Did you vote today?

Did you vote today?

Created by Rick on Jun 8, 2010

6,407 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#22084 Feb 15, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>So, are you saying being acquitted justifies the people he murdered? How old was Obama on September 10, 2001 when Ayers admitted to the New Yorker he killed those people and wished he could killed more?
"I don't regret setting bombs. I feel we didn't do enough"
And, when asked if he would "do it all again," he said "I don't want to discount the possibility."
The only thing that separates Ayers and Tim McVeigh is bad police work.
You're either the greatest hypocrite I've encountered (and that's saying something having a brother who is an Assemblies of God minister) or you just have the short term memory of a mentally challenged goldfish.
You are on a roll this morning, unfortunately as I said, same level of mentality.

You can spin what I wrote as many ways as you can think of and post your thoughts 23 post later. LMAO

Too bad for you facts are facts.


If he is so dangerous , why is he not in jail.

FACT: Because he was acquitted.

Fact: He has had 40 plus years to be a bad guy again. What is he today,

Fact: He is a retired professor in the College of Education at the University of Illinois at Chicago, formerly holding the titles of Distinguished Professor of Education and Senior University Scholar.

Fact: Ayers was never charged with killing any one.

Fact: they blew up a statue , two times and damaged some buildings.

One building with a, TWO POUND BOMB, they made for $500.00

"The only thing that separates Ayers and Tim McVeigh"

Fact: You obviously have a minute amount of knowledge of what you were posting.


Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#22085 Feb 15, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>So, are you saying being acquitted justifies the people he murdered? How old was Obama on September 10, 2001 when Ayers admitted to the New Yorker he killed those people and wished he could killed more?
"I don't regret setting bombs. I feel we didn't do enough"
And, when asked if he would "do it all again," he said "I don't want to discount the possibility."
The only thing that separates Ayers and Tim McVeigh is bad police work.
You're either the greatest hypocrite I've encountered (and that's saying something having a brother who is an Assemblies of God minister) or you just have the short term memory of a mentally challenged goldfish.
You are on a roll this morning, unfortunately as I said, same level of mentality.

You can spin what I wrote as many ways as you can think of and post your thoughts 23 post later. LMAO

Too bad for you facts are facts.


If he is so dangerous , why is he not in jail.

FACT: Because he was acquitted.

Fact: He has had 40 plus years to be a bad guy again. What is he today,

Fact: He is a retired professor in the College of Education at the University of Illinois at Chicago, formerly holding the titles of Distinguished Professor of Education and Senior University Scholar.

Fact: Ayers was never charged with killing any one.

Fact: they blew up a statue , two times and damaged some buildings.

One building with a, TWO POUND BOMB, they made for $500.00

"The only thing that separates Ayers and Tim McVeigh"

Fact: You obviously have a minute amount of knowledge of what you were posting.


Fact: Its a bitch letting a Gold fish expose your ignorance.
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#22086 Feb 15, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
You are on a roll this morning, unfortunately as I said, same level of mentality.
You can spin what I wrote as many ways as you can think of and post your thoughts 23 post later. LMAO
Too bad for you facts are facts.
If he is so dangerous , why is he not in jail.
FACT: Because he was acquitted.
Fact: He has had 40 plus years to be a bad guy again. What is he today,
Fact: He is a retired professor in the College of Education at the University of Illinois at Chicago, formerly holding the titles of Distinguished Professor of Education and Senior University Scholar.
Fact: Ayers was never charged with killing any one.
Fact: they blew up a statue , two times and damaged some buildings.
One building with a, TWO POUND BOMB, they made for $500.00
"The only thing that separates Ayers and Tim McVeigh"
Fact: You obviously have a minute amount of knowledge of what you were posting.
FACT: A man died during their playground antics. You can't change that FACT!

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#22087 Feb 15, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>So, are you saying being acquitted justifies the people he murdered? How old was Obama on September 10, 2001 when Ayers admitted to the New Yorker he killed those people and wished he could killed more?
"I don't regret setting bombs. I feel we didn't do enough"
And, when asked if he would "do it all again," he said "I don't want to discount the possibility."
The only thing that separates Ayers and Tim McVeigh is bad police work.
You're either the greatest hypocrite I've encountered (and that's saying something having a brother who is an Assemblies of God minister) or you just have the short term memory of a mentally challenged goldfish.
"September 10, 2001 when Ayers admitted to the New Yorker he killed those people and wished he could killed more?"

READ WHAT HE REALLY SAID

Despite the fairly mainstream life he lives now, though, Bill Ayers’ image took a hit with an article that appeared in the New York Times on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001. Ayers was quoted in the lead paragraph as saying,”I don’t regret setting bombs” and "I feel we didn’t do enough." The interview

The Weather Underground continued setting off bombs, including one in a men’s lavatory in the Capitol building in 1971 and another in a women’s restroom in the Pentagon in 1972. Nobody was killed, due to evacuation warnings the Weathermen sent out in advance.
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#22088 Feb 15, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
"September 10, 2001 when Ayers admitted to the New Yorker he killed those people and wished he could killed more?"
READ WHAT HE REALLY SAID
Despite the fairly mainstream life he lives now, though, Bill Ayers’ image took a hit with an article that appeared in the New York Times on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001. Ayers was quoted in the lead paragraph as saying,”I don’t regret setting bombs” and "I feel we didn’t do enough." The interview
The Weather Underground continued setting off bombs, including one in a men’s lavatory in the Capitol building in 1971 and another in a women’s restroom in the Pentagon in 1972. Nobody was killed, due to evacuation warnings the Weathermen sent out in advance.
SO liberals condone destruction of tax payer property? Maybe a Conservative should blow up Ayers house, of course he would be called with fair warning..

