Who do you support for Governor in Pe...
Dan the Man

Shippensburg, PA

#22632 May 12, 2012
Rollout wrote:
LMAO!
All danthemans rants on Romney in 1965 was pure lies.
As always with dannys posts following in his GOD Obama, open mouth insert foot before the facts!
LMAO!
11 Pages in the Post of pure LIES!
Family: Story about Romney prank on brother 'factually incorrect,' politically motivated
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/05/11/re...
LOL! Learn to read friend. That's not what the article says.

Nothing in your link disputed the incident as reported in the Post article. All the family member said was that "the portrayal of her brother" was factually incorrect. Evidently she didn't like the way her brother was described. She didn't refute any of the facts of the hair cutting incident, which was independently reported by five different people to the Post.
Dan the Man

Shippensburg, PA

#22633 May 12, 2012
Rollout wrote:
Fisrt the lies from the Obama team and the Liberal media, then bring up something in 1965, 46+ years ago? LMAO!
Pretty desperate! LOL!
The "Obama team" had nothing to do with the Washington Post article.
Dan the Man

Shippensburg, PA

#22634 May 12, 2012
did-u-c-that wrote:
<quoted text>
And just what it is that you do to go out and confront the so-called bigotry, outside of posting your views on here?
I confront bigotry where ever I see it - here or anywhere else. That's a moral obligation of all decent Americans.
Dan the Man

Shippensburg, PA

#22635 May 12, 2012
did-u-c-that wrote:
<quoted text>
The rational reason to deny homosexuals right to marriage in some peoples eyes is that they believe that the sanctity of marriage is between a man and a woman. It would be against what they believe is morally right. It would be against their religion.
Do-u-c-this?
Roger wrote:
<quoted text>
You Dan the Man do not know the Bible, you may think you're a Christian but you are not.
The issues you support are not and I repeat not Christian.
This person, who has proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that he is an unrepentant racist, probably believes he's a Christian.

He'll use his religion to support shit like this...
<quoted text>I would stop making fun of Obama if I were you. He just might send his linebacker wife after you.
Roger wrote:
<quoted text>Yep, she will be arriving on the next vine. lol
Roger wrote:
<quoted text> Oh no, the short black negro aka bobby64 is mad. Go visit your daddy if you can figure out which one of the 500 men your whore mom slept with is your daddy, then bend over for him like you did as a child you sicko.LMAO
Hey bobby64, I have a job for you if you can bring yourself to get off welfare. It involves holding a lantern at the beginning of my walk.
Roger wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama is a racist Muslim. Since the polls show him behind and dropping daily I'm going to start planning to celebrate when he is voted out.
I wonder if Danny will rent one of his restaurants to me? I need a black man who knows how to cook all this fine food too. Danny are you for hire? I pay good and I promise I won’t hide your paycheck under your work boots. I'll also need to rent out some of his hotels. Everyone on Topix will be invited for some good fried chicken, hominy, grits, ham hocks, collard greens, pigs feet, chitlins, black-eyed peas, Sweet potato pie and watermelon.
Roger wrote:
So Many Fathers
A black woman was filling out forms at the welfare office. Under "Number of children," she wrote "10," and where it said "List names of children," she wrote "Leroy." When she handed in the form, the woman behind the desk pointed out: "Now here where it says "List names of children," you're supposed to write the names of each one of your children." "Dey all named Leroy," said the black woman. "That's very unusual. When you call them, how do they know which one you want?" asked the welfare worker. "Oh, den I uses the last names."
Roger wrote:
<quoted text>Why should he help the homo? Because you have no morals and you say so you racist?
People who use their religion to justify vile shit like this are NOT moral or rational.

When you give "religious" people like Roger the Racist credibility because "they are just following their religion" you provide cover for bigotry.

This is NOT a matter of simply differing opinions. This is a matter of good and evil. When you don't unconditionally side with good, you enable evil.
May Flowers

Waynesboro, PA

#22636 May 12, 2012
Dan the Man wrote:
<quoted text>
When the right has a candidate that's a dud and they know it, they resort to re-arguing the 2008 election. It's a sign of defeat and desperation.
But maybe you can tell us, May - what's Romney's path to 270 electoral votes? Here's a map and the current state-by-state polling to help you.
http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/2012/romn...
I think you know Romney is no "dud". He is gaining in the polls, married women now prefer Romney over Obama, Romney has a 10 point lead with indepentents. Some polls Romney is ahead of Obama. The gap is closing and you know it.

As far as the electoral map that you are obsessing over, right now it's meaningless. Too many states that are toss ups and if Romney continues on this path he will have the toss up states and probably some that are now in Obama's column.

