Did you vote today?

Did you vote today?

Created by Rick on Jun 8, 2010

6,407 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#23053 Mar 3, 2013
Raptor in Michigan wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =0V0sTENxfvkXX
Listen to this goofballs words! He thinks Americans are the cause of terorist attacks in this country and around the world. He never blames the terrorists for killing Americans. He is the biggest idiot I have ever seen in politics. Good Riddance!

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#23058 Mar 3, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>They had a majority from January 2009 till November 2010.
Next question!
Tell me the dates that the Democrats had a 60% super majority in the Senate from Jan.,2009 till Nov.,2010.


I would guess that Majority in the Senate was not as powerful as you would like to make it to be.

A majority really makes no difference to a filibuster happy Republican Senator.

Here is the answer for my question, because you would not answer it, even if you could have.


The Democratic Party theoretically had a 60% filibuster-proof super majority in the Senate for most of the time period between July 7, 2009, when Al Franken (D) won a contested seat, and February 4, 2010, when Scott Brown (R) replaced Paul Kirk (D). However, Ted Kennedy's terminal illness kept him out of Washington from March 2009 until his death on August 25. The Democrats' 60% supermajority only became a practical reality on September 24 when Kennedy's replacement Paul Kirk was seated.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#23060 Mar 3, 2013
Wiser than DKN and Barney wrote:
<quoted text>Your numbers don't tell everything. I don't know where you get your information but michigan is in trouble especially detriot, Mi. Your just keep telling yourself everything is fine and obama is a wonderful president. But again old barney that doesn't make it true. I say you just face the truth. You would rather dispute the facts than admit you might be wrong.
No one said all is wine and roses, however the facts you are dening, are saying things are improving.
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#23061 Mar 3, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Tell me the dates that the Democrats had a 60% super majority in the Senate from Jan.,2009 till Nov.,2010.
I would guess that Majority in the Senate was not as powerful as you would like to make it to be.
A majority really makes no difference to a filibuster happy Republican Senator.
Here is the answer for my question, because you would not answer it, even if you could have.
The Democratic Party theoretically had a 60% filibuster-proof super majority in the Senate for most of the time period between July 7, 2009, when Al Franken (D) won a contested seat, and February 4, 2010, when Scott Brown (R) replaced Paul Kirk (D). However, Ted Kennedy's terminal illness kept him out of Washington from March 2009 until his death on August 25. The Democrats' 60% supermajority only became a practical reality on September 24 when Kennedy's replacement Paul Kirk was seated.
I really don't have time for this long diatribe right now. I am currently flirting with a gal on another forum. I will read your garbage at my earliest conveinence and get back to you!

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#23062 Mar 3, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>Who controls the purse strings?
Article I, Section 7 states that all revenue bills shall originate in the House of Representatives.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#23065 Mar 3, 2013
Wiser than DKN and Barney wrote:
<quoted text>Yes and just because you think you are an expert barney, doesn't mean you are. I believe there is quite a few people on here that might agree with me. Hate to break it to you but you are not even close to an expert barney. Wake up barney things are not better. To blow a hole in you numbers. Here's one for friday they told on the news, That the average american has 3% less income than this time last year. You have to ask yourself, if things are better, we would have alot more money in our pockets. We wouldn't have 24 million people out of work. Our unemploylent rate wouldn't be 7.9%. One out of six people wouldn't be on food stamps. Half of all americans wouldn't be getting a welfare checks. Plenty more reasons why things are not better. Guess what mr. expert your numbers don't add up. Mine do and that's what is real and happening. Here's the problem you can dispute what i said but these are the facts, face it. You are wrong.
I will agree with you, I am not a expert, and I don't play one on TV either.
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#23066 Mar 4, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Tell me the dates that the Democrats had a 60% super majority in the Senate from Jan.,2009 till Nov.,2010.
I would guess that Majority in the Senate was not as powerful as you would like to make it to be.
A majority really makes no difference to a filibuster happy Republican Senator.
Here is the answer for my question, because you would not answer it, even if you could have.
The Democratic Party theoretically had a 60% filibuster-proof super majority in the Senate for most of the time period between July 7, 2009, when Al Franken (D) won a contested seat, and February 4, 2010, when Scott Brown (R) replaced Paul Kirk (D). However, Ted Kennedy's terminal illness kept him out of Washington from March 2009 until his death on August 25. The Democrats' 60% supermajority only became a practical reality on September 24 when Kennedy's replacement Paul Kirk was seated.
ALL that just to prove I was right. Thanks!
guest

United States

#23067 Mar 4, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
No one said all is wine and roses, however the facts you are dening, are saying things are improving.
Thanks for continuing to prove how big of a hypocrite you really are.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#23068 Mar 4, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>ALL that just to prove I was right. Thanks!
The point was not which party held the majority, as you are suggesting in this post.

I do believe your argument was the majority held the power to accomplish whatever they chose for a period of two years.

When in fact they only held the possibility of accomplishing that for only a very few months in the Senate.

NO little War boy, I did not prove your post correct, I took your antiquated talking points and stuck them up your ass, and proved how ignorant of politics you are once again.


Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#23069 Mar 4, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>Thanks for continuing to prove how big of a hypocrite you really are.
Good morning Sunshine, did you forget to eat your fiber last night, you sound as if you are suffering from irregularity this AM.
guest

United States

#23070 Mar 4, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Good morning Sunshine, did you forget to eat your fiber last night, you sound as if you are suffering from irregularity this AM.
Feeling great. Thanks again for the morning dose of liberal hypocrisy just two posts into your day. Looking forward to another day of watching you pretending to "lead people around" and telling people how smart you think you are to make yourself feel better, while your lies lead you into walls, over and over again. Thanks again!

