matter. It's good to know that Barney has someone looking out for him/her.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#26424 Aug 19, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
The only Christian book I care about is the Holy Bible. I have no idea where the rest of that post came from. Do you really have to understand where I come from? All you need to know is why you keep ending up on the losing side of every argument. More importantly, why you keep thinking your right. For someone who doesn't want to talk about the Bible you sure have been doing a lot of it lately. Why is that?

Dear boy you are a legend in your own mine, let me refresh your memory, Redd was the one who told you he did not care to discuss religion. And you are being naïve thinking you do not tow the line on the "Christian Perspective". BTW, there is clearly a separation of church in State in the Constitution, However God is not mention in the Constitution.
Nope

North Little Rock, AR

#26425 Aug 19, 2013
Disagree
Reality Check

Lonoke, AR

#26426 Aug 19, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Dear boy you are a legend in your own mine, let me refresh your memory, Redd was the one who told you he did not care to discuss religion. And you are being naïve thinking you do not tow the line on the "Christian Perspective". BTW, there is clearly a separation of church in State in the Constitution, However God is not mention in the Constitution.
Then why did I tell you that I wouldn't speak about it unless you brought it up? True, but to deny that the Constitution was inspired by God's Word would be a lie and you know it no matter how much you try to deny it.
Ima Rite

Conway, AR

#26427 Aug 19, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Dear boy you are a legend in your own mine, let me refresh your memory, Redd was the one who told you he did not care to discuss religion. And you are being naïve thinking you do not tow the line on the "Christian Perspective". BTW, there is clearly a separation of church in State in the Constitution, However God is not mention in the Constitution.
This post is one of countless others as to why Barney should avoid calling others out on grammatical errors, or confusing words.
The entire post, in the context it was written of course, is the usual load of cock and bull insanity!!
Almost as insane as the link he provided of Nancy Pelosi...and all for the purpose of adding credence to his argument! If anything might cause me to roll around on the floor, laughing like a 'Barney' it would be that parallel! However, it was so pathetic, any humor I briefly felt, quickly faded.

BTW, if separation were as clear in the Constitution as you bellow, then who was/is more confused by its clarity...?
Would it be more clear or more confusing to those that wrote it, believed in it, accepted it, and for years incorporated both church and state in many matters...not only matters of church but also matters of state, with little controversy...

Or would today's society (such as yourself) be the confused, or have the better vision?
That would be Today's society of angry, bitter, divided politics. A society that choses to fight over the ridiculous, be controversial at every turn, and fight to change the original context of the Constitution that lead to the success of this nation, by instead, inferring what the writers of the Constitution must have meant couldn't possibly be what they actually documented and signed, and must be changed...thus causing utter chaos, rebellion, and lack of confidence in the very laws that have governed our nation, since the beginning of our nation.

Which, of the two, might see things more clearly?

Clearly, Barney will never be able to grasp a word of this post, and will no doubt, infer his own wrong twist into it, but that's fine, Barney. We are all popping some popcorn, and are anticipating a real comedic post from you soon...You won't intend for it to be comedic...but therein lies the comedy!

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#26432 Aug 20, 2013
Ima Rite wrote:
<quoted text>
BTW, if separation were as clear in the Constitution as you bellow, then who was/is more confused by its clarity...?
Would it be more clear or more confusing to those that wrote it, believed in it, accepted it, and for years incorporated both church and state in many matters...not only matters of church but also matters of state, with little controversy...
Or would today's society (such as yourself) be the confused, or have the better vision?
If you can dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with Bullshit Cupcake.

Because Religion be exempt from the authority of the Society at large, still less can it be subject to that of the Legislative Body. The latter are but the creatures and vicegerents of the former. Their jurisdiction is both derivative and limited: it is limited with regard to the co-ordinate departments, more necessarily is it limited with regard to the constituents. The preservation of a free Government requires not merely, that the metes and bounds which separate each department of power be invariably maintained; but more especially that neither of them be suffered to overleap the great Barrier which defends the rights of the people. The Rulers who are guilty of such an encroachment, exceed the commission from which they derive their authority, and are Tyrants. The People who submit to it are governed by laws made neither by themselves nor by an authority derived from them, and are slaves.

James Madison

James Madison is hailed as the “Father of the Constitution” for being instrumental in the drafting of the United States Constitution and as the key champion and author of the United States Bill of Rights

Madison was an avid reader of English deist tracts

However, some scholars say he leaned toward deism,[16][17] while others categorize him as such.

