Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel

Full story: Newsday 71,559
Safety pins and screws are still lodged in 15-year-old Ami Ortiz's body three months after he opened a booby-trapped gift basket sent to his family. Full Story

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#61893 Nov 4, 2013
JOEL THUMBS UP wrote:
<quoted text>
Mockery doesn't solve the purpose; on the contrary, it may aggravate the atmosphere since the other person involved in the debate may think that you're not serious in debating the issue in depth and seeing it from various angles including his own and so he may be put off and so mockery could create misunderstanding.
Mockery should be used sparingly.
If the other person cannot see the light of reason despite giving him the entire logic supported by evidence, well, then, you can't do anything and so better tell him to be free to follow what he wishes to without imposing his ideas or thoughts on others since the evidence doesn't support his views and wrap up the debate at that point. But, always keep communication lines open with him and if he at some point has a rethink then analyze what he has to say and further the debate from there by closely analyzing his point for what it's worth.
I guess the sarcasm of my post flew over your head

Its ok.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#61894 Nov 4, 2013
JOEL THUMBS UP wrote:
<quoted text>
Scripture does worse than merely calling homosexuality a disease.
Scriptures like the Tanach and Quran outright call homosexuality a "perversion" or an "evil doing" and condemn homosexuals to death by stoning or by some other horrific method.
There are more passages in the Jewish text that admonish against eating non-kosher than homosexuality.

But yet, many fundamentalists, who lack both Hebrew language skills and the ability to appreciate perspective, harp on the gay citations, and still eat shrimp.

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#61895 Nov 4, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>

In fact, from what I figure, the closest his Christian scripture gets to addressing homosexuality is when it tells you to "turn the other cheek". Hardly an admonition.
NT is filled with contradictions.

On the one hand, the NT advises believers to turn the other cheek, to let go of revenge since an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth would make the whole world blind, to love/pray for one's enemies and to forgive 70 times 7 but on the other hand it curses non-believers and threatens them with hell fire and insists that salvation lies only through Jesus and calls for the death of anyone rejecting Christ....

There are many other contradictory statements that I can point out to you in the NT.

So, well, I take its teachings with a ton of salt since most of its teachings have a fanatical agenda underlying them and its goodwill and love are conditional.

In many ways, the NT is a barbarous book and Jesus was not a man of peace.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#61896 Nov 4, 2013
JOEL THUMBS UP wrote:
<quoted text>
But, always keep communication lines open with him and if he at some point has a rethink then analyze what he has to say and further the debate from there by closely analyzing his point for what it's worth.
Every few months he says something funny.

But he pushes the same views now as he did when he first appeared. Not very much evolution on his part. If anything, he has gotten more angry. Maybe that is a reaction to his domestic life. Maybe that is a reaction to us. Either way, it is sad.

Our experience with religious homophobes here in the US is that they are often gay but repressed, until they realize enough is enough. Then they go public. In a big way.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#61897 Nov 4, 2013
JOEL THUMBS UP wrote:
<quoted text>
NT is filled with contradictions.
On the one hand, the NT advises believers to turn the other cheek, to let go of revenge since an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth would make the whole world blind, to love/pray for one's enemies and to forgive 70 times 7 but on the other hand it curses non-believers and threatens them with hell fire and insists that salvation lies only through Jesus and calls for the death of anyone rejecting Christ....
There are many other contradictory statements that I can point out to you in the NT.
So, well, I take its teachings with a ton of salt since most of its teachings have a fanatical agenda underlying them and its goodwill and love are conditional.
In many ways, the NT is a barbarous book and Jesus was not a man of peace.
To be fair, what you call the OT has as many contradictions. Its the application that matters. And why Jews have an oral tradition as well - to bring some order and make the value system livable.

"Turning the othe cheek" - that was a blatant play on words. Not even an acknowledgement? I am hurt - it was probably one of my better ideas in a while.

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#61898 Nov 4, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>

Tanach doesnt really say that. Your Christianized western translation of the tanach says that. Stoning isnt even in the English translations, dunno where that came from
The main point to note is that whatever be the method of capital punishment, the Tanach says that a homosexual should be put to death.

This is what I wish to highlight - that the Tanach calls for the death of homosexuals.

Stoning to death was a common practice in those days.

Tanach condemns homosexuality and calls for the death of homosexuals.

The method of putting a homosexual to death could be stoning, beheading or any other method which is besides the point.

Obviously, Hugh has picked up his hideous ideas regarding homosexuality from the teachings of the Tanach. This much is clear.

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#61899 Nov 4, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>

I guess the sarcasm of my post flew over your head

Its ok.
Your mockery serves no purpose except that it shows you in a poor light.

People usually resort to sarcasm or mockery when they have little logic to offer or when they are not serious.

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#61900 Nov 4, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>

There are more passages in the Jewish text that admonish against eating non-kosher than homosexuality.
Yes.

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#61901 Nov 4, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>

But yet, many fundamentalists, who lack both Hebrew language skills and the ability to appreciate perspective, harp on the gay citations, and still eat shrimp.
Eating shrimp is a minor violation of mitzvot and calls for makkot or lashes but homosexuality is considered with revulsion and is like breaking the shabbat considered heinous enough to put the homosexual to death.

This is the difference - major enough.

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#61902 Nov 4, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>

To be fair, what you call the OT has as many contradictions.
NT is an improvement on the Tanach in key philosophical terms like for instance its reference to nondualism that is far superior to the monolatry and dualism of the Tanach and in some other areas like mindless rituals the NT shows a more more sensible than a rigid approach.

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#61903 Nov 4, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>

Our experience with religious homophobes here in the US is that they are often gay but repressed, until they realize enough is enough. Then they go public. In a big way.
It's not always true that the biggest homophobes are gay.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#61904 Nov 4, 2013
JOEL THUMBS UP wrote:
<quoted text>
Eating shrimp is a minor violation of mitzvot and calls for makkot or lashes but homosexuality is considered with revulsion and is like breaking the shabbat considered heinous enough to put the homosexual to death.
This is the difference - major enough.
Not true. The passage is usually translated as "(he) surely put to death" but a closer reading of the passage in the native language reveals that it is in third person - i.e. it is not necessarily directed at the transgressor - its equally directed at the action - i.e. the action will lead to death (kind of like your evolutionary spin on things)- plus its in the plural..

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#61905 Nov 4, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>

To be fair, what you call the OT has as many contradictions. Its the application that matters. And why Jews have an oral tradition as well - to bring some order and make the value system livable.
That is why we have the Talmud with its stress on Mishnah and Gemara.

I question several interpretations since to know the ethos and the perspective of a particular teaching from Torah one would have to have the consciousness of Moshe who revealed it to us and so the exact essence gets lost in oral rendition and in interpretations...I'll rather go straight to the source than listen to the comments given by immature intermediaries...

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#61906 Nov 4, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>

"Turning the other cheek" - that was a blatant play on words. Not even an acknowledgement? I am hurt - it was probably one of my better ideas in a while.
I have a funnier take - Hey, I have turned both my cheeks to you to hit and now I have no more cheeks to turn! LOL.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#61907 Nov 4, 2013
JOEL THUMBS UP wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not always true that the biggest homophobes are gay.
I agree. But with the "publically" religious it happens a lot.

And in the case of Hughbe, where every other reference is to sex, it is a given. The boy is crying, SCREAMING, for help.

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#61908 Nov 4, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>

But he pushes the same views now as he did when he first appeared. Not very much evolution on his part. If anything, he has gotten more angry.
No, no, that's a wrong evaluation of Hugh.

Hugh has evolved in some ways and become more mature, mellowed, become more poised and learned a lot by coming online and talking to posters, here.

This is very evident to me.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#61909 Nov 4, 2013
JOEL THUMBS UP wrote:
<quoted text>
Eating shrimp is a minor violation of mitzvot and calls for makkot or lashes but homosexuality is considered with revulsion and is like breaking the shabbat considered heinous enough to put the homosexual to death.
This is the difference - major enough.
the commentary notes that NEITHER punishment was ever enacted. This is where perspective comes in.

The working application of the tanach (i.e. the Talmud) does not proscribe either penalty for either situation either. On the other hand, there is no shortgage of penalties for other offenses.(Understanding, of course, that the Hughbes of the world dont bother to read the commentaries..)

A more balanced interpretation of the text, in my opinion, is that there are some uncomfortable allusions, but on the whole, native followers (i,e. mos mainstream Jews) normally dont run with these towards the most negative applications like the fundamentalists do.

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#61910 Nov 4, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>

Maybe that is a reaction to his domestic life.
His problem could be could financial.

He's not well off in any way and knows nothing about luxury or about the high life.

Well, anyway, it doesn't matter.

Hope he progresses on all fronts.

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#61911 Nov 4, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>

i.e. it is not necessarily directed at the transgressor - its equally directed at the action - i.e. the action will lead to death
Either way, it is the death rap for the homo.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#61912 Nov 4, 2013
JOEL THUMBS UP wrote:
<quoted text>
That is why we have the Talmud with its stress on Mishnah and Gemara.
I question several interpretations since to know the ethos and the perspective of a particular teaching from Torah one would have to have the consciousness of Moshe who revealed it to us and so the exact essence gets lost in oral rendition and in interpretations...I'll rather go straight to the source than listen to the comments given by immature intermediaries...
If you have a direct line to Moshe, great. Most of us don't, so we have to settle.

Settling isnt such a bad thing, though, IMO. Most of the time the elders have already analyzed and debated all (or most of the) angles, saving time.

Thank you for discussing this in a human manner, by the way. See, we should talk more often.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pinos Altos Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Arts Scene Feb 25 Judith Meyer 1
Grant Co.---rotten corner of NM (Sep '11) Feb 24 guest 46
Former Santa Clara clerk accused of stealing ut... (Apr '10) Feb 16 his ex married lover 93
Dr. Twana Sparks (Dec '09) Feb 15 Steve 52
Do you know how safe your kids are around trust... Feb 9 asdf 2
Former Lt. Gov. Mike Runnels dies in Ruidoso Feb 7 Michele Rebstock 1
Hearse from Pinos Altos Hearst Church moved to ... (Aug '12) Aug '12 Lorina 2
Pinos Altos Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Pinos Altos People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 4:00 am PST

Bleacher Report 4:00AM
Broncos Final Free-Agency Outlook and Predictions
Bleacher Report 2:27 AM
Fantasy Football Outlook for Cardinals Stars
Bleacher Report 4:00 AM
Weighing the Pros and Cons of Top Free-Agent Targets
NFL 6:28 AM
Visits Tracker: Darnell Dockett meets with 49ers
Bleacher Report 8:58 AM
Buzz: DEN 'Ready to Move On' If Peyton Won't Restructure