Did you vote today?

Created by Rick on Jun 8, 2010

5,979 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

Reality Check

Little Rock, AR

#24063 Mar 23, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps you find me impossible to talk to because I will not let you put words in my mouth, such as this attempt;
"Liberals on the other hand believe that if a person is poor than it's not their fault so it's the government's responsibility to take money from those who are self sustaining and give it to those who are not"
To this I can only say you are totally clueless, and I could not possibly disagree more.
Again you twist what I say. Your president and his party which you have, on countless occasions, quoted, agreed with, and defended, have said as much and their policies show my statement to be true. Wait a second, are you up for re-election for some office in 2014? That would explain you talking as if you aren't as liberal as you have been in the past.
what

Dallas, TX

#24064 Mar 23, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps you find me impossible to talk to because I will not let you put words in my mouth, such as this attempt;
"Liberals on the other hand believe that if a person is poor than it's not their fault so it's the government's responsibility to take money from those who are self sustaining and give it to those who are not"
To this I can only say you are totally clueless, and I could not possibly disagree more.
Wow, a completely baseless opinion from someone who demands facts from others. You've answered my question. You are incapable of preventing yourself from being made a fool.
guest

Blytheville, AR

#24066 Mar 23, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Again you twist what I say. Your president and his party which you have, on countless occasions, quoted, agreed with, and defended, have said as much and their policies show my statement to be true. Wait a second, are you up for re-election for some office in 2014? That would explain you talking as if you aren't as liberal as you have been in the past.
Left-wingers twisting the meaning of words is a tactic that's as old as the devil itself. Where do you think they got the tactic?

Go to the book of Luke in Chapter 4 where Satan temps Christ in the desert. Satan deliberately twists Old Testament scripture to try to get Christ to fall into a trap. Now, fast forward to the 1971 and "community organizer" Saul Alinsky. Alinsky is the architect of the current prograssive/liberal/socialist movement. Their bible is his book "Rules for Radicals." Obama is a well known follower of Alinky's tactics and taught his tactics in Chicago in the 80's. In fact, Alinsky's son, Saul, wrote in the Boston Globe after the 08' convention:“Obama learned his lesson well. I am proud to see that my father’s model for organizing is being applied successfully beyond local community organizing to affect the Democratic campaign in 2008. It is a fine tribute to Saul Alinsky as we approach his 100th birthday.”

Obama has been the most divisive President on purpose. Why? He learned it from Alinsky who said in his book:
"An organizer must stir up dissatisfaction and discontent." And:“The organizer’s first job is to create the issues or problems."

What does the epigraph of Alinsky's book say?: "“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history… the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.”
Alinsky give credit to Lucifer because he used and taught Lucifer's tactics and Luke 4 is the most glaring example.

So, the next time you hear a liberal claim moral superiority and that their way is based on Biblical accounts, as they often feebly attempt to do, as Alinsky said, "The tenth rule of the ethics of rules and means is that you do what you can with what you have and clothe it in moral arguments" they are not lying, it's just the biblical accounts that they are based upon are the ones of Satan deceiving and exploiting man and they are well aware of it.
Reality Check

Lonoke, AR

#24067 Mar 23, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>Left-wingers twisting the meaning of words is a tactic that's as old as the devil itself. Where do you think they got the tactic?
Go to the book of Luke in Chapter 4 where Satan temps Christ in the desert. Satan deliberately twists Old Testament scripture to try to get Christ to fall into a trap. Now, fast forward to the 1971 and "community organizer" Saul Alinsky. Alinsky is the architect of the current prograssive/liberal/socialist movement. Their bible is his book "Rules for Radicals." Obama is a well known follower of Alinky's tactics and taught his tactics in Chicago in the 80's. In fact, Alinsky's son, Saul, wrote in the Boston Globe after the 08' convention:“Obama learned his lesson well. I am proud to see that my father’s model for organizing is being applied successfully beyond local community organizing to affect the Democratic campaign in 2008. It is a fine tribute to Saul Alinsky as we approach his 100th birthday.”
Obama has been the most divisive President on purpose. Why? He learned it from Alinsky who said in his book:
"An organizer must stir up dissatisfaction and discontent." And:“The organizer’s first job is to create the issues or problems."
What does the epigraph of Alinsky's book say?: "“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history… the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.”
Alinsky give credit to Lucifer because he used and taught Lucifer's tactics and Luke 4 is the most glaring example.
So, the next time you hear a liberal claim moral superiority and that their way is based on Biblical accounts, as they often feebly attempt to do, as Alinsky said, "The tenth rule of the ethics of rules and means is that you do what you can with what you have and clothe it in moral arguments" they are not lying, it's just the biblical accounts that they are based upon are the ones of Satan deceiving and exploiting man and they are well aware of it.
Good point.
I

Since: Dec 10

Washington DC

#24068 Mar 23, 2013
what wrote:
<quoted text>Wow, a completely baseless opinion from someone who demands facts from others. You've answered my question. You are incapable of preventing yourself from being made a fool.
If you have not caught on my political views tend to favor the Left.

Being my opinion was based on what this Liberal believes, it was hardly baseless.

I think it takes a couple of pompous asses to presume you know more about what I think than I do.


Hmmm

Hot Springs National Park, AR

#24069 Mar 23, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>
So, the next time you hear a liberal claim moral superiority and that their way is based on Biblical accounts, as they often feebly attempt to do, as Alinsky said, "The tenth rule of the ethics of rules and means is that you do what you can with what you have and clothe it in moral arguments" they are not lying, it's just the biblical accounts that they are based upon are the ones of Satan deceiving and exploiting man and they are well aware of it.
Naw, most liberals don't fear the debil on a daily basis, we leave that one to the hypocrites pretending to know God's mind.

Since: Dec 10

Washington DC

#24070 Mar 23, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Again you twist what I say. Your president and his party which you have, on countless occasions, quoted, agreed with, and defended, have said as much and their policies show my statement to be true. Wait a second, are you up for re-election for some office in 2014? That would explain you talking as if you aren't as liberal as you have been in the past.
I have said as much.

Is that how you say, that was not your exact words, but you are a Liberal so that is what you meant?

BTW- I did not "twist" what you said I quoted you verbatim.

I will tell you the same thing again, as it applies here just as well it did the last time.

Your theory is preposterous


Hmmm

Hot Springs National Park, AR

#24071 Mar 23, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Good point.
I
Sure is...that is if one is trying to qualify today's political situation by associating it with Stone/Bronze/Iron Age thinking.

Since: Dec 10

Washington DC

#24072 Mar 23, 2013
Raptor in Michigan wrote:
<quoted text>
Mine are doing great too. If only I would have invested more $$ five years ago!!
Your buddy is in good shape because he tows the Fox News line, maybe you should watch Fox also, here is what Fox said;
..........

Thanks to their pro-business approach and the anemic recovery, Republicans would seem to have a clear path to grab the economic mantle heading into the 2012 race for the White House.

However, history actually shows that the U.S. economy, stock prices and corporate profits have generated stronger growth under Democratic administrations than Republican ones.

According to McGraw-Hill’s (MHP

S&P Capital IQ, the S&P 500 has rallied an average of 12.1% per year since 1901 when Democrats occupy the White House, compared with just 5.1% for the GOP.

Likewise, gross domestic product has increased 4.2% each year since 1949 when Democrats run the executive branch, versus 2.6% under Republicans.

Even corporate profits show a disparity: S&P 500 GAAP earnings per share climbed a median of 10.5% per year since 1936 during Democratic administrations, besting an 8.9% median advance under Republicans, S&P said.

Due to their “tax-and-spend” reputation, investors expect Democratic administrations to underperform Republican ones and be “poison to any portfolio,” Sam Stovall, chief equity strategist at S&P Capital IQ, wrote in a note.“History shows the opposite to be true, however.”


Read more: http://www.foxbusiness.com/investing/2012/09/...

Since: Dec 10

Washington DC

#24073 Mar 23, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>My stocks are doing quite well thank you. Maybe you should AGAIN clarify all of your past statements like you as a lib usually have to do!
Your stocks are doing quite well are they, I do seem to remember not so long ago you saying something about a 20% correction in the market was imminent and you took all your money out of stocks.

Maybe I am wrong, but did you not say you were putting that money into bonds?

Perhaps if you could, just kind of clarify that for me, if you would please?
what

Dallas, TX

#24074 Mar 23, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
If you have not caught on my political views tend to favor the Left.
Being my opinion was based on what this Liberal believes, it was hardly baseless.
I think it takes a couple of pompous asses to presume you know more about what I think than I do.
It simply takes one to be awake to know that you favor the left and even less to know what you think. Being that your opinion was not based on any fact is what makes it baseless. Being that it was made by a liberal makes it pointless.
what

Dallas, TX

#24075 Mar 23, 2013
Hmmm wrote:
<quoted text>
Naw, most liberals don't fear the debil on a daily basis, we leave that one to the hypocrites pretending to know God's mind.
Do you know how to read? That post had nothing to do with liberals "fearing the debil" but showed how liberals copy the "debil's" tactics under the guise of morality you ignorant twit.

Since: Dec 10

Washington DC

#24076 Mar 23, 2013
what wrote:
<quoted text>Do you know how to read? That post had nothing to do with liberals "fearing the debil" but showed how liberals copy the "debil's" tactics under the guise of morality you ignorant twit.
We are knee deep in irony tonight!

Since: Dec 10

Washington DC

#24077 Mar 23, 2013
what wrote:
<quoted text>It simply takes one to be awake to know that you favor the left and even less to know what you think. Being that your opinion was not based on any fact is what makes it baseless. Being that it was made by a liberal makes it pointless.
Tell you what, no pun intended, you inserted yourself into this banter with a caviler attitude.

Here is your chance to prove you do not have what appears to be a bad case of alligator mouth and a hummingbird ass.

You ready?

R/C said:

"Liberals on the other hand believe that if a person is poor than it's not their fault so it's the government's responsibility to take money from those who are self sustaining and give it to those who are not"

I say he is full of shit.