[1]^ a b The religion of James Madison retrieved 9 April 2013

[16] Bruce Miroff et al.(2011). Debating Democracy: A Reader in American Politics

[17] Michael Corbett (2013). Politics and Religion in the United States
SamBo

Ash Flat, AR

#26433 Aug 20, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Dear boy you are a legend in your own mine, let me refresh your memory, Redd was the one who told you he did not care to discuss religion. And you are being naïve thinking you do not tow the line on the "Christian Perspective". BTW, there is clearly a separation of church in State in the Constitution, However God is not mention in the Constitution.
The Black Bra (as told by a woman)

I had lunch with 2 of my unmarried friends.

One is engaged, one is a mistress, and I have been married for 20+ years.

We were chatting about our relationships and decided to amaze our men by greeting them at the door wearing a black bra, stiletto heels and a mask over our eyes. We agreed to meet in a few days to exchange notes.

Here's how it all went.

My engaged friend:
The other night when my boyfriend came over he found me with a black leather bodice, tall stilettos and a mask. He saw me and said,'You are the woman of my dreams...I love you.' Then we made passionate love all night long.

The mistress:
Me too! The other night I met my lover at his office and I was wearing a raincoat, under it only the black bra, heels and mask over my eyes. When I opened the raincoat he didn't say a word, but he started to tremble and we had wild sex all night.

Then I had to share my story:
When my husband came home I was wearing the black bra, black stockings, stilettos and a mask over my eyes. When he came in the door and saw me he said,

(you are going to love this..)























" What's for dinner, Zorro?"


Reality Check

Camden, AR

#26434 Aug 20, 2013
Liberals turning on their own. Maureen Down wrote an article in the NY Times that just undressed the Clinton's. Basically, it appears as though it's akin to the character assassination that was effectively used on Romney during the 2012 elections. We will have to see if this is an isolated incident or if this is the beginning of the process to have someone elected from the Democratic side that is more in line with Obama's current America-killing agenda than Hillary Clinton. We all know how the Obama's and Clinton's feel about each other. You can read the article at http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/18/opinion/sun... .
Reality Check

Camden, AR

#26435 Aug 20, 2013
Liberals are killing our schools. I found an article on The Blaze where the Illinois school district is allowing kids to get math problems wrong as long as they can explain how they arrived at the answer. The video shows a representative explaining that a child can say that 3 times 4 equals 11 as long as they can explain how they arrived at the answer. You can read the article and watch the video at
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/08/19/ru...

Barney, you should be proud of you side for this one. With this type of leadership for our failing public schools we should be back atop the world academic standings in no time.
redneck

Jonesboro, AR

#26436 Aug 20, 2013
You people are trying to empress each other with your word vocabulary, and it makes it hard for us rednecks to understand.
whowhoimanowl

Tampa, FL

#26437 Aug 20, 2013
Why is this thread so active?
guest

Oklahoma City, OK

#26438 Aug 20, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
Liberals are killing our schools. I found an article on The Blaze where the Illinois school district is allowing kids to get math problems wrong as long as they can explain how they arrived at the answer. The video shows a representative explaining that a child can say that 3 times 4 equals 11 as long as they can explain how they arrived at the answer. You can read the article and watch the video at
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/08/19/ru...

Barney, you should be proud of you side for this one. With this type of leadership for our failing public schools we should be back atop the world academic standings in no time.
As opposed to conservatives who would like "God" to be interjected into the curriculum. Yeah, that should rocket us (pun intended) ahead in science globally.
SamBo

Ash Flat, AR

#26439 Aug 20, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
If you can dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with Bullshit Cupcake.
Because Religion be exempt from the authority of the Society at large, still less can it be subject to that of the Legislative Body. The latter are but the creatures and vicegerents of the former. Their jurisdiction is both derivative and limited: it is limited with regard to the co-ordinate departments, more necessarily is it limited with regard to the constituents. The preservation of a free Government requires not merely, that the metes and bounds which separate each department of power be invariably maintained; but more especially that neither of them be suffered to overleap the great Barrier which defends the rights of the people. The Rulers who are guilty of such an encroachment, exceed the commission from which they derive their authority, and are Tyrants. The People who submit to it are governed by laws made neither by themselves nor by an authority derived from them, and are slaves.
James Madison
James Madison is hailed as the “Father of the Constitution” for being instrumental in the drafting of the United States Constitution and as the key champion and author of the United States Bill of Rights
Madison was an avid reader of English deist tracts
However, some scholars say he leaned toward deism,[16][17] while others categorize him as such.
[1]^ a b The religion of James Madison retrieved 9 April 2013
[16] Bruce Miroff et al.(2011). Debating Democracy: A Reader in American Politics
[17] Michael Corbett (2013). Politics and Religion in the United States
What Are Castings?
As earthworms eat, they excrete tiny pellets called castings. The castings are water-soluble plant food that is easily available to the plant when the plant needs it, both immediately and long-term. Besides being rich in nitrogen, phosphorus, calcium and potassium, earthworm castings also balance the pH, help retain moisture, improve drainage, and aerate the soil.
PROUD ATHEIST

Magnolia, AR

#26440 Aug 20, 2013
HA HA HA atheists are smarter than religious people that's a no brainer DUH!!!!!!!!!!
Reality Check

Camden, AR

#26441 Aug 20, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>
As opposed to conservatives who would like "God" to be interjected into the curriculum. Yeah, that should rocket us (pun intended) ahead in science globally.
Are you ok with what was said in that article? I hope not. Or, are you like Barney? When the liberal way shows it's inevitable failure, Barney will blame God, Bush, conservatives, or whoever is closest. Under no circumstances will Barney admit failure of his beloved liberalism.
hmmm

United States

#26442 Aug 20, 2013
This must be the looney convention thread!

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#26443 Aug 20, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
Liberals turning on their own. Maureen Down wrote an article in the NY Times that just undressed the Clinton's. Basically, it appears as though it's akin to the character assassination that was effectively used on Romney during the 2012 elections. We will have to see if this is an isolated incident or if this is the beginning of the process to have someone elected from the Democratic side that is more in line with Obama's current America-killing agenda than Hillary Clinton. We all know how the Obama's and Clinton's feel about each other. You can read the article at http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/18/opinion/sun... .
"Maureen Down" ?

How About
Maureen Dowd

The Maureen Dowd
who won a Pulitzer Prize for her series of columns on the Monica Lewinsky scandal in the Clinton administration.

This is a passage from a Right Wing Blog about Maureen Dowd, funny how you guys hate her till you decide to like her..........

"Conservatives rightly disdain Maureen Dowd as the New York Times’s queen of snark, a writer whose work has long become the byword for pointless nastiness and deeply unserious takes on the news of the day that gives a bad name to political hatchet work. Yet, harking back to her salad days in the 1990s when she earned a reputation as the rare liberal who was willing to challenge Bill Clinton’s cult of personality

www.commentarymagazine.com/.../a-crack-in-the... ;

by Jonathan TobinMay 12, 2013 - Conservatives rightly disdain Maureen Dowd as the New York Times's queen of snark, a writer whose work has long become the byword for ...
Reality Check

Camden, AR

#26444 Aug 20, 2013
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/08/20/mi...

Need I say more? Thanks liberal progressive indoctrination institutions aka public school systems. And liberals are supposed to fight for women and children's rights. Where was the 8th grader's rights? And people wonder why parents are pulling their children out of our public shcool systems.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#26445 Aug 20, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
Liberals are killing our schools. I found an article on The Blaze where the Illinois school district is allowing kids to get math problems wrong as long as they can explain how they arrived at the answer. The video shows a representative explaining that a child can say that 3 times 4 equals 11 as long as they can explain how they arrived at the answer. You can read the article and watch the video at
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/08/19/ru...
Barney, you should be proud of you side for this one. With this type of leadership for our failing public schools we should be back atop the world academic standings in no time.
I respect you for stating the THE BLAZE was your source for the article. As you notice the story started off asking a question three fourths of the way through it tells you the answer, it is no.
So in the end, they have a benign puff piece, that says absolutely nothing.

But when you take FOX REJECT, GLEN BECK, and try and turn that into a silk purse,

all as I can say is,

good luck.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pocahontas Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Do the theatre still have good shows? 7 hr The truth 6
Cheating (Aug '12) 7 hr set the record st... 48
Work needed for Christmas 8 hr Rent Money 17
begger 8 hr saulman 4
County cops VS city cops (Nov '09) 8 hr guest 30
Kyle ford (Nov '12) 9 hr Curious 21
I must be obsolete 14 hr old guy 3
Pocahontas Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Pocahontas People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Pocahontas News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Pocahontas

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 11:06 pm PST

Yahoo! Sports11:06PM
Long Todman run helps Jaguars take down Titans
Bleacher Report 4:00 AM
NFL Power Rankings Post TNF
Bleacher Report 5:00 AM
Full AFC, NFC Playoff Outlook, Week 16 Predictions
NBC Sports 6:35 AM
Whitehurst: May not look like it, but we can win
NBC Sports 3:14 PM
Losers of 13 of 14, Titans set for top draft pick - NBC Sports