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#22089 Feb 15, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>FACT: A man died during their playground antics. You can't change that FACT!
Tell me some more about this.

Anybody want to bet what his response that will be? LMAO
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#22090 Feb 15, 2013

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#22091 Feb 15, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>FACT: A man died during their playground antics. You can't change that FACT!
Nor would I try, I do not believe you can change facts, but as hard as you try I have to believe, you think you can.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#22092 Feb 15, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
Seriously, this is the best you can do, a frigging opinion blog.




"It’s been quite a turnaround for Bill Ayers. The Communist terrorist who planned bombings of police stations, in order to inflict maximum injury and death"

What an idiot this guy who wrote that BS.

They blew up a couple of bath rooms and told them before hand they were going to do it.

So much for the FBI and its informant, it was the FBI's alleged illegal tactics that got the charges dropped.

Three or four of their members blew themselves trying to make a bomb, why would the survivors try to do it again, those were smart kids, mean as hell, but smart.

And again, the police station bombing was never connected to the Weather Underground........

WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#22093 Feb 15, 2013

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#22096 Feb 15, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B ill_Ayers
The two who brought up all this Bill Ayers nonsense to begin with got themselves soundly defeated in the election they tried to use it.

Does that not tell you something, it should, as I said its yesterdays already debunked B.S.

WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#22097 Feb 15, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
The two who brought up all this Bill Ayers nonsense to begin with got themselves soundly defeated in the election they tried to use it.
Does that not tell you something, it should, as I said its yesterdays already debunked B.S.
What it tells me is the state of mind you are in by defending this terrorist. Your defense of this pathetic idiot speaks volumes about your mental state!

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#22098 Feb 15, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>What it tells me is the state of mind you are in by defending this terrorist. Your defense of this pathetic idiot speaks volumes about your mental state!

Posting facts that squarely debunk your lies is not defending anything but the truth.


Game, set, match.
Hmmm

Little Rock, AR

#22099 Feb 15, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>What it tells me is the state of mind you are in by defending this terrorist. Your defense of this pathetic idiot speaks volumes about your mental state!
And of course you're an expert on judging anthers mental state, you being nothing more than a repetitive, on-line pecker gnat and all.
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#22100 Feb 15, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Posting facts that squarely debunk your lies is not defending anything but the truth.
Game, set, match.
Defending an admitted terrorist who is a left wing whining lying nut speaks volumes about your mental state.

CHECK MATE!
guest

United States

#22101 Feb 15, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
The two who brought up all this Bill Ayers nonsense to begin with got themselves soundly defeated in the election they tried to use it.
Does that not tell you something, it should, as I said its yesterdays already debunked B.S.
So, we should only bring up topics that are politically advantageous regardless of what happened? You find all kinds of ways to justify liberal murderers, don't you? This apparently is really tugging at your sense of morality the way you are just trying to dismiss it and shove it under the rug.
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#22102 Feb 15, 2013
Hmmm wrote:
<quoted text>
And of course you're an expert on judging anthers mental state, you being nothing more than a repetitive, on-line pecker gnat and all.
Do you miss pecker gnats in your life? Your mental state is almost equal to Barney's.
guest

United States

#22103 Feb 15, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Seriously, this is the best you can do, a frigging opinion blog.
"It’s been quite a turnaround for Bill Ayers. The Communist terrorist who planned bombings of police stations, in order to inflict maximum injury and death"
What an idiot this guy who wrote that BS.
They blew up a couple of bath rooms and told them before hand they were going to do it.
So much for the FBI and its informant, it was the FBI's alleged illegal tactics that got the charges dropped.
Three or four of their members blew themselves trying to make a bomb, why would the survivors try to do it again, those were smart kids, mean as hell, but smart.
And again, the police station bombing was never connected to the Weather Underground........
I guess personal admissions of the actual act aren't considered "connections" as long as liberals do it.

As for your "friggin opinion blog" comment...
This coming from someone who has, on more than one occasion, used the biased opinions of a Robert Sobel...

http://www.examiner.com/liberal-in-orlando/ro...

"A degree in communications and media production. He (Sobel) has written, directed and edited four short films as well as creating his own BLOG on politics and entertainment. A constant, outspoken American, Robert will not pull back any punches when it comes to delivering his OPINIONS."

...as facts.

I'll chalk that one up to your goldfish-like memory and Hyena-in-heat objectivity. You're lies and hypocrisy are already well known around these parts.
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#22104 Feb 15, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>So, we should only bring up topics that are politically advantageous regardless of what happened? You find all kinds of ways to justify liberal murderers, don't you? This apparently is really tugging at your sense of morality the way you are just trying to dismiss it and shove it under the rug.
Liberals are taught murder is acceptable in order to fit their agenda. They have no problems with millions of babies being murdered yearly.
guest

United States

#22105 Feb 15, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Posting facts that squarely debunk your lies is not defending anything but the truth.
Game, set, match.
And the next time you do that will be the first time. And, in your dreams does not count.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pocahontas Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
mcghee baby abused 5 hr Pocahontas 5
Aaron and Amber Smith 11 hr leo 7
Who are some of the hardest working people in P... (Feb '09) 12 hr Ptown 91
What's being done to slow down the stealing? (Jan '15) 15 hr Olson Wilson 18
gaye carter 23 hr coco 11
Poll Laveida Jones or Tribble for Sheriff? (Mar '10) Sat ghost 102
Swinggers Sat MrBlowWads 8

Pocahontas Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Pocahontas Mortgages