What facts can you bring to the table to prove him correct?
Hmmm

Hot Springs National Park, AR

#24078 Mar 24, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>Left-wingers twisting the meaning of words is a tactic that's as old as the devil itself. Where do you think they got the tactic?
Here's one for you Mr. Falwell, seeing that the debil is at least 13 billion years old and all. You won't notice but this could be a major key in unlocking the secretes to gravity, dark matter, and the Universe...maybe even multiple dimensions and other Universes.

God is much bigger than Man could ever have imagined.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson
Hmmm

Hot Springs National Park, AR

#24079 Mar 24, 2013
what wrote:
<quoted text>It simply takes one to be awake to know that you favor the left and even less to know what you think. Being that your opinion was not based on any fact is what makes it baseless. Being that it was made by a liberal makes it pointless.
Keep that narrow view, keep slapping these other Bozo's on the back, you're the type of conservative that makes it easy to defeat. Maybe you has-beens could get together at the coffee shop and solve the world's problems while trying to sweet talk some 20 year old waitress.
Hmmm

Hot Springs National Park, AR

#24080 Mar 24, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Tell you what, no pun intended, you inserted yourself into this banter with a caviler attitude.
Here is your chance to prove you do not have what appears to be a bad case of alligator mouth and a hummingbird ass.
You ready?
R/C said:
"Liberals on the other hand believe that if a person is poor than it's not their fault so it's the government's responsibility to take money from those who are self sustaining and give it to those who are not"
I say he is full of shit.
What facts can you bring to the table to prove him correct?
Yep, since Liberals comprise less than 20% of the electorate it sure seems odd that they have any political power at all. Could it be that the Conservative Hate Tanks aren't reaching the Moderates effectively? Could it be that a system that advocates separating it'self from so many Americans in a time of demographic flux isn't working?

I find it hilarious that the Right is now starting to reach out to the Gay Community....to compromise their position on Immigration.

What's next?....Abortion.

Grand Old Party my ass.

Since: Dec 10

Washington DC

#24081 Mar 24, 2013
Hmmm wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, since Liberals comprise less than 20% of the electorate it sure seems odd that they have any political power at all. Could it be that the Conservative Hate Tanks aren't reaching the Moderates effectively? Could it be that a system that advocates separating it'self from so many Americans in a time of demographic flux isn't working?
I find it hilarious that the Right is now starting to reach out to the Gay Community....to compromise their position on Immigration.
What's next?....Abortion.
Grand Old Party my ass.
Could be abortion, since the GOP has determined that,

"the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down”

That is the new plank in the Republican platform,

Legitimate Pro-choice.
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#24083 Mar 24, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Your stocks are doing quite well are they, I do seem to remember not so long ago you saying something about a 20% correction in the market was imminent and you took all your money out of stocks.
Maybe I am wrong, but did you not say you were putting that money into bonds?
Perhaps if you could, just kind of clarify that for me, if you would please?
You're wrong as usual. I am not a liberal I do not need to clarify my statements once I make them..
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#24084 Mar 24, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Your buddy is in good shape because he tows the Fox News line, maybe you should watch Fox also, here is what Fox said;
..........
Thanks to their pro-business approach and the anemic recovery, Republicans would seem to have a clear path to grab the economic mantle heading into the 2012 race for the White House.
However, history actually shows that the U.S. economy, stock prices and corporate profits have generated stronger growth under Democratic administrations than Republican ones.
According to McGraw-Hill’s (MHP
S&P Capital IQ, the S&P 500 has rallied an average of 12.1% per year since 1901 when Democrats occupy the White House, compared with just 5.1% for the GOP.
Likewise, gross domestic product has increased 4.2% each year since 1949 when Democrats run the executive branch, versus 2.6% under Republicans.
Even corporate profits show a disparity: S&P 500 GAAP earnings per share climbed a median of 10.5% per year since 1936 during Democratic administrations, besting an 8.9% median advance under Republicans, S&P said.
Due to their “tax-and-spend” reputation, investors expect Democratic administrations to underperform Republican ones and be “poison to any portfolio,” Sam Stovall, chief equity strategist at S&P Capital IQ, wrote in a note.“History shows the opposite to be true, however.”
Read more: http://www.foxbusiness.com/investing/2012/09/...
Can you explain a little bit about this Fox that you watch to me? Is it you and people like you who make them number one and rich? After all you are a self proclaimed smart guy so this Fox thing must be doing something right for you to be watching them correct? I didn't even know thay had cable TV in Salem!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pocahontas Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
second chance 27 min guest 22
Pocahontas City Attorney & $73,060 he stole 2 hr Hopeful 13
eric bibb 7 hr Naughty 5
Satan's Craziest New Trend: WICCA (Apr '11) 10 hr guest 31
Minimum Wage . Raise or not ? Sun Yes No Maybe 19
Dogs running loose Sun Poky Gal 2
is Samantha Willingham a good mom Sun girlygirl 9
Pocahontas Dating
Find my Match

Pocahontas Jobs

Pocahontas People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Pocahontas News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Pocahontas

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]