One of your silly questions in another post was why have I not mentioned Romney as my candidate(something like that)?

I don't need to go around Romney this and Romney that. I will vote for Romney, I have always liked him.

Unlike you, always foaming at the mouth for your love of Obama. I behave with maturity, I don't need to be constantly sloppering like a fool.

Obama is slowly slipping at the polls and the map at this point is meaningless.

Try another angle...one that's convincing...the map isn't and neither are any of your other rants.

Obama is finished, he's toast, the party is over.
May Flowers

Waynesboro, PA

#22637 May 12, 2012
One more thing Dan the Man, looks like it's going to be a beautiful day. Why don't you pull yourself away from your computer and enjoy life?

It won't make one bit of difference that you take a day away from the Obama cheerleading squad and just enjoy the day.

Obsessions aren't healthy. Especially when you obsess over a loser!
May Flowers

Waynesboro, PA

#22638 May 12, 2012
Dan the Man wrote:
<quoted text>
I confront bigotry where ever I see it - here or anywhere else. That's a moral obligation of all decent Americans.
I suggest you confront yourself.
dbar

Quakertown, PA

#22639 May 12, 2012
May Flowers wrote:
<quoted text>I think you know Romney is no "dud". He is gaining in the polls, married women now prefer Romney over Obama, Romney has a 10 point lead with indepentents. Some polls Romney is ahead of Obama. The gap is closing and you know it.
As far as the electoral map that you are obsessing over, right now it's meaningless. Too many states that are toss ups and if Romney continues on this path he will have the toss up states and probably some that are now in Obama's column.
One of your silly questions in another post was why have I not mentioned Romney as my candidate(something like that)?
I don't need to go around Romney this and Romney that. I will vote for Romney, I have always liked him.
Unlike you, always foaming at the mouth for your love of Obama. I behave with maturity, I don't need to be constantly sloppering like a fool.
Obama is slowly slipping at the polls and the map at this point is meaningless.
Try another angle...one that's convincing...the map isn't and neither are any of your other rants.
Obama is finished, he's toast, the party is over.
yes the republicans have figured out that they are stuck with mitt.
so when the voter apathy of all the groups that had no use for mitt comes into play he will fail.
he can forget the religious right as they will stay home.
the cult of paul will drain some independents.
and the so called tea party will realize that they hold no power over mitt.
the republican party can use the election loss of romney to purge their party of the crackpots that are dragging them down and retool for a fight in 2016.
Roger

Cumberland, MD

#22640 May 12, 2012
dbar wrote:
<quoted text>
yes the republicans have figured out that they are stuck with mitt.
so when the voter apathy of all the groups that had no use for mitt comes into play he will fail.
he can forget the religious right as they will stay home.
the cult of paul will drain some independents.
and the so called tea party will realize that they hold no power over mitt.
the republican party can use the election loss of romney to purge their party of the crackpots that are dragging them down and retool for a fight in 2016.
LOL, sometimes all one can do is shake their head and laugh at what you post.
TaxNoMore

Canoga Park, CA

#22641 May 12, 2012
Dan the Man wrote:
<quoted text>
Do-u-c-this?
<quoted text>
This person, who has proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that he is an unrepentant racist, probably believes he's a Christian.
He'll use his religion to support shit like this...
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
People who use their religion to justify vile shit like this are NOT moral or rational.
When you give "religious" people like Roger the Racist credibility because "they are just following their religion" you provide cover for bigotry.
This is NOT a matter of simply differing opinions. This is a matter of good and evil. When you don't unconditionally side with good, you enable evil.
**********

After I refuted all of your bullshit lies you come with this tired, old bullshit?

LOL!

Just more proof that you have NOTHING to support your insane beliefs.
Geraldo R

West Mifflin, PA

#22642 May 12, 2012
Mitt Robney interview on FOX,,,,,,,,,, He doesnt recall = he wont admit it,,,,,,,,,,and he says " I,ve done some stupid things in my life that I'm not proud of" ! LOL! " I seen the report, I'm going to argue with it"!
Isnt this the saME NEWS NETwoRK (fox) THAT EMPLOYs
Hannity, O'Reilly, and Glenn Beck the racist, nazi nutjob?? Got to be true if its on FOX.
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!

See the interview here:
LQQK HERE:

Geraldo R

West Mifflin, PA

#22643 May 12, 2012
Here's another site ABC News ,,,,,,,,,guess they are a democratic news network?
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!

LQQK HERE:

&fe ature=related

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!
Roger

Cumberland, MD

#22644 May 12, 2012
Dan the Man wrote:
<quoted text>
Do-u-c-this?
<quoted text>
This person, who has proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that he is an unrepentant racist, probably believes he's a Christian.
He'll use his religion to support shit like this...
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
People who use their religion to justify vile shit like this are NOT moral or rational.
When you give "religious" people like Roger the Racist credibility because "they are just following their religion" you provide cover for bigotry.
This is NOT a matter of simply differing opinions. This is a matter of good and evil. When you don't unconditionally side with good, you enable evil.


Beyond a shadow of a doubt? LOL You love to take another's words and give them a different meaning. Nice try, won't work. Changing the subject once again to avoid the truth. Try looking into the mirror for once.

Now for a serious question that I'm sure you will do your best to avoid answering.

Why are you keeping notes, posts etc. of those who disagree with you and have exposed you for the liar that you are? Could it be you are thinking of filing suit. That will never work and we both know why. Could it be an obsession with you? Could you be a stalker. Could you be a revengeful man that intents to even the score?
TaxNoMore

Canoga Park, CA

#22645 May 12, 2012
Dan the Man wrote:
<quoted text>
Do-u-c-this?
<quoted text>
This person, who has proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that he is an unrepentant racist, probably believes he's a Christian.
He'll use his religion to support shit like this...
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
People who use their religion to justify vile shit like this are NOT moral or rational.
When you give "religious" people like Roger the Racist credibility because "they are just following their religion" you provide cover for bigotry.
This is NOT a matter of simply differing opinions. This is a matter of good and evil. When you don't unconditionally side with good, you enable evil.
**********

Would your Marxist leader renege on a deal he made the American people?

I'll be a One-Term President If I Don't Fix This Economy In Three Years;

I Will Be Held "Accountable"

..........

c'mon danny boy debate

SCUM-bagger
TaxNoMore

Canoga Park, CA

#22646 May 12, 2012
Dan the Man wrote:
<quoted text>
Do-u-c-this?
<quoted text>
This person, who has proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that he is an unrepentant racist, probably believes he's a Christian.
He'll use his religion to support shit like this...
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
People who use their religion to justify vile shit like this are NOT moral or rational.
When you give "religious" people like Roger the Racist credibility because "they are just following their religion" you provide cover for bigotry.
This is NOT a matter of simply differing opinions. This is a matter of good and evil. When you don't unconditionally side with good, you enable evil.
**********

So you lied when you said you answered it, didn't you?

You post under multiple names and, therefore, accuse others of posting under multiple names.

You make racist statements and, therefore, accuse others of making racist statements.

You tell pathological lies and, therefore, accuse others of telling lies.

Now THIS is projection, my racist little piece of shit friend.

You have PROVEN that you ascribe to others your own worst traits.

There is no reason to believe ANYTHING you post is truthful, and

your pathological use of multiple names makes it impossible to

believe anything ANYBODY from Hanover posts - because they're all

probably YOU.

(Which is actually a relief to me - I hate to believe that everyone in Hanover is a lying piece of shit racist).
TaxNoMore

Canoga Park, CA

#22647 May 12, 2012
Dan the Man
Hanover, PA

sez

Really?

It's fair that they pay 10% to 15% while the rest of us pay 30%?

Maybe you don't know the meaning of the word

"fair."

LOL!

..........

c'mon danny boy debate

..........

..........

Federal Income Taxes on Middle-Income Families Remain Near Historic Lows

By Chuck Marr

Updated April 2, 2012

Federal taxes on middle-income Americans are near historic lows,[1] according to the latest available data.

That’s true both for federal income taxes and total federal taxes.[2]

Income taxes:

A family of four in the exact middle of the income spectrum will pay only 5.6 percent of its 2011 income in federal income taxes, according to a new analysis by the Urban Institute-Brookings Institution Tax Policy Center.[3]

Average income tax rates for these typical families have been lower during the Bush and Obama Administrations than at any time since the 1950s, as Figure 1 shows.

(As discussed below, 2009 and 2010 were particularly low because of the temporary Making Work Pay Tax Credit.)

Overall federal taxes:

Overall federal taxes — which include income as well as payroll and excise taxes — on middle-income households are near their lowest levels in decades, according to the latest data from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm ...

DEMOCRAT SCUM

Socialist,Communist,Utopian,Ma rxist

Dan the Man

SCUM-bagger

..........

c'mon danny boy debate
Mitt Robney

West Mifflin, PA

#22648 May 12, 2012
Mitt Romney: Cut Medicare, Social Security benefits for seniors:

In his sparsely attended "major policy speech" today in Detroit, Mitt Romney didn't have that much new to say.

Except for his plan to mess with Social Security and Medicare. He got much more concrete, and as has been in vogue among Republicans, wants to take away benefits. He's going Ryan-lite on Medicare (the Ryan-Wyden plan), with the addition of raising the eligibility age, and both raising the retirement age for Social Security and means testing it.

When it comes to Social Security, we will slowly raise the retirement age. We will slow the growth in benefits for higher-income retirees.
When it comes to Medicare, tomorrow’s seniors will have a choice among insurance providers, including traditional Medicare.[...] And with Medicare, like with Social Security, lower-income seniors will receive the most generous benefits.

Starting in 2022, new retirees will participate in this new system. We will gradually increase the Medicare eligibility age by one month each year. In the long run, the eligibility ages for both programs will be indexed to longevity so that they increase only as fast as life expectancy.

They are bad ideas which, no matter how many Very Serious People trumpet them, will do nothing but hurt seniors. In the case of Medicare the only thing it really achieves is increasing actual health care spending and pushing that cost increase onto seniors.
Ur nuts

New Castle, PA

#22649 May 12, 2012
TaxNoMore = ZERO credibility.
Mitt Robney

West Mifflin, PA

#22650 May 12, 2012
----------

Ryan’s new plan is in lockstep with Romney’s radical budget plan. Here’s a look at how both Ryan and Romney pursue the same policies that endanger the security of seniors and middle-class families in order to make sure millionaires and billionaires get tax cuts.

Privatize Medicare

•Ryan: The Ryan plan would turn Medicare into a voucher program, in which seniors would be left with a voucher that they could use to buy private insurance. Ryan claims that traditional Medicare would remain an option for seniors, but in reality, private plans would cherry pick healthy enrollees, driving up costs for the older and less healthy people with Medicare.

•Romney: Romney would also turn Medicare into a voucher program. Similar proposals would force seniors to pay $6,350 more in out-of-pocket expenses each year. And because he wants to repeal the health care law, he would increase payments to insurance companies by $100 billion, and deplete the Medicare trust fund by 2016. Like Ryan, Romney claims that traditional Medicare would remain an option for seniors—but we know the reality is his plan would drive up costs for those on the program.

Cuts to Medicaid and health coverage

•Ryan: Ryan’s plan repeals health reform and cuts over $1 trillion from Medicaid over the next 10 years. Such cuts will deny coverage up to 60 million people, including low-income children, pregnant women, nursing home patients, and people with disabilities.

•Romney: Romney also wants to repeal health reform and cut over $1 trillion from Medicaid over the next decade. His plan would deny coverage to up to 53 million people, including low-income children, pregnant women, nursing home patients, and people with disabilities.

Cuts to middle-class investments

•Ryan: Ryan’s plan would slash education spending, infrastructure spending, and investments in clean energy and scientific and medical research funding—all of which would cost jobs and affect the future for middle-class families.

•Romney: Romney’s promise to blindly balance the budget would require deeper cuts to all domestic programs than Ryan’s plan.

But both Ryan and Romney made sure to protect the people they think matter most: the wealthy. Ryan and Romney extend the Bush tax cuts for the top income earners. Ryan provides trillions more in tax rate cuts that benefit the rich without explaining how he’ll pay for them, and Romney provides $5 trillion in tax cuts for the wealthy without specifying how he’ll pay for them. And while Ryan rolls back key protections in the Wall Street Reform law meant to help prevent future financial crises and bailouts of Wall Street, Romney repeals all of the Wall Street Reform law, even though a repeal doesn’t offer any budget savings.

Romney and Ryan have congratulated each other on each other’s plans. But when it comes to supporting America’s middle class, the plans offer nothing to celebrate.

http://www.keepinggophonest.com/romney-and-ry...
TaxNoMore

Canoga Park, CA

#22651 May 12, 2012
Ur nuts wrote:
TaxNoMore = ZERO credibility.
..........

Find a new bone, chickenshit.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pittston Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Detractors, growing debt dog local builder (Jun '07) Aug '17 Knaz216 3,669
News Hispanics mobilize against city immigration act... (Jun '06) Jul '17 Al Busillo 682
News It's all uphill Jul '17 Smokey The Bear 1
News 'Our Town: Tamaqua' debuts on WVIA Jun '17 cuntfucker 6
Skyliners Drum & Bugle Corps Hosting DCA Show o... Jun '17 SkylinersDBCorps 1
News Police charge four in OF (Dec '09) Apr '17 JJ genell 3
News 'Polka King' puts NEPA back on big screen (Jan '17) Feb '17 TRUMP your President 3

Pittston Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Pittston Mortgages