The revenue would come from EVERYBODY paying their "fair share" and not just half the country. No double taxation needed.<quoted text>You are still missing the whole point. So what you are saying is you would not tax corporations anything correct? Then where would revenue to build the roads and bridges come from then to go to work at these corporations?
I only mentioned China because they were one of the first to corner a large sector of foreign made goods. Again, NAFTA would have had no relevence if the American consumer would have refused to buy foreign made products. You may not like it but it IS price that is king to the American consumer. No patriotism goes into purchasing decisions for at least 95% of American consumers. I blame the consumer for the dominance of foreign products in our country. The same people that only price shop are the same people that are complaining that everything we buy comes from overseas yet they want to take no responsibility for their part in the problem. It's always NAFTA's fault. You say CEO's are rewarded for the job's they do. Do you think most CEO's are overcompensated? I can assure you that the CEO's of a company have to have far more intellect and skill about the company they run than all of the people under them combined. All taxes in this country come from the corporate level which pay their workers who pay income taxes or from government that pays it's workers that pay their income taxes. So your point about personal taxes paying for welfare is a mute point. You do realize that a reduction in business doesn't mean they are failing don't you? No, wait, you keep going to that well so obviously you don't know that and apparantly don't want to know it. Ignorance is bliss. Please fill me in on your business experience. I really am curious to know how much business knowlege you actually have because what you have been posting shows you have none.