Mass brawl between school kids breaks...

Mass brawl between school kids breaks out at the bus stop after...

There are 11 comments on the Daily Mail story from Jan 12, 2013, titled Mass brawl between school kids breaks out at the bus stop after.... In it, Daily Mail reports that:

A massive riot involving as many as 60 students and their parents broke out at a Pittsburgh school bus stop after class on Monday and then the mob met again on Tuesday to continue the fight.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Daily Mail.

“Clinton is a Liar, Period!”

Since: Jan 07

Pittsburgh, PA

#1 Jan 13, 2013
Were there any Negroes in the fray? Will a candlelight vigil fix he problem? Was there a couch on someone's porch? Was Harper beating down the reporters with a rubber hose? Were there any Democrats in the fight? Did anyone go to the hospital and, if so, how much did the ER cost and who paid?
Da Old Fool rolls on

Uniontown, PA

#2 Jan 13, 2013
Gee, azzhole, perhaps you should actually read the friggin' article; but then your role in this post, as most of your comments, is to seek any "truth," or foster an open exchange to create understanding, but rather to be the despicable Internet "troll" seeking to draw out the bigots and haters. And the couch burning thingy is more a WVa white-trash proclivity, old fool.

“Clinton is a Liar, Period!”

Since: Jan 07

Pittsburgh, PA

#3 Jan 13, 2013
Da Old Fool rolls on wrote:
Gee, azzhole, perhaps you should actually read the friggin' article; but then your role in this post, as most of your comments, is to seek any "truth," or foster an open exchange to create understanding, but rather to be the despicable Internet "troll" seeking to draw out the bigots and haters. And the couch burning thingy is more a WVa white-trash proclivity, old fool.
]AHHH my poor friend with the short memory. The city of Pittsburgh put out the couch/porch legislation. While it may happen in Morgantown, this is Pittsburgh, not West Virginia. As to the truth. My questions, were there any Negroes involved? Fair question as anything involving race is deemed racial. Did Harper get involved by beating the reporters with a rubber hose? Fair question as you seem to imply he is punishing reporters who dare ask questions. Was any taken to the ER and how much was the bill? Fair question, the public should know who pays for this youthful exchange.

You are such a brainwashed progressive dolt that intelligent intercourse is impossible. Enjoy your ignorance, "O" college trained one, the rumors are, indeed, true. Your education sapped the entire amount of "common sense" from your psyche.
Da Old Fool rolls on

Uniontown, PA

#4 Jan 13, 2013
OK, first, I did not imply anything about Chief Harper. And although the accusation that the police bureau did "punish" reporters by revealing questions and story info in a subsequent press release has been forwarded by the P-G, asking about physical abuse utilizing rubber hoses is a bit of a stretch, old fool. Second, When you inquire about the race of the actors, yes, then your question has a racial orientation. But not necessarily racist, however. Is English your first language? I did misinterpret your couch comment, though... and natural enough mistake when dealing with your ilk.

Interestingly, though, is that conservatives lacking formal education often assert that those with college training have somehow traded that training for the ability to exercise "common sense," or is it simply that you believe formal education invariably introduces some terrible manner of "bias" that compel the educated to seek objective evidence in answering a question, rather than simply accept the conservative "conventional wisdom" that they then confuse with common sense?
Obama Phone

Carlisle, PA

#5 Jan 13, 2013
Dem thar coloreds at Woody High be actin like a buncha of inbred we todds yo.

“Clinton is a Liar, Period!”

Since: Jan 07

Pittsburgh, PA

#6 Jan 13, 2013
Da Old Fool rolls on wrote:
OK, first, I did not imply anything about Chief Harper. And although the accusation that the police bureau did "punish" reporters by revealing questions and story info in a subsequent press release has been forwarded by the P-G, asking about physical abuse utilizing rubber hoses is a bit of a stretch, old fool. Second, When you inquire about the race of the actors, yes, then your question has a racial orientation. But not necessarily racist, however. Is English your first language? I did misinterpret your couch comment, though... and natural enough mistake when dealing with your ilk.
Interestingly, though, is that conservatives lacking formal education often assert that those with college training have somehow traded that training for the ability to exercise "common sense," or is it simply that you believe formal education invariably introduces some terrible manner of "bias" that compel the educated to seek objective evidence in answering a question, rather than simply accept the conservative "conventional wisdom" that they then confuse with common sense?
Not at all, just the common sense to ask, "who dat gonna' be that pays for all this free crap? If dey be a lookin' to the 1%, common sense says that der jist aint enuff of dem!!!!!!
Da Old Fool rolls on

Uniontown, PA

#7 Jan 13, 2013
And, that you dumb putz, is adequate reason to excuse them from paying a fair share?

But why, then, do you defend the 1% against a reasonable level of taxation, old fool? Do you understand the marginal rate in the time of Eisenhower was 90%?! Do you understand the Democrats only sought to return rates on the rich to the level of the Clinton era, a fraction of that rate? You do remember Clinton, old fool... the last President to deliver federal budget surpluses?

And if you don't want to tax the sacred GOP's "job creators," I gotta ask you, azzwipe: it's been a decade... where are the jobs?

God save the nation from the morons of the GOP!

“Clinton is a Liar, Period!”

Since: Jan 07

Pittsburgh, PA

#8 Jan 14, 2013
Da Old Fool rolls on wrote:
And, that you dumb putz, is adequate reason to excuse them from paying a fair share?
But why, then, do you defend the 1% against a reasonable level of taxation, old fool? Do you understand the marginal rate in the time of Eisenhower was 90%?! Do you understand the Democrats only sought to return rates on the rich to the level of the Clinton era, a fraction of that rate? You do remember Clinton, old fool... the last President to deliver federal budget surpluses?
And if you don't want to tax the sacred GOP's "job creators," I gotta ask you, azzwipe: it's been a decade... where are the jobs?
God save the nation from the morons of the GOP!
The jobs are off to Mexico, Asia, and South America. Due to the "Giant sucking sound" created when Bill Clinton signed off on NAFTA and Asian free trade agreements. The only thing Clinton did was to degrade the office of president, get his willy serviced, and take credit for the dot.com boom which went bust real quick and do the don't tell thing with the military.
Da Old Fool rolls on

Uniontown, PA

#9 Jan 14, 2013
NAFTA, azzwipe, stands for North American Free Trade Agreement. It has three signatories- the US, Mexico & Canada- and DOES NOT include Asia and South America, as you claim.

Furthermore, putz, following diplomatic negotiations dating back to 1986 among the three nations, the leaders met in San Antonio, Texas, on December 17, 1992, to sign NAFTA. U.S. President George H.W. Bush, Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and Mexican President Carlos Salinas, each responsible for spearheading and promoting the agreement, ceremonially signed it. The agreement then needed to be ratified by each nation's legislative or parliamentary branch.

Before the negotiations were finalized, Bill Clinton came into office in the U.S. and Kim Campbell in Canada, and before the agreement became law, Jean Chr├ętien had taken office in Canada. So as you can see, this effort was a GOP initiative, and any fool can google the history of it... even you, so don't try to claim ignorance!

Is this another application of the right wing-nut "big lie" strategy (tell a big enough lie often enough, and the massess will come to believe it, as promoted by Herr Goebbels, although ineffective in a democracy), or simply your Alzheimers faring up again, old man?

“Clinton is a Liar, Period!”

Since: Jan 07

Pittsburgh, PA

#10 Jan 15, 2013
Da Old Fool rolls on wrote:
NAFTA, azzwipe, stands for North American Free Trade Agreement. It has three signatories- the US, Mexico & Canada- and DOES NOT include Asia and South America, as you claim.
Furthermore, putz, following diplomatic negotiations dating back to 1986 among the three nations, the leaders met in San Antonio, Texas, on December 17, 1992, to sign NAFTA. U.S. President George H.W. Bush, Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and Mexican President Carlos Salinas, each responsible for spearheading and promoting the agreement, ceremonially signed it. The agreement then needed to be ratified by each nation's legislative or parliamentary branch.
Before the negotiations were finalized, Bill Clinton came into office in the U.S. and Kim Campbell in Canada, and before the agreement became law, Jean Chr├ętien had taken office in Canada. So as you can see, this effort was a GOP initiative, and any fool can google the history of it... even you, so don't try to claim ignorance!
Is this another application of the right wing-nut "big lie" strategy (tell a big enough lie often enough, and the massess will come to believe it, as promoted by Herr Goebbels, although ineffective in a democracy), or simply your Alzheimers faring up again, old man?
T'was Billy, that signed it into law. HIs watch, his credit.
Da Old Fool rolls on

Uniontown, PA

#11 Jan 15, 2013
And it was Dubya Dumazz who nearly brought down the friggin' world economy at the end of his presidency, and the man whose watch began with the single greatest foriegn terror assualt was successfully launched against America!(remember 9/11, putz?)

Yep, old fool, yer hoisted by your own petard!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pittsburgh Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
WTAE Weekend News - Appreciation Thread (Dec '13) 21 hr LMfao 152
Hi Fri bigfoots mailman 7
News Stuck in the middle WITHOUT you: College studen... Fri Wendy Bell 10
Review: I Love Kickboxing - Pittsburgh (Nov '13) Aug 24 Christina C 111
Pittsburgh CB Radio Problems (Jan '15) Aug 24 interwebs wins again 71
Robert Mynster and his daughter Shanna Aug 22 A_M_B 4
NiSource/Columbia Gas (Jun '15) Aug 20 No Job For You 9

Pittsburgh Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Pittsburgh Mortgages