Did you vote today?

Did you vote today?

Created by Rick on Jun 8, 2010

6,304 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#24558 Apr 18, 2013
what wrote:
<quoted text>You're right. The senators who supported this bill that would not have stopped the Newtown tragedy should be ashamed of themselves for exploiting those people for their own selfish reasons. The president should be just as ashamed for using the Newtown people as
and then lying about it yesterday.
I will be blunt with you sir, the rhetoric you just put forth is nothing less than what you have heard from Rush, Fox News and other extreme right wing pundits.

What you should know is those people make millions off the likes of people like you who buy their crap, and laugh all the way to the bank.

Your ignorance is not making you a dime, lets just hope it doesn't cost you or a love one your life.

What if that love one was your voice because you are in the grave and cannot speak.

Would you call your loved one a "human shield", because they chose to speak out on your behalf?

what

Dallas, TX

#24559 Apr 18, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
I will be blunt with you sir, the rhetoric you just put forth is nothing less than what you have heard from Rush, Fox News and other extreme right wing pundits.
What you should know is those people make millions off the likes of people like you who buy their crap, and laugh all the way to the bank.
Your ignorance is not making you a dime, lets just hope it doesn't cost you or a love one your life.
What if that love one was your voice because you are in the grave and cannot speak.
Would you call your loved one a "human shield", because they chose to speak out on your behalf?
If it's rhetoric, then prove how a background check would have kept those kids and teachers alive? The President wasn't mad because her cares about kids, he was mad because he knew the bill would not pass. Only he thought it would be killed in the house and not by his own party in the senate. Now he can't truthfuly blame republicans and all of his lies and exploitations have gone to waste.

It's always amusing to see you react when you are brought face to face with your lies.
what

Dallas, TX

#24560 Apr 18, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
I will be blunt with you sir, the rhetoric you just put forth is nothing less than what you have heard from Rush, Fox News and other extreme right wing pundits.
What you should know is those people make millions off the likes of people like you who buy their crap, and laugh all the way to the bank.
Your ignorance is not making you a dime, lets just hope it doesn't cost you or a love one your life.
What if that love one was your voice because you are in the grave and cannot speak.
Would you call your loved one a "human shield", because they chose to speak out on your behalf?
One more thing; You can count yourself as one of those who should be ashamed of adding to the exploitation of human suffering.
OMG

Malden, MO

#24561 Apr 18, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
I will be blunt with you sir, the rhetoric you just put forth is nothing less than what you have heard from Rush, Fox News and other extreme right wing pundits.
What you should know is those people make millions off the likes of people like you who buy their crap, and laugh all the way to the bank.
Your ignorance is not making you a dime, lets just hope it doesn't cost you or a love one your life.
What if that love one was your voice because you are in the grave and cannot speak.
Would you call your loved one a "human shield", because they chose to speak out on your behalf?
At first I thought you nothing more than a pathetic attempt at a internet troll due to the obvious ignorance spewed forth, however, after further investigation, I believe you honestly think this way and believe the stupidity coming out of your own mouth. You and your liberal counterparts really need help. You realize that right?
what

Dallas, TX

#24562 Apr 18, 2013
OMG wrote:
<quoted text>
At first I thought you nothing more than a pathetic attempt at a internet troll due to the obvious ignorance spewed forth, however, after further investigation, I believe you honestly think this way and believe the stupidity coming out of your own mouth. You and your liberal counterparts really need help. You realize that right?
You are right on both fronts.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#24563 Apr 18, 2013
what wrote:
<quoted text>If it's rhetoric, then prove how a background check would have kept those kids and teachers alive? The President wasn't mad because her cares about kids, he was mad because he knew the bill would not pass. Only he thought it would be killed in the house and not by his own party in the senate. Now he can't truthfuly blame republicans and all of his lies and exploitations have gone to waste.
It's always amusing to see you react when you are brought face to face with your lies.
No One has ever said background checks could have prevented the tragedy at Sandy Hook, NO ONE has ever said that background checks would put an end to mass killings.

"The President wasn't mad because her cares about kids"

BTW-IDIOT "her" is a he.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#24564 Apr 18, 2013
OMG wrote:
<quoted text>
At first I thought you nothing more than a pathetic attempt at a internet troll due to the obvious ignorance spewed forth, however, after further investigation, I believe you honestly think this way and believe the stupidity coming out of your own mouth. You and your liberal counterparts really need help. You realize that right?
What I do realize is how cowards like you , find it so much easier to wage a personal attack against those whose political beliefs differ from your own.

That you find it unfeasible that anyone would think differently.

You find that it is easier, than to defend the actions and principals of your party.



That is what I realize about the right wing Topix participants like you.
WARRIOR

Washington, DC

#24565 Apr 18, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
I will be blunt with you sir, the rhetoric you just put forth is nothing less than what you have heard from Rush, Fox News and other extreme right wing pundits.
What you should know is those people make millions off the likes of people like you who buy their crap, and laugh all the way to the bank.
Your ignorance is not making you a dime, lets just hope it doesn't cost you or a love one your life.
What if that love one was your voice because you are in the grave and cannot speak.
Would you call your loved one a "human shield", because they chose to speak out on your behalf?
Wait a minute idiot, for you to know what Rush, Fox news and other extreme right wing pundits say you would have to patronize them. So you watch them or you listen to them right Barney? So you help these people you so despise make millions and become number one in their field correct Barny? So you are no better than the people you rail against correct? If you do not support those right wingers you just mentioned than you know absolutely nothing about what they are saying or what they mean with what they say so this would make you a liar.

Which is it Barney do you patronize the right wing shows you rail against and help make them millions, rich and number one or are you a liar?
OMG

Malden, MO

#24566 Apr 18, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
What I do realize is how cowards like you , find it so much easier to wage a personal attack against those whose political beliefs differ from your own.
That you find it unfeasible that anyone would think differently.
You find that it is easier, than to defend the actions and principals of your party.
That is what I realize about the right wing Topix participants like you.
Again with more idiocricy spewing forth from that mouth. First off, thank you for proving my point about the vile and absolute lack of knowledge that comes from liberals. Second off, in the last 6 Presidential elections I have voted Republican 4 times, and Democrat twice. Hence the title independent, which is exactly what I am. I am neither right wing nor left wing, I am an American and right down the middle, and I absolutely despise earthworm mentality twits like yourself that try to use insults, racism, and fear mongering to further your liberal fantasy land agendas. You sir, are an idiot...end of story.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#24567 Apr 18, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>Wait a minute idiot, for you to know what Rush, Fox news and other extreme right wing pundits say you would have to patronize them. So you watch them or you listen to them right Barney? So you help these people you so despise make millions and become number one in their field correct Barny? So you are no better than the people you rail against correct? If you do not support those right wingers you just mentioned than you know absolutely nothing about what they are saying or what they mean with what they say so this would make you a liar.
Which is it Barney do you patronize the right wing shows you rail against and help make them millions, rich and number one or are you a liar?
Let's put all your other BS to aside for a moment and let me explain something to you.

No matter if it is I, you, Rush or any one else, we all put our pants on one leg at a time, no one of us is any better than the other.

For you to say I think other wise is incorrect,

you are simply depicting your own narrow minded beliefs.

BTW, the rest of that post is ridiculous as well.


Reality Check

Lonoke, AR

#24568 Apr 18, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
Senators, Republican and Democrat should be ashamed of them selves.
A bi-partisan bill with 90% public approval polling.
What the Hell were they thinking?
They were elected by the people not the NRA.
Sens. Manchin and Toomey struck a compromise deal on background checks to cover all gun-show and online sales of firearms (excepting for family transfers). But after that agreement -- and after the two senators thought they had the NRA's tacit agreement not to oppose their amendment -- the gun-rights organization pulled its trigger by releasing a letter opposing the amendment and suggesting it would score the vote. After that NRA opposition, any momentum the Manchin-Toomey amendment had stopped. In fact, a number of red-state Democrats and fence-sitting Republicans later opposed the compromise measure. Further demonstrating the NRAs power on Wednesday, a pro-gun-rights amendment to enable those with concealed-weapons permit to carry guns across state lines (even in states where that action isnt legal) garnered more votes (57) than the Manchin-Toomey measure (54). This fact perhaps tells the story of the gun debate better than any other.
Here's a thought. Maybe, just maybe there isn't any correlation between LEGAL gun ownership and gun crimes. And maybe, just maybe there IS a direct correlation between ILLEGAL gun ownership and gun crimes. And maybe, just maybe the NRA knew this and they also probably knew this new law was more about power and the ability of the government to gain more control over our citizens than anything else. Just a thought.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#24569 Apr 18, 2013
OMG wrote:
<quoted text>
Again with more idiocricy spewing forth from that mouth. First off, thank you for proving my point about the vile and absolute lack of knowledge that comes from liberals. Second off, in the last 6 Presidential elections I have voted Republican 4 times, and Democrat twice. Hence the title independent, which is exactly what I am. I am neither right wing nor left wing, I am an American and right down the middle, and I absolutely despise earthworm mentality twits like yourself that try to use insults, racism, and fear mongering to further your liberal fantasy land agendas. You sir, are an idiot...end of story.
Tell me, in your opinion, what makes you think the above post (yours) is not a perfect example of what I said in the very post you issued this rebuttal to?
guest

Forrest City, AR

#24570 Apr 18, 2013
why is anyone still posting on this post. This is so stupid. ost like this needs to die away
WARRIOR

Washington, DC

#24571 Apr 18, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's put all your other BS to aside for a moment and let me explain something to you.
No matter if it is I, you, Rush or any one else, we all put our pants on one leg at a time, no one of us is any better than the other.
For you to say I think other wise is incorrect,
you are simply depicting your own narrow minded beliefs.
BTW, the rest of that post is ridiculous as well.
So which is it Barney, do you watch Fox and listen to Rush or are you a LIAR? It has to be one or the other..
guest

Searcy, AR

#24572 Apr 18, 2013
Joining in late, so what are you ladies raggin about?

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#24573 Apr 18, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>So which is it Barney, do you watch Fox and listen to Rush or are you a LIAR? It has to be one or the other..
NO it does not have to be, "one or the other", there is copious other outlets, TV, print, and internet quoting those of I which I spoke.

To say you have to watch them to know what they are saying is being very nave or more likely in your case, just plain stupid.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#24574 Apr 18, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's a thought. Maybe, just maybe there isn't any correlation between LEGAL gun ownership and gun crimes. And maybe, just maybe there IS a direct correlation between ILLEGAL gun ownership and gun crimes. And maybe, just maybe the NRA knew this and they also probably knew this new law was more about power and the ability of the government to gain more control over our citizens than anything else. Just a thought.
Maybe the NRA is a lobbying group for gun manufactures.

Jared Lee Loughner and Colorado theater shooter James Holmes and the Jonesboro Ark, school shooters, Lee Harvey Oswald all had legal guns.

Just a thought.
Post Turtle

Salem, AR

#24576 Apr 19, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe the NRA is a lobbying group for gun manufactures.
Jared Lee Loughner and Colorado theater shooter James Holmes and the Jonesboro Ark, school shooters, Lee Harvey Oswald all had legal guns.
Just a thought.
How do you know?
guest

Jonesboro, AR

#24577 Apr 19, 2013
Post Turtle wrote:
<quoted text>How do you know?
Because it was in the paper.
guest

Blytheville, AR

#24578 Apr 19, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
NO it does not have to be, "one or the other", there is copious other outlets, TV, print, and internet quoting those of I which I spoke.
To say you have to watch them to know what they are saying is being very nave or more likely in your case, just plain stupid.
So, you trust second hand liberal interpretations instead of going to the actual source.

Yes, it always comes down to one or the other with you, as you have proven over and over again.

You are either a liar or a sucker.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pocahontas Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Sarah Rice 50 min guest 4
I have a question ❗️ 1 hr Knowitallsally 2
subway 3 hr Ccr 7
John Simkins 11 hr BEWARE 8
Old Hill Crest Hotel 14 hr Guest 23
County fair and carnival. 16 hr yes 4
Mid South or Family's Inc? (Oct '11) 18 hr 100 percent real 17
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Pocahontas Mortgages