7 Make Case For Pittsfield At-Large...
Three incumbents and four challengers outlined accomplishments, experience and positions as they compete for four at-large seats on the City Council, to be chosen by voters of all seven of Pittsfield's wards next Tuesday.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at IBerkshires.
#1 Oct 31, 2013
Picking just one out of those seven is impossible, never mind four out of those seven. But if I had a choice between voting for a reeking vile putrid pile of dog**** or Lothrop, that would be an easy choice. While neither one is acceptable, I could at least vote for the less offensive of the two, easily.
#2 Oct 31, 2013
The one favorable thing about dogshit is that it eventually decomposes and goes away.....on the other hand
#3 Oct 31, 2013
I do agree about the lingering problem of the more offensive choice. So without a doubt, as disgusting as a reeking vile putrid pile of dog**** is, it's still the less offensive choice of the two. And while it wouldn't be easy to look at sitting in Lothrop's seat, neither is he. Really!
Add your comments below
|Pittsfield politics forever (Jul '12)||5 min||Your Mom||540|
|Since my Mother||18 min||Your Mom||2|
|Contract extended for Pittsfield schools Superi...||2 hr||cops are liars an...||2|
|Gaetani has joined the GOB network||15 hr||Danny||4|
|Pittsfield and GD are the toilets of the Universe||17 hr||The Good Shepherd||1|
|Second Pittsfield officer files federal whistle...||18 hr||cops are liars an...||16|
|Backpacks stuffed full with supplies go to 500 ...||18 hr||cops are liars an...||4|
Find what you want!
Search Pittsfield Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC