Did you vote today?

Did you vote today?

Created by Rick on Jun 8, 2010

6,284 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

what

Palestine, TX

#21944 Feb 13, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
What does any of that have to do with what I posted being incorrect?
Oh I know, you cannot prove it wrong, so you attack the messengers..........yawn, same old BS, different day.
You're right Hillary... I mean Barney. What difference does it make if klein is telling the truth so long as people believe his lie.
Barnyard

Jonesboro, AR

#21945 Feb 13, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
"Liberals think it is the job for legislatures to pass laws to regulate and control other peoples lifes".
You mean like taking away a woman's right to do as she wishes with her own uterus.
Nope that would be Republicans, silly me.
Conservatives spell for the unborn, Barney speaks for the uneducated.
Barnyard

Jonesboro, AR

#21946 Feb 13, 2013
Darn autocorrect, but even Barney should be able to know what it meant,bell maybe not.
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#21947 Feb 13, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
WARRIOR assuming you are male, how would you feel if the legislators of this nation told you, you have no choice of what to do with what is going on inside your body?
This was your question I responded to. No where does it say anything about killing babies. You liberals are responsible for millions of abortions, millions of baby deaths. Not me. You need to take a class on reading comprehension..
AllRightsReserve d

Springdale, AR

#21948 Feb 13, 2013
Color of Law

"Color" means "An appearance, semblance, or simulacrum, as distinguished from that which is real. A prima facia or apparent right. Hence, a deceptive appearance, a plausible, assumed exterior, concealing a lack of reality; a disguise or pretext. See also colorable." Black's Law Dictionary, 5th Edition, on page 240.

"Colorable" means "That which is in appearance only, and not in reality, what it purports to be, hence counterfeit feigned, having the appearance of truth." Windle v. Flinn, 196 Or. 654, 251 P.2d 136, 146.

"Color of Law" means "The appearance or semblance, without the substance, of legal right. Misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because wrongdoer is clothed with authority of state is action taken under 'color of law.'" Atkins v. Lanning. D.C.Okl., 415 F. Supp. 186, 188.

If something is "color of law" then it is NOT law, it only looks like law. If you go to the website for the Office of Law Revision Counsel, you will see that most of the titles of the United States Code are "prima facia evidence of the laws of the United States".

"prima facia" means "At first sight; on the first appearance; on the face of it; so far as can be judged from the first disclosure; presumably; a fact presumed to be true unless disproved by some evidence to the contrary." State ex rel. Herbert v. Whims, 68 Ohio App. 39, 38 N.E.2d 596, 599, 22 O.O. 110. Black's Law Dictionary 5th Edition page 1071.

Prima facia and color of law both go hand in hand, because if a law is prima facia evidence of the laws of the United States, that means it is color of law, by definition. In other words the bureaucrat presumes that the law applies to you until you defeat their presumption.
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#21950 Feb 13, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
I find rather odd that you and the Blytheville guest seem to show up at the same time regularly and both displaying the same level of mentality.
Guest quote,
"false and misleading data and even changed information on published graphs to promote his lies. Topix says these two post
WARRIOR's Quote,
You don't mean like this do you guest. Surely Barney can read..
Topix says both post were 1 hr. ago.
Man that is just freaky.
You know what, I think I will get a I-pad, change my IP to, oh lets say New Mexico, and create a straw man to back me up.
What ya think, don't that sound like fun?
I would bet that you do.
Yes you busted us. We are one in the same. Man you are good. How do you do it? Day in and day out with all of that intelligence bottled up inside one individual it juast ain't fair for the rest of us. Yes he and I or I and he or shall I say we, are one in the same. You guessed it, the old I-Pad trick! LMAO!
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#21951 Feb 13, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
"Liberals think it is the job for legislatures to pass laws to regulate and control other peoples lifes".
You mean like taking away a woman's right to do as she wishes with her own uterus.
Nope that would be Republicans, silly me.
I missed that law is it in the CFR? Please tell me where I can find it.

I mean like taking away a babies life by murdering it so it can never make a decision on its own....You agree that a baby should be able to grow up and decide what he/she wants to do with his/her life right?
Hmmm

Little Rock, AR

#21952 Feb 13, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>They already have enough to perform those tasks. There are 22,000 Border Patrol Agents alone. The cost is already there. Those who can't pay the severe fines would do community service the first time and jail time the second. The impact to agriculture would be the same as it was when the combine was invented and slaves no longer had to pick cotton. Fences along the border are generally 18 feet high, RVSS already exists across the vast majority of border. You should really come down here and look for yourself. The coast guard has sufficient numbers to patrol the shores and they can be supplemented with the Navy. As far as airspace you have AMO already patrolling it along with OFO and the office of the BP running drones. It is not easier said than done. It can be done and doing it is already in place. People like you said landing on the moon is easier said than done. Hope this helps.
http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2...
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#21953 Feb 13, 2013
Hmmm wrote:
What do you think that means?

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#21954 Feb 13, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>This was your question I responded to. No where does it say anything about killing babies. You liberals are responsible for millions of abortions, millions of baby deaths. Not me. You need to take a class on reading comprehension..
LMAO, my comprehension, what do you think we were talking about.... APPENDICITIS?
dont know nothin

Yakima, WA

#21955 Feb 13, 2013
Lol wrote:
<quoted text>Who is making T nugent a roll model,or why are you making him a roll model,now the baby,she dont have to keep,plenty of ppl wanting to adolpt children it would not be a problem for any women to find a place for the child.
What? Really? If you would have comprehended the prior statements then you would understand what is going on instead of just spewing out simple minded rhetoric.
Mr Right

Jonesboro, AR

#21956 Feb 13, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO, my comprehension, what do you think we were talking about.... APPENDICITIS?
That is what he was talking about, you don't have a clue, get a neighbor's kid to explain it to you

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#21957 Feb 13, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>Yes you busted us. We are one in the same. Man you are good. How do you do it? Day in and day out with all of that intelligence bottled up inside one individual it juast ain't fair for the rest of us. Yes he and I or I and he or shall I say we, are one in the same. You guessed it, the old I-Pad trick! LMAO!
Oh,Im sorry, it is just rather strange how both post referenced the same obscure web page at the same time, and it is also strange the charges in those two post only showed up one obscure web page.

Man that's just freaky, don't you think.


WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#21958 Feb 13, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO, my comprehension, what do you think we were talking about.... APPENDICITIS?
Yet caught again in another one of your lies!
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#21959 Feb 13, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh,Im sorry, it is just rather strange how both post referenced the same obscure web page at the same time, and it is also strange the charges in those two post only showed up one obscure web page.
Man that's just freaky, don't you think.
Nope, I think you are freaky..

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#21960 Feb 13, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>I missed that law is it in the CFR? Please tell me where I can find it.
I mean like taking away a babies life by murdering it so it can never make a decision on its own....You agree that a baby should be able to grow up and decide what he/she wants to do with his/her life right?
Lets face it, there is nothing pretty about abortion, whether it is legal or illlegal, it is going to happen.

The undeniable truth, abortion rates are on the way down.

dont know nothin

Yakima, WA

#21961 Feb 13, 2013
American wrote:
<quoted text>Nay i'll bet your still concerned that your president didn't even call his national security adviser while 4 americans were being murdered in an 8 hour battle in Benghazi,even though they were calling for help,the president had a drone over head but was not concerned enough to even call his national security adviser,he is a murderer not only there but he is killing Americans with drones that he himself determinds if they are guilty or innocent,Hitler,king.
I am not concerned at all. The president, the secretary of state, the nato forces and others all acted and responded with what information the intellegence agency was giving them. That is what was proposed and testified on in the hearings and on the tapes that were viewed by all the congressmen and women that watched it. The hearings are over things are being done to make sure nothing like this ever happens again, and if any suspicious activity took place do you not think they would have both the president and hilary strung up to dry? Nah, that would only make too much sense. How do you know what was going on over there during that time? Were you there? I think not. You would have cheered the president for using this "drone" and then condemned him for killing innocent victims that may have been in the vicenity. You cannot take what Fox News and Karl Rove tells you as fact and report it as such since what they report is nothing but lies. You still waiting on Romney to win the election too? So what you are saying is that we should just try and capture these so called "Americans" with more boots on the ground? " Anwar al-Awlaki was a radical American-born Muslim cleric who became a leading figure in Al Qaeda’s affiliate in Yemen. He was killed there on Sept. 30, 2011, by a missile fired from an American drone aircraft.' There was no reason to question this man who was involved in the bombings of 9/11 and who was a rising star in Al Qaeda. If you renounce your citizenship and harbor with terrorists, you lose your right to due process. Even if you do not renounce, this is called treason and deserves a traitors death, plain and simple. However, this too would also make to much sense.
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#21962 Feb 13, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Lets face it, there is nothing pretty about abortion, whether it is legal or illlegal, it is going to happen.
The undeniable truth, abortion rates are on the way down.
Down is better. Zero would be best.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#21963 Feb 13, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>Yet caught again in another one of your lies!
Okay slick, you tell me what I was referring to in the post you responded to, what do you think I was talking about?
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#21964 Feb 13, 2013
dont know nothin wrote:
<quoted text>I am not concerned at all. The president, the secretary of state, the nato forces and others all acted and responded with what information the intellegence agency was giving them. That is what was proposed and testified on in the hearings and on the tapes that were viewed by all the congressmen and women that watched it. The hearings are over things are being done to make sure nothing like this ever happens again, and if any suspicious activity took place do you not think they would have both the president and hilary strung up to dry? Nah, that would only make too much sense. How do you know what was going on over there during that time? Were you there? I think not. You would have cheered the president for using this "drone" and then condemned him for killing innocent victims that may have been in the vicenity. You cannot take what Fox News and Karl Rove tells you as fact and report it as such since what they report is nothing but lies. You still waiting on Romney to win the election too? So what you are saying is that we should just try and capture these so called "Americans" with more boots on the ground? " Anwar al-Awlaki was a radical American-born Muslim cleric who became a leading figure in Al Qaeda’s affiliate in Yemen. He was killed there on Sept. 30, 2011, by a missile fired from an American drone aircraft.' There was no reason to question this man who was involved in the bombings of 9/11 and who was a rising star in Al Qaeda. If you renounce your citizenship and harbor with terrorists, you lose your right to due process. Even if you do not renounce, this is called treason and deserves a traitors death, plain and simple. However, this too would also make to much sense.
Obama is not a leader. He is not even a very engaged manager. He has lived off of one form or another of government assistance his entire life so he sees nothing wrong with handing it out like it is candy..

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pocahontas Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Police Chase 30 min Tammy Medley 7
jade camp 47 min Molon Labe 3
Sandy Burgess Nelson 1 hr Anonymous 4
Chubby chaser's? Who are they? 2 hr gasmtastet 15
wondering 2 hr brown eyes 1
"The wife" 2 hr husband 3
White 35th Anniversary Edition Camaro For Sale 8 hr Wayne 35
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Pocahontas Mortgages