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#23072 Mar 4, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>Feeling great. Thanks again for the morning dose of liberal hypocrisy just two posts into your day. Looking forward to another day of watching you pretending to "lead people around" and telling people how smart you think you are to make yourself feel better, while your lies lead you into walls, over and over again. Thanks again!
My goodness little fella, to be "Feeling great" you sure are a might testy.

Told me two times or you might say "over and over again"

"thanks again"

Oh my those little knickers were in such a wad were they not.

Im lmao and you are going Ape shit, whos leading who around Dip?

“Conserve Wildlife Habitat”

Since: Dec 10

SE Michigan

#23073 Mar 4, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>That is the problem with this country now, you sissies sat back and let the LIBTARDS attack us over and over and over again and refused to fight back. After a while it became the norm for the LIBTARDS to bad mouth and belittle us and occasionally when we mouthed off it got immediate negative attention by everybody in the media. I will no longer sit back and be attacked without defending myself, my country, my core values and morals. I will fight fire with fire and slay every last one of these LIBTARDS! GUARANTEED!
True conservatives do fight back, but we do it in an intelligent and mature way using facts.

"After a while it became the norm for the LIBTARDS to bad mouth and belittle us"
Speak for yourself. There is no such thing as a libtard. I have been called plenty of names and belittled by liberals ALOT. You apparently are very weak-minded if it bothers you.

"I will no longer sit back and be attacked without defending myself, my country, my core values and morals. I will fight fire with fire and slay every last one of these LIBTARDS!"
Your core values and morals tell you to call people names? I'm glad mine don't and all the conservatives I know don't either.

“Conserve Wildlife Habitat”

Since: Dec 10

SE Michigan

#23074 Mar 4, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>Who controls the purse strings?
Who's got the veto power?

“Conserve Wildlife Habitat”

Since: Dec 10

SE Michigan

#23075 Mar 4, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>Listen to this goofballs words! He thinks Americans are the cause of terorist attacks in this country and around the world. He never blames the terrorists for killing Americans. He is the biggest idiot I have ever seen in politics. Good Riddance!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =XYbLR03JnYEXX
Have you ever heard the term "blowback?" Do you know what it means? Do you know who came up with it?

At this point, it doesn't matter anymore. Our foreign policy is what it is and in order to save face, it will not change. Neither will the attacks against us and the hate. But hey, who in the heck are they to not conform to our way of life?
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

“Conserve Wildlife Habitat”

Since: Dec 10

SE Michigan

#23076 Mar 4, 2013
Wiser than DKN and Barney wrote:
<quoted text>Yes a crash is coming. It will be us good hard working americans that will have to pick up the pieces.
Speak for yourself. I did my part to try to prevent it. Not enough people listened. It won't be on me to pick up the pieces. If voters won't hold their elected officials to the oath of office they take, they get what they deserve.

“Conserve Wildlife Habitat”

Since: Dec 10

SE Michigan

#23077 Mar 4, 2013
Wiser than DKN and Barney wrote:
<quoted text>Are you serious, do you really want the idiots in charge cleaning it up. They've done enough damage.
The sad fact is it will not get cleaned up. The once great republic we had is gone.

“Conserve Wildlife Habitat”

Since: Dec 10

SE Michigan

#23078 Mar 4, 2013
Wiser than DKN and Barney wrote:
<quoted text>The regular news outlets are so hung up on obama they don't tell the truth. For the most part, fox is honest they want you to make up your on mind not be deceived with the other news outlet. They are fair and balance. And nobody is making you watch fox that's your choice.
"For the most part, fox is honest they want you to make up your on mind"
No, they aren't and no, they don't! They make your mind up for you and you don't even know it.

I watch Fox, but I recognize the fact that they are not always telling the whole truth. Sometimes they in fact, are HIDING the truth. Sometimes they even LIE, so we don't get the truth. At least I am intelligent enough to see it and don't live in denial that they can do no wrong anymore, like I once thought.

Take words like this and others repeated over and over and over and over on Fox:
"Ron Paul can't win"
"Ron Paul is an isolationist."
"Ron Paul is dangerous."
"Ron Paul should drop out of the race."
"Ron Paul will take away votes from the republican nominee."

There is NO CASE that can be made that that is "fair and balanced" reporting. NONE!

“Conserve Wildlife Habitat”

Since: Dec 10

SE Michigan

#23079 Mar 4, 2013
Wiser than DKN and Barney wrote:
<quoted text>Your numbers don't tell everything. I don't know where you get your information but michigan is in trouble especially detriot, Mi. Your just keep telling yourself everything is fine and obama is a wonderful president. But again old barney that doesn't make it true. I say you just face the truth. You would rather dispute the facts than admit you might be wrong.
Obama cannot be blamed for all the problems in Detroit. First look at the unions who helped to break the city. Then the corruption in the Detoit leadership over the years.
Obamastan

Springdale, AR

#23080 Mar 4, 2013
Raptor in Michigan wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama cannot be blamed for all the problems in Detroit. First look at the unions who helped to break the city. Then the corruption in the Detoit leadership over the years.
Maybe not Soetoro, but surely the Democrat party that has held steadfast in Detroit can.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pocahontas Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Marla choate 5 hr Weller 5
Rachel Spears? 5 hr Weller 4
PECO play house (Nov '16) 6 hr Boss 6
Christy terry 7 hr Lorry 14
Seth and Whitney 7 hr jack 2
David hart and mike skeet 16 hr Mike 10
smoke 19 hr Condom Dealer 3

Pocahontas Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Pocahontas Mortgages